CQUniversity Unit Profile
CRIM12005 Community Justice Innovation
Community Justice Innovation
All details in this unit profile for CRIM12005 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

Innovation in the justice sector is increasingly sought at community level involving Non Government Organisations (NGOs) and community organisations as well as government agencies. Through this unit you will understand this new environment and the importance of therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice as ways of understanding how justice is achieved. You will develop skills in human centred design and systems thinking that will enable you to operate in this inter-agency collaborative environment. Concepts such as social innovation will aid you in becoming a catalyst for change, in developing sustainable solutions to justice problems and participating in the changes the justice sector is undergoing.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 2
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 10
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 2 - 2020

Online
Rockhampton
Townsville

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Case Study
Weighting: 30%
2. Presentation
Weighting: 10%
3. Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books
Weighting: 30%
4. Report
Weighting: 30%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Apply the human centred design approach to justice issues and innovations
  2. Demonstrate the importance of theories of therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice in the contemporary justice field
  3. Develop an innovative response to a justice challenge
  4. Evaluate the public value generated by different community justice programs
  5. Identify opportunities for change in the justice system that are located at the community level.

No external accreditation is relevant to this award.

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Case Study - 30%
2 - Presentation - 10%
3 - Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books - 30%
4 - Report - 30%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Case Study - 30%
2 - Presentation - 10%
3 - Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books - 30%
4 - Report - 30%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Masahiro Suzuki Unit Coordinator
m.suzuki@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 13 Jul 2020

Module/Topic

Introduction

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 2 Begin Date: 20 Jul 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (1) - origin, concept, definition

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 3 Begin Date: 27 Jul 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (2) - principle, practice, theory

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 4 Begin Date: 03 Aug 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (3) - empirical studies on offenders

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 5 Begin Date: 10 Aug 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (4) - empirical studies on victims and other stakeholders

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Vacation Week Begin Date: 17 Aug 2020

Module/Topic

No topic

Chapter

No chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 6 Begin Date: 24 Aug 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (5) - critical debates

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Item 1

Report. Due: Week 6 Friday (28 August 2020) 9:00 am AEST

Assessment Item 2

Presentation. Due: Week 6 Friday (28 August 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Presentation Due: Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Report Due: Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Week 7 Begin Date: 31 Aug 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (6) - current research trends

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 8 Begin Date: 07 Sep 2020

Module/Topic

Restorative justice (7) - beyond criminal justice settings

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 9 Begin Date: 14 Sep 2020

Module/Topic

Therapeutic jurisprudence (1) - concept, application

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 10 Begin Date: 21 Sep 2020

Module/Topic

Therapeutic jurisprudence (2) - drug courts, mental health courts, family violence courts, Indigenous courts

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Week 11 Begin Date: 28 Sep 2020

Module/Topic

Community policing

Chapter

· Putt, J. (2011). Community policing in rural and remote Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp111.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Item 3

Learning logs. Due: Week 11 Friday (2 October 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Learning Logs Due: Week 11 Friday (2 Oct 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Week 12 Begin Date: 05 Oct 2020

Module/Topic

Review

Chapter

No reading

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 12 Oct 2020

Module/Topic

No topic

Chapter

No reading

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Item 4

Case study. Due: Exam Week Friday (16 October 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Case STudy Due: Review/Exam Week Friday (16 Oct 2020) 9:00 am AEST
Exam Week Begin Date: 19 Oct 2020

Module/Topic

No topic

Chapter

No reading

Events and Submissions/Topic

No events

Assessment Tasks

1 Case Study

Assessment Title
Case STudy

Task Description

Students will complete a 1500-word case study examining a community justice program. They have to:

1. Identify an agency that works under the philosophy of community justice (e.g. neighbourhood justice centre, community policing initiative or local crime control project).

2. Briefly describe the work of the agency and describe the ‘philosophy’ upon which the agency bases its practices (e.g. restorative justice, therapeutic jurisprudence, community policing).

3. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of what this agency does in terms of community justice.


