Overview
This foundation unit will introduce you to core concepts in the field of domestic and family violence practice including the influence of socio-political structures, particularly as they impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. There is a specific focus on investigating terminology issues and the prevailing understanding of domestic and family violence at state, national and global levels. Critical use is made of contemporary research, and practice and policy documents that address domestic and family violence (including intimate partner violence and the abuse of children, older persons, parents, siblings and animals). You will explore legal and safety considerations that arise from working in this context and consider ethical, professional and self-management implications for practice.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 3 - 2019
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student feedback
Students noted that they wanted more personal practical relevance in the assessment items, as they weren't able to see the connection between the assignment and their daily work practices
Alter assessment items so they focus more specifically on the student's workplace rather than workplaces in general.
Feedback from Student feedback
Some of the student feedback highlighted that students valued the assessment templates and this assisted them to structure and write their assignments.
Continued use of assessment templates to assist student writing.
Feedback from Personal reflection
When I ran the tutorials, I noticed that students who attended most highly valued the information on how to write the assignments.
Pre-record a video on each assignment to ensure that all students have access to information on writing the assignments whenever they choose to access that information.
Feedback from Personal reflection
I believe that students appreciated the weekly announcements, as it gave them a sense of connection to the unit and kept them updated on important information for the unit.
Send weekly announcements to keep students engaged with the unit and informed on key issues beyond the assessment items.
- Critique the socio-political structures associated with domestic and family violence; particularly as they impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
- Identify and describe relevant research and other sources of data related to domestic and family violence integrating terminology appropriate to the field.
- Analyse the basis for contemporary theories of domestic and family violence, with a focus on gender.
- Evaluate a range of types of domestic and family violence and related impacts, theories, history and legislation.
- Examine the ethical and legal context of professional practice in domestic and family violence.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Portfolio - 30% | |||||
| 2 - Portfolio - 30% | |||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | |||||
| 2 - Communication | |||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | |||||
| 4 - Research | |||||
| 5 - Self-management | |||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | |||||
| 7 - Leadership | |||||
| 8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1 - Portfolio - 30% | ||||||||
| 2 - Portfolio - 30% | ||||||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 6th Edition (APA 6th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
e.hurrenpaterson@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Chapter
Phillips, J. & Vandenbroek, P. (2014). Domestic, family and sexual violence in Australia: An overview of the issues. Parliamentary Library Research Paper. Parliament of Australia: Department of Parliamentary Services.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Key concepts and definitions - Domestic and Family Violence: Intimate Partner Violence; Elder Abuse; Sibling Abuse
Chapter
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2013). Defining the data challenge for family, domestic and sexual violence, 4529. Canberra, ACT: ABS.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2009). Issues in defining family and domestic violence. Canberra, ACT: ABS.
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy. J. A., Zwi, A. B. & Lozano, R. (Eds.) (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, CH: World Health Organization.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Contemporary theories of Domestic and Family Violence
Chapter
Lawson, J. (2012). Sociological theories of intimate partner violence. Environment, 22, 572-590
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Contemporary theories of Domestic and Family Violence (continued)
Chapter
Bograd, M. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 275-289.
Meyer, S. (2012). Why women stay. A theoretical examination of rational choice and moral reasoning in the context of intimate partner violence. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 45, 179-193.
Sokoloff, N. J.,& Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersection of race, class and gender challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38-64.
Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. (2014). Australian’s attitudes to violence against women. Findings from the 2013 National Community Attitudes towards Violence Against Women Survey (NCAS). Melbourne, VIC: Author.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Data sources and challenges: Retrieving and analysing data; identifying data challenges
Chapter
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Defining the data challenge for family, domestic and sexual violence. Canberra, ACT: ABS.
Kavanagh, A. & Robinson, S. (2015). We count what matters, and violence against people with disability matters. The Conversation.
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA). (2018). Code of conduct for nurses. Principle 3: Cultural practice and respectful relationships. Melbourne, VIC: NMBA.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The impact of Domestic and Family Violence: Short- and long-term health, economic and social consequences; global and national perspectives
Chapter
Braaf, R. & Barrett Meyering, I. (2011). Seeking security: Promoting women's economic wellbeing following domestic violence. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse, Sydney.
