Overview
In this unit, you will explore problems that require technological solutions as systems analysis involves determining what a system needs to accomplish. This unit covers concepts such as systems feasibility, user requirements elicitation, and systems modelling. You will learn how to analyse systems requirements, select and plan how to take the system through all stages of the system development life cycle.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2020
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Staff
Quizzes as part of the assessments are helpful in student learning, yet scoring high marks in quizzes requires more effort.
Review the workloads required and assessment weights of the quizzes.
Feedback from Staff
Week 4 and 5 topics (cost-benefit analysis and economics of Project management) do not align with any of the ULOs. These topics are covered in depth in COIT12208.
Revise weekly contents to remove redundant topics (covered in other units) and to ensure the contents are aligned with the unit’s learning outcomes.
- Explain systems analysis concepts, terminologies, system analysis tasks, models, tools, techniques, and methodologies
- Select and plan appropriate models, tools, techniques, and methodologies in the systems analysis phase of a systems development project
- Apply information gathering techniques to derive system functionalities
- Construct modelling diagrams to depict system functionalities for users' requirements.
Australian Computer Society (ACS) recognises the Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA). SFIA is in use in over 100 countries and provides a widely used and consistent definition of ICT skills. SFIA is increasingly being used when developing job descriptions and role profiles.
ACS members can use the tool MySFIA to build a skills profile at https://www.acs.org.au/professionalrecognition/mysfia-b2c.html
This unit contributes to the following workplace skills as defined by SFIA. The SFIA7 code is included:
- Business Analysis (BUAN)
- Requirements Definition and Management (REQM)
- Business Modelling (BSMO)
- Data Modelling and Design (DTAN)
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Online Quiz(zes) - 10% | ||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||
| 4 - Project (applied) - 40% | ||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Communication | ||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | ||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | ||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | ||||
| 5 - Team Work | ||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | ||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | ||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Online Quiz(zes) - 10% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
| 4 - Project (applied) - 40% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World 7th (2016)
Edition: 7th (2016)
Authors: Satzinger, Jackson & Burd
Cengage
Boston Boston , MA , USA
ISBN: 9781305117204
Binding: Paperback
Additional Textbook Information
All students MUST use only the 7th edition of the prescribed text book.
If you prefer to study with a paper copy, they are available at the CQUni Bookshop here: http://bookshop.cqu.edu.au (search on the Unit code).
eBook copies can be purchased from the publisher's website here: https://www.cengagebrain.com.au/shop/isbn/9781305117204?cid=aussearchpage
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- MS Office or equivalent software
- MS Project
- MS Visio
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
p.poon@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
An Overview of Systems Analysis and Design
Chapter
Chapter 1 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Approaches to Systems Development
Chapter
Chapter 10 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The Role of Systems Analyst
Chapter
Online Chapter A (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Project Planning and Project Management
Chapter
Chapter 11 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Project Management Techniques
Chapter
Online Chapter C (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Investigating Systems Requirement
Chapter
Chapter 2 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Identifying User Stories and Use Cases
Chapter
Chapter 3 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Domain Modeling
Chapter
Chapter 4 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Use Case Modeling
Chapter
Chapter 5 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Designing the User Interface
Chapter
Chapter 8 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Deploying the New System
Chapter
Chapter 14 (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Revision
Chapter
All previously covered chapters (Prescribed textbook)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Associate Professor Pak Poon (Unit Coordinator)
Office: Room 6.15, Level 6, School of Engineering and Technology, 120 Spencer Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 (Melbourne Campus)
Email: p.poon@cqu.edu.au
Phone: (03) 9616 0693
1 Online Quiz(zes)
There will be four quizzes to assess your understanding of the unit materials. The quizzes will be held during the tutorial sessions in Weeks 4, 7, 9 and 11.
Late submissions might not be possible for online quizzes. Late submissions where possible (only under very exceptional circumstances) are subject to the university's late submission penalty policies.
Within 2 weeks from the due date or within 2 weeks of submission (whichever is the later)
This assessment consists of multiple questions. Each question will be marked according to its correctness.
- Explain systems analysis concepts, terminologies, system analysis tasks, models, tools, techniques, and methodologies
- Select and plan appropriate models, tools, techniques, and methodologies in the systems analysis phase of a systems development project
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
2 Written Assessment
Imagine you have recently commenced a systems development project in the role of systems analyst. You will be provided with a Project Case Study. You are required to identify critical elements, undertake analysis tasks and develop a report. Your report will document aspects such as:
- The rationale behind your selected systems development methodology;
- Your project plan including a scheduling chart; and
- A cost-benefit analysis.
You will be required to use software such as Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Project.
Week 6 Wednesday (26 Aug 2020) 11:00 am AEST
Late submissions are subject to the university's late submission penalty policies
Week 8 Wednesday (9 Sept 2020)
This assessment consists of multiple questions. Each question will be marked separately based on the following:
- Correctness: The answer should be technically correct. Justifications should explain the advantages and disadvantages.
- Clarity: Explanations, formatting and diagrams/charts should be clear, consistent and relevant.
The assessment criteria will also cover document layout, format, file types, and referencing. Furthermore, all the different parts of the assessment should be written in a report in a coherent manner.
- Select and plan appropriate models, tools, techniques, and methodologies in the systems analysis phase of a systems development project
- Apply information gathering techniques to derive system functionalities
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
3 Written Assessment
Assessment 2 follows on from Assessment 1 and usually uses the same project case study. Assessment 2 requires you to apply techniques and models to complete systems analysis tasks. You will select, justify and use information-gathering techniques to identify, analyse and specify requirements of an information system. You will then design an information system using models such as use case diagrams, domain class models, activity diagrams and system sequence diagrams.
You will be required to use software such as Microsoft Visio to develop modeling diagrams.
Week 10 Wednesday (23 Sept 2020) 11:00 am AEST
Late submissions are subject to the university's late submission penalty policies.
Week 12 Wednesday (7 Oct 2020)
This assessment consists of multiple questions. Each question will be marked separately based on the following:
- Correctness: The answer should be technically correct. Justifications should explain the advantages and disadvantages.
- Clarity: Explanations, formatting and diagrams/charts should be clear, consistent and relevant.
The assessment criteria will also cover document layout, format, file types, and referencing. Furthermore, all the different parts of the assessment should be written in a report in a coherent manner.
- Apply information gathering techniques to derive system functionalities
- Construct modelling diagrams to depict system functionalities for users' requirements.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Technology Competence
4 Project (applied)
This individual project covers all the topics taught from Week 1 to Week 11, and is also based on the Case Study used for Assessments 1 and 2. While Assessments 1 and 2 focus on individual phases of the software development life cycle, Assessment 3 will cover the entire life cycle (including the activities to be performed during or after system cutover).
.
Week 12 Friday (9 Oct 2020) 11:00 am AEST
Late submissions are subject to the university's late submission penalty policies.
Exam Week Monday (19 Oct 2020)
Expected to return to students no later than 2 weeks after submission due date.
This assessment consists of multiple questions. Each question will be marked separately based on the following:
- Correctness: The answer should be technically correct. Justifications should explain the advantages and disadvantages.
- Clarity: Explanations, formatting and diagrams/charts should be clear, consistent and relevant.
The assessment criteria will also cover document layout, format, file types, and referencing. Furthermore, all the different parts of the assessment should be written in a report in a coherent manner.
- Explain systems analysis concepts, terminologies, system analysis tasks, models, tools, techniques, and methodologies
- Construct modelling diagrams to depict system functionalities for users' requirements.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Ethical practice
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
