CQUniversity Unit Profile
CRIM11002 Criminal Justice Procedure and Analysis
Criminal Justice Procedure and Analysis
All details in this unit profile for CRIM11002 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This unit introduces you to the investigation of crime within the framework of Australian law. The social role of policing and the structure of police services are examined in depth, particularly in the context of ethics and oversight mechanisms. The historical transformations of police services are explored in order to understand the evolving nature of policing as social demands and relevant technologies also change. The scope of the power of investigation, the discretion whether or not to prosecute and the criminal adjudicatory process are considered. This unit also introduces the tools used to analyse crime and how such analysis informs decisions and interventions in the criminal justice system.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 1
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 10
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2020

Online
Rockhampton
Townsville

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 30%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 40%
3. Written Assessment
Weighting: 30%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Student evaluations

Feedback

Some students reported they would prefer a text book

Recommendation

Although some students indicate they would like a text book, many cannot afford a textbook. We will set an optional textbook for additional reading plus develop the second iteration of the study guides to fill some more of the knowledge and skills that students require.

Feedback from Student evaluations

Feedback

Some students reported this unit provided them with a good understanding of the criminal justice system and the knowledge gained from this unit will be useful throughout the course and after graduation .

Recommendation

We will use students feedback to ensure we provide our students with the necessary knowledge to equip them to work within the Criminal Justice System.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Analyse police organisations and practice in order to critique how the law governs the procedures for investigation of crime
  2. Explain how the criminal law balances the rights of the individual and the State
  3. Discuss the links between criminal theories and models of criminal analysis
  4. Identify patterns in criminal data and the appropriate response for crime prevention.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Written Assessment - 30%
2 - Written Assessment - 40%
3 - Written Assessment - 30%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Written Assessment - 30%
2 - Written Assessment - 40%
3 - Written Assessment - 30%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 6th Edition (APA 6th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Scott Beattie Unit Coordinator
s.beattie@cqu.edu.au
Masahiro Suzuki Unit Coordinator
m.suzuki@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 09 Mar 2020

Module/Topic

Introduction 

Chapter

Richards J. (2010, December 29). Native Police, Retrieved from http://www.qhatlas.com.au/content/native-police.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 2 Begin Date: 16 Mar 2020

Module/Topic

Police structure   

Chapter

Bayley, D. H. (1979). Police function, structure, and control in Western Europe and North America: Comparative and historical studies. Crime and Justice, 1, 109-144. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/449060?mobileUi=0&.

Ransely, J. & Mazerolle, L. (2009). Policing in an era of uncertainty. Police Practice and Research, 20(4), 365-381. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15614260802586335.

Stenning, P. (2000). Powers and Accountability of Private Police, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, 325-353. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008729129953.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 3 Begin Date: 23 Mar 2020

Module/Topic

Police powers   

Chapter

Queensland Government (2000). Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000. https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2000-005.

Farmer, C. (2017). Upholding whose right? Discretionary police powers to punish, collective ‘pre-victimisation’ and the dilution of individual rights. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 5(4), 493–509. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0004865816660351.

McElhone, M. (2017). ‘Now they’re extraordinary powers’: Firearms prohibition orders and warrantless search powers in New South Wales. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28(3), 329-338. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10345329.2017.12036078.

Walsh, T. & Taylor, M. (2007). ‘You're Not Welcome Here’: Police move-on powers and discrimination law, University New South Wales Law Journal, 30(1), 151-173. http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/article/youre-not-welcome-here-police-move-on-powers-and-discrimination-law/.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 4 Begin Date: 30 Mar 2020

Module/Topic

Police accountability

Chapter

The Fitzgerald Inquiry (1989). https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/about-us/our-history/fitzgerald-inquiry.

Chan, J. (1999). Governing police practice: limits of the new accountability. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 251-270. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00251.x.

Porter, L. & Warrender, C. (2009). A multivariate model of police deviance: examining the nature of corruption, crime and misconduct. Policing & Society, 19(1), 79-99.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 5 Begin Date: 06 Apr 2020

Module/Topic

Criminal offences   

Chapter

Qld Criminal Code Act (1899). https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1899-009.

