N/A Level

Introductory Level

Intermediate Level

Graduate Level

Professional Level

Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks	Learning Outcomes
	1	2	3
1 - Written Assessment - 50%
2 - Written Assessment - 50%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes	Learning Outcomes
	1	2	3
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
8 - First Nations Knowledges
9 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks	Graduate Attributes
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1 - Written Assessment - 50%
2 - Written Assessment - 50%

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title

Critical analysis

Task Description

Learning Outcomes Assessed

· Evaluate the relevance of health promotion theory to healthy ageing

Aim

The aim of this assessment is to prepare you to analyse, critique, and manage a wide range of situations in your practice where you can make an impact to promote healthy ageing.

Instructions

You are writing an analysis of a health promotion theory, which includes a critical evaluation of the relevance of the theory to healthy ageing.

Please follow the steps below to complete the assessment task:

· Choose a health promotion theory that is relevant to your clinical setting or area of interest.

· Discuss this theory, providing background information and related evidence to justify the selection.

· Critically evaluate this theory and its implementation related to its ability to meet the needs of older people, using evidence-based research.

The following is a suggested structure for your essay:

Introduction (200 words) – Introduce your topic. The introduction outlines the key points of your essay. It will inform the reader what you are writing about - why you are writing about it and how you will discuss this topic.

The main body of the essay (1600 words)

Identify and explain the health promotion theory selected.

Justify the selection of the theory and how this relates to the care of the older person in your clinical setting or area of interest.

Critically evaluate the health promotion theory selected and its relevance to older persons.

The main body of the essay should be substantiated with reference to the peer reviewed literature (no less than 7 peer reviewed articles).

Conclusion (200 words) – There are to be no references in this section. The conclusion should summarise the key areas that address the set task. No new information should be included.

Support

You can provide a draft of your assessment for review, prior to submitting the assessment. The Unit Coordinator will provide informal feedback on the first page of your draft. Please email your draft to the Unit Coordinator at a.monson@cqu.edu.au by Wednesday, 9^th April 2021, 5.00 pm (AEST).

Literature and references

In this assessment use at least 10 contemporary references (<10 years) to support your discussion. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible “grey literature”. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature must be from reputable sources such as from government, university, or peak national bodies: for example, Aged & Community Services Australia (ACSA) or Leading Age Services Australia (LASA), or Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC) or other such as these.

Requirements

· Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman or Arial, with 1.5 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).

· Include page numbers on each page in a header.

· Write in the third-person perspective, keeping your writing as objective as possible.

· Use formal academic language.

· Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style. The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.

· The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations.

Resources

· You can use unit provided materials and other credible sources (e.g., journal articles, books, grey literature) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important.

· We recommend that you access your discipline specific library guide: the Nursing and Midwifery Guide; Social Work and Community Services Guide.

· We recommend you use EndNote to manage your citations and reference list. However, this is not mandatory. More information on how to use EndNote is available at the CQUniversity Library website.

· For information on academic communication please go to the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources including information for students with English as a second language.

· Submit a draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.

Submission

Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.

Marking Criteria

Refer to the marking rubric on the Moodle site for more detail on how marks will be assigned.

Assessment Due Date

Week 7 Wednesday (28 Apr 2021) 5:00 pm AEST

Assessment 1 - Written assessment - Critical Analysis

Return Date to Students

Week 9 Wednesday (12 May 2021)

All assessment tasks will be returned with individualised feedback within 2 weeks of the submission date.

