CQUniversity Unit Profile
AINV20009 Accident Forensics and Engineering
Accident Forensics and Engineering
All details in this unit profile for AINV20009 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In this unit, students will develop an advanced understanding of the role forensic engineering methods and victim pathology play in informing accident investigation and causation. Students will also appraise the contribution of engineers and the engineering profession, safety engineering concepts, safe design, engineering failure analysis to accident investigation and prevention. The contribution of principles and methods of fire investigation and the role of meteorology are also analysed. All students are required to attend a Residential School.

Details

Career Level: Postgraduate
Unit Level: Level 8
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2018

Mixed Mode

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Residential Schools

This unit has a Compulsory Residential School for distance mode students and the details are:
Click here to see your Residential School Timetable.

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 40%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 40%
3. Group Discussion
Weighting: 20%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Student feedback

Feedback

Student suggested increasing the engineering focus during the residential school.

Recommendation

Residential school activities should be revised to include engineering testing/investigation aspects.

Feedback from student feedback

Feedback

Assessment does not give timely feedback before next item

Recommendation

Assessment items and their timing are to be reviewed to allow more time for feedback to students.

Feedback from student feedback

Feedback

Need more engineering analysis

Recommendation

Unit content is to be reviewed to include more engineering analysis.

Feedback from student feedback

Feedback

Great interaction with staff

Recommendation

Ensure that current high levels of interaction between staff and students remain.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Discuss the role and effect of safety engineering and prevention through design on the causation and prevention of accidents.
  2. Analyse forensic investigation contexts and methods from the engineering disciplines including mechanical, electrical, civil and chemical engineering for establishing accident causation factors.
  3. Examine the methods of engineering failure analysis and their contribution to accident forensics.
  4. Examine the contribution of victim pathology in identification of the biomechanics of injury causality and the implication for future design and injury prevention.
  5. Explore the nature of fires and the principles and techniques for fire investigation.
  6. Examine the impact of meteorology on accident causation and associated methods of investigation.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Group Discussion - 20%
2 - Written Assessment - 40%
3 - Written Assessment - 40%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Group Discussion - 20%
2 - Written Assessment - 40%
3 - Written Assessment - 40%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Prue Howard Unit Coordinator
p.howard@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 05 Mar 2018

Module/Topic

Introduction to Unit and Moodle


Safety engineering & prevention

(engineering design and crashworthiness)

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 12 Mar 2018

Module/Topic

Forensic Engineering Investigation Methods

(Surveying, Physical and Laboratory testing, Event data recorders)

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Contribute to Moodle Group discussion

Week 3 Begin Date: 19 Mar 2018

Module/Topic


Engineering Failure Analysis

(Stress, strain, Forces, Materials)

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic


Week 4 Begin Date: 26 Mar 2018

Module/Topic

Engineering Failure Analysis

(Metallurgy, Fatigue)

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic


Week 5 Begin Date: 02 Apr 2018

Module/Topic

Residential School

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Residential School - Tues 3 - Thurs 5 April 2018 - Bundaberg Crash Lab

Vacation Week Begin Date: 09 Apr 2018

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 16 Apr 2018

Module/Topic

Forensic Engineering Investigation Methods

(computer modelling, photography, videos)


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Residential School Portfolio Due: Week 6 Monday (16 Apr 2018) 11:55 pm AEST
Week 7 Begin Date: 23 Apr 2018

Module/Topic

Crashworthiness and biomechanics

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic


Week 8 Begin Date: 30 Apr 2018

Module/Topic

Meteorology and accidents


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Contribute to Moodle Group discussion

Week 9 Begin Date: 07 May 2018

Module/Topic

Fire investigation

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Contribute to Moodle Group discussion


Literature Review Due: Week 9 Friday (11 May 2018) 11:55 pm AEST
Week 10 Begin Date: 14 May 2018

Module/Topic

Victim Pathology

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Contribute to Moodle Group discussion

Week 11 Begin Date: 21 May 2018

Module/Topic

Review & reflection

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 28 May 2018

Module/Topic

Review & reflection

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Class Discussion and Moodle Activities Due: Week 12 Friday (1 June 2018) 11:55 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 04 Jun 2018

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 11 Jun 2018

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Residential School Portfolio

Task Description

During the compulsory residential school, you will be engaged in a number of practical activities to apply the knowledge you have learned. Details of each activity will be provided during the residential school, however they will include:

  • Forensic Engineering & Crashworthiness assessment
  • Engineering Failure Analysis
  • Surveying
  • Site visit
  • Oral presentation.  You will be required to research and describe to the class how a specific piece of engineering equipment works.  You will be given your equipment item prior to the residential school. This will share a number of engineering contexts with the class.  Examples of equipment could include a brake; an LED; a compressor.  A range of items covering the different areas of engineering will be given to the class.

