CQUniversity Unit Profile
AINV13003 Crash Lab Project 1
Crash Lab Project 1
All details in this unit profile for AINV13003 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This unit will provide students the opportunity to consolidate and apply all of the accident investigation and analysis theory studied in the Accident Forensics course to a real accident scenario. Learners will take a leadership role in planning and conducting a detailed accident investigation. Post investigation the learner will be required to analyse the accident causation sequences and linkages by applying an event tree or equivalent method.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Prereq: AINV11001 Real World Investigation and AINV11002 Socio-technical Systems and AINV12001 Investigation Methods Practice and AINV12002 Accident Phenomenology and AINV12003 Accident Forensics and coreq: AINV13001 Accident Analysis

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2019

Adelaide
Brisbane
Bundaberg
Gladstone
Melbourne
Mixed Mode
Rockhampton
Sydney

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Residential Schools

This unit has a Compulsory Residential School for distance mode students and the details are:
Click here to see your Residential School Timetable.

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Group Discussion
Weighting: Pass/Fail
2. Practical and Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%
3. Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Have your say

Feedback

Provide more information on event tree analysis prior to the residential school

Recommendation

Event tree analysis to be reinforced in AINV12001, as well as revision in the weeks leading up to the residential school in this unit.

Feedback from Have your say

Feedback

Facilitate the residential school earlier in the term to provide more time for students to work on their accident analysis

Recommendation

Review the order of presentation of modules and determine if a change of residential school dates is necessary or warranted.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Plan and conduct a detailed accident investigation.
  2. Analyse the accident causation sequences and linkages by applying an event tree or equivalent method.
  3. Employ effective communication strategies appropriate to a major accident investigation.
  4. Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the graduating practitioner.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Group Discussion - 0%
2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 50%
3 - Written Assessment - 50%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 - Group Discussion - 0%
2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 50%
3 - Written Assessment - 50%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Kevin Perry Unit Coordinator
k.perry@cqu.edu.au
Allison Hutton Unit Coordinator
a.hutton@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 11 Mar 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Introduction and Course Overview

  • Unit expectations
  • Residential school
  • Final report expectations


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic


Week 2 Begin Date: 18 Mar 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Scene Management - What do we know and what do we need to know?:

  • Powers
  • Site management
  • Evidence collection
  • Witness management


Chapter

Reading - Evidence guide

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom Tutorial : Legal Professional Privilege

Week 3 Begin Date: 25 Mar 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Digging Deeper

  • Other sources of evidence
  • Thinking 'outside the square'
  • Planning more in-depth.
  • Requesting information


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Group Discussion Q1 due (25 March 19) 09:00 AM AEST


Zoom Tutorial : Media Management

Week 4 Begin Date: 01 Apr 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Collating the Data - What are your facts?

  • Facts v assumptions
  • Sorting the 'wheat from the chaff'
  • Verifying and validating facts.


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom Tutorial : Putting RWI and STS to work

Week 5 Begin Date: 08 Apr 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Collating the Data - Creating logic diagrams

  • Event trees
  • PEEPO

Chapter


Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom Tutorial : Practice at building a logic diagram from facts

Vacation Week Begin Date: 15 Apr 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Group Discussion Q2 due (15 April 19) 09:00 hrs AM AEST

Week 6 Begin Date: 22 Apr 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Review of AINV Material

Collating the Data - Extending your lines of enquiry


Chapter


Events and Submissions/Topic

Group Discussion Q3 due (22 April 19) 09:00 AM AEST


Week 7 Begin Date: 29 Apr 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Final Crash Lab Preparations

  • Leading Teams
  • Final preparation
  • Expectations / professionalism
  • Explanation of processes required

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic


Risk Assessment due for residential school.

