CQUniversity Unit Profile
EDCU13017 Chemical and Physical Sciences
Chemical and Physical Sciences
All details in this unit profile for EDCU13017 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In Chemical and Physical Sciences, students apply theoretical concepts and current research related to teaching and learning in Science to engage in authentic evaluation and pedagogical design practices. Chemical and Physical Sciences examines both theoretical perspectives and the content and pedagogy required to teach Science in Primary and Early Childhood classrooms. Students develop understanding of the content and structure of these two strands in the Australian Curriculum and build on the knowledge and skills they developed in the Biological and Earth and Space Science unit to further examine views around best practice in Science pedagogy linked to current research. Chemical and Physical Sciences includes an emphasis on assessment practices in Science which can be applied to other strands of this learning area. Planning to teach and assess students’ understanding of Science is addressed with an emphasis on how best to engage students in this learning area and scaffold understanding to enhance the ability to provide scientific explanations for phenomena.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 7
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 2 - 2019

Bundaberg
Cairns
Mackay
Online
Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Practical Assessment
Weighting: 50%
2. Practical and Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Student Feedback and evaluation

Feedback

Science concept teaching materials.

Recommendation

Some additional materials will be available to support the structuring of scientific investigations.

Feedback from Student Feedback and Evaluation

Feedback

Textbook

Recommendation

A review of the suitability of the current textbook will be conducted.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Evaluate examples of teaching and assessment practice in Science to identify how connections are made to students’ prior knowledge or experience to promote learning
  2. Access and apply professional literature on contemporary Science education to critically evaluate or justify planning and assessment practices
  3. Plan lesson sequences that use appropriate research-based teaching strategies and ICTs to structure content and address students’ possible misconceptions in Science
  4. Develop diagnostic , formative and summative assessment tools that identify students’ understanding of scientific phenomena
  5. Select assessment strategies that engage students in active learning, promote higher order thinking and scaffold students’ understanding of core concepts in the areas of Chemical and Physical sciences.

Successful completion of this unit provides opportunities for students to engage with the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Graduate Career Stage) focus areas of:

1.1 Physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students

1.2 Understand how students learn

2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area

2.2 Content selection and organisation

2.3 Curriculum, assessment and reporting

2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning programs

3.3 Use teaching strategies

3.4 Select and use resources

3.6 Evaluate and improve teaching programs

4.1 Support student participation

5.1 Assess student learning

5.4 Interpret student data

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Practical Assessment - 50%
2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 50%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Practical Assessment - 50%
2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 50%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Connecting with science education

Edition: 2nd ed. (2018)
Authors: Gregson, R & Doidge, N
Oxford University Press
Melbourne Melbourne , VIC , Australia
ISBN: 9780190309343
Binding: Paperback
Prescribed

Teaching primary science: promoting enjoyment and developing understanding

Edition: 3rd ed. (2018)
Authors: Peter Loxley, Lyn Dawes, Linda Nicholls, Babs Dore
Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group)
New York New York , NY , USA
ISBN: 9781138651838
Binding: Paperback

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 6th Edition (APA 6th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Brendan Jacobs Unit Coordinator
b.jacobs@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 15 Jul 2019

Module/Topic

Pedagogical Frameworks in Science

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapters 1, 2

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapters 1, 2)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Register for free Teacher Account with

Science by Doing (online)

Week 2 Begin Date: 22 Jul 2019

Module/Topic

Scientific Investigation processes

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapters 3, 4

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapters 3, 4)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 29 Jul 2019

Module/Topic

Chemical Sciences Strand overview

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapters 5, 6

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapters 5, 6)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 05 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Assessment in Science

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapters 7, 8

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapters 7, 8)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 12 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Physical Sciences Strand overview

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapter 10

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapter 9)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Scientific Concepts and Alternate Conceptions Due: Week 5 Thursday (15 Aug 2019) 11:45 pm AEST
Vacation Week Begin Date: 19 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 26 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Chemical Sciences content

Chapter

Gregson (2018) Chapter 11

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 02 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Chemical Sciences content

(continued)

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapter 17

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapter 16)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 09 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Chemical Sciences assessment

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapter 18

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapter 17)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 16 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Physical Sciences content

Chapter

Gregson (2018) Chapter 13

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 23 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Physical Sciences content (continued)

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapters 19, 20

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapters 18,

19)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11 Begin Date: 30 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Physical Sciences assessment

Chapter

Loxley (2018) Chapters 21, 22

(For those students with previous

version: Loxley (2014) Chapters 20,

21)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 07 Oct 2019

Module/Topic

Unit review and consolidation

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Evaluation of Two Science Units Due: Week 12 Thursday (10 Oct 2019) 11:45 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 14 Oct 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 21 Oct 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title
Scientific Concepts and Alternate Conceptions

Task Description

People have many preconceptions and alternate conceptions about the scientific world.  People think about what they do and see, all the time constructing shared explanations of how objects and events work.  The building of these ideas can often result in misconceptions about how the world works.