Morgan, A., & Chadwick, H. (2009). Key issues in domestic violence. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology.
VicHealth. (2011) Preventing violence against women in Australia: Research summary: Addressing the social and economic determinants of mental and physical health. Melbourne, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
History and legislation: Violence against women movement; implications of legislation for victims and perpetrators
Chapter
Ailwood, S., Esteal, P., & Kennedy, J. (2012). Law’s indifference to women’s experience of violence: Colonial and contemporary Australia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35, 86-96.
Douglas, H. (2008). Criminal Law's Response to Domestic Violence: What's Going On? Sydney Law Review, 30, 439-469.
Longbottom, M. (2018, June 8). Systemic responses continue to fail and traumatise Aboriginal women who survive violence. IndigenousX. Retrieved from https://indigenousx.com.au
Weldon, S. L. & Htun, M. (2013). Feminist mobilisation and progressive policy change: Why governments take action to combat violence against women. Gender & Development, 21, 231-247.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
At-risk groups: Socio-political structures and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
Chapter
Cheers, B., Binell, M., Coleman, H., Gentle, I., Miller, G., Taylor, J., & Weetra, C. (2006). Family violence: An Indigenous community tells its story. International Social Work, 49, 51-63.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
At risk groups: Socio-political structures and other groups, including CALD communities, women with disabilities, older people, women in rural/ remote communities
Chapter
Mays, J.M. (2006). Feminist disability theory: Domestic violence against women with a disability. Disability & Society, 21, 147-158.
Guggisberg, M., Henricksen, J., & Holt, A. (2017). Violence against women with intellectual disability: A quest for special sexual violence prevention education in tandem. Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 2, 1-3.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Ethical and legal context of professional practice
Chapter
Queensland Government. (2002). Practice standards for working with women affected by domestic and family violence. Brisbane, QLD: Department of Families.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Ethical and legal context of professional practice (continued)
Chapter
Healey, L., Humphreys, C., & Howe, K. (2013). Inclusive domestic violence interventions for women with disabilities. Violence & Victims, 28, 50-68.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Contemporary portrayals and debates in domestic and family violence
Chapter
Allen, M. (2011). Is there gender symmetry in intimate partner violence? Child & Family Social Work, 16, 245-254. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00735.x/pdf
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Portfolio
1500 words (+/- 10%)
For this portfolio activity, you are asked to identify and explain the key features of intersectionality as it relates to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivor experiences of Domestic and Family Violence (DFV) and service delivery in this area. NOTE: Family violence is a preferred term among Indigenous Australian communities. You should review and analyse national and international theoretical and empirical evidence to address where the theory’s origins are situated and more broadly how it relates to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivors’ experiences in the Australian context.
A minimum of six academic references (i.e. journal articles and grey literature) are required for this assessment piece. In addition, you should draw on current Australian statistics (e.g. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare etc).
The following points should be embedded in your assignment:
- Key features and origins of this theoretical perspective in relation to DFV
- How this theoretical perspective can be used to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivors of family violence (i.e. Present relevant Australian statistics pertaining to the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivors in relation to prevalence and severity. Consider barriers to service provision as a consequence of their intersecting vulnerabilities).
- Explain how this theoretical framework can be applied to guide ethical service delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivors (If you currently work in a DFV-related field, you may choose to present your own de-identified practice examples to illustrate your arguments. Alternatively, you may draw examples from appropriate literature)
The assignment should be presented in essay format using Times News Roman 12 point font with 1.5 spacing. Your essay should contain a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. The conclusion should contain no new information and no citations, but should summarise the key points/take home messages. You are permitted to use subheadings. You must use APA referencing style.