Week 8 Begin Date: 06 May 2019

Module/Topic

Residential School : 6 -10 May

  • Management of accident scenario
  • Assistant investigator
  • Collecting of evidence
  • Delivering presentation

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Residential School 6 - 10 May, Bundaberg Crash Lab

Portfolio assessed during residential school

Week 9 Begin Date: 13 May 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Conducting your Accident Analysis

  • Developing your Preliminary Analysis


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Online submission of residential school  presentation slides due (7 May 2018) 09:00 AM AEST


Zoom Tutorial : Analysing your event tree with an HF lens

Week 10 Begin Date: 20 May 2019

Module/Topic

Lecture: Narratives & Reflections

  • Writing narratives accurately
  • Reflecting and using this in future work.

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Group Discussion Q4 due (20 May 19) 09:00 AM AEST


Zoom Tutorial : Road Testing your Logic Diagram

Week 11 Begin Date: 27 May 2019

Module/Topic

No lecture

Independent work on accident analysis diagrams and narrative.

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom Q & A session (if required)

Week 12 Begin Date: 03 Jun 2019

Module/Topic

No lecture

Independent study 

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Preliminary report & Reflection Due: Week 12 Monday (3 June 2019) 9:00 am AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 10 Jun 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 17 Jun 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Group Discussion

Assessment Title
Preparing for the crash lab and analysis

Task Description

In this assessment task, your lecturer will start discussions in Moodle which will continue throughout the term, exploring key topics. These discussions will help you to prepare for the Crash Lab residential school and to start the analysis of your accident. Four specific discussion questions will be posted and you must participate in all four of these discussions. In each thread you must post your own submission and respond constructively to at least one other student's post.

In your career, you will find yourself discussing points of view and you need to be able to argue your position effectively. These questions will give you practice in this skill and also get you thinking about your learning in the Bachelor of Accident Forensics course to date, helping you prepare for the residential school and reporting activities.

More details about this assessment and the discussion questions themselves will be posted on the Moodle site throughout the term.

This is a Pass/Fail Discussion Assessment.


Assessment Due Date

Question 1 due 0900 Mon 25 March 2019; Question 2 due 0900 Mon 15 April 2019; Question 3 due 0900 Mon 22 April 2019; Question 4 due 0900 Mon 20 May 2019


Return Date to Students

Two weeks after the submission date


Weighting
Pass/Fail

Minimum mark or grade
Students must pass all four discussion questions to pass this assessment.

Assessment Criteria

For each discussion thread, you must post an answer which reflects your thoughts based on your readings and learnings in the Bachelor of Accident Forensics to date (remember your referencing too!). Ensure that in your post for each discussion thread, you must:

  • demonstrate your understanding of the question
  • state your position or argument clearly and concisely
  • support your position or argument with authoritative sources that are appropriately referenced.

When you respond to another student’s post in each of the discussion threads, engage constructively and respectfully with what they have said. For example, you could say whether you agree or disagree with them and explain why briefly, or you could take what they have said and extend it with another example.

Hint : Remember, these are discussions, NOT essays, a couple of paragraphs at most should do it.

The lecturer will provide progressive feedback on these discussion questions.

This is a Pass/Fail Discussion Assessment.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Post your submission and responses in the Assessment area in Moodle

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Employ effective communication strategies appropriate to a major accident investigation.
  • Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the graduating practitioner.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

2 Practical and Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Crash Lab Activities & Portfolio

Task Description

The work carried out in this assessment will form the basis for the final project in AINV13006 - Crash Lab Project 2.  The standard of work undertaken in this assessment will directly affect the quality of your work in AINV13006.

During the Crash Lab Project residential school, students will work in investigation teams to investigate a series of accidents. Each student will lead one team and work as a team member on a number of teams led by other students.

