Overview
LAWS11062 Contract B builds on and develops knowledge acquired in LAWS11061 Contract A. In this unit you will examine contracts with a vitiating element such as a mistake; misrepresentation; duress; undue influence; unconscionable contracts and illegal and void contracts. The unit also covers the ways in which a contract may be assigned, discharged, terminated; promissory estoppel; and the remedies available for non-performance of a contract. This unit together with LAWS11061 Contract A meets the LPAB requirements for contracts.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Prerequisite: LAWS11061
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2018
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from survey
Students asked for more unit-related content to be cross-posted to the Facebook Closed Group for participation and discussion by students.
Recommend continue to cross-post more unit-related content to the Facebook Closed Group for greater participation via social media.
- Understand the legal concepts and consequences of vitiating factors in contract law
- Identify and apply corresponding statutory, common law and equitable remedies in resolving contractual disputes
- Research and apply legal principles from statute and case law to the analysis of contractual disputes
- Compare the operation of Australian contract law with overseas contract law, particularly in relation to online commerce
- Demonstrate skills in communication, critical legal thinking, and reasoning
- Demonstrate an understanding of how contracts are assigned, discharged or terminated.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||
| 2 - Presentation - 30% | ||||||
| 3 - Examination - 50% | ||||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 - Communication | ||||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | ||||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | ||||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | ||||||
| 5 - Team Work | ||||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | ||||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | ||||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Presentation - 30% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Examination - 50% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
Contract Law
Edition: 4th (2013)
Authors: Willmott, Christensen, Butler, Dixon
OUP
South Melbourne South Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
ISBN: 9780195578461
Binding: Hardcover
Contract Law Case Book
Edition: 4th (2013)
Authors: Butler, Christensen, Dixon, Willmott
OUP
South Melbourne South Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
ISBN: 9780195578478
Binding: Hardcover
Additional Textbook Information
Both of the above books come packaged together at a reduced cost to students. See the CQUni Bookshop for details: http://bookshop.cqu.edu.au/texts.asp
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 3rd ed
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
a.m.george@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Mistake
*Start on Misrepresentation
Chapter
Prescribed text book ***Please note*** I will NOT be using the old 2013 text, so please DISREGARD the "Textbooks and Resources" section above. I will be using the new 2018 text. This is available online through the CQU library (see access options in the next box to the right).
The two editions are substantially similar except for:
*Week 2 readings on misrepresentation/misleading or deceptive conduct, and
*Week 7 readings on termination, and
*Week 10 readings on restitution.
Please check out those chapters online (see box to the right).
This week read: Chapter 14 (of either 2013 or 2018 edition)
Total reading at this point only 28 pages* so ...
*Make a start on Week 2, Chapter 13 of the 2018 text (see box to right), Common law Misrepresentation (pp463-492), 28 pages: brings total reading for the week to 56 pages
Events and Submissions/Topic
TO ACCESS THE WILLMOTT ET AL, 2018 TEXT:
Go to the CQUniversity Library catalogue entry for Willmott et al, and access the 2018 text HERE!!
OR login with your CQUniversity student details and view the new 2018 text here via ProQuest: Willmott et al, 2018 [online version through CQU library]
OR see the pdf version of Willmott et al, Chapter 13 for Week 2 HERE!!
Module/Topic
Misrepresentation and misleading and deceptive conduct
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 13 of 2018 text (see access options under "Events and Submissions/Topic" in Week 1 above), finish this chapter (Misleading or Deceptive Conduct pp492-565)
Total reading for this week 73 pages* so if you didn't start this last week ...
*You can finish the last 16pgs next week (from 13.19.6 on p549 to p565), brings total reading for this week to 57 pages
Events and Submissions/Topic
Read Chapter 13 online if necessary, see notes to Week 1 above.
Module/Topic
Estoppel*
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 7 (of either 2013 and 2018 edition)
Total reading this week only 20 pages* so ...