Week 5 Monday (16 Dec 2019) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 7 Monday (6 Jan 2020)
Feedback will be provided within 10 working days of submission
| DFVP20001 – Portfolio Activity 1: Intersectionality Theory | |||||
High Distinction (100-85) |
Distinction (84-75) |
Credit (74-65) |
Pass (64-50) |
Fail (49-0) |
|
| Key features and origins of intersectionality theory in relation to DFV (30%) | Provides elaborate and insightful description of key features and origins of intersectionality theory in relation to DFV | Provides insightful description of key features and origins of intersectionality theory in relation to DFV | Provides appropriate description of key features and origins of intersectionality theory in relation to DFV | Attempt at description of key features and/or origins of intersectionality theory in relation to DFV but limited | Description of key features and/or origins of intersectionality theory in relation to DFV is absent |
| Application of intersectionality theory to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivors of DFV in Australia (30%) | Outstanding application of intersectionality theory to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivor-victims; comprehensive understanding of the relationship between theory and prevalence, severity and barriers to service provision | Excellent application of intersectionality theory to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivor-victims; very good understanding of the relationship between theory and prevalence, severity and barriers to service provision | Well considered application of intersectionality theory to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivor-victims; good understanding of the relationship between theory and prevalence, severity and barriers to service provision | Clear and logical application of intersectionality theory to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivor-victims; competent understanding of the relationship between theory and prevalence, severity and barriers to service provision | Unclear/inconsistent/ illogical application of intersectionality theory to explain over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivor-victims; understanding of the relationship between theory and prevalence, severity and barriers to service provision is not demonstrated |
| Application of intersectionality theory to guide ethical service delivery for representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victim-survivors in Australia (30%) | Outstanding application of intersectionality theory to guide ethical service delivery, illustrative examples very well presented and great insight demonstrated with key issues well elaborated upon | Excellent application of intersectionality theory to guide ethical service delivery, illustrative examples outline relevant practice elements of service delivery, and insight demonstrated with key issues discussed | Well considered application of intersectionality theory to guide ethical service delivery, illustrative examples are relevant to a specified group and relevant service delivery and some insight demonstrated in relation to key issues | Clear and logical application of intersectionality theory to guide ethical service delivery, recognisable effort to provide illustrative examples, but more insight needed to be demonstrated in relation to key issues | Unclear/inconsistent/ illogical/absent application of intersectionality theory to guide ethical service delivery, and/or absent of recognisable effort to provide illustrative examples. Lacks logic and insight in relation to key issues |
| Academic writing, structure, paraphrasing, APA referencing, spelling and grammar (10%) | Well written paper following all academic writing, structuring and referencing conventions; excellent spelling and grammar | Very good academic writing, structure, referencing style, and spelling and grammar (minor, insignificant errors) | Good writing, structure, referencing style and spelling and grammar – a number of minor errors (more careful editing is required) | Some errors with writing, structure, referencing and spelling and grammar – attention is required to improve academic writing and referencing style | Major difficulties, structure is unclear, inappropriate paraphrasing and referencing, many errors in spelling and grammar |
Comments /100 /30%
|
|||||
- Identify and describe relevant research and other sources of data related to domestic and family violence integrating terminology appropriate to the field.
- Analyse the basis for contemporary theories of domestic and family violence, with a focus on gender.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
2 Portfolio
Up to 1,000 words in notes section of slides (not including words on PowerPoint slides)
A range of theories and perspectives are covered in this unit. You are asked to develop a PowerPoint presentation for an audience of your peers. The presentation should focus on ONE theory/perspective covered in Week 3 or 4 of this unit (EXCLUDING intersectionality), and explain the relevance of this theory to your everyday practice.
Your presentation should include the following:
- Outline – begin your presentation with an outline/overview slide noting the key topics to be covered
- Overview of Theory/Perspective – provide an overview of your chosen theory/perspective and explain its relevance to DFV generally (e.g consider its relevance to understanding the causes, consequences and responses to DFV. Does this theory consider gender?).
- Application of Theory/Perspective - explain the relevance of this theory to your everyday practice (e.g. give examples of how this theory/perspective may guide particular choices you may make and/or interactions you may have with your clients/stakeholders).
- Evaluation of Theory/Perspective - comment on the benefits and challenges of applying this theory/perspective to your everyday practice (e.g.Can this theory be relied upon in isolation? Are there practical restraints to its application in everyday practice?)