You will be accountable for the integrity of the investigation in which you are the leader. This includes responsibility for:

  • Managing your investigation team
  • Safety at the accident scene
  • Preservation of the the accident scene
  • Gathering and continuity of evidence
  • Identifying and interviewing witnesses
  • Obtaining witness statements
  • Identifying and collecting documentary and other evidence
  • Creating and maintaining appropriate logs
  • Initial analysis of the accident
  • Initial preparation of the applicable logic diagrams
  • Identifying and collecting information to be able to discuss the following areas within the final report:
    • Human Factors (Physical, cognitive and organisational)
    • Work organisation (eg. SMS, rosters, SOP, risk assessments, training)
    • Victim pathology
    • Crashworthiness
    • Organisational issues
    • Engineering issues, (eg design and/or failures)
    • Regulatory analysis

Your practical application of the relevant theory will be assessed during the residential school against each of these subject areas. You and your team will collect evidence throughout the residential school. We will verify your understanding of your collected evidence Portfolio at the end of the residential school.


In addition, you will be required to prepare and deliver a presentation, supported by Powerpoint that describes your investigation, your preliminary analysis, including your preliminary logic diagrams.

There will be four parts to this this assessment:


Part A : Preparedness (10%)

  • Crash Kit Assessment
  • Risk Assessment


Part B : Advanced Scene Management and Evidence Collection (30%)

  • Accident Scenario - Team Leader Assessment
  • Collected evidence Portfolio


Part C : Initial Analysis (10%)

  • Verbal Presentation supported by visual materials


Part D : Professionalism (Pass/Fail)

  • Throughout the residential school, students will be assessed on their ability to apply professional approaches to all activities.


The majority of the assessment will be completed during the residential school. Your completed Powerpoint presentation should also be uploaded into the applicable assessment area in Moodle by 0900 hours on the Monday following the residential school.


NOTE: In order for all students to satisfactorily complete this assessment, it will be necessary for students in the investigation teams to share their collected evidence, artefacts, photos, maps, documents, records and logs etc with their team leader/s in a timely fashion. To facilitate this, students should each bring an appropriate USB stick to the residential school to facilitate the transfer of files.

Failure to share with your team leader your evidence, artefacts, photos, maps, documents, records and logs etc collected during the investigation activities at the residential school in a timely fashion, will result in your failure of this assessment task.


Assessment Due Date

Risk assessment due via Moodle 1 week prior to residential school. Presentation slides are due via Moodle on 13 May 9am AEST. Assessment of the remainder of this assessment task will take place during the residential school.


Return Date to Students

Within 3 weeks of submission date


Weighting
50%

Minimum mark or grade
Students must be graded Pass in all core skills: scene management, photography, mapping, witness interviewing and professionalism; during the residential school, to pass this assessment. Students must pass this assessment to pass this unit

Assessment Criteria

The detailed assessment criteria for each part will be provided and explained during the term.


PART A: - Pre-planning (10%)

Students are required to attend the first morning of the residential school with a copy of the completed effective risk assessment (submitted 1 week earlier) and a complete crash kit as detailed during the lectures. Failure to have these two items will result in the student being excluded from the practical activities of the residential school until the shortcomings are corrected. 


PART B: - Scene Management & Evidence Collection (30%)

Accident Scenario - Team Leader Assessment

Collected evidence:

  • Has collected, engaged with and can verbally explain the photos, sketch map and log sheets done by their team.
  • Has witness statements to appropriate standard and has interviewed a number of witnesses.
  • Has sufficient materials and understanding to be able to prepare a report.
  • Recognises weaknesses in collected materials and has a plan to address them 


PART C: – Preliminary Analysis (10%)

Presentation – Presentation style, formatting, content & preliminary event tree logic diagram


PART D:– Professionalism (Pass/Fail) Throughout the residential school, students are expected to apply professional approaches to all activities.


Detailed marking matrices are provided in Moodle for these assessments.


