Overview
Systems engineering considers both the business and the technical needs of all customers, with the goal of providing a quality product that meets the user requirements. In this unit you will focus on the realisation and deployment of successful systems through the structured development process that proceeds through the entire systems life-cycle.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Prerequisite or Corequisite BUSN20016 Research in Business
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2018
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Teaching team feedback
Teaching materials
Additional teaching material that extends and compliments the material covered in the textbook will be sourced.
- Describe the processes of development and management of systems over the systems life cycle
- Critically evaluate the importance of feedback control loop and human factors in the preliminary and detailed system design
- Critically evaluate and report the common management processes used in the development, implementation and disposal of real or simulated systems
- Apply appropriate processes in the optimisation of systems using reliability testing, sustainability and evaluation
N/A
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||
| 3 - Examination - 50% | ||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | ||||
| 2 - Communication | ||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | ||||
| 4 - Research | ||||
| 5 - Self-management | ||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | ||||
| 7 - Leadership | ||||
| 8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||
| 3 - Examination - 50% | ||||||||
Textbooks
Systems Engineering and Analysis
2011 Fifth Edition (2011)
Authors: Benjamin S. Blanchard, Wolter J. Fabrycky
Pearson
Upper Saddle River Upper Saddle River , New Jersey , United States
Binding: Paperback
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- MS Office
- MS Visio
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
d.jarvis@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Systems and engineering
Chapter
Chapter 1 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Overview of the engineering systems development process
Chapter
Chapter 2 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Conceptual system design
Chapter
Chapter 3 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Preliminary system design
Chapter
Chapter 4 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Detailed design and development
Chapter
Chapter 5 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
System test, evaluation and validation
Chapter
Chapter 6 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Optimisation in design and operations
Chapter
Chapter 9 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Control concepts
Chapter
Chapter 11 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design for reliability and maintainability
Chapter
Chapters 12 and 13 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Human factors
Chapter
Chapter 14 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Producibility, disposability and sustainability
Chapter
Chapter 16 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Systems engineering management
Chapter
Chapters 18 and 19 of the textbook
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Contact details for the Unit Coordinator. Name: Dennis Jarvis: Email: d.jarvis@cqu.edu.au Office: (07) 3023 4237. Please submit questions about the unit to the 'Q&A' discussion forum in Moodle - that way, everyone can benefit from the questions and answers.
1 Written Assessment
In this group assessment, you are required to write a report which critically analyses the conceptual design phase of a systems engineering project. Projects might include designing a bridge, a dam, an environmentally-conscious building or a mechatronic system. You might not have been involved in the project personally, but some connection with the project would make the analysis more meaningful. The report should analyse the following:
- Needs definition
- Conceptual system design
The details of this assessment will be available on the unit website in Week 1.
Week 6 Friday (24 Aug 2018) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 8 Friday (7 Sept 2018)
Two weeks after submission.
Marking Assessment Criteria: Weighted 20%
1. Introduction (5 Marks)
2. Needs definition (10 Marks)
3. Conceptual design (10 Marks)
4. Conclusion (5 marks)
5. Research skills (5 marks)
6. Grammar and spelling (5 Marks)
- Describe the processes of development and management of systems over the systems life cycle
- Critically evaluate the importance of feedback control loop and human factors in the preliminary and detailed system design
- Critically evaluate and report the common management processes used in the development, implementation and disposal of real or simulated systems
- Apply appropriate processes in the optimisation of systems using reliability testing, sustainability and evaluation
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
2 Written Assessment
Your group has already analysed the conceptual design of a project in assignment 1. In this assessment, you are required to write a report which critically analyses the preliminary design and detailed design phases of the project discussed in assignment 1. Particular attention is to be paid to the system test, evaluation and validation processes employed and any optimisation that was required.
The details of this assessment will be available on the unit website in Week 1.
Week 11 Friday (28 Sept 2018) 11:45 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Friday (12 Oct 2018)
Two weeks after submission.
Marking Assessment Criteria: Weighted 30%
1. Introduction (10 Marks)
2. Preliminary design (10 Marks)
3. Detailed design and development (10 Marks)
4. System test, evaluation & validation and optimisation (10 Marks)
5. Conclusion (5 marks)
6. Research skills (10 marks)
7. Grammar and spelling (5 Marks)
- Describe the processes of development and management of systems over the systems life cycle
- Critically evaluate the importance of feedback control loop and human factors in the preliminary and detailed system design
- Critically evaluate and report the common management processes used in the development, implementation and disposal of real or simulated systems
- Apply appropriate processes in the optimisation of systems using reliability testing, sustainability and evaluation
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
Examination
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
