Overview
In this unit, you will extend your professional knowledge about teaching and learning in numeracy and Mathematics to develop deep understanding of the structure, sequencing and links between critical concepts and skills in content across the year levels in the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. You will examine research to identify issues or challenges to the development of mathematical understanding in key stages of the learning progression as a guide for planning lesson sequences and developing and interpreting assessment for diagnostic purposes. You will use data from your research to design and justify differentiated teaching and learning activities for specific sub-strands of the curriculum that cater for students at a range of ability levels and overcome identified barriers to the development of mathematical proficiency and improve the transfer of mathematical reasoning, logic and analysis to problem-solving situations. Your personal numeracy competence will be further enhanced in this unit as you construct marking guides for diagnostic assessment using appropriate and accurate mathematical procedures and communication.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Pre-requisite EDCU20037 Numeracy Learning
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2024
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from SUTE
Assessment Task 2
Review task requirements for alignment with industry expectations and practices.
- Analyse the structure and organisation of content in the mathematics curriculum to identify key stages in concept development as a focus for teaching, learning and assessment
- Research and apply evidence-based pedagogical approaches that are responsive to misconceptions or barriers to learning in Mathematics for students from a range of ability levels, characteristics and experiential backgrounds
- Propose and justify strategies and approaches to teaching Mathematics that promote the inclusive participation, understanding and mathematical proficiency of students from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds and students with disability
- Design assessment strategies and marking guides for collecting and interpreting data and reporting on students’ progress and achievement of knowledge and skills in Mathematics
- Justify teaching strategies and the selection and use of resources that scaffold students’ understanding of core mathematical concepts
- Identify opportunities for students to use ICTs for purposeful participation in learning experiences to gain mathematical knowledge and proficiency
- Participate in moderation for the purpose of developing shared understanding of student learning needs and achievement.
Successful completion of this unit provides opportunities for students to demonstrate the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers focus areas of:
1.2 Understand how students learn
1.4 Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities
1.6 Strategies to support full participation of students with disability
2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area
2.2 Content selection and organisation
2.3 Curriculum, assessment and reporting
2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning programs
3.3 Use teaching strategies
3.4 Select and use resources
4.1 Support student participation
5.1 Assess student learning
5.2 Provide feedback to students on their learning
5.3 Make consistent and comparable judgements
5.5 Report on student achievement
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 50% | |||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 50% | |||||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | |||||||
| 2 - Communication | |||||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | |||||||
| 4 - Research | |||||||
| 5 - Self-management | |||||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | |||||||
| 7 - Leadership | |||||||
| 8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||||
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
a.odewahn@cqu.edu.au
m.vanderburg@cqu.edu.au
r.zipf@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Australian Curriculum: Mathematics and the National Numeracy Learning Progression
Understanding primary school Mathematics
Chapter
The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics (ACARA, 2014)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Developing number sense and algebraic thinking - Planning for thinking: Open-ended problems
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Measurement and Geometry
Chapter
Chapter 8 & 9
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Statistics and probability
Chapter
Chapter 10
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Learner diversity in Mathematics
Chapter
Harrison, N. & Sellwood, J. (2016). Learning and teaching in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education. (3rd ed.). Oxford. (Chapter 4 – Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students)
Bradley S. Witzel, M., & Little, E.. (2016).Teaching Elementary Mathematics to Struggling Learners. The Guilford Press. (Chapter 2 - The critical importance of instruction)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Diagnostic assessment in mathematics
Chapter
Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children's Mathematics 4-15, McGraw-Hill Education, Chapter 2 Learning from errors and misconceptions.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment Task 1 Due Monday
Planning for effective teaching and learning in Mathematics Due: Week 6 Monday (19 Aug 2024) 11:59 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Common misconceptions in mathematical thinking
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Resources for developing mathematical reasoning
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Using ICTs to expand learning opportunities
Inclusive learning and catering for students with disability
Chapter
Chapter 1 & 11
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Learner engagement and meeting the needs of students with diverse backgrounds
Review and reflection - Putting theory into practice.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment Task 2 Due Monday
Assessment for and of student learning in Mathematics Due: Week 11 Monday (23 Sept 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Task Description
You are to develop a teaching plan for four weeks for mathematics for a designated primary school year level and term (e.g. Year 2, Term 1). The plan must use the Australian Curriculum V9: Mathematics (ACARA, 2022) and focus on content descriptions from Number and one other Content Strand (i.e. Algebra, Measurement, Space, Statistics and Probability ).
The plan must show alignment between curriculum intent, teaching and learning and assessment. It must be comprehensive and include details of content, key learning experiences, resources and formative and summative assessment. You need to prepare to teach the planned topic/s by researching common learning misconceptions and gathering resources including digital resources/ICTs that promote engagement with and understanding of the core mathematical concepts for learners from a range of ability levels. Your research should consider approaches and technological aids that support the inclusive participation of students with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds and students with disability.