*If you haven't finished the Misrepresentation chapter (13) do so this week, brings total reading for this week to 36 pages
*And then you still have time to get cracking on your first assessment (!)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Equitable concepts:
unconscionability, duress and undue influence
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapters 15, 16, 17 (of either 2013 or 2018 edition)
Total reading for the week 50 pages
Events and Submissions/Topic
Problem assignment due NEXT WEEK!
Module/Topic
Illegality
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 18 (of either 2013 or 2018 edition)
Total reading the week 50 pages
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
[If you have time, why not get started on Assessment 2!]
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Discharge by performance or agreement
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapters 19 and 21 (of either 2013 or 2018 edition)
Total reading to this point only 27 pages* so ...
*Make a start on next week's reading, Discharge by Termination, Chapter 20 (2018 edition, p717 to 20.10 on p735. See access options in Week 1 above or see the pdf of Chapter 20 in the box to the right), 18 pages, brings total reading for the week to 45 pages
Events and Submissions/Topic
Read Chapters 19 and 21 (either edition) then start Chapter 20, 2018 edition. See access options under Week 1, above. OR see the online pdf of Chapter 20, HERE!!
Module/Topic
Discharge by termination: breach, repudiation
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 20 (read 2018 edition). See access options under Week 1 above, or pdf of Chapter 20 in Week 6 above.
Total reading for the week 67 pages* (hopefully you started the first 18 pages last week!)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Frustration
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 22 (of either 2013 or 2018 edition)
Total reading for the week only 20 pages* so ...
*Why not finish off last week's reading on Discharge by Termination, OR
*Why not get started on next week's reading on Remedies, OR
*Why not spend some time on Assessment 2?
Events and Submissions/Topic
Court presentation due NEXT WEEK!
Module/Topic
Remedies (Part I: Damages)
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 23 (of either 2013 or 2018 text. If reading from 2013 text, **please read p869 [23.13.5] to p871 (3 pages) of 2018 text as this is NOT in 2013 edition**
Total reading for the week 50 pages
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Remedies (Part II: Restitution, Equity, ACL)
Chapter
Prescribed text book
Chapter 24 of 2018 edition, AND
Chapter 25 (of either 2013 or 2018 edition)
Total reading from text for the week 59 pages*
*Also need to read relevant provisions of the Australian Consumer Law
Events and Submissions/Topic
Chapter 24, 2018 edition. See access options under Week 1, above. No pdf available for this chapter for copyright reasons. Also read Chapter 25 (either edition).
Module/Topic
International aspects of contract law
Chapter
Prescribed text book (2013 edition)*
Chapter 28* (see box to right for .pdf version)
*Only read selected portions [28.05-95], [28.280-415]
Malbon, J 'Online Cross-Border Consumer Transactions', [2013] UWALawRw 3 access it HERE!!
Module/Topic
Revision and Q&A session
Chapter
... and ... we're done ...!
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Centrally Scheduled Examination
1 Written Assessment
This assessment is designed to reinforce student learning in relation to the early-unit material covering the various means of vitiation of contracts. The assessment also requires students to undertake basic research tasks, including the use of textbooks and other sources of information, to understand the basis for the vitiation of contracts. Students will be provided with problem questions based upon vitiating factors.
The specific questions will be provided to students during Week 1 of the semester. The assessment will be 2000 words maximum in length.
*Please
note all submissions must adhere to the citation method used in the Australian
Guide to Legal Citation, 3rd ed referencing style. See further the AGLC
website here.
