Overview
LAWS11059 Statutory interpretation has a specific focus on locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation, and deployment of interpretative techniques. In this unit you will learn how to determine whether the exercise of a statutory power is invalid if a condition or procedure regulating its exercise, is breached; whether a law has a retrospective operation; whether a statutory offence contains a mental ingredient to be proved by the prosecution (mens rea), and if so, what that ingredient is; the scope of a statutory power to make delegated legislation in the light of delegated legislation, which has purportedly been made under a power; and the application of a rule in any applicable charter of human rights. A law graduate should be able to give a reasoned opinion as to the appropriate meaning of a legislative provision which takes adequate account of the law of statutory interpretation. This unit meets the LPAB requirements for statutory interpretation.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Co-requisite: LAWS11057
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 3 - 2018
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
- Analyse whether a law has a retrospective operation
- Analyse whether a statutory offence contains a mental element (mens rea)
- Analyse the scope of statutory power to make delegated legislation
- Analyse and critically reflect on the application and interpretation of legislation, legislative instruments and related material.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 60% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Communication | ||||||
2 - Problem Solving | ||||||
3 - Critical Thinking | ||||||
4 - Information Literacy | ||||||
5 - Team Work | ||||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||||
8 - Ethical practice | ||||||
9 - Social Innovation | ||||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 60% |
Textbooks
Statutory Interpretation
Edition: 2nd (2016)
Authors: Michelle Sanson
Oxford University Press
South Melbourne South Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
ISBN: 9780190304577
Binding: Paperback
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- ZOOM
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 3rd ed
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
j.a.milburn@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to Statutory Interpretation
Chapter
Sanson chapter 1
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Creating Legislation
Chapter
Sanson chapter 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Interpreting Legislation
Chapter
Sanson chapter 3
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Context & Purpose
Chapter
Sanson chapter 4
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Intention and Interpretive Techniques
Chapter
Sanson chapter 5
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Intrinsic Materials: Statute Components
Chapter
Sanson chapter 6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Intrinsic Materials: The Text
Chapter
Sanson chapter 7
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Extrinsic Materials
Chapter
Sanson chapter 8
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Traditional Common Law Approaches
Chapter
Sanson chapter 9
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Sanson chapter 10
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Fundamental Human Rights in International Law
Chapter
Sanson chapters 11, 12, 13 and 14
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Review and Take Home Paper Week
Chapter
No prescribed reading this week
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Presented in two parts with 10 marks allocated for each part.
Part 1 A research task.
Part 2 A short interpretation question you can answer by reference to interpretation legislation and cases.
Week 5 Thursday (13 Dec 2018) 11:45 pm AEST
I expect students to present their assignment work on time. Please note that I will not consider any request for an extension of time unless you upload an application in the appropriate manner, supported by documentation and made prior to the due time/date. I will impose a penalty deduction of 5% per day for late work until the cut-off date, which is Saturday, 22 December 2018. If you do not submit your work by the cut-off date, I will award you a 'nil' mark.
Week 7 Saturday (31 Dec 2022)
Student satisfaction surveys in the past indicate student concerns when a unit coordinator does not provide assessment feedback quickly. Generally, I release the feedback and marks soon after the cut-off date.
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Poor |
Basic goals (30%): | |||
Identification of primary issues | Identification of all major issues. | Identification of most major issues. | Identification of some major issues. |
Demonstrated understanding of the subject matter | Excellent demonstrated understanding of the subject matter. | Good / Some understanding of the subject matter. | Lacks understanding of the subject matter. |
Structured argument | Well structured arguments. | Reasonably structured argument. | Poorly structured argument. |
Higher order goal (5%): | |||
Analytical ability | Demonstrated high level of analysis. | Some analytical skills demonstrated | Numerous analytical errors or omissions - limited to no analysis. |
Skills (5%): | |||
Demonstrated clear and concise written expression | Clear and concise written expression. | Some unclear or verbose written expression. | Numerous examples of unclear or verbose written expression. |
Spelling and grammar | No identifiable spelling or grammatical issues. | Minor spelling or grammatical issues. | Numerous spelling or grammatical issues. |
Plain English drafting | No Plain English drafting errors. | Some Plain English drafting errors. | Numerous Plain English drafting errors. |
Students should also familiarise themselves with the University policy on assessment which sets out the criteria for high distinctions, distinctions, credit and pass marks in some detail.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
- Analyse whether a law has a retrospective operation
- Analyse whether a statutory offence contains a mental element (mens rea)
- Analyse the scope of statutory power to make delegated legislation
- Analyse and critically reflect on the application and interpretation of legislation, legislative instruments and related material.
2 Written Assessment
I will ask you to solve a statutory interpretation problem question.
Week 8 Thursday (10 Jan 2019) 11:45 pm AEST
I expect students to present their assignment work on time. Please note that I will not consider any request for an extension of time unless you upload an application in the appropriate manner, supported by documentation and made prior to the due time/date. I will impose a penalty deduction of 5% per day for late work until the cut-off date, which is Saturday, 19 January 2019. If you do not submit your work by the cut-off date, I will award you a 'nil' mark.
