Overview
Enterprise Systems (ES) have become increasingly popular since the early 1990s. One goal of these systems is to provide an encapsulation of core business processes and information. Many organisations have acquired ES technology, however there are considerable risks associated with ES implementation, maintenance and on-going use. This unit aims to equip students with the information required to inform ES adoption, selection and implementation decisions and the ability to communicate this knowledge to their peers and employers.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
48 credit points
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 3 - 2017
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Moodle
Allow students to access the ERP software from outside the campus to complete weekly tasks at any time for convenience.
Allow students to access the ERP software through the CQU anydesk website and also provide instructions to access the ERP software through anydesk.
Feedback from Teaching evaluation
More details about Assignment 3 tasks should be provided.
Rewrite assignment-3 tasks and provide detailed description for each task.
- Describe Enterprise Systems (ES) and be able to explain how and why they evolved.
- Evaluate the role of ES in organisations and their adoption and use characteristics.
- Discriminate between the common ES modules and their features.
- Analyse the individual activities and the roles of key stakeholders in an organisation's ES life-cycle.
- Develop an argument for the support or rejection of an ES adoption decision in an organisation.
- Examine the role of business process remodelling during ES adoption and implementation.
- Assess risk factors, relevant critical success factors and best practice in an ES adoption and implementation project.
Australian Computer Society (ACS) recognises the Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA). SFIA is in use in over 100 countries and provides a widely used and consistent definition of ICT skills. SFIA is increasingly being used when developing job descriptions and role profiles.
ACS members can use the tool MySFIA to build a skills profile at https://www.acs.org.au/professionalrecognition/mysfia-b2c.html
This unit contributes to the following workplace skills as defined by SFIA. The SFIA codes is included:
- Information Analysis (INAN)
- Research (RSCH)
- Emerging Technology Monitoring (EMRG)
- Business Analysis (BUAN)
- Database/Repository Design (DBDS)
- Change Management (CHMG)
- Problem Management (PBMG).
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | |||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||||
| 3 - Practical and Written Assessment - 40% | |||||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1 - Communication | |||||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | |||||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | |||||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | |||||||
| 5 - Team Work | |||||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | |||||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | |||||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Practical and Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
Enterprise Systems for Management
Edition: 2nd (2012)
Authors: Motiwalla, L & Thompson, J
Pearson
Upper Saddle River Upper Saddle River , USA
ISBN: 9780132145763
Binding: Paperback
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
m.chan@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to Enterprise Systems for Management
Chapter
1
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Systems Integration
Chapter
2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Enterprise Systems Architecture
Chapter
3
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Development Life Cycle
Chapter
4
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
12
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
5
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
10
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Software and Vendor Selection
Chapter
6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Operations and Post-implementation
Chapter
7
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
9
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Program and Project Management
Chapter
8
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
11
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Unit Coordinator
Michael Chan
Email: m.chan@cqu.edu.au
School of Engineering & Technology, CQUniversity Brisbane
160 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000
1 Written Assessment
The assessment will relate to one or more of the unit learning outcomes depending upon the choice of selected presentation development topic.
This is an individual assignment for on-campus and off-campus students. Each student is to develop a PowerPoint presentation about any area of Enterprise Systems related to weeks one to four learning topics. Along with the PowerPoint presentation, students are to provide scripts and a handout. Students are to prepare a handout which should be in a format that students can use as a summary of the main points of the PowerPoint presentation and include the references. Students are to include their scripts as part of their PowerPoint presentation, that is, what would be said if they were giving the presentation in front of an audience. The scripts should show clearly what would be said or discussed as each slide is presented. This scripts should be included in the ‘Notes’ section of each slide.
Any other topic that is not related to weeks one to four learning topics needs to be approved by your local Lecturer.
The assignment is to be submitted as a zip file using the electronic assignment submission system that can be accessed from the link on the unit website. The zip file should contain the followings:
1. The PowerPoint slides (.pptx file).
2. The ‘handout’ (Word document - .docx file).
3. Any other relevant materials.
The full specifications for this assessment and the marking criteria are available on Moodle unit website.
Week 5 Thursday (14 Dec 2017) 2:00 pm AEST
Within 2 weeks of the due date or within 2 weeks of submission (whichever is the later).
The detailed description of 'Assessment 1 - Developing a Presentation' is accessible on Moodle unit website which will include information on how it will be assessed.
- Describe Enterprise Systems (ES) and be able to explain how and why they evolved.
- Evaluate the role of ES in organisations and their adoption and use characteristics.
- Discriminate between the common ES modules and their features.
- Analyse the individual activities and the roles of key stakeholders in an organisation's ES life-cycle.
- Develop an argument for the support or rejection of an ES adoption decision in an organisation.
- Examine the role of business process remodelling during ES adoption and implementation.
- Assess risk factors, relevant critical success factors and best practice in an ES adoption and implementation project.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
2 Written Assessment
Task Description
This assessment is worth 40% of the total available marks for this unit. The aims of this assessment is for you to respond to a case study. Details of the case study, description of the task and the requirements will be made available on the unit website. If you have any questions in regards to this assessment you should consult your local Lecturer or Unit Coordinator.
Submission: Online
- Group (2-3 students in each group) or Individual (permission required)
Week 8 Thursday (11 Jan 2018) 2:00 pm AEST
Within 2 weeks of the due date or within 2 weeks of submission (whichever is the later).
The detailed description of 'Assessment 2 - Case Study' is accessible on Moodle unit website which will include information on how it will be assessed.
- Describe Enterprise Systems (ES) and be able to explain how and why they evolved.
- Evaluate the role of ES in organisations and their adoption and use characteristics.
- Discriminate between the common ES modules and their features.
- Analyse the individual activities and the roles of key stakeholders in an organisation's ES life-cycle.
- Develop an argument for the support or rejection of an ES adoption decision in an organisation.
- Examine the role of business process remodelling during ES adoption and implementation.
- Assess risk factors, relevant critical success factors and best practice in an ES adoption and implementation project.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
3 Practical and Written Assessment
Task
Description
This assessment is worth 40% of the total available marks for this unit. The aim of this assessment is for you to apply theories into practice. You are going to solve problems in a case study situation and to write a report. Details of the case study, description of the task and the requirements will be made available on the unit website. If you have any questions in regards to this assessment you should consult your local Lecturer or Unit Coordinator.
Submission: Online
- Group (2-3 students in each group) or Individual (permission required)
Week 11 Thursday (1 Feb 2018) 2:00 pm AEST
As per University policies, Grades for this assignment will not be released until the certification date.
The detailed description of 'Assessment 3 - Solve Problem' is accessible on Moodle unit website which will include information on how it will be assessed.
- Describe Enterprise Systems (ES) and be able to explain how and why they evolved.
- Evaluate the role of ES in organisations and their adoption and use characteristics.
- Discriminate between the common ES modules and their features.
- Analyse the individual activities and the roles of key stakeholders in an organisation's ES life-cycle.
- Develop an argument for the support or rejection of an ES adoption decision in an organisation.
- Examine the role of business process remodelling during ES adoption and implementation.
- Assess risk factors, relevant critical success factors and best practice in an ES adoption and implementation project.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