You will collate these activities as a portfolio and submit it for assessment.

More details will be provided on Moodle and in the class sessions.


Assessment Due Date

Week 6 Monday (16 Apr 2018) 11:55 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 7 Friday (27 Apr 2018)


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

As a general rule assessment criteria for all assessment items include

1. (90%) Content - includes the accuracy, relevance and application of key concepts, analysis, argument, language and grammer used in answering a question or report (see marking criteria for individual requirements).

2. (10%) References - includes the provision of a reference list and the application of the Harvard style for referencing information, data, tables or images sourced for the assignment or report.

A more detailed marking criteria sheet will be provided to you in Moodle.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Discuss the role and effect of safety engineering and prevention through design on the causation and prevention of accidents.
  • Examine the methods of engineering failure analysis and their contribution to accident forensics.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills
  • Research
  • Self-management
  • Ethical and Professional Responsibility

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Literature Review

Task Description

You are required to find and identify case studies where engineering forensics were used to help identify the cause of the accident.

You will be required to discuss how at least 4 engineering forensics methods were used and contributed to the investigation. You may be able to identify more than one forensic engineering method in a single case study. The number of case studies you identify will be dependant on how many engineering methods were used in the investigation. You should discuss the strengths and weaknesses of those methods and what their contributions were to the investigation.

More details will be provided on Moodle and in the class sessions.


Assessment Due Date

Week 9 Friday (11 May 2018) 11:55 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 11 Friday (25 May 2018)


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

There is no word limit for this assessment item, however a guide of approximately 3000 words is suggested.

As a general rule assessment criteria for all assessment items include

1. (90%) Content - includes the accuracy, relevance and application of key concepts, analysis, argument, language and grammer used in answering a question or report (see marking criteria for individual requirements).

2. (10%) References - includes the provision of a reference list and the application of the Harvard style for referencing information, data, tables or images sourced for the assignment or report.

More details will be provided on Moodle and in the class sessions.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse forensic investigation contexts and methods from the engineering disciplines including mechanical, electrical, civil and chemical engineering for establishing accident causation factors.
  • Examine the contribution of victim pathology in identification of the biomechanics of injury causality and the implication for future design and injury prevention.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills
  • Research
  • Self-management
  • Ethical and Professional Responsibility

3 Group Discussion

Assessment Title
Class Discussion and Moodle Activities

Task Description

Discussion topics related to the unit content of Accident Forensics and Engineering will be introduced in the News forum at stages throughout the term. These will then be discussed by the cohort on the Moodle discussion forum, where you will develop and share your final understandings.

You are expected to participate in each of these discussions as they form a part of the assessment activities for this unit.

4 topics will be introduced throughout the term.  You must initiate one discussion per topic and respond to at least one discussion per topic.  Your response will be aimed at extending the knowledge of the cohort on that topic.  This process will allow you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of key concepts.

You must initiate a discussion within one week of the topic being given, and then you must repond to a discussion within 2 weeks of the topic being given.  The submissions will be marked at the end of the two week period.  This will allow for feedback for further submissions.  No responses will be allowed after the end of the two week period. 


Topics will include:

  • The role of safety engineering through design.
  • Vicim pathology
  • Meteorology
  • Fire investigation

Each topic will be worth 25% of the assignment mark.


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Friday (1 June 2018) 11:55 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Friday (15 June 2018)

Feedback on each of the four submissions will be made with 2 weeks of the submission.


Weighting
20%

Assessment Criteria

A suggested length of 300 words per discussion item, and 200 words per response is a guide for this assessment item.

As a general rule assessment criteria for all assessment items include

1. (90%) Content - includes the accuracy, relevance and application of key concepts, analysis, argument, language and grammer used in answering a question or report (see marking criteria for individual requirements).

2. (10%) References - includes the provision of a reference list and the application of the Harvard style for referencing information, data, tables or images sourced for the assignment or report.

More details will be provided on Moodle and in the class sessions.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submission via the discussion forum in Moodle

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Discuss the role and effect of safety engineering and prevention through design on the causation and prevention of accidents.
  • Analyse forensic investigation contexts and methods from the engineering disciplines including mechanical, electrical, civil and chemical engineering for establishing accident causation factors.
  • Explore the nature of fires and the principles and techniques for fire investigation.
  • Examine the impact of meteorology on accident causation and associated methods of investigation.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills
  • Research
  • Self-management
  • Ethical and Professional Responsibility
  • Leadership

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?