Overview
LAWS11059 Statutory interpretation has a specific focus on locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation, and deployment of interpretative techniques. In this unit you will learn how to determine whether the exercise of a statutory power is invalid if a condition or procedure regulating its exercise, is breached; whether a law has a retrospective operation; whether a statutory offence contains a mental ingredient to be proved by the prosecution (mens rea), and if so, what that ingredient is; the scope of a statutory power to make delegated legislation in the light of delegated legislation, which has purportedly been made under a power; and the application of a rule in any applicable charter of human rights. A law graduate should be able to give a reasoned opinion as to the appropriate meaning of a legislative provision which takes adequate account of the law of statutory interpretation. This unit meets the LPAB requirements for statutory interpretation.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Co-requisite: LAWS11057
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2020
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student feedback
Students have given feedback about their learning experience in this unit and expressed the desire for more materials on basic legal academic skills.
Provide more materials and recordings on legal academic skills. This is expected to equip students with legal academic literacy skills which is expected to translate to greater overall satisfaction in their learning experience in this unit. Scaffolding of this information in the first two weeks of content delivery instead of pushing students straight into difficult legal content.
Feedback from Student feedback
Engagement is good but we always enjoy improving students' online experience through feeling a greater sense of belonging to a legal community.
A 'team teaching' approach with other staff members of the law discipline so that units preceding or delivered at the same time as this unit, can be better aligned - both in terms of content and dlivery - so students feel a sense of 'seamlessness'
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
- Analyse whether a law has a retrospective operation
- Analyse whether a statutory offence contains a mental element (mens rea)
- Analyse the scope of statutory power to make delegated legislation
- Analyse and critically reflect on the application and interpretation of legislation, legislative instruments and related material.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 60% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Communication | ||||||
2 - Problem Solving | ||||||
3 - Critical Thinking | ||||||
4 - Information Literacy | ||||||
5 - Team Work | ||||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||||
8 - Ethical practice | ||||||
9 - Social Innovation | ||||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 60% |
Textbooks
Statutory Interpretation
Edition: 2 (2016)
Authors: Michelle Sanson
Oxford University Press Australia
Melbourne Melbourne , VIC , Australia
ISBN: 9780190304577
Binding: Paperback
Additional Textbook Information
Students can purchase the hardcopy and eBook at the CQUni Bookshop here: http://bookshop.cqu.edu.au (search on the Unit code)
As this is a 2016 publication, previous students may also be willing to donate/resell the book.
These are the various options available to students.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- ZOOM
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 4th ed
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
c.y.lee@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
We begin by looking at the structure of the unit, the assessment activities and engagement with one another.
In terms of content, students are introduced to statutory interpretation and that the focus of the unit is on this aspect. The cases in the textbook considered relevant may involve a number of different legal issues, but the important point for our purposes is to apply the legislation as it was, to the fact, as they were, to resolve the issue of statutory interpretation faced by the court.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapters 1 and 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
We will turn to examine the creation of legislation. In order to understand how statutes are interpreted, we must understand how they were first created. Our primary task is to reach an interpretation of the text in light of its 'context and purpose' (covered in week 4.)
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Interpretation legislation is central to the unit because it tells us how legislation is to be interpreted.
This chapter will cover numerous provisions from each juridiction with a focus on the Commonwealth provisions.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 3
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Considering the context and purpose of legislation. This chapter and the next are crucial aspects for students to understand, in terms of reasoning skills, for statutory interpretation. We begin with the theory, examining some of the conceptual details this week and next, we consider applications in practice.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 4
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Assessment 1
Case Note and Research Due: Week 4 Monday (3 Aug 2020) 10:00 am AEST
Module/Topic
The 'intention and interpretive techniques' chapter is challenging as we address intention as an objective concept. Analogies and case examples will be used to explain the concept to students but under-girding these will be discussions as to 'why' intention should be objective, and 'how' it can be identified and then, applied.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 5
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Intrinsic materials are relevant to identifying the meaning of words in their context and in light of their purpose.
Statutory components: intrinsic materials contained within the statute in question. We will examine component parts of the statute to determine meaning.
The seminal case Project Blue Sky will be the focus of examination this week.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Intrinsic materials are relevant to identifying the meaning of words in their context and in light of their purpose.
The text: examining the text of the legislation as an example of intrinsic material which must be considered in statutory interpretation.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 7
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Extrinsic Material involve using Materials from outside the Act in order to identify the meaning intended by the legislation.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 8
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Traditional Common Law Approaches: Can they still help?