The assessment task submission should use a presentation-style appropriate for a primary school curriculum planning document (e.g. Prep to Year 10 Unit Overview: Mathematics Template available from QCAA website)
You are NOT permitted to submit a planning document from a school or C2C units.
The final submission should be in the form of a written report with the following sections:
● Introduction- brief outline of the context and key considerations for planning mathematics units and lessons. (approx. 200-250 words)
● Planning document for the mathematics (NOT counted in word limit)
● Discussion of the research on common learning misconceptions, the experiential backgrounds of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students and the needs of students with disability that have informed your pedagogical decision-making and understanding about how students learn in ONE of the mathematics areas in the plan (e.g. measurement) (approx. 500 words)
● Discussion of the ways that digital resources and tools could be used to complement teaching strategies and promote deep learning of, and engagement with, the content of the chosen mathematics topic area/s of students with diverse needs and backgrounds for the weekly lessons. (approx. 200-250 words)
● Justification of the pedagogy and resources chosen to develop the identified content and skills for the topic/s and planned assessment of student learning in the chosen year level (approx. 400-450 words)
● References (NOT counted in word limit)
● Appendices - Resources (or evidence of) to support learning in the plan (NOT counted in word limit)
Word count: 1400 words maximum
Learning Outcomes Assessed
1. Analyse the structure and organisation of content in the mathematics curriculum to identify key stages in concept development as a focus for teaching, learning and assessment
2. Research and apply evidence-based pedagogical approaches that are responsive to misconceptions or barriers to learning in Mathematics for students from a range of ability levels, characteristics and experiential backgrounds
3. Propose and justify strategies and approaches to teaching Mathematics that promote the inclusive participation, understanding and mathematical proficiency of students from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds and students with disability
4. Design assessment strategies and marking guides for collecting and interpreting data and reporting on students’ progress and achievement of knowledge and skills in mathematics
5. Justify teaching strategies and the selection and use of resources that scaffold students’ understanding of core mathematical concepts
6. Identify opportunities for students to use ICTs for purposeful participation in learning experiences to gain mathematical knowledge and proficiency 55
Australian Professional Standards for Teachers addressed in this task
1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.6, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence agents (Gen AI)
Within this assessment, the use of Gen AI agents is as follows:
• Gen AI may only be used as specified in the assignment instructions. Please refer to the Moodle Assessment tile for specific details.
WORD COUNT for written assignments: The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. It excludes the cover page, abstract, contents page, reference page and appendices. It includes in-text references and direct quotations. Word count for this assignment: 1400 words maximum
Week 6 Monday (19 Aug 2024) 11:59 pm AEST
Please submit the task as one document with your name in the file name it is saved under
Assignments will be returned after the moderation process has been completed.
The full rubric for this assessment task can be downloaded from the Moodle site for this unit. Assessment Criteria
Assessment will be marked against the following criteria:
● Knowledge of the content, substance and structure, and teaching strategies for implementing the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics
● Planning that aligns curriculum, teaching and learning, and assessment using knowledge of student learning and effective teaching and assessment strategies
● Use and justification of strategies and resources including ICTs to support the learning and engagement of students with disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
● Justification of pedagogical decision-making, content organisation, and resource selection for overcoming common misconceptions in the way students learn Mathematics
● Design of assessment strategies and techniques for providing feedback, making judgements and reporting on student work
● Use of language conventions, clarity and conciseness of communication, and compliance with the APA Style Guide.
- Analyse the structure and organisation of content in the mathematics curriculum to identify key stages in concept development as a focus for teaching, learning and assessment
- Research and apply evidence-based pedagogical approaches that are responsive to misconceptions or barriers to learning in Mathematics for students from a range of ability levels, characteristics and experiential backgrounds
- Propose and justify strategies and approaches to teaching Mathematics that promote the inclusive participation, understanding and mathematical proficiency of students from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds and students with disability
- Design assessment strategies and marking guides for collecting and interpreting data and reporting on students’ progress and achievement of knowledge and skills in Mathematics
- Justify teaching strategies and the selection and use of resources that scaffold students’ understanding of core mathematical concepts
- Identify opportunities for students to use ICTs for purposeful participation in learning experiences to gain mathematical knowledge and proficiency
2 Written Assessment
Task Description
Assessment tasks for diagnostic purposes require an understanding of how students learn mathematics, the hierarchical nature of mathematical concepts and the sequence for developing understanding in a topic area.
The task requires you to determine the sequence of learning for numeration and two of the four mathematical operations in the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics.