Loughnan, A. (2010). Drink spiking and rock throwing: The creation and construction of criminal offences in the current era. Alternative Law Journal, 35(10), 18-21. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1037969X1003500104.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment item 1

Essay plan

Due: Week 5 Friday (10 April 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Essay plan Due: Week 5 Friday (10 Apr 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Vacation Week Begin Date: 13 Apr 2020

Module/Topic

No topic

Chapter

No chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 6 Begin Date: 20 Apr 2020

Module/Topic

Criminal trial

Chapter

Colvin, E. (2017). Bail justices in Victoria: Perceptions and experiences. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 29(2), 123-136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10345329.2017.12036091.· Langford, I. (2009). Fair trial: The history of an idea. Journal of Human Rights, 8(1): 37–52, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14754830902765857.

Paterson, J. M., van Golde, C., Devery, C. Cowdery, N. & Kemp, R. (2018). iWitnessed: Capturing contemporaneous accounts to enhance witness evidence, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 29(3), 273-281. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10345329.2018.12036102.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 7 Begin Date: 27 Apr 2020

Module/Topic

Defences

Chapter

Green, J. (1989). A provocation defence for battered women who kill. Adelaide Law Review, 12(2), 145-163. http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/AdelLawRw/1989/10.html.

O'Donovan, K. (1991). Defences for battered women who kill, Journal of Law and Society, 18(2), 219-240. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?lname=&public=false&collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/jlsocty18&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&kind=&page=219.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment item 2

Short essays

Due: Week 7 Friday (1 May 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Short essays Due: Week 7 Friday (1 May 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Week 8 Begin Date: 04 May 2020

Module/Topic

Sentencing

Chapter

Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council (2019). Sentencing Spotlights. https://www.sentencingcouncil.qld.gov.au/research/sentencing-spotlight.

Thorburn, H. & Weatherburn, D. (2018). Effect of Indigenous status on sentence outcomes for serious assault offences. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(3), 434–453. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0004865817748179.

Ellis, S., Gately, N., Rogers, S. & Horrigan, A. (2018). Give them a chance: Attitudes to sentencing young offenders in Western Australia. Youth Justice, 18(2), 169-187. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1473225418791660.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 9 Begin Date: 11 May 2020

Module/Topic

Appealing sentences

Chapter

Atkins, B. M. (1991). Party capability theory as an explanation for intervention behaviour in the English Court of Appeal. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 881-903. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2111498?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Corns, C. (2018). Leave to appeal in criminal cases: The Victorian model. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 29(1): 39-56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10345329.2017.12036084.· Songer, D. R. & Sheehan, R. S. (1992). Who wins on appeal? Upperdogs and underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeal. American Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 235-258. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2111431?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events
Week 10 Begin Date: 18 May 2020

Module/Topic

Justice and injustice

Chapter

Walker, J. & McDonald, D. (1995). The over-representation of Indigenous people in custody in Australia. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 47: 1-6. https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi47.

Diemer, K. Ross, S., Humphreys, C. & Healey, L. (2016). A ‘double edged sword’: Discretion and compulsion in policing in domestic violence. Police Practice and Research, 18(4): 339-35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15614263.2016.1230853.

Murphy, K. & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1): 181-201. https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article/52/1/181/373099.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 11 Begin Date: 25 May 2020

Module/Topic

Corrections

Chapter

The Howard League (2007). The Principles and limits of the penal system. London, UK: The Howard League. https://howardleague.org/publications/the-principles-and-limits-of-the-penal-system/.

White, R. (2004). Community corrections and restorative justice. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 16(1), 42-56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10345329.2004.12036304.· Wood, W. R. (2015). Why restorative justice will not reduce incarceration. British Journal of Criminology, 55(5), 883-900. https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article/55/5/883/478399.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment item 3

Academic essay

Due: Week 11 Friday (29 May 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Academic essay Due: Week 11 Friday (29 May 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Week 12 Begin Date: 01 Jun 2020

Module/Topic

Review - Bringing it altogether

Chapter

No chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 08 Jun 2020

Module/Topic

No topic

Chapter

No chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Exam Week Begin Date: 15 Jun 2020

Module/Topic

No topic

Chapter

No chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Essay plan

Task Description

This is an individual assignment that requires you to write an essay plan of 700 words +/- 10%. You need to complete the template provided to plan your essay. You will have to choose one of the three essay questions provided: (1) Longer (harsher) sentencing is effective in preventing recidivism, (2) Mandatory arrest by police is effective in preventing domestic violence, and (3) Rehabilitation should be the driving force of punishment. You will then need to provide three main grounds to support your position. You need to offer at least two pieces of supporting evidence for each of your ground. 


