Overview
In this unit you will examine the justice systems and practices of Indigenous Australian communities and their relationships with Western justice institutions. Indigenous Australian understandings of Western law and justice will also be compared to the situations and principles of international Indigenous communities. You will discuss and evaluate community justice innovations that seek to respond to Indigenous interests and to embrace Indigenous perspectives and voices. Through analysis of these innovations you will demonstrate the importance of empowering communities to find solutions to their problems. You will develop skills to identify the position of Indigenous people within the Western criminal justice system and you will develop your Indigenous cultural competency to a higher level.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2022
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
- Compare and contrast the key features of Indigenous justice and differences from the Western justice system
- Critically express the importance of listening to and empowering communities
- Discuss the effectiveness of Indigenous justice projects in Australia and overseas
- Evaluate innovations and programs in the Indigenous justice field
- Explore best practice for the development and implementation of Indigenous cultural competency at a professional level.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 30% | |||||
2 - Online Quiz(zes) - 20% | |||||
3 - Research Assignment - 20% | |||||
4 - Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books - 30% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1 - Communication | |||||
2 - Problem Solving | |||||
3 - Critical Thinking | |||||
4 - Information Literacy | |||||
5 - Team Work | |||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||
8 - Ethical practice | |||||
9 - Social Innovation | |||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
2 - Online Quiz(zes) - 20% | ||||||||||
3 - Research Assignment - 20% | ||||||||||
4 - Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books - 30% |
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Mozilla Hubs and Spoke
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing styles below:
- Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 4th ed
- American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
k.e.buchanan@cqu.edu.au
s.beattie@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Planet Justice
Chapter
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)
United Nations (2009) 'State of the World's Indigenous Peoples Vol 1', pp 1-11, 220-238 https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/state-of-the-worlds-indigenous-peoples.html
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Who speaks for the people?
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Who speaks for the past?
Chapter
Blagg, Harry, and Thalia Anthony. "Postcolonial Criminology: “The Past Isn’t Over…”." Decolonising Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2019. 31-54. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Web.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The legacy of the colonisers
Chapter
Carol A. Hand , Judith Hankes & Toni House (2012) Restorative justice: the indigenous justice system, Contemporary Justice Review, 15:4, 449-467, DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2012.734576
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Images of Indigeneity
Chapter
The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission Manitoba
Chapter 2: Aboriginal Concepts of Justice
Spiegel, Samuel J, Sarah Thomas, Kevin O'Neill, Cassandra Brondgeest, Jen Thomas, Jiovanni Beltran, Terena Hunt, and Annalee Yassi. "Visual Storytelling, Intergenerational Environmental Justice and Indigenous Sovereignty: Exploring Images and Stories amid a Contested Oil Pipeline Project." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17.7 (2020): 2362. Web.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The state and structural violence
Chapter
Emery-Whittington, Isla G. "Occupational Justice—Colonial Business as Usual? Indigenous Observations From Aotearoa New Zealand: La Justice Occupationnelle : Sous Régime Colonial Comme D’habitude? Observations D’autochtones D'Aotearoa En Nouvelle-Zélande." Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy (1939) 88.2 (2021): 153-62. Web.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Soft power and resistance
Chapter
“Who Speaks for Place” in Blagg, H., & Anthony, T. (2019). Decolonising criminology : Imagining justice in a postcolonial world. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Conflicts and challenges
Chapter
Stephen Cornell (2018) Justice as Position, Justice as Practice: Indigenous Governance at the Boundary in Indigenous Justice : New Tools, Approaches, and Spaces, edited by Jennifer Hendry, et al., Palgrave Macmillan UK. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?docID=5398697.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Power and corruption
Chapter
Salo de Carvalho, David R Goyes, Valeria Vegh Weis, Politics and Indigenous Victimization: The Case of Brazil, The British Journal of Criminology, Volume 61, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 251–271, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa060
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Design for justice
Chapter
Poiner, H., & Drake, C. (2021). Transformative or Tokenistic? Exploring the Legitimacy of Participatory Design Methods within an Indigenous Context. M/C Journal, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2809
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Who speaks for the people (reprise)?
Chapter
Sharon Toi (2018) Mana Wahine: Decolonising Governance?, in Indigenous Justice : New Tools, Approaches, and Spaces, edited by Jennifer Hendry, et al., Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?docID=5398697.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Launch of virtual exhibitions
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Online Quiz(zes)
In this unit you will develop skills in Indigenous cultural literacy and in professional communication. There are two online quizzes to be completed early in the term (weeks 3 and 4), testing foundational knowledge and verifying students’ ability to proceed with the other assessment tasks.
Quiz 1 - Indigenous cultural competency (10 marks, week 3)
This quiz refers to content from the first two weeks of this unit but also requires you to make your own judgement, it is not simply about recalling information. This quiz will present short answer questions that test knowledge of learning module materials and prescribed readings.
