CQUniversity Unit Profile
AVAT13026 Aviation Capstone Project
Aviation Capstone Project
All details in this unit profile for AVAT13026 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This unit will provide you with the opportunity to showcase your knowledge and analytical skills through a research project on an approved authentic aviation-related topic. You will identify and negotiate appropriate research questions and project objectives, develop a project proposal, conduct a comprehensive literature review, and choose an appropriate methodology to be used for critical analysis, all in a team environment. You will generate solutions to the research questions, and present findings of the analysis in a research report and a formal group presentation to project supervisors and peers. You will defend your project by answering questions raised during the formal presentation. To achieve this, you and your team will work with a designated academic supervisor.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Prerequisite: SOCL19060 Research Methods and minimum of 96cp study.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 2 - 2024

Cairns
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Research Proposal
Weighting: 20%
2. Research Assignment
Weighting: 30%
3. Report
Weighting: 40%
4. Presentation
Weighting: 10%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Identify and formulate appropriate research questions and project objectives for an authentic aviation problem in a team environment
  2. Critically review the literature to generate conclusions
  3. Develop and justify methodologies appropriate to the research topic
  4. Present and defend research findings in a professional manner as a member of a team using oral and written formats.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Research Proposal - 20%
2 - Research Assignment - 30%
3 - Report - 40%
4 - Presentation - 10%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Doreen La Unit Coordinator
j.la@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 08 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Lecture - Introduction and Research Proposal

Chapter

The main topics this week include a unit overview and the key elements of writing a good research proposal.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 15 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing the research topic and research proposal with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 22 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Lecture - Good practices in writing research papers

Chapter

The main topic this week includes the key elements of writing a good research paper.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 29 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment 1 due on Monday 23:59


Research Proposal Due: Week 4 Monday (29 July 2024) 11:59 pm AEST
Week 5 Begin Date: 05 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 12 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 19 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 26 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment 2 due on Monday 23:59


Research Assignment Due: Week 7 Monday (26 Aug 2024) 11:59 pm AEST
Week 8 Begin Date: 02 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 09 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Lecture - Presentation skills and Slides design

Chapter

The main topic this week includes the key elements of presentation skills and slides design

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 16 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11 Begin Date: 23 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Meeting with supervisor and unit coordinator

Chapter

The main activity this week involves discussing your research activities and research paper with your supervisor and UC.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment 3 due on Friday 23:59


Research Report Due: Week 11 Friday (27 Sept 2024) 11:59 pm AEST
Week 12 Begin Date: 30 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Final presentation

Chapter

This week will be group presentations.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment 4 due during the lecture


Final Presentation Due: Week 12 Thursday (3 Oct 2024) 11:59 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 07 Oct 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 14 Oct 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Research Proposal

Assessment Title
Research Proposal

Task Description

This assessment is a group task requiring the completion of a research proposal for the capstone project. The proposal should explain the nature and scope of the planned research. The main sections should be covered in the proposal include project aim and objectives, a brief literature review, research gaps and questions, research approach/ methodology, research timetable, expected research outcomes, and a references list. The word limit is 1000 – 1500 words, including figures and tables but excluding the abstract, table of contents, and reference list.


Assessment Due Date

Week 4 Monday (29 July 2024) 11:59 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
20%

Assessment Criteria

The proposal must be clearly written in a well-structured way. Standard templet is required, and all essential parts must be included. If your proposed research methodology includes any human-involved activities, such as surveys, interviews, or similar approaches, you must obtain approval from your supervisor and unit coordinator before conducting any research. Points will be deducted for not following APA guidelines, for Turnitin similarity scores above 15% that indicate improper paraphrasing (such as copied sentences or sentences with just one word changed), and for the use of AI tools. Besides, failure to use academic writing will also cause point reduction. Checking the rubric carefully before staring your assessment.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online Group

Submission Instructions
One submission per group

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Identify and formulate appropriate research questions and project objectives for an authentic aviation problem in a team environment

2 Research Assignment

Assessment Title
Research Assignment

Task Description

This assessment is a group task requiring the completion of the first part of a research paper. The main sections should be covered in this assessment include a brief abstract, detailed introduction and research background, project aim and objectives, detailed literature review, research gaps and questions, detailed research methodology, and references list. Appropriate tables and figures can be added to support the content. The word limit is 3,000 words for the entire group, including figures and tables but excluding the abstract, table of contents, and reference list.


Assessment Due Date

Week 7 Monday (26 Aug 2024) 11:59 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
30%

Assessment Criteria

Standard templet is required, and all essential parts must be included. You should also check the specific requirements with your supervisor. If your research includes any human-involved activities, such as surveys, interviews, or similar approaches, you must obtain approval from your supervisor and unit coordinator regarding your survey/interview questions, data collection, analysis, and storage plan. Points will be taken for not following the APA guidelines, Turnitin similarity scores above 15% that clearly show text not properly paraphrased, such as sentences copied or with a word inserted to break up the sentence, and the use of AI. Besides, failure to use academic writing will also cause point reduction. Failure to clearly identify the research questions and research aims and objectives, failure to provide a comprehensive literature review, and omission of important parts will result in a point reduction. Checking the rubric carefully before staring your assessment.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online Group

Submission Instructions
One submission per group

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Identify and formulate appropriate research questions and project objectives for an authentic aviation problem in a team environment
  • Critically review the literature to generate conclusions
  • Develop and justify methodologies appropriate to the research topic

3 Report

Assessment Title
Research Report

Task Description

This assessment is a group task requiring the completion of the second part of a research paper, which should follow the first part completed in Assessment 2. The whole research paper completed should include accomplishing the specific tasks set out for the project. The main sections should be covered in this assessment include a brief abstract, detailed research results, detailed findings and discussions, implementation and limitations, future work, and references list (if apply). Appropriate tables and figures can be added to support the content. The word limit is 3,000 words for the entire group, including figures and tables but excluding the abstract, table of contents, and reference list.


Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Friday (27 Sept 2024) 11:59 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

Standard templet is required, and all essential parts must be included. You should also check the specific requirements with your supervisor. Points will be taken for not following the APA guidelines, Turnitin similarity scores above 15% that clearly show text not properly paraphrased, such as sentences copied or with a word inserted to break up the sentence, and the use of AI. Besides, failure to use academic writing will also cause point reduction. Failure to clearly address all the research questions, failure to provide effective and detailed discussions in each section, and omission of important parts will result in point reduction. Checking the rubric carefully before staring your assessment.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online Group

Submission Instructions
One submission per group

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Critically review the literature to generate conclusions
  • Develop and justify methodologies appropriate to the research topic
  • Present and defend research findings in a professional manner as a member of a team using oral and written formats.

4 Presentation

Assessment Title
Final Presentation

Task Description

This assessment is a group presentation based on the whole research paper, which should cover both Assessment 2 and 3. This final group presentation will be conducted either online or in person during the lecture in week 12. Presentation slides, which should be fewer than 20 pages including the cover page and reference list, are required to support the presentation and must be uploaded to the Moodle site before the lecture. In-text citations are not required on each slide, but a full reference list must be attached at the end. Each team member will present their portion related to Assessment 2 and 3. The group presentation will be 15 minutes including a 5-minute Q&A session.


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Thursday (3 Oct 2024) 11:59 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
10%

Assessment Criteria

Individual points will be deducted for not presenting as part of the group. Points will also be lost for directly reading from the research paper, lacking interaction and eye contact with the audience, placing full sentences and paragraphs on the slides, and exceeding the presentation time. Checking the rubric carefully before staring your assessment.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online Group

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Present and defend research findings in a professional manner as a member of a team using oral and written formats.

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?