The modern approach to statutory interpretation developed through the history of common law rules: literal, golden and mischief. This chapter covers the main aspects of these common law rules (Latin maxims) to understand how the common law and statutes relate to one another. This synergy enables them to work together towards a coherent body of law in a common law system like Australia.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 9
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Assessment 2
Solve a statutory interpretation problem Due: Week 8 Monday (7 Sept 2020) 10:00 am AEST
Module/Topic
This week is an extension of the discussion from Chapter 9: examining rules of statutory interpretation which developed at common law and continue to be relevant. The overall point is to give primacy to the meaning of the text of a legislative provision in its context and in light of its purpose. If it is evident from the text, context or purpose that an alternative meaning should be used, then the statutory presumption may not even be applicable.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 10
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Fundamental Human Rights in International Law: Do they influence interpretation?
As fundamental and human rights become increasingly influential in all aspects of our lives, and contemporary Parliaments are legislating on topics which expand or contract our rights (counter-terrorism, privacy laws, laws regarding covid-19), the principle of legality assumes a new significance. It becomes fashionable for judges to use this principle as a way of reaching and/or justifying their interpretation of statutory provision, be that narrow or broad.
We will examine the different approaches to the application of this principle, the underlying views by the High Court judges as illustrative of a topic that continues to be in a state of flux.
Chapter
Michelle Sanson, Statutory Interpretation Chapter 11.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Review and Take Home Paper Week
Chapter
No prescribed reading this week
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly online tutorial discussions
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment 3
Take-Home Paper Due: Review/Exam Week Monday (12 Oct 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Statutory interpretation is a challenging but rewarding subject. It has long term implications to your lives as legal practitioners after you leave law school. However, it is also a great opportunity to be introduced to or consolidate your legal academic skills. I will make a basic legal academic skills toolkit available as part of your Moodle page. Please continue to refer to these basic skills throughout the term. I will make direct reference to them throughout the unit.
1 Written Assessment
Presented in two parts with 10 marks allocated for each part.
Part 1 A research task which relates to the creation and understanding of Commonwealth legislation.
Part 2 A short interpretation question you can answer by reference to interpretation legislation and cases.
Full details of the assignment task will be provided on the Statutory Interpretation Moodle site after the commencement of term.
2000 words
Week 4 Monday (3 Aug 2020) 10:00 am AEST
The first part of this assignment is to be answered in paragraphs responses. Make sure you have answered the second section of this assignment according to the IRAC legal problem-solving method.
Marked assignments will be returned via the Moodle site in approx. two (2) weeks after submission.
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Poor |
Basic goals (15%): | |||
Identification of primary issues | Identification of all major issues. | Identification of most major issues. | Identification of some major issues. |
Demonstrated understanding of the subject matter | Excellent demonstrated understanding of the subject matter. | Good / Some understanding of the subject matter. | Lacks understanding of the subject matter. |
Structured argument | Well structured arguments. | Reasonably structured argument. | Poorly structured argument. |
Higher order goal (2.5%): | |||
Analytical ability | Demonstrated high level of analysis. | Some analytical skills demonstrated | Numerous analytical errors or omissions - limited to no analysis. |
Skills (2.5%): | |||
Demonstrated clear and concise written expression | Clear and concise written expression. | Some unclear or verbose written expression. | Numerous examples of unclear or verbose written expression. |
Spelling and grammar | No identifiable spelling or grammatical issues. | Minor spelling or grammatical issues. | Numerous spelling or grammatical issues. |
Plain English drafting | No Plain English drafting errors. | Some Plain English drafting errors. | Numerous Plain English drafting errors. |
Students should also familiarise themselves with the University policy on assessment which sets out the criteria for high distinctions, distinctions, credit and pass marks in some detail.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
- Analyse whether a law has a retrospective operation
- Analyse whether a statutory offence contains a mental element (mens rea)
- Analyse the scope of statutory power to make delegated legislation
- Analyse and critically reflect on the application and interpretation of legislation, legislative instruments and related material.
2 Written Assessment
Students are required to solve a statutory interpretation problem question based on the material covered in modules in the second part of the unit.
Full details of the assignment task will be provided on the Statutory Interpretation Moodle site after the commencement of term.
2000 words (maximum)
Week 8 Monday (7 Sept 2020) 10:00 am AEST
Marked assignments will be returned via the Moodle site in about two (2) weeks after submission.