Week 5 Tuesday (7 Aug 2018) 11:59 pm AEST
Submissions will be uploaded via Moodle
Marks will be returned via Moodle within 2 weeks
The following graduate attributes are assessed in the assignment (worth 20%):
1. Communication
2. Information Literacy
3. Information Technology Competence
4. Research
5. Critical Thinking
6. Ethical practice
Assessment Criteria/Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Poor |
|
Basic
goals (10%): |
|||
|
Identification
of primary issues |
Identification
of all major issues. |
Identification
of most major issues. |
Identification
of some major issues. |
|
Demonstrated
understanding of the subject matter |
Excellent
demonstrated understanding of the subject matter. |
Good
understanding of the subject matter. |
Lacks
understanding of the subject matter. |
|
Structured
argument |
Superbly
structured arguments. |
Well-structured
argument. |
Poorly
structured argument. |
|
Higher
order goal (5%): |
|||
|
Analytical
ability |
Demonstrated
high level of analysis. |
Some
analytical errors or omissions. |
Numerous
analytical errors or omissions. |
|
Skills
(5%): |
|||
|
Demonstrated
clear and concise written expression |
Clear
and concise written expression. |
Some
unclear or verbose written expression. |
Numerous
examples of unclear or verbose written expression. |
|
Spelling
and grammar |
No
identifiable spelling or grammatical issues. |
Minor
spelling or grammatical issues. |
Numerous
spelling or grammatical issues. |
|
Plain
English drafting |
No
Plain English drafting errors. |
Some
Plain English drafting errors. |
Numerous
Plain English drafting errors. |
- Understand the legal concepts and consequences of vitiating factors in contract law
- Identify and apply corresponding statutory, common law and equitable remedies in resolving contractual disputes
- Research and apply legal principles from statute and case law to the analysis of contractual disputes
- Compare the operation of Australian contract law with overseas contract law, particularly in relation to online commerce
- Demonstrate skills in communication, critical legal thinking, and reasoning
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
2 Presentation
The video presentation assesses Unit Objectives and the University Graduate Attributes of communication, problem solving, critical thinking, information literacy, IT competence and ethical practice.
Students will be provided with a problem scenario in relation to a contract matter. Students will then be required to analyse the problem and develop oral submissions in response. The student must create a video recording of themselves delivering their response and submit the video recording. While a courtroom setting will not be required, students should make an effort to present themselves professionally for the video (male: jacket and tie; female jacket and skirt or pants; neat hair and otherwise presentable) and to deliver their submissions clearly and effectively. The submissions will cover unit material as instructed.
Week 9 Monday (10 Sept 2018) 11:59 pm AEST
Submissions will be uploaded to YouTube as unlisted videos - detailed instructions will be provided
Comments will be provided via Moodle within 2 weeks
Assessment
Criteria for the Assessment/Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Poor |
|
Basic
goals: |
|||
|
Identification of primary issues |
Identification of all major issues. |
Identification of most major issues. |
Identification of some major issues. |
|
Demonstrated understanding of the subject matter |
Excellent demonstrated understanding of the subject
matter. |
Good understanding of the subject matter. |
Lacks understanding of the subject matter. |
|
Structured argument |
Superbly structured arguments. |
Well-structured argument. |
Poorly structured argument. |
|
Higher
order goal: |
|||
|
Analytical ability |
Demonstrated high level of analysis. |
Some analytical errors or omissions. |
Numerous analytical errors or omissions. |
|
Skills: |
|||
|
Demonstrated clear and concise oral presentation |
Clear and concise oral expression. |
Some unclear or verbose oral expression. |
Numerous examples of unclear or verbose oral
expression. |
|
Pace, diction and persuasiveness |
Pace, diction and persuasiveness at a high level. |
Generally effective delibery with some lapses in
pace, diction or persuasiveness |
Poor, unpersuasive, difficult-to-follow
presentation |
|
General presentation |
Presentation at a professional level |
Some effort made at professional presentation |
Poor professional presentation |
- Identify and apply corresponding statutory, common law and equitable remedies in resolving contractual disputes
- Research and apply legal principles from statute and case law to the analysis of contractual disputes
- Demonstrate skills in communication, critical legal thinking, and reasoning
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Ethical practice
Examination
Law dictionaries, Business and Law dictionaries (discipline specific dictionaries) are authorised.
No calculators permitted
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
