Overview
This unit will provide students with an alternative approach to traditional methods of accident reconstruction. Students will begin with the study of nature of injury pathology, and learn how different regions of the human body react with different tolerance to impact trauma. The body is comprised of tissues, which also have different tolerance to force and acceleration. Students will then learn the use of victim pathology as the starting point for research or investigation in case studies ranging from simple vehicle collisions to very complex cases of multi-system severe or fatal injuries sustained where factual data may be sparse, or non existing. Students will solve cases of misadventure resulting in death or severe traumatic injuries, based on the methods of victim pathology.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
48 credit points
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2020
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student evaluations
Specific tutorials for the assessments would be beneficial for students' understanding of the assessment requirements and to establish expectations.
Run a Zoom tutorial session several weeks before each assessment due date to provide another forum for students to seek clarification of the requirements for the assessments and to establish expectations with regard to the depth of analysis.
Feedback from Coordinator observations
Students would benefit from seeing high quality submissions from previous students for the case study assessment to better visualise what they are being asked to provide in their own submissions.
Provide exemplars for the case study assessment so that students can examine the quality and depth of analysis of a successful submission.
Feedback from Coordinator reflection
The case studies and scenarios provided for the assessment items should be updated regularly for academic integrity reasons and to allow the provision of exemplars, as per the previous recommendation.
The case studies and the specific details of the hypothetical scenarios used for the assessments should be updated for the 2020 offering of this unit.
- Analyse the relevance of victim pathology in establishing causality.
- Explain and elaborate on differential human tolerance to trauma based on tissues and body regions.
- Interpret published data on human tolerance to impact.
- Analyse complex case scenarios involving multiple severe or fatal traumatic injuries and determine likely causal events.
- Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the intermediate practitioner.
- Demonstrate ability in confidentiality and ethical practice appropriate for a forensic practitioner.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 - Communication | ||||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | ||||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | ||||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | ||||||
| 5 - Team Work | ||||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | ||||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | ||||||
| 10 - First Nations Knowledges | ||||||
| 11 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 30% | |||||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||||||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 30% | |||||||||||
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
a.temple@cqu.edu.au
Week 1
Begin Date: 13 Jul 2020Module/Topic
Chapter
Reading: Lee, K 2004, The role of the pathologist at the crime scene. In Horswell, J (ed), Practice of Crime Scene Examination. Taylor & Francis: New York, NY.
This e-book is available from the CQU library in its entirety. While it is a great read, for this week's topic read Chapter 11 (pages 195-239).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 2
Begin Date: 20 Jul 2020Module/Topic
Post-mortem Examinations
Chapter
Reading: Ranson, DL & Firth, N 2016, Forensic Pathology. In Taylor, JA & Kieser, JA (eds), Forensic Odontology: Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ.
For this week's topic, read pages 134-155.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 3
Begin Date: 27 Jul 2020Module/Topic
Basic Biomechanics
Chapter
Reading: Kieser, J 2013, Basic Principles of Biomechanics. In Kieser, J, Taylor, M & Carr, D (eds), Forensic Biomechanics. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ.
For this week's topic, read this whole chapter.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 4
Begin Date: 03 Aug 2020Module/Topic
Human Tolerance Data
Chapter
Reading: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.1996, SAE Vehicle Occupant Restraint Systems and Components Standards Manual - 1996 Edition. Author: Warrendale, PA.
This document will be very useful for the rest of the term, as it contains data tables with human tolerance limits under different conditions. For this week's topic, familiarise yourself with this document.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 5
Begin Date: 10 Aug 2020Module/Topic
Blunt Force Trauma
Chapter
Reading: Ranson, DL & Firth, N 2016, Forensic Pathology. In Taylor, JA & Kieser, JA (eds), Forensic Odontology: Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ.
This week, read pages 155-166. The text discusses some injury types that we will be looking at over the next few weeks, as well as some important information about injury interpretation (useful for assessment items 2 and 3!)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Vacation Week
Begin Date: 17 Aug 2020Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 6
Begin Date: 24 Aug 2020Module/Topic
Sharp Force Trauma & Projectile Injuries
Chapter
No specific readings for this week, however example case materials may be provided on Moodle for this topic.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 7
Begin Date: 31 Aug 2020Module/Topic
Drowning and Asphyxia
Chapter
No specific readings for this week, however example case materials may be provided on Moodle for this topic.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 8
Begin Date: 07 Sep 2020Module/Topic
Injuries due to Temperature and Electricity
Chapter
No specific readings for this week, however example case materials may be provided on Moodle for this topic.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 9
Begin Date: 14 Sep 2020Module/Topic
Skeletal Injuries
Chapter
Reading: Duckworth, T & Blundell, CM 2010, Fractures and healing. In Duckworth, T & Blundell, CM (eds), Lecture Notes: Orthopaedics and Fractures, 4e. Blackwell Publishing: Hoboken, NJ.
For this week's topic, read this whole chapter.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 10
Begin Date: 21 Sep 2020Module/Topic
Injuries to the Nervous System
Chapter
Reading: Kleiven, S 2010, Why most traumatic brain injuries are not caused by linear acceleration but skull fractures are. Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 1. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2013.00015
This article explores some of the different brain injuries that may be associated with rotational kinematics. For this week's topic, read this article.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 11
Begin Date: 28 Sep 2020Module/Topic
Internal Injuries - Organ Damage
Chapter
No specific readings for this week, however example case materials may be provided on Moodle for this topic.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Week 12
Begin Date: 05 Oct 2020Module/Topic
Unexpected Natural Deaths
Contextualising Victim Pathology - Informing your Future Investigation Practice
Chapter
Reading: Christian, MS 1988, Incidence and implications of natural deaths of road users. British Medical Journal, vol. 297, pp. 1021-1024.