Weighting

50%

Assessment Criteria

Assessment 1 Rubric HAGE 20005
High Distinction 84.50-100%	Distinction 74.50-84.49%	Credit 64.50-74.49%	Pass 49.50-64.49%		Fail Below 49.50%	Fail (content absent)  0%
Structure
Efficiency & organisation 10%
An articulate essay. There is a succinct and compelling introduction that introduces the paper and outlines its direction. The essay is cogent and is brought to a compelling conclusion.	A well-written essay. There is a clear and appropriate introduction that introduces the paper and outlines its direction. The essay proceeds logically and is brought to a logical conclusion.	Appropriately written essay. There is an appropriate introduction that mostly introduces the paper and its direction. The essay mostly proceeds logically and is brought to an appropriate conclusion.	Adequately articulated essay. An introduction is apparent, and the paper has been somewhat introduced. There is an attempt made to outline the direction of the paper. The essay is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion. A conclusion is evident.		The introduction is not apparent or does not attempt to introduce the paper or outline the direction of the paper. The essay does not flow logically and is not brought to a close.	No introduction or conclusion present.
Presentation 10%
Excellent presentation of the assignment. The submitted written material is very well-presented, follows the formatting requirements, and is free from errors.	A very good presentation of the assignment. The submitted written material is well-presented and mostly follows the formatting requirements. There are minor errors (e.g., 1 or 2 errors in spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure).	A good presentation of assignment that follows the formatting requirements. There are some errors (e.g., 3 or 4 consistent errors with spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure).	An adequate presentation of assignment that sometimes follows the formatting requirements. There are 3 or 4 inconsistent errors (spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure).		Poorly presented assignment. There are many inaccuracies in formatting spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure. (> 5 errors).	Submission is missing most aspects of the task. There is little evidence of task requirements. Many errors present.
Substantiation of discussion 5%
Discussion is substantiated consistently with logic, examples, and with reference to the current literature. A minimum of 15 contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.	Discussion is generally substantiated with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature, with 1 or 2 exceptions. A minimum of 12-15 contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles has been cited.	Discussion is partly substantiated with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature, with 3 or 4 exceptions. Between 10-12, contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.	Discussion is occasionally substantiated with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature, with 5 or 6 exceptions. Between 8-10, contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.		Discussion is not or infrequently attempting to (>7 errors) to substantiate discussion with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature. Less than 8 contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.	No references present.
Referencing 5%
Accurate APA referencing. No errors.	Mostly accurate APA referencing. 1-2 consistent errors (maybe made multiple times).	Somewhat accurate APA referencing. 3 consistent errors (maybe made multiple times).	Occasionally accurate APA referencing. 4 consistent errors (maybe made multiple times).		APA referencing not used. 5 consistent errors maybe made multiple times).	No references present.
Critique of one health model 20%
The essay provides an excellent critique of one chosen health promotion model that is relevant to the student’s clinical setting or area of interest.	The essay provides a clear critique of one chosen health promotion model that is relevant to the student’s clinical setting or area of interest.	The essay partly provides a clear critique of one chosen health promotion model that is relevant to the student’s clinical setting or area of interest.	The essay lacks some content that indicates an incomplete critique of your chosen health promotion model that is relevant to the student’s clinical setting or area of interest.		The content irrelevant and/or does not address the task. The discussion lacks cohesion.	There is no critique of one chosen health promotion model. No content justifies the chosen health promotion model.
Discussion for the justification of the theory 20%
An excellent demonstration of discussion of the theory providing background information and related evidence to justify the selection. .	Appropriate demonstration of discussion of the theory providing background information and related evidence to justify the selection.	Some demonstration of discussion of the theory providing background information and related evidence to justify the selection.	There is a lack of some content that demonstrates discussion of the theory providing background information and related evidence to justify the selection. The discussion is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion.		Content irrelevant and does not discuss or justify the chosen theory.	There is no demonstration of discussion of the justification of the theory present.
Critical analysis in evaluation and implementation of the theory 40%
There is excellent critical analysis in the evaluation and implementation of the chosen theory related to its ability to meet the needs of older people.	There is very clear critical analysis in the evaluation and implementation of the chosen theory related to its ability to meet the needs of older people	There is clear critical analysis in the evaluation and implementation of the chosen theory related to its ability to meet the needs of older people.	There is some critical analysis in the evaluation and implementation of the chosen theory related to its ability to meet the needs of older people	There is very little, or no evidence of the evaluation and implementation of the chosen theory related to its ability to meet the needs of older people		There is no evidence of the evaluation and implementation of the chosen theory related to its ability to meet the needs of older people

Referencing Style

American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

Submission

Online

Submission Instructions

Your submission must be uploaded as a single Microsoft Word file (doc or docx format) to the unit Moodle site.

