Overview
This unit develops an understanding of: structural drawings and computational methods associated with timber, reinforced concrete and steel structures; design processes for timber structures including: beams, columns, tension members, compression members and connections; design processes for reinforced concrete structures including; approximate analysis and sizing of members; singly reinforced beams; doubly reinforced beams; T beams; L beams; One-way slabs; Two-way slabs; columns-short and long; footings; design process for steel structures including approximate sizing of beams and columns, tension members, compressing members, beams, columns-short and long, stiffeners and connections.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Prerequisites - BLAR11032
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2017
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Moodle course evaluation
• The assignments were always very clearly explained, all students that had questions received answers in a timely manner and the weekly recorded lectures were always very clear with multiple examples of each given concept worked through to its completion. Assignments were always marked as per the course profile feedback date.
Good to know that the online lectures, content were useful towards learning progress and assessments completion. Thank you for your feedback. Will continue to do our level best in the next offer as well.
Feedback from Moodle course evaluation
* The way Daniel conducted his lectures made it easy to follow and understand the content.
Thanks for the feedback. Will continue to do our level best in the next offer too.
- Describe structural analysis processes.
- Analyse statically indeterminate structures by both rigorous and approximate methods.
- Perform preliminary designs for structures and also sizing and design of simple structural members in buildings
- Use effectively a range of appropriate communication modes.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Communication | ||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | ||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | ||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | ||||
| 5 - Team Work | ||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | ||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | ||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
Understanding Structures
Edition: 5th (2014)
Authors: Seward, D
Palgrave Macmillan
Swindon Swindon , UK
Binding: Paperback
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Microphone and headset
- WebCam
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
r.dhanasekar@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Structural analysis processes: An overview of the design of multi cell building
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The analysis of indeterminate structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Combined stress analysis and limit state design. Design of timber structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of timber structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of timber structures.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of concrete structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of concrete structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of concrete structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of steel structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of steel structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design of steel structures
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Professional practice: The future
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Program Review week
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
This assessment item aligns to course learning outcomes 1,2 and 4 as outlined in the course profile. Assessment questions include theory and analysis of structures.
Week 5 Wednesday (5 Apr 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 7 Wednesday (26 Apr 2017)
(5%) Presentation and layout—includes the selection of typeface, written and general appearance, detail and quality of the assessment item submission
(90%) Content—includes the accuracy and relevance of information, application of knowledge, language and grammar used in answering questions, and proper referencing of sources of information, equations, images, data and tables used in the assessment submission. When referencing, use of the Harvard Referencing System
(5%) Reference - Use of the Harvard Referencing System. Harvard referencing guide can be available via course profile.
- Describe structural analysis processes.
- Analyse statically indeterminate structures by both rigorous and approximate methods.
- Perform preliminary designs for structures and also sizing and design of simple structural members in buildings
- Use effectively a range of appropriate communication modes.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
2 Written Assessment
This assessment item aligns to course learning outcomes 1,3 and 4 as outlined in the course profile. Assessment questions include theory and design of structural elements .
Week 8 Wednesday (3 May 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 10 Wednesday (17 May 2017)
(5%) Presentation and layout—includes the selection of typeface, written and general appearance, detail and quality of the assessment item submission
(90%) Content—includes the accuracy and relevance of information, application of knowledge, language and grammar used in answering questions, and proper referencing of sources of information, equations, images, data and tables used in the assessment submission. When referencing, use of the Harvard Referencing System
(5%) Reference - Use of the Harvard Referencing System. Harvard referencing guide can be available via course profile.
- Describe structural analysis processes.
- Perform preliminary designs for structures and also sizing and design of simple structural members in buildings
- Use effectively a range of appropriate communication modes.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
3 Written Assessment
This assessment item aligns to course learning outcomes 1,3 and 4 as outlined in the course profile. Assessment questions include theory and design of structural members .
Review/Exam Week Wednesday (7 June 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
5.00PM on 01 July Friday - University Vacation period
(5%) Presentation and layout—includes the selection of typeface, written and general appearance, detail and quality of the assessment item submission
(90%) Content—includes the accuracy and relevance of information, application of knowledge, language and grammar used in answering questions, and proper referencing of sources of information, equations, images, data and tables used in the assessment submission. When referencing, use of the Harvard Referencing System
(5%) Reference - Use of the Harvard Referencing System. Harvard referencing guide can be available via course profile.
- Perform preliminary designs for structures and also sizing and design of simple structural members in buildings
- Use effectively a range of appropriate communication modes.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