Assessment Due Date

Week 5 Friday (10 Apr 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 7 Friday (1 May 2020)


Weighting
30%

Assessment Criteria

This assignment will be assessed by four criteria. The first is argument/reasoning, in which you will be assessed by whether you provide relevant key grounds for your position, whether you support points with evidence, whether you provide logical reasoning linking evidence to grounds, and whether you mount a coherent argument. The second is content/sources, in which you will be assessed by whether you use relevant evidence/sources, whether you use quality academic sources, whether you refer to a sufficient range of key references and sources, and whether you provide details of what these sources did/found. The third is structure/focus, in which you will be assessed by whether you use the template appropriately, whether you consistently present grounds and position, and whether you plan directly address the question and takes a position. The fourth is referencing and presentation, in which you will be assessed by whether you provide in-text referencing for all arguments, whether you provide a complete list of references, and whether you use correct APA style.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse police organisations and practice in order to critique how the law governs the procedures for investigation of crime
  • Explain how the criminal law balances the rights of the individual and the State
  • Discuss the links between criminal theories and models of criminal analysis


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Short essays

Task Description

You need to answer three of four questions provided: (1) Colonisation has impacted Indigenous peoples around the world. In Queensland, our Indigenous peoples make up 95% of our incarcerated youth. Explain how the effects of colonisation can help explain these incarceration rates. (2) In recent time, we have seen more specialised courts such as Domestic Violence, Drug and Indigenous Courts. What are the advantages and disadvantages of specialty courts? You may focus one specialised court. (3) The Australian criminal court is adversarial. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the adversarial system. (4) Victims of crime and other stakeholders often criticise judicial decisions. Discuss the advantages and the disadvantages when somebody accused of murder receives a lesser charge of manslaughter because they were provoked to kill? You will then need to write a 500-word response to each question (+/- 10%). Your total word count should be 1500 words )+/- 10%).


Assessment Due Date

Week 7 Friday (1 May 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 9 Friday (15 May 2020)


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

This assessment will be assessed by four criteria. The first is structure and argument, in which you will be assessed whether you directly address the question, whether you break questions into parts and respond to each, whether you mount a coherent and logical argument, whether you integrate information from various sources, and whether you support arguments with references. The second is content, in which you will be assessed by whether you explain all relevant key terms and concepts, whether you provide a concise overview of the topic, whether you refer to sufficient range of key references, whether you draw explicit links with key literature, and whether you use relevant examples. The third is referencing, in which you will be assessed by whether you provide in-text referencing for all arguments, whether you appropriately paraphrase source materials, whether you provide a complete list of references, and whether you use correct APA style. The fourth is presentation, in which you will be assessed by whether you have a clear and readable in formatting and presentation, whether your essay is clear and readable in terms of written expression, and whether you conform with the word length requirement.


Referencing Style

Submission

No submission method provided.


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Identify patterns in criminal data and the appropriate response for crime prevention.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy

3 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Academic essay

Task Description

You are required to write a 2000-word (+/- 10%) academic essay. You must choose one of the three questions provided.


Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Friday (29 May 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Monday (15 June 2020)


Weighting
30%

Assessment Criteria

This assignment will be assessed by four criteria. The first is structure and argument, in which you will be assessed by whether Introduction defines the problem and summarises the argument, whether the essay directly addresses the question, whether the essay follows the set plan, whether you break the question into parts and responds to each, whether you support points with evidence, whether you mount a coherent and logical argument, whether you integrate information from various sources, and whether Conclusion summarises claim, grounds and main issues. The second is content, in which you will be assessed by whether you explain all relevant key terms and concepts, whether you refer to sufficient range of academic references, whether you draw explicit links between key literature and the grounds, and whether show understanding of the topic. The third is referencing, in which you will be assessed by whether you provide in-text referencing for all arguments, whether you appropriately paraphrase source material, whether you provide a complete list of references, and whether you use correct APA style. The fourth is presentation, in which you will be assessed by whether your essay is clear and readable in formatting and presentation, whether your essay is clear and readable in terms of written expression, and whether your essay conforms with the word length requirement.


Referencing Style

Submission

No submission method provided.


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse police organisations and practice in order to critique how the law governs the procedures for investigation of crime
  • Explain how the criminal law balances the rights of the individual and the State
  • Discuss the links between criminal theories and models of criminal analysis
  • Identify patterns in criminal data and the appropriate response for crime prevention.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?