Learning Outcomes Assessed

Evaluate the relevance of health promotion theory to healthy ageing

Graduate Attributes

Knowledge
Communication
Cognitive, technical and creative skills
Research
Self-management
Leadership

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title

Health promotion evaluation and plan

Task Description

The aim of this assessment is to prepare you to make a high-level contribution to health promotion policy and practice for the older person throughout the health care system.

Instructions

You are writing a critical analysis of a health promotion strategy and related campaign aimed at older persons. Choose a targeted area such as physical activity, smoking cessation, obesity, mental health or some other focus area requiring health promotion in the community of older persons.

This involves, firstly, choosing a current health promotion strategy and related campaign aimed at older persons.

Your task is to:

· critically evaluate the strategy and

· assess the campaign and

· devise a health promotion plan for the older person related to the strategy and campaign.

Please follow the steps below to complete your assessment task:

1. Introduction (250 words) –Introduce your topic. The introduction outlines the key points of your essay. It will inform the reader what you are writing about - why you are writing about it and how you will discuss this topic.

2. The main body of the essay (2000 words) identify and explain the health promotion strategy and campaign selected. Justify the selection of your strategy and campaign and how it relates to the care of the older person. Critically analyse and assess the strategy and campaign selected and its relevance to the older person. Devise a health promotion plan for a local level related to the strategy and campaign. The main body of the essay should be substantiated with reference to the peer-reviewed literature (no less than 10 peer-reviewed articles).

3. Conclusion (250 words) – no references in this section. The conclusion should summarise the key areas that address the set task. No new information should be included.

Literature and references

In this assessment use at least 12 contemporary references (<10 years) to support your discussion. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible websites. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature sourced from the internet must be from reputable websites such as from government, university, or peak national bodies: for example,

Requirements

· Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman or Arial, with 1.5 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).

· Include page numbers on each page in a header.

· Write in the third-person perspective.

· Use formal academic language.

· Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style. The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.

· The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations.

Resources

· You can use unit provided materials and other credible sources (e.g., journal articles, books, grey literature) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important.

· We recommend that you access your discipline-specific library guide: the Nursing and Midwifery Guide; Social Work and Community Services Guide.

· We recommend you use EndNote to manage your citations and reference list. More information on how to use EndNote is available at the CQUniversity Library website.

· For information on academic communication please go to the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources including information for students with English as a second language.

· Submit a draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.

Submission

Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.

Marking Criteria

Refer to the marking rubric on the Moodle site for more detail on how marks will be assigned.

Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Wednesday (26 May 2021) 5:00 pm AEST

All tasks will be returned with individulised feedback within 2 weeks of the submission date

Return Date to Students

Review/Exam Week Wednesday (9 June 2021)

All assessment tasks will be returned with individualised feedback within 2 weeks of the submission date.