Quiz 2 - Communicating with Mozilla Hubs (10 marks, week 4)
In this unit you will create an online virtual museum using Mozilla Hubs using skills developed in learning module 3 and required reading/viewing tasks. This quiz assesses your understanding of the fundamental skills involved and the restrictions around use of content such as cultural protocols and intellectual property. This quiz presents a combination of short answer and multiple choice questions.
1
Other
Due weeks 3 and 4
Two weeks from submission.
- Understanding of principles and practice
- Application of knowledge to factual situations
- Understanding of the practical and professional context in which the skills are used
No submission method provided.
- Explore best practice for the development and implementation of Indigenous cultural competency at a professional level.
- Problem Solving
- Cross Cultural Competence
2 Written Assessment
1500 words maximum. Due week 12
In this unit you will select an Indigenous First Nation and explore the concept of Indigenous justice based on their perspective. You will collect ten artefacts (image, text, audio, video or other digital format) and present these in a Mozilla Hubs space, accompanied by curation text that provides context (approx 100 words).
Examples:
- Maori (Aotearoa)
- First Nations (United States or Canada)
- Romani (Europe)
- Sa’mi (Finland and Norway)
- Ainu (Japan)
- Nahua (Mexico and Central America)
- Peul (Burkina Faso and Central Africa)
Your virtual exhibition must be completed and ready for assessment in week 12. You must submit the URL of your exhibition to the unit coordinator before week 10 in order for this to be included in the exhibition launch.
You will also submit a .doc version of your curation text that includes references and further academic discussion of your selected artefacts, 1500 words maximum. This is also due in week 12 and must also include the URL of your museum.
The requirements for these artefacts are established in the learning modules and will be discussed in the workshops. You are not required to present these artefacts in your museum using the same order or using the same titles. The .doc version should however present the artefacts in the order established by the learning modules and clearly state which artefact relates to which module.
Museums may be created in a team that focuses on a particular first nation if you want to, but each team member must curate their own artefacts and submit an individual .doc assignment.
Week 12 Friday (3 June 2022) 11:45 pm AEST
Two weeks after submission
- Clarity of presentation
- Connection between different artefacts, so that a viewer is able to explore a particular narrative to make sense of them
- Critical thinking in the selection and curation of artefacts
- Ability to follow the design brief including the submitting URL on time and meeting the design specifications, including spelling, IP control and referencing.
No submission method provided.
- Discuss the effectiveness of Indigenous justice projects in Australia and overseas
- Evaluate innovations and programs in the Indigenous justice field
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
- Social Innovation
3 Research Assignment
1500 words maximum, due week 13
At the end of this unit, you will reflect on your learning, using the framework established below. First, consider this quote from cultural theorist Stuart Hall:
- Certainly, the colonised other was constituted within the regimes of representation of such a metropolitan centre. Those colonised persons were placed in their otherness, in the marginality, by the nature of the “English eye,” the all-encompassing “English eye.” The “English eye” sees everything else but is not so good at recognising that it is itself actually looking at something. It becomes coterminous with sight itself. It is, of course, a structured representation nevertheless and it is a cultural representation that is always binary. That is to say, English identity is strongly centred; knowing where it is, what it is, it places everything else.
Stuart Hall, ‘The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity’, in Anne McClintock, Aarmir Mufti and Ella Shohat (eds), Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1997, p. 174.
Reflect on what you have learned about Indigenous justice and your chosen First Nation or Indigenous community using the following framework. Do not respond directly to this structure as a series of questions to be answered. Instead you should create your own thesis/central argument about Indigenous Justice, using this structure and your workbook observations as an initial starting point. This argument must be supported by reference to theory and concepts from unit readings and from your own research.
Review/Exam Week Friday (10 June 2022) 11:45 pm AEST
Two weeks from date of submission
- Clear expression
- Ability to address the guided reflection framework, using an academic level of analysis
- Connection of discussion to unit themes, readings and independent research
- Ability to contextualise discussion to learning across the criminology course and other studies where applicable
- Presentation of a structured argument that includes a core thesis and conclusions
No submission method provided.
- Critically express the importance of listening to and empowering communities
- Communication
- Critical Thinking
- Cross Cultural Competence
4 Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books
Two submissions of 1000 words maximum each, due weeks 6 and 11
The workshops in this unit will involve discussion of the weekly readings and consideration of artefacts for inclusion in your virtual museum. The assessment for this is the standard model used for CQU Criminology units.
The workbook is to be submitted in two stages, to allow for feedback. You will select three workbooks from modules 1-5 to be submitted in week 6 and three workbooks from modules 6-10 to be submitted in week 11. These assessments have a maximum of 1000 words each.
Part one is due in week 6, part 2 is due in week 11
Two weeks from date of submission
- Use creative problem solving in response to challenges.
- Report succinctly on challenge task activities and what you have learnt from them.
- Reflect on your learning process and set educational goals for the future.
- Understand how theories and concepts from the coursework integrate into practical and applied situations.
- Participate in small team activities (synchronous and asynchronous) and actively support peers’ learning.
No submission method provided.
- Compare and contrast the key features of Indigenous justice and differences from the Western justice system
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Cross Cultural Competence
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.