Referencing Style

Submission
Offline Online

Submission Instructions
Risk Assessment submitted 1 week prior to residential school commencing (29 April 9am AEST). Presentation slides shall be submitted via Moodle by Monday 13 May 2019 (9.00am). These shall be in Word, Excel, Powerpoint or .pdf format.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Plan and conduct a detailed accident investigation.
  • Analyse the accident causation sequences and linkages by applying an event tree or equivalent method.
  • Employ effective communication strategies appropriate to a major accident investigation.
  • Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the graduating practitioner.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Team Work
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

3 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Preliminary report & Reflection

Task Description

The work carried out in this assessment will form the basis for the final project in AINV13006 - Crash Lab Project 2. The standard of work undertaken in this assessment will directly affect the quality of your work in AINV13006.


PART A (40%) - Preliminary report

During the Crash Lab Project residential school each student will lead an investigation team.

For this assessment task you must:

  • Obtain copies of all the relevant physical and documentary evidence, photographs, logs, interview statements etc collected by the members of your investigation team as part of the investigation in which you were team leader
  • Develop your analysis of the accident and event tree which were commenced during the residential school
  • Participate in tutorials to ensure that you and your peers have a greater understanding of the relevant investigation and lines of enquiry.
  • Prepare a preliminary analysis, including a narrative of causation which aligns with the causation logic of your event tree.
  • Present material in a preliminary report format

Assessment

The grade for this Assessment task accounts for 40% of the total assessment for this course.

Note: This exercise and preliminary report forms basis for your final report in AINV13006 - Crash Lab Project 2.

Your submission for the preliminary report will include the following materials collected to date:

  • Executive Summary pertaining the accident you were managing
  • Table of contents
  • Background of accident you were managing
  • Timeline
  • PEEPO
  • Event Tree
  • Causation Narrative
  • Discussion of lines of enquiry (including those eliminated)
  • Evidence Logs
  • Continuity Logs
  • Photographic Logs and Photos
  • Maps (Sketch and scale)
  • Witness statements and/or records of interview (at least 5)
  • List of documentary evidence you have collected
  • An outline of the evidence you are going to seek to assist with your investigation (Investigation plan)

Please note: For members of your investigation teams to successfully finalise their portfolio items you will need to share the artefacts that you collected or created during the investigation of the accident scenes. This is a component of professionalism and failure to provide this information to your investigation team members in a timely manner, will result in an automatic fail of this assignment.

  

PART B (10%) - Reflection

You will be required to reflect on your preparedness for professional practice. For Part B of this assessment task, you are required to:

  • Reflect on your learning in the Bachelor of Accident Forensics course to date.
  • Complete a self assessment of your Part A report (using criteria provided by your lecturer).
  • Identify your strengths and weaknesses in relation to each of the crash lab activities (eg evidence collection, logic diagrams etc).
  • Explain how you will address any shortcomings prior to your industry placement.

You are free to present this Part B of the assessment in the format of your choice.


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Monday (3 June 2019) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
50%

Minimum mark or grade
To pass this assessment, students must be graded Pass in all core skills: causation narrative and logic diagrams. Students must pass this assessment to pass this unit.

Assessment Criteria

The detailed assessment criteria for each part will be provided and explained during the term.

PART A - Accident Analysis (40%)

Your report will be assessed on the:

  • Description of the accident
  • Quality of the logic diagrams (PEEPO, Timeline and Event Tree)
  • Depth of analysis
  • Identification of latent failures
  • Consideration of similar accidents
  • Causation narrative alignment to logic diagrams
  • Written expression
  • Sources and referencing

PART B - Self-reflection (10%)

Your self-reflection will be assessed on your:

  • Critical Reflection of own learning and performance
  • Reflection on your preparation and capacity for leadership of investigation teams
  • Reflection on your professional practice confidence and competence during the residential school activities
  • Self assessment of the quality of your own work
  • Plan to extend strengths and address shortcomings
  • Written expression


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
All files are to be in .pdf format. Students should ensure that all diagrams, when enlarged are legible.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Plan and conduct a detailed accident investigation.
  • Analyse the accident causation sequences and linkages by applying an event tree or equivalent method.
  • Employ effective communication strategies appropriate to a major accident investigation.
  • Demonstrate reflective skills appropriate to the development of the graduating practitioner.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?