- Conclusion - finish your presentation with a brief reiteration of your key points/take home messages
Guidelines for the assessment:
· Your presentation should be between 8 and 10 slides in length (not including the title page and end-text references)
· Each slide should contain succinct bullet points (maximum six per slide)
· Information on the slides does not count towards the upper word limit of 1,000 words (+/- 10%)
· Your notes sections should form the word-for-word ‘script’ of your presentation (what you would say if you were presenting the slides to an audience. Your overall word limit should be divided relatively equally across the slides, ensuring that you are explaining and expanding upon the contents of your slides, and not simply repeating the contents)
· You may wish to include images (need to be appropriately referenced) or web links to bring the presentation to life
· The presentation should be composed in a style appropriate for your audience
· A PowerPoint template is provided for you on the Moodle site with additional information
· There is a guide on Moodle regarding how to turn your PowerPoint presentation into a pdf that displays the notes pages for submission
The assignment should be presented as a PowerPoint presentation with notes pages. No specific font is required (although a font size of 20 is generally recommended to assist your audience to see the slides) – the PowerPoint should be aesthetically pleasing, free of grammatical and spelling errors and include appropriate in-text citations and a full reference list at the end in APA style. You should include at least six academic resources.
Week 8 Monday (13 Jan 2020) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 10 Monday (27 Jan 2020)
Feedback will be provided within 10 working days of submission
| DFVP20001 – Portfolio Activity 2: PowerPoint Presentation | |||||
High Distinction (100-85) |
Distinction (84-75) |
Credit (74-65) |
Pass (64-50) |
Fail (49-0) |
|
| Overview of chosen theory/ perspective and relevance to DFV (30%) | Effective and insightful overview of chosen theory/perspective, exceptional explanation of relevance of theory to DFV | Insightful overview of chosen theory/perspective, relevance of theory to DFV very clearly explained | Clear overview of chosen theory/perspective, relevance of theory to DFV clearly explained | Overview of chosen theory/ perspective provided, relevance of theory to DFV could have been more clearly explained | Overview of chosen theory/perspective absent or incorrectly outlined, and/or relevance of theory to DFV not explained |
| Application of theory/perspective to everyday practice (30%) | Application of theory/perspective to everyday practice is outstanding, excellent discussion of relevant and exceptional examples of theory/practice nexus | Application of theory/perspective to everyday practice is very clear, very good discussion of relevant and insightful examples of theory/practice nexus | Application of theory/perspective to everyday practice is clear, good discussion of relevant examples of theory/practice nexus | Application of theory/perspective to everyday practice is attempted, examples could have been discussed in further depth/been more relevant to specific elements of practice | Application of theory/perspective to everyday practice absent or covered in insufficient depth |
| Evaluation of benefits and challenges of applying theory/perspective to everyday practice (30%) | Outstanding discussion of benefits and challenges of applying theory/perspective to everyday practice, excellent explanation of relevant issues, demonstrates exceptional insight | Effective discussion of benefits and challenges of applying theory/perspective to everyday practice, very clearly explains relevant issues, demonstrates a high level of insight | Good discussion of benefits and challenges of applying theory/perspective to everyday practice, clearly outlines relevant issues, demonstrates insight | Discusses benefits and challenges of applying theory/perspective to everyday practice, but some lack of clarity around the relevant issues | Lacks understanding of the benefits and challenges of applying theory/perspective to everyday practice |
| Presentation/format of slides, academic writing, paraphrasing, APA referencing, spelling and grammar (10%) | Most appropriate presentation/format of slides, well written following all academic writing, structuring and referencing conventions; excellent spelling and grammar | Very good presentation/format of slides, academic writing, structure, referencing style, and spelling and grammar (minor, insignificant errors) | Good presentation/format of slides, writing, referencing style and spelling and grammar – a number of minor errors (more careful editing is required) | Some errors with presentation/format of slides, writing, referencing and spelling and grammar – attention is required to improve academic writing and referencing style | Major difficulties, inappropriate presentation/format of slides, inappropriate paraphrasing and referencing, many errors in spelling and grammar |
Comments /100 /30%
|
|||||
- Analyse the basis for contemporary theories of domestic and family violence, with a focus on gender.
- Evaluate a range of types of domestic and family violence and related impacts, theories, history and legislation.
- Examine the ethical and legal context of professional practice in domestic and family violence.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
3 Written Assessment
2,000 words
For this assessment item you will produce a brief practice paper on an emerging area of research regarding domestic and family violence (DFV) in Australia. To facilitate dissemination of key findings, one or more students may be invited to have their paper published in the Queensland Centre for Domestic and Family Violence Research publication "The QCDFVR Reader".
