CQUniversity Unit Profile
ENEV12002 Community and Indigenous Engagement
Community and Indigenous Engagement
All details in this unit profile for ENEV12002 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In this unit you will critique approaches to community and Indigenous engagement within the environmental management sector. You will study aspects of post-colonialism, sustainable environmental management and cultural heritage, as well as examine applied stakeholder relationships and adaptive management approaches. Drawing on transdisciplinary perspectives from Aboriginal studies, community development, history, planning, and sociology, you will learn to evaluate the requirements of community and Indigenous engagement, and develop a professional approach to this aspect of environmental management.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 2
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 3 - 2018

Distance

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Portfolio
Weighting: 40%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 60%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Moodle site student feedback

Feedback

Content wise the course assisted my learning in CIE a lot. Thanks!

Recommendation

Continue to refine the core learning from the selected Unit materials. Continuously update the Unit materials to maintain currency for students. A review of the unit readings should be conducted to better balance the student workload for this unit.

Feedback from Moodle site student feedback

Feedback

I think more explanation on the assessment tasks.

Recommendation

The second assessment task (CIE report) challenged the students although most completed the task to a high level. More explanation of the expectations could be provided as well as an increase in the number of student activities provided in the weekly study guide that focus on report writing skills.

Feedback from Moodle site student feedback

Feedback

Struggled through assessment 2 as the word count suggested wasn't practical.

Recommendation

Include exercises that highlight the need for concise evidence based writing. Include exemplars from term 1 which illustrate a consistent approach to report writing. A review of the unit readings should be conducted to better balance the student workload for this unit.

Feedback from Moodle site student feedback

Feedback

I felt a bit un-engaged from this unit.

Recommendation

Could include assessment item based on levels of engagement through the Unit forum earlier in the unit (week 4). Also could make telephone contact with students at the beginning of the term.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Discuss the importance of cultural and historical awareness of Indigenous engagement within Australia and overseas
  2. Identify the implications of top-down/bottom-up approaches to engagement in environmental management
  3. Develop basic community and Indigenous engagement plans based on adaptive management principles
  4. Prepare an engagement section of an environmental management planning report
  5. Critique the key issues that shape contemporary discourses of community and Indigenous engagement.

NA

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Portfolio - 40%
2 - Written Assessment - 60%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Portfolio - 40%
2 - Written Assessment - 60%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • ZOOM
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Nathan Brooks-English Unit Coordinator
n.english@cqu.edu.au
Alice Buhrich Unit Coordinator
a.buhrich@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Principles of community engagement in environmental planning (Week 1) Begin Date: 05 Nov 2018

Module/Topic

Principles of community engagement in environmental planning

Chapter

Cavaye, J.M. 2004 Governance and community engagement. In W.R Loval and R. Shaffer (Eds.) The Australian experience in participatory governance: Planning, conflict mediation and public decision making in civil society. Ashgate Publishing, UK, pp 85-102.




Marshall, N., Steinmetz, C. and R. Zehner 2012 Community participation in planning. In S. Thompson and P.J. Maginn (Eds.) Planning Australia (2nd Ed). Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 276-293.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Prepare summary of readings

History of community and Indigenous engagement (Week 2) Begin Date: 12 Nov 2018

Module/Topic

History of community and Indigenous engagement

Chapter

Foley, G. 2010 A short history of the Australian Indigenous Resistance 1950-1990, Koorieweb, accessed from http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/resources/pdfs/229.pdf


Smith, B. 2008 Still under the Act? Subjectivity and the State in Aboriginal North Queensland. Oceania 78: 199-216.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Prepare summary of readings

Web search of Aboriginal language map Australia & National Native Title Tribunal

Natural Resource Management (Week 3) Begin Date: 19 Nov 2018

Module/Topic

Natural Resource Management

Chapter

Syme, G.J., B.E. Nancarrow and J.A. McCreddin 1999 Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of Environmental Management 57:51-70.


Australian Government 2017 Module to the National Water Initiative (NWI) Policy Guidelines for water planning and management: Engaging Indigenous Peoples in water planning and management.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Prepare summary of readings

Guest Lecture: Joann Schmider

Participatory planning (Week 4) Begin Date: 26 Nov 2018

Module/Topic

Participatory planning

Chapter

Freitas, R. 2016 Cultural mapping as a development tool. City, Culture and Society 7:9-16.


Jeanotte, S. 2016 Story-telling about place: Engaging citizens in cultural mapping. City, Culture and Society 7:35-71.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Prepare summary of readings

Vacation Week Begin Date: 03 Dec 2018

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Using quantitative data (Week 5) Begin Date: 10 Dec 2018

Module/Topic

Using quantitative data

Chapter

McGinty, S. (2012). Engaging Indigenous Knowledge(s) in research and practice. Journal of Language Studies 12(1): 5-15.


De Vaus, D. (2002).Finding a Sample. Surveys in social research. Fifth Edition, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW: 69-93.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Prepare summary of readings

Group work

Using qualitative data (Week 6) Begin Date: 17 Dec 2018

Module/Topic

Using qualitative data

Chapter

Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. The Qualitative Report 15(3): 754-760.


