CQUniversity Unit Profile
COIT20259 Enterprise Computing Architecture
Enterprise Computing Architecture
All details in this unit profile for COIT20259 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This unit introduces you to the components, architectures and industrial standards involved in the design and implementation of enterprise software applications. The focus will be on applications employing 3 tiers - a presentation tier, an application tier and a data persistence tier. In terms of technology, both traditional desktop applications and web-based applications will be covered and different technology platforms will be compared and contrasted. Emerging technologies and current research issues will also be discussed. Note: If you have completed COIT20227 Enterprise Computing then you cannot take this unit.

Details

Career Level: Postgraduate
Unit Level: Level 9
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Prerequisites: COIT20256 Data Structures and Algorithms, COIT20247 Database Design and Development Co-requisite: COIT20257 Distributed Systems: Principles and Development, COIT20258 Software Design: Principles, Models and Patterns

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2017

Brisbane
Distance
Melbourne
Rockhampton
Sydney

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 20%
2. Practical and Written Assessment
Weighting: 40%
3. Examination
Weighting: 40%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from From term teaching and assignmemt marking

Feedback

Using the NetBeans built-in database server and application server for deploying a 3-tier enterprise application is not a good practice. Doing so would hide the layers of an enterprise application and course poor understanding of the distribution/interaction of components in real world enterprise environments.

Recommendation

The use of separate application server GlassFish and database server Derby needs to be taught in lectures/tutorials and the use of separated servers will be required for assignment 2.

Action

Independent application server GlassFish and independent databased server Derby are taught and compulsory for building a 3-tier enterprise application.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Compare and contrast the major enterprise software architectures.
  2. Analyse and evaluate the design options available for each tier in a typical 3-tiered application.
  3. Design and implement complex 3-tier applications.
  4. Assess the potential business impact of emerging enterprise computing technologies.
  5. Critically evaluate key research areas in enterprise computing.

Australian Computer Society (ACS) recognises the Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA). SFIA is in use in over 100 countries and provides a widely used and consistent definition of ICT skills. SFIA is increasingly being used when developing job descriptions and role profiles.
ACS members can use the tool MySFIA to build a skills profile at https://www.acs.org.au/professionalrecognition/mysfia-b2c.html
This unit contributes to the following workplace skills as defined by SFIA. The SFIA code is included:
  • Systems Design(DESN)
  • Systems integration (SINT)
  • Program ming/Software Development (PROG
  • Data analysis (DTAN)
  • Database/repository design (DBDS)
  • Testing (TEST), Network support (NTAS)
  • Release and deployment (RELM)
  • Application support ( ASUP).

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Written Assessment - 20%
2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 40%
3 - Examination - 40%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Written Assessment - 20%
2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 40%
3 - Examination - 40%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Beginning Java EE 7

(2013)
Authors: Antonio Goncalves
Apress
New York New York , NY , USA
ISBN: 978-1-4302-4626-8
Binding: Hardcover

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • JDK 1.7 or higher; Apache Maven 3 or higher; Derby Database 10 or higher; GlassFish 4 Application Server; NetBeans IDE 8.1 or higher
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Wei Li Unit Coordinator
w.li@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 06 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Enterprise Computing & Java EE

Chapter

1 & 4

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 13 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Object-Relational Mapping

Chapter

5

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 20 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Managing Persistent Objects

Chapter

5 & 6

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 27 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Callbacks and Listeners

Chapter

6

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 03 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Enterprise Java Beans

Chapter

7

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assignment 1 Due: Week 5 Friday (7 Apr 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
Vacation Week Begin Date: 10 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Vocation

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 17 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Session Beans

Chapter

7 & 8

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 24 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Callbacks, Timer Service and Authorization

Chapter

8

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 01 May 2017

Module/Topic

JavaServer Faces

Chapter

10

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 08 May 2017

Module/Topic

Pages and Components

Chapter

10

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 15 May 2017

Module/Topic

Processing and Navigation

Chapter

11

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11 Begin Date: 22 May 2017

Module/Topic

Transactions

Chapter

8 & 9

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assignment 2 Due: Week 11 Friday (26 May 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 12 Begin Date: 29 May 2017

Module/Topic

Messaging

Chapter

13

Events and Submissions/Topic

Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 05 Jun 2017

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 12 Jun 2017

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Term Specific Information

The unit coordinator of Term 1, 2017

Dr. Wei Li

School of Engineering & Technology
Central Queensland University
Rockhampton QLD 4702, Australia
Phone: +61 7 4930 9686
Email: w.li@cqu.edu.au

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Assignment 1

Task Description

Your task for this assignment is to write a technical report on the topic of Review of Cloud Computing, which is a service-oriented architecture for enterprise computing. The purpose of this assignment is to assess your competency in review, critique and clarification of a technical issue and writing a formal academic report.

The assignment specification and marking criteria can be found from the unit web site.


Assessment Due Date

Week 5 Friday (7 Apr 2017) 11:45 pm AEST

Assignment-1 Due


Return Date to Students

Week 6 Friday (21 Apr 2017)

Assignment-1 Results Release


Weighting
20%

Assessment Criteria

The assignment will be assessed by the format, technical contents and referencing of the report. The detailed marking criteria can be found from the unit web site.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Compare and contrast the major enterprise software architectures.
  • Analyse and evaluate the design options available for each tier in a typical 3-tiered application.
  • Assess the potential business impact of emerging enterprise computing technologies.
  • Critically evaluate key research areas in enterprise computing.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Research

2 Practical and Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Assignment 2

Task Description

Your task for this assignment is to design, implement, test and document a 3-tier enterprise application system. The purpose of this assignment is to assess your competency in enterprise computing paradigm, JSF, EJB and JPA programming and the interoperations between layers of an enterprise application.

The assignment specification and marking criteria can be found from the unit web site.


Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Friday (26 May 2017) 11:45 pm AEST

Assignment-2 Due


Return Date to Students

Review/Exam Week Friday (9 June 2017)

Assignment-2 Results Release


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

The assignment will be assessed by the design and test document and the software implementation. The detailed marking criteria can be found from the unit web site.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse and evaluate the design options available for each tier in a typical 3-tiered application.
  • Design and implement complex 3-tier applications.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills

Examination

Outline
Complete an invigilated examination

Date
During the examination period at a CQUniversity examination centre

Weighting
40%

Length
120 minutes

Exam Conditions
Open Book

Materials
Calculator - non-programmable, no text retrieval, silent only
Dictionary - non-electronic, concise, direct translation only (dictionary must not contain any notes or comments).
Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?