You are required to use the template provided, and produce a practice paper that is suitable for a varied audience of practitioners, researchers, and community members.
You must select from one or more of the following emerging areas:
- Non-fatal strangulation
- DFV sub-populations (e.g. older persons, children, siblings, parents, persons with disability, CALD, LGBTIQA+, or animals)
- Perpetrator accountability
In producing your practice paper, you should address the following:
- Provide a brief overview of your selected emerging area/s (Ensure that you define key terms)
- Note/list the key legislation pertaining to this issue in your jurisdiction
- Present key data related to prevalence and impact of your selected emerging area/s (e.g. data from ABS, AIC, AIHW, AIFS etc)
- Discuss research challenges relating to your area/s of interest
- Discuss practice challenges relating to your area/s of interest
- Summarise the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers
You must include at least 6 academic resources. You must use APA referencing style. Please use the QCDFVR Reader template provided on the Moodle site.
Week 11 Monday (3 Feb 2020) 5:00 pm AEST
Exam Week Monday (17 Feb 2020)
Feedback will be provided within 10 working days of submission
| DFVP20001 – Written Assessment: Critical Analysis | |||||
High Distinction (100-85) |
Distinction (84-75) |
Credit (74-65) |
Pass (64-50) |
Fail (49-0) |
|
Overview of selected emerging area/s, legislation, and prevalence
|
Effective and insightful overview of emerging area/s, legislation and prevalence, using excellent examples/evidence, demonstrating outstanding critical thinking | Provides an effective overview of emerging area/s, legislation and prevalence, well supported by appropriate examples/evidence, demonstrating critical thinking | Provides a clear overview of emerging area/s, legislation and prevalence, with some relevant examples/evidence, demonstrating developing critical thinking | Provides an overview of emerging area/s, legislation and prevalence with some errors/ contradictions, some examples/evidence provided but needed to be more relevant | Lacks an overview of emerging area/s, legislation and/or prevalence |
Overview of research and practice challenges (30%) |
Demonstrated well developed understanding of all content presented on research and practice challenges; insightful discussion of fully elaborated points with effective illustrative examples; clear & detailed information, many original thoughts & ideas, and effective links to cited references | Demonstrated understanding of all content presented on research and practice challenges; all points elaborated with illustrative examples and effective links to cited references; original ideas and thoughts presented | Demonstrated understanding of research and practice challenges and most points were elaborated with details; information is relevant and supported by appropriate references; original thought presented | Demonstrated understanding of research and practice challenges (general points with little or no specific details given) and/or irrelevant information provided and/or inappropriate references used | Unable to demonstrate understanding of research and practice challenges, or only a few general points made, and/or factual errors presented |
Outline of the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers
|
Provided an excellent outline of the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers; insightful discussion of fully elaborated points with effective illustrative examples; clear & detailed information, many original thoughts & ideas, and effective links to cited references | Provided a very good outline of the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers; all points elaborated with illustrative examples and effective links to cited references; original ideas and thoughts presented | Provided a good outline of the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers, and most points were elaborated with details; information is relevant and supported by appropriate references; original thought presented | Provided an outline of the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers (general points with little or no specific details given) and/or irrelevant information provided and/or inappropriate references used | Unable to effectively outline the importance of this area for practitioners and policy makers, or only a few general points made |
Academic writing, structure, paraphrasing, APA referencing spelling and grammar (10%) |
Well written paper following all academic writing, structuring and referencing conventions; excellent spelling and grammar | Very good academic writing, structure, referencing style, and spelling and grammar (minor, insignificant errors) | Good writing, structure, referencing style and spelling and grammar – a number of minor errors (more careful editing is required) | Some errors with writing, structure, referencing and spelling and grammar – attention is required to improve academic writing and referencing style | Major difficulties, structure is unclear, inappropriate paraphrasing and referencing, many errors in spelling and grammar |
Comments /100 /40%
|
|||||
- Critique the socio-political structures associated with domestic and family violence; particularly as they impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
- Identify and describe relevant research and other sources of data related to domestic and family violence integrating terminology appropriate to the field.
- Evaluate a range of types of domestic and family violence and related impacts, theories, history and legislation.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
