This assessment 1 is split into two (2) deliverables:

• Part A: Group Project Proposal (17%)
• Part B: Individual Reflection and Learning Plan (8%)

This is the first milestone of your capstone project and focuses on defining, justifying, and planning your proposed project. You are required to form a group of three to four members (subject to class size) and identify an industry-based or case based project. Projects must be approved by the project facilitator (Unit Coordinator or campus lecturer). You are strongly encouraged to source a real-world project. The proposed project must demonstrate sufficient complexity to showcase your business analysis knowledge and skills while remaining feasible to complete within the term.

Part A: Group Project Proposal (17%):

As a group, you must submit a Project Proposal that includes:

• Project background and justification
• Problem statement and objectives
• Innovative aspects of the proposed solution
• Project scope, assumptions, and constraints
• High-level requirements overview
• Work decomposition (e.g., WBS, backlog structure)
• Delivery roadmap (e.g., Gantt chart)
• Risk identification and mitigation plan
• Quality considerations
• Team structure, roles, and responsibilities matrix
• Identification of task leads for each major deliverable
• Required tools and resources

The proposal should clearly demonstrate conceptual thinking, analytical capability, and alignment between business needs and the proposed solution.
Part B: Individual Learning Plan (8%):

Each student must submit an Individual Learning Plan that includes:

• Identification of personal learning goals relevant to the project
• Knowledge and skills gaps are to be developed during the term
• Planned strategies for acquiring required skills
• Description of meaningful contributions to the team
• Reflection on professional responsibility and ethical considerations

This component assesses your readiness for self-directed learning, professional growth, and accountability within a team environment.

AI Assessment Scale - AI Collaboration
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.

Individual and Group Contributions:
The proposal is primarily group work (17%), but individual reflections (8%) will be marked separately. All group submissions must include a clear declaration of individual contributions. If contributions vary significantly, individual marks may differ. Failure to declare contributions may result in a deduction as specified in the marking guide.

IMPORTANT NOTE
This assessment is exempt from the 72-hour submission grace period and must be submitted by the stated due date and time. Please refer to Moodle for detailed marking criteria and submission instructions.

Assessment Criteria-Project Proposal and Learning Plan
Part A: Group Project Proposal (17%)
The Project Proposal and Plan will be assessed based on the following criteria:
1. Project Justification and Problem Definition

• Clarity of problem statement
• Strength of project rationale and business need
• Alignment between objectives and the identified organisational issue
• Demonstration of innovative thinking

2. Scope, Requirements and Feasibility

• Clear definition of project scope, assumptions, and constraints
• High-level identification of stakeholder needs
• Evidence that the project is feasible within the term
• Appropriate level of complexity

3. Project Planning and Structure

• Quality and logical structure of work decomposition (WBS)
• Deliverable roadmap (e.g., Gantt chart)
• Clear allocation of roles and responsibilities
• Identification of task leads 

4. Risk and Quality Considerations

• Identification of key project risks
• Appropriateness of mitigation strategies
• Consideration of quality management principles

5. Team Organisation and Resource Planning

• Clear team structure and role clarity
• Identification of required tools, technologies, and resources

6. Professional Presentation and Communication

• Logical organisation and structure
• Academic writing quality Correct use of Harvard referencing (where applicable)
• Professional formatting and clarity

Part B: Individual Learning Plan(8%)
The Individual Learning Plan will be assessed based on:

1. Identification of Learning Goals

• Clear identification of relevant technical and professional skills
• Alignment between learning goals and project requirements

2. Self-Assessment and Knowledge Gap Analysis

• Insightful reflection on current competencies
• Identification of realistic skill gaps

3. Strategy for Skill Development

• Practical and achievable strategies for skill improvement
• Evidence of self-directed learning planning

4. Planned Contribution and Professional Responsibility

• Clear explanation of intended project contributions
• Demonstration of accountability and teamwork readiness
• Awareness of ethical and professional considerations.

This assessment 2 (25%) is split into two (2) deliverables:

• Progress Report 1 (12.5%) due in week 6
• Progress Report 2 (12.5%) due in week 9

Assessment 2 requires you to submit an individual Progress Report that demonstrates your contributions and development throughout the project. The purpose of this task is to monitor your engagement, technical progress, and professional participation before submission of the final report. In this report, you must provide clear and verifiable evidence of the work you have completed in alignment with the responsibilities assigned to you in the approved Project Proposal.
Evidence may include GitHub commit history, Jira or Trello task logs, modelling artefacts, updated requirements documentation, design specifications, prototype components, meeting action items, or other approved project management tools. The evidence must clearly identify your individual contribution and demonstrate measurable progress.

You must also demonstrate substantial advancement in requirements development, analysis, and design activities relevant to your role in the project. The submission should show refinement and evolution of artefacts rather than repetition of earlier drafts. In addition, you are required to provide a reflective self-assessment outlining tasks completed, challenges encountered, problem-solving strategies used, time management, contribution to team collaboration, and areas for improvement. The reflection should demonstrate accountability and professional growth. Attendance and meaningful participation in scheduled mentor meetings are expected throughout the term. Evidence of engagement, including meeting discussions and assigned action items, may be considered when evaluating your progress.

AI Assessment Scale - AI Collaboration
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.

IMPORTANT NOTE
This assessment is exempt from the 72-hour submission grace period and must be submitted by the stated due date and time. Please refer to Moodle for detailed marking criteria and submission instructions.

