CQUniversity Unit Profile
LAWS12067 Environmental Law
Environmental Law
All details in this unit profile for LAWS12067 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

The environmental movement is strong and getting stronger. It is an important social revolution. Environmental law is a new and exciting area of legal practice. The Constitution of Australia does not include power for the Federal Parliament to make laws in relation to the environment. In this unit we will consider how the Commonwealth does have a role to play in environmental law despite its lack of constitutional power. We consider the role of State Governments at the Parliamentary and Executive level. The impact of environmental groups has gained more momentum year by year; after an initial explosion of publicity which led to blockade of the Franklin River and ultimately the High Court Tasmanian Dam decision in 1983. New philosophies such as the precautionary principle will be explored and explained. The apparent conflict between environmental law rights which are in the public domain and landowners' property and contractual rights in relation to land will be considered. We will also deal with environmental litigation, including prosecution and the difficulties which face environmental groups. Discussion points include recent developments such as the extraction of coal seam gas and the development of the Gas Fields Commission. We explore the process of environmental impact assessment.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 2
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 10
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Prerequisites: LAWS11057, LAWS11059, LAWS11061, LAWS11062, LAWS11063, LAWS11064, LAWS11060, (LAWS11065 or LAWS12055)

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 3 - 2019

Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 25%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 25%
3. Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from John Milburn, unit coordinator.

Feedback

Unit content and delivery.

Recommendation

Continue with the assessment regime and the general format of this unit. I updated the unit content to reflect the new planning regime introduced in Queensland, with an increased emphasis on issues associated with industry practice.

Feedback from Student feedback and self-evaluation.

Feedback

Interaction with students and between students using UCROO.

Recommendation

Continue using UCROO as the primary means of online discussion with students and between students.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Describe the basic structure, institutions, key functions and processes of the Australian legal systems within which environmental law operates.
  2. Analyse major topics and key issues such as environmental property rights, access to and management of the environment, environmental protection measures and environmental litigation with reference to the relevant sources of legal authority..
  3. Identify and respond to the types of legal problems and issues likely to be embedded in commonly encountered environment-related activities.
  4. Explain the environmental law litigation process and alternative dispute resolution procedures.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Written Assessment - 25%
2 - Written Assessment - 25%
3 - Written Assessment - 50%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Written Assessment - 25%
2 - Written Assessment - 25%
3 - Written Assessment - 50%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Environmental Law in Australia

Edition: 10th (2019)
Authors: Gerry Bates
Lexis Nexis Butterworths
Sydney Sydney , NSW , Australia
ISBN: 9780409349115
Binding: Paperback
Supplementary

Planning in Queensland: Law, Policy and Practice

Edition: 1st (2019)
Authors: Philippa England
The Federation Press
Sydney Sydney , NSW , Australia
ISBN: 9781760022068
Binding: Paperback

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • Zoom capacity (web cam and microphone)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 4th ed

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
John Milburn Unit Coordinator
j.a.milburn@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 11 Nov 2019

Module/Topic

Introduction to Environmental Law

Chapter

Bates chapter 1

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 18 Nov 2019

Module/Topic

Environmental Law in Legal Context

Chapter

Bates chapter 1

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 25 Nov 2019

Module/Topic

Environment Protection and the Common Law

Chapter

Bates chapter 1

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 02 Dec 2019

Module/Topic

International Environmental Law and Federal Governance

Chapter

Bates chapters 2-3

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 09 Dec 2019

Module/Topic


Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 16 Dec 2019

Module/Topic

Environmental Legislation/Ecologically Sustainable Development

Chapter

Bates chapter 4

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 23 Dec 2019

Module/Topic

Strategic Environmental Planning and Assessment

Chapter

Bates chapters 4-5

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 06 Jan 2020

Module/Topic

Environmental Impact Assessment

Chapter

Bates chapter 5 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 13 Jan 2020

Module/Topic

Protection of Biodiversity, Climate Change and Indigenous Cultural Heritage

Chapter

Bates chapters 6-10 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Case Note and Hypothetical Appeal Due: Week 8 Thursday (16 Jan 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 9 Begin Date: 20 Jan 2020

Module/Topic

Environmental Litigation – Civil Law

Chapter

Bates chapter 12 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 27 Jan 2020

Module/Topic

Environmental Litigation – Criminal Law

Chapter

Bates chapter 11 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Environmental Impact Case Study Due: Week 10 Thursday (30 Jan 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 11 Begin Date: 03 Feb 2020

Module/Topic

Challenging Environmental Decision-making /ADR

Chapter

Bates chapter 12-13 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 10 Feb 2020

Module/Topic

Review

Chapter

Nil

Events and Submissions/Topic

Take Home Paper is released on Thursday, 13 February 2020 at 6:45 PM and is due on on Friday 14 February 2020 commencing by 11:45 PM AEST (Qld).