Part A Case Study: Through research, select a scientific concept taught in either the Chemical Sciences strand or the Physical Sciences strand of the Australian Curriculum Science that is commonly misunderstood or poorly understood.  Misconceptions can often be found in the media, in popular culture or during conversations with children.

  • Identify a learner context that you choose to work within: either Prep to Year 2 learners or Year 3 to Year 6 learners.
  • Design/select a diagnostic tool to critically analyse the understanding that these learners have about your selected concept.
  • Include examples and a comparison of the language used by the different learners to explain this science concept.

Part B Replacing Alternate Conceptions: Develop a learning sequence that works to replace the alternate conception identified during Part A.

  • The pedagogy used in your learning sequence must be linked to current research on effective teaching and learning practice and take account of the cognitive and language characteristics of the learners in the chosen age group.
  • The learning sequence should use ICT where appropriate.
  • You need to include a range of teaching strategies.
  • Outline how you would report your findings to students, parents/carers, teachers and academics.

Word Limit - 3,000 words



Assessment Due Date

Week 5 Thursday (15 Aug 2019) 11:45 pm AEST

Please upload assignments via MOODLE


Return Date to Students

Week 6 Thursday (29 Aug 2019)


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

1. Scientific concept identified. Learner context identified.

2. Diagnostic tool including examples and a comparison of the language used.

3. Comparison of the alternate conception with the currently held scientific conception.

4. Learning sequence and appropriate use of ICT

5. Communicates findings using appropriate language for context (students, parents/carers, teachers, academics).

The full rubric for this assessment task can be downloaded from the Moodle site for this unit.

Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Graduate Career Stage) demonstrated:

1.1 Physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students.

1.2 Understand how learners learn.

2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area.

2.2 Content selection and organisation.

2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning programs.

3.3 Use teaching strategies.

3.4 Select and use resources.

5.1 Assess student learning.

5.4 Interpret student data.

5.5 Reporting on Student Achievement



Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Upload file via the Unit MOODLE.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Evaluate examples of teaching and assessment practice in Science to identify how connections are made to students’ prior knowledge or experience to promote learning
  • Access and apply professional literature on contemporary Science education to critically evaluate or justify planning and assessment practices
  • Plan lesson sequences that use appropriate research-based teaching strategies and ICTs to structure content and address students’ possible misconceptions in Science
  • Develop diagnostic , formative and summative assessment tools that identify students’ understanding of scientific phenomena


Graduate Attributes
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence

2 Practical and Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Evaluation of Two Science Units

Task Description

  • Examine two consecutive units of science work, one from the Physical Sciences sub-strand and one from the Chemical Sciences sub-strand, taught in a primary school for a particular year level.
  • In light of current research around effective practice in assessment in Science, evaluate formative and summative assessment used in these units of work.
  • Identify the types of assessment used, how they demonstrate student understanding and motivate or engage students in learning.
  • Make at least two recommendations for improvement in the assessment used in each of these units of work using the knowledge you have gained throughout the unit. This unit has examined assessment for, of and as learning.
  • These recommendations must be justified by links to current research and should include redesign or development of appropriate tools and techniques for promoting engagement and making reliable, consistent and comparable judgements on students' learning as input for teaching and reporting purposes.

Word Limit - 3,000 words


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Thursday (10 Oct 2019) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Assessment will be returned following moderation and in accordance with university policy on certification of grades.


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

1. Sophisticated explanation of the formative and summative assessment used in each of the two units of work.

2. Comprehensive explanation of how the types of assessment used in the units of work demonstrate student understanding and motivate or engage students in the learning.

3. Two appropriate recommendations are identified for improvement in the assessment items of each unit and justified by links to current research.

4. Cohesive writing consistent with academic conventions. Extensive use of relevant and credible sources for explanation of scientific concepts.

The full rubric for this assessment task can be downloaded from the Moodle site for this unit.

Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Graduate Career Stage) demonstrated:

2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area.

2.3 Curriculum, assessment and reporting.

3.6 Evaluate and improve teaching programs.

4.1 Support student participation.

5.1 Assess student learning.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Upload file via the Unit MOODLE.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Evaluate examples of teaching and assessment practice in Science to identify how connections are made to students’ prior knowledge or experience to promote learning
  • Access and apply professional literature on contemporary Science education to critically evaluate or justify planning and assessment practices
  • Develop diagnostic , formative and summative assessment tools that identify students’ understanding of scientific phenomena
  • Select assessment strategies that engage students in active learning, promote higher order thinking and scaffold students’ understanding of core concepts in the areas of Chemical and Physical sciences.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?