You will identify specific content descriptions for these topics at a chosen year level and determine the expected prior knowledge and future learning in numeration and your selected operations to inform the development of a diagnostic assessment tool and accompanying marking guide that will assist you to determine the learner’s current level of understanding and skill development in relation to future expected performance on a summative assessment task. Early Childhood students will focus on the Foundation Level and will therefore consider the prior knowledge children might be expected to have in the Foundation Level. This means that early childhood students will make reference back to the Early Years Learning Framework. The diagnostic and summative assessment tasks and marking guide should be referenced to the Australian Curriculum V9: Mathematics achievement standards and content descriptions (ACARA, 2022) and be structured to include sample items that identify students working at, above or below the expected year level to provide a focus for planning differentiated teaching and learning for students across the full range of ability levels.
The design of assessment must be justified through reference to curriculum documents and other relevant sources and show evidence of professional knowledge of the sequence for developing conceptual understanding of the focus topics. The marking guide should include responses to the assessment items that use accurate mathematical procedures and communication for making reliable judgements on students’ responses and include examples of common errors or misconceptions that would assist a user in establishing learning goals for students of varying abilities and characteristics and determining next steps teaching.
In addition, you need to share the design of your assessment and expected learner responses with either a peer or a practising teacher to initiate a moderation conversation. From this professional conversation, report whether your marking guide and proposed diagnosis of learning needs would be supportive of teachers in planning for differentiated instruction and making consistent and comparable judgements on student learning. For this part of the task, you should respond specifically to the three questions outlined below:
(a) Where interpretation of the sample learner responses differed between you and your teaching peer/colleague, what was the basis for that difference (e.g. particular expectations for mathematical communication, parts of the response that affected the award of full marks, gaps in prior knowledge, etc)?
(b) What feedback could you report to students at each ability level (working at, above and below expected level) and their parents/carers about their current progress and achievement in this aspect of the Mathematics curriculum?
(c) How useful was your marking guide for the purpose of establishing learning goals and planning differentiated instruction for students across the full range of ability levels? 56
(d) What did you learn about the assessment and interpretation of student work as a result of your participation in the moderation process?
Your submission should include:
● An overview outlining topic area, year level, Australian Curriculum V9: Mathematics (ACARA, 2022) learning statements, sequence for developing understanding of the topic area, a copy of the proposed summative assessment, and any other information you believe is relevant to the design of the diagnostic assessment.
● A diagnostic task, marking guide and sample responses for students at a range of ability levels for the topic area and year level.
● Justification of the items included on the diagnostic task as the basis for establishing learning goals and planning differentiated instruction for students at the full range of ability levels.
● Samples of feedback that could be provided to students and parents/carers to report on their current progress and achievement in relation to the chosen topic/s
● A summary of the moderation process including responses to the four questions, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the diagnostic task and any changes you would make to it following moderation.
● Appropriate terminology and references to authoritative sources.
Learning Outcomes Assessed
1. Analyse the structure and organisation of content in the mathematics curriculum to identify key stages in concept development as a focus for teaching, learning and assessment
4. Design assessment strategies and marking guides for collecting and interpreting data and reporting on students’ progress and achievement of knowledge and skills in Mathematics
7. Participate in moderation for the purpose of developing a shared understanding of student learning needs and achievement
Australian Professional Standards for Teachers addressed in this task
1.2, 1.5, 2.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence agents (Gen AI)
Within this assessment, the use of Gen AI agents is as follows:
• Gen AI may only be used as specified in the assignment instructions. Please refer to the Moodle Assessment tile for specific details.
WORD COUNT for written assignments:
The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. It excludes the cover page, abstract, contents page, reference page and appendices. It includes in-text references and direct quotations.
Word count for this assignment: 3000 words maximum
Week 11 Monday (23 Sept 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Submit the task as one document with your surname in the file name.
Assignments will be returned once moderation has been completed.
The full rubric for this assessment task can be downloaded from the Moodle site for this unit.
Assessment will be marked against the following criteria:
● Knowledge and understanding of how students learn Mathematics and the learning progression for the chosen topic
● Design and justification of assessment strategies tools for making reliable judgements on students’ understanding and Mathematical proficiency for the purposes of giving feedback, differentiating instruction and reporting on student learning
● Understanding of the purpose of assessment moderation for making comparable and consistent judgements on students’ work samples
● Application of knowledge of the content, stages of conceptual understanding and processes for communicating Mathematical thinkingAssessment will be marked against the following criteria:
● Knowledge and understanding of how students learn Mathematics and the learning progression for the chosen topic
● Design and justification of assessment strategies tools for making reliable judgements on students’ understanding and Mathematical proficiency for the purposes of giving feedback, differentiating instruction and reporting on student learning
● Understanding of the purpose of assessment moderation for making comparable and consistent judgements on students’ work samples
● Application of knowledge of the content, stages of conceptual understanding and processes for communicating Mathematical thinking
- Analyse the structure and organisation of content in the mathematics curriculum to identify key stages in concept development as a focus for teaching, learning and assessment
- Design assessment strategies and marking guides for collecting and interpreting data and reporting on students’ progress and achievement of knowledge and skills in Mathematics
- Participate in moderation for the purpose of developing shared understanding of student learning needs and achievement.
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