Anguelovski, I. (2011). Understanding the Dynamics of Community Engagement of Corporations in Communities: The Iterative Relationship Between Dialogue Processes and Local Protest at the Tintaya Copper Mine in Peru. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 24(4): 384- 399.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Group work

Indigenous engagement and conflict resolution (Week 7) Begin Date: 31 Dec 2018

Module/Topic

Indigenous engagement and conflict resolution

Chapter

Bauman, T. (2007) ‘You mob all agree?’: the chronic emergency of culturally competent engaged Indigenous problem solving, Indigenous Law Bulletin 6 (29)


Web resource: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community histories at https://www.qld.gov.au/atsi/cultural-awareness-heritagearts/community-histories

Events and Submissions/Topic

Lecture

Readings

Prepare summary of readings

Case study: Working alongside Aboriginal custodians in the Wet Tropics (Week 8) Begin Date: 07 Jan 2019

Module/Topic

Case study: Working alongside Aboriginal custodians in the Wet Tropics

Chapter

Buhrich, A., S. McIntyre-Tamwoy and S. Greer (in press) Working alongside: Community archaeology in post-native title Australia. Transforming Heritage Practise in the 21st Century: Contributions from community archaeology. One World Archaeology Series.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Lecture

Reading


Reading summary and analysis Due: Week 8 Friday (11 Jan 2019) 11:45 pm AEST
Case study: Indigenous engagement James Price Point (Week 9) Begin Date: 14 Jan 2019

Module/Topic

Case study: Indigenous engagement James Price Point

Chapter

None.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Lecture

Case study: Bush Heritage Australia (Week 10) Begin Date: 21 Jan 2019

Module/Topic

Case study: Bush Heritage Australia

Chapter

Conservation planning in a crosscultural context: the Wunambal Gaambera Healthy Country Project in the Kimberley, Western Australia

Events and Submissions/Topic

Lecture

Reading

Evaluating success in community engagement (Week 11) Begin Date: 28 Jan 2019

Module/Topic

Evaluating success in community engagement

Chapter

Sufian, M. et al (2011) Program Evaluation and Evaluating Community Engagement. In M. Silberberg, J. Cook, C. Drescher, D. McClosley, S. Weaver and L. Ziegahn (Eds) Principles of Community Engagement 2nd Ed, Department of Health and Human Services Publication, Washington.


Douglas Shire Council (2014) Community Engagement Guide and Tools, Douglas Shire Council Publication, Mossman, Queensland.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Study guide

Lecture

Readings

Course review (Week 12) Begin Date: 04 Feb 2019

Module/Topic

Course Review

Chapter

Community Planning Toolkit

Events and Submissions/Topic

Lecture

Community engagement strategy Due: Week 12 Monday (4 Feb 2019) 11:45 pm AEST
Exam Week Begin Date: 11 Feb 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Portfolio

Assessment Title
Reading summary and analysis

Task Description

Prepare a portfolio that summarises and discusses peer reviewed journal articles on the theme of Community and Indigenous Engagement.

1. Summarise five peer reviewed journal articles using the principles of reading scientific writing discussed in Week 1 (Lecture 1b 'Reading and note taking).

2. Prepare a short introduction that sets the context of the portfolio and identifies the main issues.

3. Write a discussion that draws links between the content of the papers and the concepts studied in weeks 1 to 4.


Total word count in 1000-1200 words, not including references.

The aim of this assessment is to introduce you to communication, critical thinking and analysis, which are all essential skills for your university studies. The desired outcome of the task is to help you in the process of reading, understanding and interpreting concepts and arguments, and knowing how to apply these skills in an academic context. Group discussion and analysis of the readings will take place throughout the term and help to engage and guide you through the reading material.

Further details are provided on the Moodle site.


Assessment Due Date

Week 8 Friday (11 Jan 2019) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 10 Friday (25 Jan 2019)


Weighting
40%

Minimum mark or grade
Minimum mark or grade - A grade of 40% or higher must be obtained to complete the unit

Assessment Criteria

Marks for this assessment will be awarded as follows:

  • 20% for participation in a group discussion (either in online forum or in real-time on zoom).
  • 10% Presentation - the report is clearly presented, easy to follow, with all the essential elements included in the title page (name, date, title, course number, assessment number). Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation must be used.
  • 15% Introduction - context and identification of main issues.
  • 30% Summary of readings (10% for each reading) - one reading per page, discusses aim of paper, take home message, example from reading (if relevant) and your own interpretation, judgement or comment.
  • 20% Discussion - highlights the main points, compares information from 2 or more sources, links papers to course content. Includes a brief conclusion.
  • 5% Referencing - follows the Harvard style in-text, as headings for each article and in list of references.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Discuss the importance of cultural and historical awareness of Indigenous engagement within Australia and overseas
  • Identify the implications of top-down/bottom-up approaches to engagement in environmental management
  • Develop basic community and Indigenous engagement plans based on adaptive management principles


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Community engagement strategy

Task Description

Prepare a proposal for a 'Community Engagement Strategy' utilising the knowledge, concepts and strategies learned throughout this unit.

Word limit: 2000 (+/- 10%)

You will be provided with a template of the basic structure for the proposal.



Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Monday (4 Feb 2019) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Friday (15 Feb 2019)

Friday 23/02/2018


Weighting
60%

Minimum mark or grade
Minimum mark or grade - A grade of 40% or higher must be obtained to complete the unit

Assessment Criteria

Marks for this assessment will be awarded as follows:

  • 20% Presentation - grammar, formatting, layout, word count, referencing.
  • 10% Introduction - includes the principles and aims of your Community Engagement Strategy, definitions, benefits and risks of CIE to this project.
  • 20% Background and Stakeholders - Location of proposed project, who are the key stakeholders, is there a priority of stakeholders.
  • 30% Recommended strategies - these can be quantitative, qualitative or a combination of both. They should be based on your readings, lectures and study guide.
  • 20% Discussion and conclusion.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Discuss the importance of cultural and historical awareness of Indigenous engagement within Australia and overseas
  • Identify the implications of top-down/bottom-up approaches to engagement in environmental management
  • Develop basic community and Indigenous engagement plans based on adaptive management principles
  • Prepare an engagement section of an environmental management planning report
  • Critique the key issues that shape contemporary discourses of community and Indigenous engagement.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?