NOTE: When making unit selections, please check the timing of the take home papers in your other subjects to cater for, or avoid, a conflict.


Take Home Paper Due: Week 12 Friday (14 Feb 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Case Note and Hypothetical Appeal

Task Description

Overview of the objectives for this exercise

You are required to read a Planning and Environment Court (PEC) case about an appeal against a council decision, make comment about it and provide advice about a hypothetical appeal against the PEC decision. You should be able to answer the questions in less than 1250 words in total.


Required reading

Read the following case:

Lipoma Pty Ltd & Ors v Redland City Council & Nerida Pty Ltd [2019] QPEC 43


Assessment Due Date

Week 8 Thursday (16 Jan 2020) 11:45 pm AEST

I expect students to present their assignment work on time. Please note that I will not consider any request for an extension of time unless you upload an application in the appropriate manner, supported by documentation and made prior to the due time/date. I will impose a penalty deduction of 5% per day for late work, up to the final cut-off date (Wednesday, 29 January 2020 at 11:45 PM AEST). Failure to upload work by the cut-off date will result in a nil mark.


Return Date to Students

Week 10 Thursday (30 Jan 2020)

Student satisfaction surveys in the past indicate student concerns when a unit coordinator does not provide assessment feedback quickly. Generally, I release the feedback and marks the day after the final cut-off date.


Weighting
25%

Assessment Criteria

I assess students on their ability to demonstrate thinking and writing skills, to comprehend the material, to process the material and to provide a critical analysis and logical discussion of the law. Students are required to communicate clearly, logically and in a concise manner. I expect you to present your paper in a professional manner. Please paginate the paper and use correct spelling and grammar. You must appropriately reference and attribute the work of others.


High distinction standard

  • You wrote your answer very well and expressed yourself clearly and concisely
  • You presented your paper in a logical structure
  • You demonstrated an appreciation and understanding of the issues involved
  • You backed your answer by well-reasoned arguments demonstrating a detailed insight and analysis of issues
  • You produced a sophisticated analysis from a variety of perspectives
  • You demonstrated mastery of the AGLC referencing system

Distinction Standard

  • Your answer is well written and expressed
  • You produced a well-structured and logical paper
  • You clearly identified, and appreciated, legal issues
  • You referenced your material correctly
  • You referred to appropriate case law, but your analysis and interpretation was not as detailed and reasoned as for high distinction standard

Credit Standard

  • Your answer is generally well written and expressed
  • Your paper is well structured and sequential
  • Your coverage of issues is reasonably comprehensive with a good treatment and analysis
  • Referencing is satisfactory
  • Your analysis is not as detailed and reasoned as for distinction standard

Pass Standard

  • I could understand your paper
  • You could better organise and structure your paper
  • You could identify and address issues in more depth
  • Your paper is confusing or incorrect
  • Core facts/issues not clearly understood or identified
  • You demonstrated some familiarity with legislation and case law
  • Your conclusions reached are somewhat simplistic
  • You included quantities of material of marginal relevance in your paper
  • Referencing needs improvement
  • Your analysis is not as detailed and reasoned as for credit standard


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
I will only accept online submission of your work. Upload your work in a Word document (not PDF). I expect students to present their assignment work on time. Take care with your submission. Avoid obvious mistakes, such as basic spelling and grammatical errors. Read your paper out aloud, word by word. It is slow however; it may be a productive exercise. Alternatively, or in addition, ask a friend to read your material. Generally, you should submit one document (even if the assessment is in two or more parts) and ensure that your name is included in the name of the saved document.

Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe the basic structure, institutions, key functions and processes of the Australian legal systems within which environmental law operates.
  • Analyse major topics and key issues such as environmental property rights, access to and management of the environment, environmental protection measures and environmental litigation with reference to the relevant sources of legal authority..
  • Identify and respond to the types of legal problems and issues likely to be embedded in commonly encountered environment-related activities.
  • Explain the environmental law litigation process and alternative dispute resolution procedures.

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Environmental Impact Case Study

Task Description

Overview of the objectives for this exercise

You are required to consider a case study involving the Townsville Port Expansion Project application . You should be able to answer the questions in less than 1500 words in total.

Required reading

You are required to read the document 'Townsville Port Expansion Project Additional Information to the Environmental Impact Statement (AEIS) - Summary'. You should also consider all of the environmental impact statement material, including the terms of reference relevant to the Townsville Port Expansion Project application. To complete the task you may need to consider the other documentation available on the Department of State Development, Coordinator-General's projects website in relation to the application.