Assessment Criteria- Project Progress

1. Evidence of Individual Contribution

• Clear alignment between completed tasks and those allocated in the Project Proposal
• Strong, verifiable evidence provided (e.g., GitHub commits, Jira logs, modelling artefacts, documentation updates)
• Demonstration of measurable and meaningful progress
• Clear distinction of individual work

2. Progress in Achieving Project Goals

• Demonstrated advancement in requirements development
• Refinement of documentation and models
• Logical progression toward final deliverables
• Technical accuracy and depth

3. Reflection and Professional Accountability

• Critical self-assessment
• Identification of challenges and problem-solving approaches
• Evidence of learning and improvement
• Clear action plan for the remaining project work

4. Minimum Engagement and Professional Conduct

• Attendance and weekly progress updates are required via the online system or in a meeting
• Demonstrated understanding of assigned responsibilities
• Professional communication and structured presentation of the report

Assessment 3 is one deliverable: Project Final Report (35%)

To pass this assessment, you must achieve a minimum of 50% of the total 40% weighting and meet any specified minimum mark requirements for the individual components. The Project Final Report is the culminating deliverable of the capstone project. It must comprehensively document the technical artefacts, analytical processes, and project management activities undertaken throughout the entire project lifecycle. This report should demonstrate the integration of business analysis knowledge, project management principles, technical design capability, and professional practice developed during your course of study.

Task Description:

As a group, you are required to submit a comprehensive and professionally structured Final Report that documents:

• The complete scope and outcomes of the project
• The development and refinement of project artefacts
• The evolution of requirements and design decisions
• The implementation and/or prototype development (where applicable)
• The evaluation of proposed solutions
• Ethical and professional considerations encountered or anticipated

The structure and specific technical artefacts included in the report may vary depending on the chosen topic and the problem being addressed. However, the report must clearly demonstrate systematic progression from problem identification to solution evaluation.

AI Assessment Scale - AI Collaboration
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.

IMPORTANT NOTE
This assessment is exempt from the 72-hour submission grace period and must be submitted by the stated due date and time. Please refer to Moodle for detailed marking criteria and submission instructions.

Assessment Criteria-Project Final Report
1. Project Overview and Problem Definition

• Clear articulation of project background, objectives, and scope
• Logical alignment between the identified problem and the proposed solution
• Comprehensive stakeholder overview
• Demonstration of conceptual clarity and contextual understanding
• High marks require a well-framed, coherent, and strategically aligned project foundation

2. Quality of Technical Artefacts

• Completeness and relevance of artefacts
• Logical progression from requirements to design and solution
• Depth and technical accuracy of documentation
• Clear traceability between requirements, models, and the proposed solution
• Appropriateness of modelling techniques and analytical tools
• Integration of security, risk, and change management considerations
• High marks require technically rigorous, well-structured, and professionally presented artefacts demonstrating advanced analytical capability

3. Analysis, Evaluation and Recommendations

• Critical evaluation of candidate solutions
• Justification of design decisions
• Consideration of feasibility and limitations
• Evidence-based recommendations
• Alignment between analysis findings and proposed improvements 
• High marks require strong critical thinking, evidence-based reasoning, and practical relevance

4. Ethical and Professional Considerations

• Identification of ethical issues encountered or anticipated
• Consideration of privacy, security, and professional standards
• Awareness of legal and intellectual property implications
• Reflection on societal and organisational impacts
• Demonstration of professional responsibility
• High marks require critical engagement rather than superficial description

5. Project Management Integration

• Evidence of structured planning and execution
• Risk and change management summary
• Quality assurance considerations
• Clear documentation of team structure and coordination
• High marks require a clear demonstration of systematic project management practice

6. Professional Presentation and Academic Quality

• Logical structure and clarity
• Professional formatting and organisation
• Technical writing quality
• Proper Harvard referencing

Assessment 4 is split into two (2) deliverables:

• Final Presentation (10%) 
• Individual Reflection (5%)

Expectations of Final Presentation
Online/distance students are required to present their slides live via Zoom, while on-campus students must deliver a poster presentation. You must demonstrate a live system or prototype during your presentation. Further details will be provided on the Moodle site.
Expectations of Individual Reflection: You are expected to provide an individual reflection on your experience, demonstrating insight into your performance,
learning outcomes, strengths, challenges, and areas for future improvement.

AI Assessment Scale - AI Collaboration
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use. You may receive a Zero (0) in this assessment if you fail to appear on the planned demonstration/presentation day.

IMPORTANT NOTE
This assessment is exempt from the 72‑hour submission grace period.

Assessment Criteria-Final Presentation

1. Content Quality and Relevance

• Clear explanation of the project problem, objectives, and solution
• Sufficient technical depth
• Appropriate and meaningful contributions
• Reflection on key lessons learned
• Relevance to the discipline/major

2. Demonstration of Prototype/System

• Effective demonstration of system, model, or solution
• Appropriate technologies selected and shown
• Clear evidence of applied knowledge and technical skills

3. Organization and Flow

• Logical structure and smooth transitions between presenters
• Effective use of visual aids
• Professional preparation
• Staying within the allocated time limit

Individual Reflection:
You are required to write a reflection on your learning experiences throughout the project life cycle, highlighting the knowledge, skills, challenges, and professional growth you developed.