This article describes a study conducted from 1978 to 1987 in which car crash fatality cases were examined for indications of driver sudden natural death. For this week's topic, read this article.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Review/Exam Week
Begin Date: 12 Oct 2020Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Exam Week
Begin Date: 19 Oct 2020Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Using the material provided on Moodle and a minimum of three additional appropriately-referenced reputable sources, develop a written submission which addresses the following three prompts:
1. Describe the basic principles of pathoanatomy and biomechanics
2. Discuss the limitations associated with the use of human tolerance reference data
3. Explain the steps involved in a typical autopsy process
As a guide, you should be aiming for 500-750 words for each of the three components of this submission.
Week 5 Friday (14 Aug 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Week 8 Monday (7 Sept 2020)
Marks and Feedback will be provided via the Moodle site for this unit.
Your written submission will be graded on the accuracy of your response, and the depth to which you:
- Describe the basic principles of pathoanatomy and biomechanics, including the following concepts: pathoanatomy, pathophysiology, systematic pathoanatomy, stress, strain, elasticity and viscoelasticity (10 marks)
- Discuss the limitations associated with the use of human tolerance reference data (10 marks)
- Explain the steps involved in a typical autopsy process (10 marks)
- Utilise and appropriately reference at least 3 reputable sources in accordance with Harvard Referencing Style (Non-graded requirement)
- Analyse the relevance of victim pathology in establishing causality.
- Explain and elaborate on differential human tolerance to trauma based on tissues and body regions.
- Interpret published data on human tolerance to impact.
- Analyse complex case scenarios involving multiple severe or fatal traumatic injuries and determine likely causal events.
- Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the intermediate practitioner.
- Demonstrate ability in confidentiality and ethical practice appropriate for a forensic practitioner.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Team Work
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
2 Written Assessment
Part A (20%)
Using the material provided on Moodle and a minimum of two additional appropriately-referenced reputable sources, answer the following questions:
1. What are the differences between contusions, abrasion, lacerations and incisions?
As a guide, you should be aiming for 750-1000 words for each answer.
Part B (20%)
Choose one of the trauma cases presented on Moodle. Imagine you are the investigator and you have been asked to provide advice on the nature and aetiology of the trauma. Analyse the case within the context of the topics covered so far, and present an opinion of the pathophysiology. Identify your selected case, and include:
1. A marked-up figure sketch indicating the apparent pathoanatomy
2. A systematic description of the internal and external injuries, using the systematic pathoanatomy structure provided in the unit
3. Your considered opinion regarding how the deceased may have incurred those injuries, with reference to biomechanical principles and human tolerance data.
As a guide, you should be aiming for 1500-2000 words for Part B.
Week 10 Monday (21 Sept 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Review/Exam Week Monday (12 Oct 2020)
Marks and Feedback will be provided via the Moodle site for this unit.
Part A
You will be assessed on the depth to which you have:
- Explained the differences between contusions, abrasion, lacerations and incisions (10 marks)
- Discussed some expected differences in injury presentation between self-inflicted injuries and those inflicted by external agencies (10 marks)
- Utilised and appropriately referenced at least 3 reputable sources in accordance with Harvard Referencing Style (Non-graded requirement).
Part B
You will be assessed on the depth to which you have:
- Marked up the figure sketch to indicate all apparent pathoanatomy (both internal and external) (4 marks)
- Systematically described all of the injuries evident from the case material, using the systematic pathoanatomy structure provided in the unit (7 marks)
-
Explained your considered opinion regarding how the deceased may have incurred those injuries, justifying your position with reference to biomechanical principles and human tolerance data (9 marks).
- Analyse the relevance of victim pathology in establishing causality.
- Explain and elaborate on differential human tolerance to trauma based on tissues and body regions.
- Interpret published data on human tolerance to impact.
- Analyse complex case scenarios involving multiple severe or fatal traumatic injuries and determine likely causal events.
- Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the intermediate practitioner.
- Demonstrate ability in confidentiality and ethical practice appropriate for a forensic practitioner.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Team Work
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
3 Written Assessment
Victim Pathology is primarily concerned with examining the final result of an accident or traumatic scenario, and working backwards from these to establish what happened. In this assessment item, you need to work forwards from the scenario and predict the injuries expected, demonstrating your understanding of the aetiology of injuries. Consider each of the three following scenarios:
1. A car collides with a pedestrian at 60km/h (victim is the pedestrian)
2. A car collides with a tree at 100km/h (victim is the driver)
3. A fall of a person from a height of 6m
Explore each scenario, systematically describing the pathoanatomy presentations that you would expect to observe following these events (use the systematic pathoanatomy structure provided in the unit). In your submission, justify your position with reference to biomechanical principles and human tolerance data.
As a guide, you should be aiming for 1000 words for each scenario.
Review/Exam Week Monday (12 Oct 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Exam Week Friday (23 Oct 2020)
Marks and Feedback will be provided via the Moodle site for this unit.
For each of the three scenarios, you will be assessed on the depth to which you have:
- Systematically described the pathoanatomy presentations that you would expect to observe following the event, using the systematic pathoanatomy structure provided in the unit (5 marks)
- Justified for your position with reference to biomechanical principles and human tolerance data (5 marks).
(Total 30 marks)
- Analyse the relevance of victim pathology in establishing causality.
- Explain and elaborate on differential human tolerance to trauma based on tissues and body regions.
- Interpret published data on human tolerance to impact.
- Analyse complex case scenarios involving multiple severe or fatal traumatic injuries and determine likely causal events.
- Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the intermediate practitioner.
- Demonstrate ability in confidentiality and ethical practice appropriate for a forensic practitioner.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