Assessment Due Date

Review/Exam Week Friday (16 Oct 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Friday (23 Oct 2020)


Weighting
30%

Assessment Criteria

This assignment will be assessed by five criteria. The first is Introduction, in which students will be assessed by whether they will clearly outline their main arguments and signpost their supporting arguments in Introduction. The second is Description of agency, in which students will be assessed by whether they clearly describe the work and philosophy of the agency they focus on Case Study. The third is Analysis of the agency, in which students will be assessed by whether they relate the work of the agency to community justice practices, such as restorative justice, therapeutic jurisprudence, and community policing. The fourth is Conclusion, in which students will be assessed by whether they clearly summarise their main arguments in Conclusion. The fifth is Clarity of expression and referencing, in which students will be assessed by whether their writing structure is logical and adheres to the format including referencing.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit as Word or PDF

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Demonstrate the importance of theories of therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice in the contemporary justice field
  • Evaluate the public value generated by different community justice programs


Graduate Attributes
  • Critical Thinking
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice
  • Social Innovation

2 Presentation

Assessment Title
Presentation

Task Description

Alongside Report, students will create a 3-minute video of their spoken presentation of the pitch for funding a small restorative justice initiative. The video should be a summary of your report including:

· A hypothetical crime problem

· What restorative justice is

· How you apply restorative justice to the problem

· Why restorative justice is effective


Assessment Due Date

Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 8 Friday (11 Sept 2020)


Weighting
10%

Assessment Criteria

This assignment will be assessed by five criteria. The first is Introduction, in which students will be assessed by whether they present their key points at the beginning of their presentation. The second is Knowledge of content, in which students will be assessed by whether they have a thorough knowledge of the content as demonstrated by their handling of research of the presentation topic. Thir third is Organisation of presentation, in which students will be assessed by whether they present information and ideas in a logical and interesting sequence, which the audience can easily follow. The fourth is Visual aids, in which students will be assessed by whether their use of visual aids effectively support and add impact to the presentation. The fifth is Conclusion, in which students will be assessed by whether they have clear and concise summary with effective links to the introduction and body of the presentation.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit as a Video file (.3gp .avi .dv .dif .flv .f4v .mov .movie .mp4 .m4v .mpeg .mpe .mpg .ogv .qt .rmvb .rv .swf .swfl .webm .wmv .asf).

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Apply the human centred design approach to justice issues and innovations


Graduate Attributes
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Social Innovation

3 Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books

Assessment Title
Learning Logs

Task Description

Students are provided with a task to complete in Modules 2-11 the study guide. These short tasks make up the learning logs, and there are 10 tasks in total. Each task is relevant to that week’s particular topic and will develop your knowledge and reflections in relation to community justice. Word length per task is 100 words (+/- 10%). There are 10 tasks to complete (total 1,000 words). Responses must be written as complete sentences except where tables or bullet points are appropriate.


Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Friday (2 Oct 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Review/Exam Week Friday (16 Oct 2020)


Weighting
30%

Assessment Criteria

This assignment will be assessed by three criteria. The first is Level of reflection, in which students will be assessed whether they describe a number of events and reflects critically on them in a deep and significant way. The second is Presentation, communication & evidence, in which students will be assessed by whether their writing has excellent individual and overall structure, which leads to clear narrative and sub-narratives. The third is Completeness, in which students will be assessed by whether they have concrete connections between logs entries into a whole, demonstrating clear steps in the developmental learning process. 


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit as Word or PDF

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Apply the human centred design approach to justice issues and innovations
  • Demonstrate the importance of theories of therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice in the contemporary justice field
  • Identify opportunities for change in the justice system that are located at the community level.


Graduate Attributes
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice
  • Social Innovation

4 Report

Assessment Title
Report

Task Description

Students will prepare a 1000-word report, which involves a pitch for funding a small restorative justice initiative. They have to:

· Set out (1) a hypothetical crime problem that you are going to address in the neighbourhood justice initiative (e.g., theft of vehicles in the community) and (2) a target funding agency (e.g., government, philanthropic foundation)

· Explain what restorative justice is

· Describe how you apply restorative justice to the problem

· Discuss why restorative justice is an effective mechanism to address the problem.

Note: I have also revised the assessment instruction that is uploaded on Moodle.


Assessment Due Date

Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 8 Friday (11 Sept 2020)


Weighting
30%

Assessment Criteria

This assignment will be assessed by four criteria. The first is Introduction and conclusion, in which students will be assessed by whether they clearly describe their main argument in Introduction and draw major themes together in Conclusion. The second is Description of restorative justice, in which students will be assessed by whether they demonstrate a clear understanding of restorative justice. The third is Application and discussion of restorative justice, in which students will be assessed by whether they have excellent and original illustrations of the application of restorative justice with evidence. The fourth is Clarity of expression and referencing, in which students will be assessed by whether they have a logical structure and adhere to the format including referencing. 


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit as Word or PDF

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Develop an innovative response to a justice challenge
  • Evaluate the public value generated by different community justice programs
  • Identify opportunities for change in the justice system that are located at the community level.


Graduate Attributes
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Team Work
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice
  • Social Innovation

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?