Marks

I allocate 25 marks for the exercise. I have allocated a specific number of marks for each of the questions.

Your response

Answer in short paragraphs where appropriate. I value brevity.


Assessment Due Date

Week 10 Thursday (30 Jan 2020) 11:45 pm AEST

I expect students to present their assignment work on time. Please note that I will not consider any request for an extension of time unless you upload an application in the appropriate manner, supported by documentation and made prior to the due time/date. I will impose a penalty deduction of 5% per day for late work, up to the final cut-off date (Wednesday, 12 February 2020 at 11:45 PM AEST). Failure to upload work by the cut-off date will result in a nil mark.


Return Date to Students

Week 12 Thursday (13 Feb 2020)

Student satisfaction surveys in the past indicate student concerns when a unit coordinator does not provide assessment feedback quickly. Generally, I release the feedback and marks the day after the final cut-off date.


Weighting
25%

Assessment Criteria

I assess students on their ability to demonstrate thinking and writing skills, to comprehend the material, to process the material and to provide a critical analysis and logical discussion of the law. Students are required to communicate clearly, logically and in a concise manner. I expect you to present your paper in a professional manner. Please paginate the paper and use correct spelling and grammar. You must appropriately reference and attribute the work of others.


High distinction standard

  • You wrote your answer very well and expressed yourself clearly and concisely
  • You presented your paper in a logical structure
  • You demonstrated an appreciation and understanding of the issues involved
  • You backed your answer by well-reasoned statements demonstrating a detailed insight and analysis of issues
  • You produced a sophisticated analysis from a variety of perspectives
  • You demonstrated mastery of the AGLC referencing system

Distinction Standard

  • Your answer is well written and expressed
  • You produced a well-structured and logical paper
  • You clearly identified, and appreciated, legal issues
  • You referenced your material correctly
  • You referred to appropriate material, but your analysis and interpretation was not as detailed and reasoned as for high distinction standard

Credit Standard

  • Your answer is generally well written and expressed
  • Your paper is well structured and sequential
  • Your coverage of issues is reasonably comprehensive with a good treatment and analysis
  • Referencing is satisfactory
  • Your analysis is not as detailed and reasoned as for distinction standard

Pass Standard

  • I could understand your paper
  • You could better organise and structure your paper
  • You could identify and address issues in more depth
  • Your paper is confusing or incorrect
  • Core facts/issues not clearly understood or identified
  • You demonstrated some familiarity with process
  • Your conclusions reached are somewhat simplistic
  • You included quantities of material of marginal relevance in your paper
  • Referencing needs improvement
  • Your analysis is not as detailed and reasoned as for credit standard


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
I will only accept online submission of your work. Upload your work in a Word document (not PDF). I expect students to present their assignment work on time. Take care with your submission. Avoid obvious mistakes, such as basic spelling and grammatical errors. Read your paper out aloud, word by word. It is slow however; it may be a productive exercise. Alternatively, or in addition, ask a friend to read your material. Generally, you should submit one document (even if the assessment is in two or more parts) and ensure that your name is included in the name of the saved document.

Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe the basic structure, institutions, key functions and processes of the Australian legal systems within which environmental law operates.
  • Analyse major topics and key issues such as environmental property rights, access to and management of the environment, environmental protection measures and environmental litigation with reference to the relevant sources of legal authority..
  • Identify and respond to the types of legal problems and issues likely to be embedded in commonly encountered environment-related activities.
  • Explain the environmental law litigation process and alternative dispute resolution procedures.

3 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Take Home Paper

Task Description

Take Home Paper is released on Thursday, 13 February 2020 at 6:45 PM AEST (Qld).


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Friday (14 Feb 2020) 11:45 pm AEST

No extensions allowed. You will be no opportunity to complete the task after the deadline. This is not an assessment where you will receive a deduction for late submission. If you do not submit your work by the cut-off time (11:45 PM AEST Qld) you will receive a nil mark.


Return Date to Students

Normal examination conditions apply. The final online paper is not returned to students. General feedback is provided to the whole class in the form of an answer guide after the due date in accordance with University assessment policy.


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

No extensions.  NOTE: When making unit selections, please check the timing of the take home papers in your other subjects to cater for, or avoid, a conflict.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Upload a single Word (not PDF) document to Moodle. No extensions are possible, as exam conditions apply.

Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe the basic structure, institutions, key functions and processes of the Australian legal systems within which environmental law operates.
  • Analyse major topics and key issues such as environmental property rights, access to and management of the environment, environmental protection measures and environmental litigation with reference to the relevant sources of legal authority..
  • Identify and respond to the types of legal problems and issues likely to be embedded in commonly encountered environment-related activities.
  • Explain the environmental law litigation process and alternative dispute resolution procedures.

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?