Basic goals (15%): | |||
Identification of primary issues | Identification of all major issues. | Identification of most major issues. | Identification of some major issues. |
Demonstrated understanding of the subject matter | Excellent demonstrated understanding of the subject matter. | Good / Some understanding of the subject matter. | Lacks understanding of the subject matter. |
Structured argument | Well structured arguments. | Reasonably structured argument. | Poorly structured argument. |
Higher order goal (2.5%): | |||
Analytical ability | Demonstrated high level of analysis. | Some analytical skills demonstrated | Numerous analytical errors or omissions - limited to no analysis. |
Skills (2.5%): | |||
Demonstrated clear and concise written expression | Clear and concise written expression. | Some unclear or verbose written expression. | Numerous examples of unclear or verbose written expression. |
Spelling and grammar | No identifiable spelling or grammatical issues. | Minor spelling or grammatical issues. | Numerous spelling or grammatical issues. |
Plain English drafting | No Plain English drafting errors. | Some Plain English drafting errors. | Numerous Plain English drafting errors. |
Students should also familiarise themselves with the University policy on assessment which sets out the criteria for high distinctions, distinctions, credit and pass marks in some detail.
- Communication
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
3 Written Assessment
You have just over one day to complete a (total maximum) 2000-word reply to the task.
Notes
- Working to a short deadline and submitting work on time is part of the assessment.
- The paper will be made accessible on Sunday, 11 October 2020 at 5:00 PM (Qld). You must complete this assessment task by Monday, 12 October 2020 at 11:45 PM (Qld). In the absence of an approved extension (up to 5 days after submission date), you will not have an opportunity to complete the task after this date. There will be no opportunity to apply a late penalty of five per cent per day and you will receive a mark of zero for this assessment task.
- I will not return the final take home paper to students. I will not provide personalised feedback. Your mark forms part of your grade for this unit.
- I require you to upload your assessment through the Moodle unit website. Submit your entire answer, including your outline of submissions, in a single Word (not PDF) document. Do not submit in multiple parts.
- You may consult with peers at your discretion, but the final answer must be yours and I will check it via Turnitin for originality. When sharing ideas, it is important to retain something original for your own response. This is an individual assessment and you may not collude; which means that you cannot act together to cheat or to plagiarise or engage in academic misconduct.
Review/Exam Week Monday (12 Oct 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
You must complete this assessment task by Monday, 12 October 2020 at 11:45 PM (Qld). In the absence of an approved extension, you will not have an opportunity to complete the task after this date. There will be no opportunity to apply a late penalty of five per cent per day and you will receive a mark of zero for this assessment task.
Normal exam conditions apply. The final online paper is not returned to students. I will provide general feedback to the class. The individual papers are not returned to students. I will not provide personalised feedback. Your mark forms part of your grade for this unit. However, feedback is provided to the whole class in the form of an exam feedback report on the Certification of grades date in accordance with the University Assessment Policy.
I assess students on their ability to demonstrate thinking and writing skills, to comprehend the material, to process the material and to provide a critical analysis and logical discussion of the law. Students are required to communicate an answer clearly, logically and in a concise manner. I expect you to present your paper in a professional manner. Please paginate your paper and use correct spelling and grammar. You must appropriately reference and attribute the work of others.
Fail
You will have shown evidence of the following:
- the written expression is poor and difficult to understand
- the answer is poorly organised
- referencing is generally inadequate
- lack of familiarity with the legislation and its application
- failure to identify and address the issues in the question
- reasoning and application demonstrated is poor
Pass
You will have:
- made a conscientious attempt to address the topic and/or answer the question
- shown evidence of having done the required reading and of having understood the reading
- presented a reasonable argument to back up your conclusions
- demonstrated a reasonable level of spelling and grammatical usage
- used referencing but this may need improvement
- issues that may need to be identified and addressed in more depth
Credit
You will have:
- addressed the topic and/or answered the question directly
- presented soundly based arguments and backed these up with reasons
- gone beyond description to analysis of key issues
- used the English language well
- shown evidence of reading widely
- demonstrated understanding of the reading
- used referencing that is satisfactory
Distinction
You will have:
- met the above criteria for a credit
- demonstrated the attainment of a high degree of understanding of the concepts of the unit
- demonstrated deep insight into the application of knowledge and skills to complex theoretical and practical situations
- used referencing correctly
- referred to all appropriate legislation
High Distinction
You will have:
- met the above criteria for a distinction
- demonstrated the attainment of an outstanding level of achievement regarding the objectives of this unit
- demonstrated an interesting and/or original approach/idea/argument
- demonstrated mastery of the relevant referencing system
- ensured your conclusions are backed by well-reasoned arguments demonstrating a detailed insight and analysis of issues
- ensured your references are made to the appropriate legislation for issues
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Ethical practice
- Apply skills in locating and using legislation, aids to interpretation and deployment of interpretive skills
- Evaluate whether the exercise of statutory power is invalid
- Analyse whether a law has a retrospective operation
- Analyse whether a statutory offence contains a mental element (mens rea)
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.