This is an individual submission item. This task consists of two parts. In Part A, you will carry out a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of yourself and discuss your journey as an engineering graduate. You will list your career goals, the reason you have joined this course, and what discipline you wish to specialise in and why.

In Part B, summarise the Code of Ethics and state how you think they are important to the practice of engineering not just in Australia but across the globe. 

Below are the details of the tasks.

For part A

1. Visit the Engineers Australia website and download the Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineers document. Read this document thoroughly.
2. Conduct a SWOT analysis of yourself.
3. Map your skills and competencies with Engineers Australia’s descriptors.
4. Discuss your journey as an engineering graduate and list your career goals, the reason you have joined this course, and what subdiscipline you wish to specialise in and why.
5. Reflect on your current standing as an engineering graduate and what areas you have to improve to achieve your professional targets.
6. Limit your writing to 1600 words maximum.
7. Accurately reference the work of third parties, words, figures, tables, etc., in accordance with CQU's Harvard referencing guide.

For part B

1. Download the Engineers Australia Code of Ethics document and read it thoroughly.
2. Based on the Engineers Australia Code of Ethics indicated above, state how you think they are important to the practice of engineering, not just in Australia but across the globe (200 words, +/-10%).
3. Choose any one of the four codes of ethics and write an essay (1000 words, +/-10%) on your opinion of the code you have selected by citing a personal example in your career of how you have upheld that code of ethics.
4. Accurately reference the work of third parties, words, figures, tables, etc., in accordance with CQU's Harvard referencing guide.

The assignment must be submitted using the Moodle submission link in MS Word format. The file name should be in the format "Your first name_unit code_assessment number.docx.". An example of a file format is "Name_ENEG28001_A1.docx."

Details are illustrated in the marking rubrics and criteria available in MOODLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO OPPORTUNITY TO RESUBMIT OR REDO THIS ASSESSMENT.

Moodle contains a marking rubric/criteria that includes indicators of attainment at "Sound", "Good", and "Excellent" levels for each element of the assessment.

This assessment two is a mandatory team submission. Only one report submission from each team is required. You are required to form a TEAM with 4–5 students (this number may vary depending on the number of enrolments). For this professional project task, you have to choose a team, and each team will use Hybrid Optimisation of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) software to carry out your team project work. You are required to develop a project scope and project report. Make sure the entire project tasks are distributed equally or agreed % of contribution among your team members so that all team members work equally at an equal pace. 

For this assessment:

1. You are required to form a TEAM with 4–5 students (this number may vary depending on the number of enrolments).
2. Select one topic from the list provided in Moodle.
3. With the help of your team members, develop a project scope, find the required solution to the problem, and prepare a team project report.
4. Accurately reference the work of third parties, words, figures, tables, etc., in accordance with CQU's Harvard referencing guide.
5. Since this is a collaborative project, each team's submission will be evaluated, and a grade will be assigned based on the criteria of this assessment. After that, individual grades will be calculated using the formula below, considering each member's contribution. An individual's mark may be higher than the team's mark but will be capped at the maximum mark of the assessment.
6. You must submit a team contribution table in the Project Scope and Project Report (details are available in Moodle). Without this table, your submission will not be evaluated.
7. Unlike Assessment 1, this assessment is based on teamwork, and only one submission from each team is required.

In Assessment 2, teams will develop a project scope to demonstrate the project progress, which should include but not be limited to  

• Introduction, including the problem statement, significance of the project, a brief literature review, and research questions.
• Aims and objectives.
• Inclusions and exclusions.
• Assumptions.
• Expected outcomes.
• Project deliverables.
• Team charter.
• Team contribution table.
• Gantt Chart.

Assessment 2: teams will work on a team project report, which should include but not be limited to

• Updated introduction, including the problem statement, significance of the project, a brief literature review, and research questions.
• Updated aims and objectives.
• Materials and methods.
• Results and discussion.
• Conclusions and recommendations.
• Risk assessment.
• Self and peer review.
• Team contribution table.
• Stakeholder identification and management.
• Community engagement plan.
• Updated Gantt Chart.

Assessment 2 carries a 60% mark; the minimum mark to pass is 40%.

Moodle contains a marking rubric/criteria that includes indicators of attainment at "Sound", "Good", and "Excellent" levels for each element of the assessment.

Assessment 2 the calculation of an individual team member's mark is as follows:

Team A received 25 marks (out of 40) for their team project work (Part 2). The individual contributions of 3 students in Team A are: Student 1 = 33%, Student 2 = 35%, and Student 3 = 32% (total = 33 + 35 + 32 = 100%). Average team contribution = 100/3 = 33.33%. 

Thus, the individual marks will be calculated as follows:
Student 1 = 25 x (33/33.33) = 24.75 (out of 40)
Student 2 = 25 x (35/33.33) = 26.25 (out of 40)
Student 3 = 25 x (32/33.33) = 24.00 (out of 40)

The assignments must be submitted using the Moodle submission link in MS Word format. The file name should be in the format "Your team name_unit code_assessment number.docx.". An example of a file format is "Team A_ENEG28001_Project Report.docx."

Details are illustrated in the marking rubrics and criteria available in MOODLE.  PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO OPPORTUNITY TO RESUBMIT OR REDO THIS ASSESSMENT.

This is a team presentation. Each team will present its team project outcome. All team members must attend and present their projects. The detailed schedule for the presentation will be available in Unit Moodle in due time. Students are required to give an 8–10-minute oral presentation on their team project with PowerPoint (PPT) slides.  Each team should upload PPT slides to the Moodle submission link at least 24 hours before the presentation. During the presentation, each team or group will present 8–10 minutes, followed by 5–6 minutes for questions and answers.

Below are snapshots of your team presentation.

1. This is also a mandatory assessment item. All team members must present their team project.
2. Accurately reference the work of third parties, words, figures, tables, etc., in accordance with CQU's Harvard referencing guide in your slides.
3. All team members should follow the dress code.
4. Before your presentation, do some mock presentations with your peers and supervisors.
5. Each team will present for eight to ten minutes, followed by five to six minutes of questions and answers.
6. You will be given a warning one minute before the finishing time and a final warning at the finishing time.

Any team member's failure to attend and present will result in a “fail mark” in this assessment.
Assignments must be submitted via Moodle submission link in "PowerPoint" format. The file name should be in the format "Your Team name_unit code_assessment number.pptx". An example of a file format is "Team A_ENEG28001_A3.pptx".

Details are illustrated in the marking rubrics/criteria available in MOODLE. 

PLEASE NOTE THAT IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO APPLY FOR A POSTPONEMENT OR EXTENSION FOR THIS ASSESSMENT. ALSO, PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO OPPORTUNITY TO RESUBMIT OR REDO THIS ASSESSMENT.

Refer to the Moodle that contains marking rubrics/criteria.