Week 10 Monday (21 Jan 2019)
Student satisfaction surveys in the past indicate student concerns when a unit coordinator does not provide assessment feedback quickly. Generally, I release the feedback and marks the day after the final cut-off date (that is, I provide feedback and marks 10 days after the due date).
Basic goals (30%): | |||
Identification of primary issues | Identification of all major issues. | Identification of most major issues. | Identification of some major issues. |
Demonstrated understanding of the subject matter | Excellent demonstrated understanding of the subject matter. | Good / Some understanding of the subject matter. | Lacks understanding of the subject matter. |
Structured argument | Well structured arguments. | Reasonably structured argument. | Poorly structured argument. |
Higher order goal (5%): | |||
Analytical ability | Demonstrated high level of analysis. | Some analytical skills demonstrated | Numerous analytical errors or omissions - limited to no analysis. |
Skills (5%): | |||
Demonstrated clear and concise written expression | Clear and concise written expression. | Some unclear or verbose written expression. | Numerous examples of unclear or verbose written expression. |
Spelling and grammar | No identifiable spelling or grammatical issues. | Minor spelling or grammatical issues. | Numerous spelling or grammatical issues. |
Plain English drafting | No Plain English drafting errors. | Some Plain English drafting errors. | Numerous Plain English drafting errors. |
Students should also familiarise themselves with the University policy on assessment which sets out the criteria for high distinctions, distinctions, credit and pass marks in some detail.
- Communication
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
3 Written Assessment
You have (just over) one day to complete a (total maximum) 2000-word reply to the task.
Notes
- Working to a short deadline and submitting work on time is part of the assessment.
- You must complete this assessment task by Friday 8 February 2019 at 11:45 PM (Qld). In the absence of an approved extension, you will not have an opportunity to complete the task after this date. There will be no opportunity to apply a late penalty of five per cent per day and you will receive a mark of zero for this assessment task.
- I will not return the final take home paper to students. I will not provide personalised feedback. Your mark forms part of your grade for this unit.
- I require you to upload your assessment through the Moodle course website. Submit your entire answer, including your outline of submissions, in a single Word (not PDF) document. Do not submit in multiple parts.
- You may consult with peers at your discretion, but the final answer must be yours and I will check it via Turnitin for originality. When sharing ideas, it is important to retain something original for your own response. This is an individual assessment and you may not collude; which means that you cannot act together to cheat or to plagiarise or engage in academic misconduct.
Week 12 Friday (8 Feb 2019) 11:45 pm AEST
You must complete this assessment task by Friday 8 February 2019 at 11:45 PM (Qld). In the absence of an approved extension, you will not have an opportunity to complete the task after this date. There will be no opportunity to apply a late penalty of five per cent per day and you will receive a mark of zero for this assessment task.
I will provide class feedback. I will not return the final take home paper to students. I will not provide personalised feedback. Your mark forms part of your grade for this unit.
I assess students on their ability to demonstrate thinking and writing skills, to comprehend the material, to process the material and to provide a critical analysis and logical discussion of the law. Students are required to communicate an answer clearly, logically and in a concise manner. I expect you to present your paper in a professional manner. Please paginate your paper and use correct spelling and grammar. You must appropriately reference and attribute the work of others.
Fail
You will have shown evidence of the following:
- the written expression is poor and difficult to understand
- the answer is poorly organised
- referencing is generally inadequate
- lack of familiarity with the legislation and its application
- failure to identify and address the issues in the question
- reasoning and application demonstrated is poor
Pass
You will have:
- made a conscientious attempt to address the topic and/or answer the question
- shown evidence of having done the required reading and of having understood the reading
- presented a reasonable argument to back up your conclusions
- demonstrated a reasonable level of spelling and grammatical usage
- used referencing but this may need improvement
- issues that may need to be identified and addressed in more depth
Credit
You will have:
- addressed the topic and/or answered the question directly
- presented soundly based arguments and backed these up with reasons
- gone beyond description to analysis of key issues
- used the English language well
- shown evidence of reading widely
- demonstrated understanding of the reading
- used referencing that is satisfactory
Distinction
You will have:
- met the above criteria for a credit
- demonstrated the attainment of a high degree of understanding of the concepts of the unit
- demonstrated deep insight into the application of knowledge and skills to complex theoretical and practical situations
- used referencing correctly
- referred to all appropriate legislation
High Distinction
You will have:
- met the above criteria for a distinction
- demonstrated the attainment of an outstanding level of achievement regarding the objectives of this unit
- demonstrated an interesting and/or original approach/idea/argument
- demonstrated mastery of the relevant referencing system
- ensured your conclusions are backed by well-reasoned arguments demonstrating a detailed insight and analysis of issues
- ensured your references are made to the appropriate legislation for issues
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Ethical practice
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
- Analyse whether a law has a retrospective operation
- Analyse whether a statutory offence contains a mental element (mens rea)
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.