Weighting

50%

Assessment Criteria

Assessment 2 Rubric HAGE 20005
High Distinction 84.50-100%	Distinction 74.50-84.49%	Credit 64.50-74.49%	Pass 49.50-64.49%		Fail Below 49.50%	Fail (content absent)  0%
Structure
Efficiency & organisation 10%
An articulate essay. There is a succinct and compelling introduction that introduces your paper and outlines its direction. The essay is cogent and is brought to a compelling conclusion.	A well-written essay. There is a clear and appropriate introduction that introduces your paper and outlines its direction. The essay proceeds logically and is brought to a logical conclusion.	Appropriately written essay. There is an appropriate introduction that mostly introduces the paper and its direction. The essay mostly proceeds logically and is brought to an appropriate conclusion.	Adequately articulated essay. An introduction is apparent, and your paper has been somewhat introduced. There is an attempt made to outline the direction of the paper. The essay is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion. A conclusion is evident.		The introduction is not apparent or does not attempt to introduce your paper or outline the direction of the paper. The essay does not flow logically and is not brought to a close.	No introduction or conclusion present.
Presentation 10%
Excellent presentation of the assignment. The submitted written material is very well-presented, follows the formatting requirements, and is free from errors.	A very good presentation of the assignment. The submitted written material is well-presented and mostly follows the formatting requirements. There are minor errors (e.g., 1 or 2 errors in spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure).	A good presentation of assignment that follows the formatting requirements. There are some errors (e.g., 3 or 4 consistent errors with spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure).	An adequate presentation of assignment that sometimes follows the formatting requirements. There are 3 or 4 inconsistent errors (spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure).		Poorly presented assignment. There are many inaccuracies in formatting spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure. (> 5 errors).	Submission is missing most aspects of the task. There is little evidence of task requirements. Many errors present.
Substantiation of discussion 5%
Discussion is substantiated consistently with logic, examples, and with reference to the current literature. A minimum of 15 contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.	Discussion is generally substantiated with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature, with 1 or 2 exceptions. A minimum of 12-15 contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles has been cited.	Discussion is partly substantiated with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature, with 3 or 4 exceptions. Between 10-12, contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.	Discussion is occasionally substantiated with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature, with 5 or 6 exceptions. Between 8-10, contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.		Discussion is not or infrequently attempting to (>7 errors) to substantiate discussion with logic, examples, and with reference to the current peer-reviewed literature. Less than 8 contemporary* peer-reviewed journal articles have been cited.	No references present.
Referencing 5%
Accurate APA referencing. No errors.	Mostly accurate APA referencing. 1-2 consistent errors (maybe made multiple times).	Somewhat accurate APA referencing. 3 consistent errors (maybe made multiple times).	Occasionally accurate APA referencing. 4 consistent errors (made multiple times).		APA referencing not used, or more than 5 inaccuracies.	No references present.
Application of health promotion strategy and related campaign aimed at older persons 20%
High-level application of a health promotion strategy is used well to enhance the discussion.	Appropriate level application of a health promotion strategy used well to enhance the discussion.	A clear application of a health promotion strategy is used well to enhance the discussion.	There is a lack of some content that applies a health promotion strategy to enhance the discussion.		The content irrelevant and/or does not address the task. The discussion lacks cohesion.	There is no application of a health promotion strategy present.
Critical analysis of health promotion strategy and related campaign 30%
A high-level analysis is reflected in a clear cohesive argument that includes a target area such as physical activity, smoking cessation, obesity, mental health, or some other focus.	The appropriate level analysis is reflected in a clear cohesive argument that includes a target area such as physical activity, smoking cessation, obesity, mental health, or some other focus.	The clear level analysis is reflected in a clear cohesive argument that includes a target area such as physical activity, smoking cessation, obesity, mental health, or some other focus.	There is a lack of some content and analysis relevant to a target area.		The content irrelevant and/or does not address the task. The discussion lacks cohesion and analysis.	There is no analysis present.
Health Promotion Plan 20%
Excellent strategies to improve intervention, campaign, or strategy outcomes provided and used well to discuss.	Very clear strategies to improve intervention, campaign, or strategy outcomes provided and used well to discuss	Clear strategies to improve intervention, campaign, or strategy outcomes provided and used well to discuss	Lack of strategies to improve intervention, campaign, or strategy outcomes provided and used well to discuss	The has a minimal discussion on strategies to improve intervention, campaign, or strategy outcomes provided and used well to discuss		There are no strategies present.

Referencing Style

American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

Submission

Online

Submission Instructions

Your submission must be uploaded as a single Microsoft Word file (doc or docx format) to the unit Moodle site.

Learning Outcomes Assessed

Evaluate the suitability of a current health promotion strategy to meet the needs of older people using evidence-based research
Assess a current health promotion campaign related to healthy ageing and devise a health promotion plan to optimise well-being in older people.

Graduate Attributes

Knowledge
Communication
Cognitive, technical and creative skills
Research
Self-management

Overview

Details

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Offerings For Term 1 - 2021

Attendance Requirements

Website

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Class Timetable

Assessment Overview

Assessment Grading

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Textbooks

IT Resources

Week 1

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Review/Exam Week

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

1 Written Assessment

Learning Outcomes Assessed

Aim

Instructions

Literature and references