Overview
On completion of this unit students will be able to appraise and perform advanced haematological and haemostatic methods used in the diagnosis and monitoring of blood diseases. Therapeutic management of diseases of blood coagulation will also be investigated. Distance education students will be required to: have access to a computer to make frequent use of internet resources; and, to attend a residential school.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Prerequisites: CHEM11041 – Chemistry for the Life Sciences BMSC11001 – Human Body Systems 1 BMSC11003 – Intro to Medical Sciences BMSC11002 – Human Body Systems 2 BMSC11004 – Introduction to Biochemistry BMSC12003 – Haematology BMSC12002 – Work Integrated Learning 1
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2017
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Residential Schools
This unit has a Compulsory Residential School for distance mode students and the details are:
Click here to see your Residential School Timetable.
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student evaluation
Learning resources are appreciated
Continue to provide variety of learning resources
Variety of learning resources has been maintained and will continue to do so with industry support.
Feedback from Student evaluation
Course well structured and relevant
Continue to maintain relevance of course content to meet needs of industry
Industry experts performed lectures and provided course content, ensuring the continuing relevance of course material in line with industry practices.
Feedback from Student evaluation
More blood films for residential school
Continue to procure more blood films from industry
The majority of slides have been replaced, an industry contact from QLD Health is continuing to provide 10-20 slides of any interesting cases they have encountered, which we are now using in class for both learning and assessment
- Assess the evidence base and factors that are essential in development of new haematological and haemostatic testing methods for the detection and monitoring of blood diseases.
- Discuss limitations of haematology laboratory procedures and use of tests within specified limits.
- Evaluate haematological and haemostatic instrumentation quality control processes including manual and automated validation and institute corrective action as required.
- Distinguish between technical/instrumental causes and pathological causes of unexpected results and develop solutions to problems with testing procedure based on clinical and scientific expertise.
- Discuss report presentation, critical range and interpretation of abnormal haematological and haemostatic results.
- Describe common causes of artefactual or discrepant haematological and haemostatic test results and explain the concept of therapeutic range of anticoagulant therapy.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 10% | ||||||
| 2 - Practical Assessment - 40% | ||||||
| 3 - Examination - 50% | ||||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 - Communication | ||||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | ||||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | ||||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | ||||||
| 5 - Team Work | ||||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | ||||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | ||||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 10% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Practical Assessment - 40% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Examination - 50% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
Hematology: Clinical Principles and Applications
4th edition (2012)
Authors: Rodak & Fritsma & Keohane
Elsevier Saunders
St Louis St Louis , Missouri , United States of America
ISBN: 9781437706925
Binding: Hardcover
Clinical Hematology Atlas
4th edition (2012)
Authors: Rodak & Carr
Elsevier
St Louis St Louis , Missouri , United States of America
ISBN: 9781455708307
Binding: Hardcover
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Digital microscope
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
a.taylor-robinson@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
1. Introduction to Advanced Haematology
2. Bone marrow examination
Chapter
16
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
1. Increased RBC destruction
2. Intrinsic defects
3. Extrinsic defects - Immune and Non-immune causes
Chapter
22, 23, 24, 25
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
1. Non-malignant leucocyte disorders
2. Paediatric and Geriatric Haematology
Chapter
28, 38
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Haematological malignancy development, genetics and nomenclature
Chapter
29, 30, 31, 32, 33
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
1. Myelodysplastic syndromes
2. Myeloproliferative neoplasms
Chapter
34, 35
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
No lecture
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Myeloid leukaemia
Chapter
34, 35, 36, 37
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Lymphoid leukaemia
Chapter
34, 35, 36, 37
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
1. Lymphomas
2. Myelomas
3. Other haematological malignancies
Chapter
29 - 37
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Residential School
Chapter
Practical Workbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
1. Anticoagulants and coagulopathies
2. Platelet disorders
Chapter
40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Malaria and other blood parasites
Chapter
24
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Revision lecture
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
You will be provided with an authentic clinical case study on the Moodle site. The following information regarding the case will be available to you: clinical presentation, patient history, blood smear morphology, haematological parameters (provided by an automated analyser) and biochemical changes (if any). You are then required to write a report (around 1,000 words) using a case study approach describing the pathology observed, aetiology, specific morphological or haematological characteristics observed that led to the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment options and any recommended further tests. Guidelines to complete the report, marking rubric and a template will be available on the Moodle site.
Week 6 Friday (21 Apr 2017) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 8 Friday (5 May 2017)
The assessment task is marked according to how well you have met the specific requirements and in accordance with the criteria outlined below:
Presentation: The report is presented in the required template. Clarity of purpose and coherence of expression (spelling, grammar, syntax); Clear and organised flow of information.
Abstract: Provides a clear overview and overall summary of the case study.
Introduction: Provides necessary background information and pathophysiology of the case. Does not discuss the final diagnosis rather supports the intended diagnosis via arguments.
Materials and Methods: Briefly describes all the methods used to aid in diagnosis. Discusses further tests to be employed in order to confirm the diagnosis.
Results: All data presented clearly with reference ranges. Layout is clear with further tests and expected results discussed.
Discussion: Clear discussion of the results with supporting arguments and reasoning for arriving at the final diagnosis.
References: Harvard referencing system used with appropriate in-text references
- Assess the evidence base and factors that are essential in development of new haematological and haemostatic testing methods for the detection and monitoring of blood diseases.
- Discuss limitations of haematology laboratory procedures and use of tests within specified limits.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
2 Practical Assessment
You will be provided with a laboratory workbook on the moodle site. This workbook will contain all the tasks that need to be completed during the residential school block. It will also contain a series of short questions and patient reports to be completed in relation to the authentic cases provided. Group experimental activities during the residential school will foster team work and provide hands-on experience of the haematological techniques used in pathology laboratories. Completion of the workbook will evidence student engagement and understanding of the principles behind the haematological tests. Laboratory staff or demonstrators will assess your individual experimental capability during residential school to ensure your understanding of the learning outcomes. You will be required to submit the completed version of the laboratory workbook on the moodle site.
Important: On Day 3 of your residential school block, you will have a final practical examination. Further details regarding the examination will be available on the moodle site.
Week 10 Friday (19 May 2017) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 12 Friday (2 June 2017)
- Residential school and Workbook component: Each section will have respective assigned marks depending on the complexity of the task to be performed. A total mark obtained for the workbook and associated tasks would then be converted to 20% of your final grade. The laboratory staff will provide immediate verbal feedback to you on the practical hands-on aspect of this assessment item. The laboratory workbook template will contain the weightage of marks associated with the tasks and subsequent questions/reports to be completed
- Practical examination component: The practical examination conducted on Day 3 of the residential school is worth 20% of your final grade. Further information on the examination will be available on the moodle site.
- Total for practical assessment: 20 + 20 = 40%
- Evaluate haematological and haemostatic instrumentation quality control processes including manual and automated validation and institute corrective action as required.
- Distinguish between technical/instrumental causes and pathological causes of unexpected results and develop solutions to problems with testing procedure based on clinical and scientific expertise.
- Discuss report presentation, critical range and interpretation of abnormal haematological and haemostatic results.
- Describe common causes of artefactual or discrepant haematological and haemostatic test results and explain the concept of therapeutic range of anticoagulant therapy.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
Examination
Dictionary - non-electronic, concise, direct translation only (dictionary must not contain any notes or comments).
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
