Overview
Informed practice is fundamental to safe midwifery care. To achieve this, you require research skills and the ability to critique the research in order to provide the best care. This unit will develop your ability to critically analyse research for the purpose of enhancing your midwifery practice and critique current policy.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Pre-req MDWF12001 Midwifery - Past and Present
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2020
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Unit feedback.
"The content was easy to understand and encouraged me to learn. Clear direction, well explained."
To continue to ensure that content is interesting and easy to understand.
Feedback from Unit feedback.
"Evidence-based research is paramount! Finding the evidence through research makes so much more sense now."
To continue to ensure that the unit continues to include specific instructions on how to search, locate and identify the literature to inform midwifery practice.
Feedback from Unit feedback.
"The assessments are very well explained. There are plenty of opportunities to clarify what is required. Tanya explains concepts very well and the youtube videos in the weekly study guides were very good for explaining things."
To continue to offer Zoom sessions to discuss assessment tasks, and to provide videos to further inform more complex concepts such as those relating to quantitative research.
Feedback from Unit feedback.
"Thoroughly enjoyed the assessments and Tanya was great! The assignments were interesting therefore easier to write!"
To continue to prepare interesting assessment tasks that relate to contemporary midwifery practice.
Feedback from Unit feedback.
"When previously taking on a research subject in a bachelor of nursing (not at Cqu) I have struggled to understand it. In this course, Tanya has made me grasp an understanding of research. thank you, Tanya."
To continue to ensure that the unit content is easy to understand and apply to practice.
Feedback from Unit feedback.
"One of the topics of discussion was very similar to the question of the written assessment. I felt like repeating the same thing and it was not motivated me at all."
To ensure that the blog topics are very different from the larger written assessment tasks in order to avoid any overlap in content.
- Identify the concepts that underpin the types of evidence informing current midwifery practice.
- Demonstrate the ability to analyse current evidence for best practice in midwifery.
- Critique current policy relevant to midwifery practice.
- Recommend appropriate midwifery care informed by current research and ethical decision making.
NMBA Midwife Standards for Practice
Standard 1: Promotes evidence-based maternal health and wellbeing.
Standard 2: Engages in respectful partnerships and professional relationships.
Standard 3: Demonstrates the capability and accountability for midwifery practice.
Standard 5: Develops plans for midwifery practice.
Standard 6: Provides safe and quality midwifery practice.
Standard 7: Evaluates outcomes to improve midwifery practice.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Group Discussion - 30% | ||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Communication | ||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | ||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | ||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | ||||
| 5 - Team Work | ||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | ||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | ||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Group Discussion - 30% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
Midwifery : Preparation for Practice
4th edition (2019)
Authors: Pairman, Pincombe, Thorogood & Tracy
Elsevier
Sydney, Sydney, , NSW , Australia
Binding: Paperback
Additional Textbook Information
If you prefer to study with a paper copy, they are available at the CQUni Bookshop here: http://bookshop.cqu.edu.au (search on the Unit code). eBooks are available at the publisher's website.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
t.capper@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to Research
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Application of the Evidence to Midwifery Practice
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
PICO and Searching for Evidence
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Appraising the Evidence
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Quantitative Research
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Mixed Methods Research
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT's)
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Ethical and Legal Issues in Research
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Policies and Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Applying Research Knowledge to Practice
Chapter
Chapter 7 of: Midwifery Preparation for Practice, 4th Edition.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Group Discussion
Assessment One: Online Group Discussion
Total weighting 30%
Objectives: This assessment relates to learning outcome one (1).
1. Identify the concepts that underpin the types of evidence informing current midwifery practice
Task Description
You are required to participate in an online group discussion via Moodle that will be directed by the Unit Coordinator. The online activities will require you to participate in a group discussion on set topics/questions/activities posed in your study guide. Marks will be awarded for your active online participation in the group discussion. You must not only post your own group discussion entries but also respond to your peers as per the marking rubric.
Group discussion subjects will be set for study weeks 3, 6, 9 & 12.
Contribution to the online discussion is to add to the question being posed in the study guide and to contribute to the discussion generated by your colleagues. Simply stating ‘yes I agree with previous statements’ will not be considered to be contributing to the discussion.
Your online submission is due by the Friday of the corresponding week at 11:45 pm AEST.
Length of Post/Discussion: 250-300 words
FINAL Assessment Due Date: Week 12 Friday 9th October 2020, 11:45 PM AEST
The Unit co-ordinator will collate your responses and complete the final submission.
Assessment Criteria
Your written online discussion will be evaluated on the following assessment criteria:
Comprehension of Topic: 30%
Critical Thinking: 40%
Online Posting: 30%
Discussion 1 (Assessment 1 - Week 3)
In the week two study guide, you had the opportunity to practice applying Page’s 5 steps of evidence-based midwifery to a scenario. Now let’s try this in collaboration with your peers. Choose a clinical scenario from the following list and write a brief script for a role-play of how the care of a woman might unfold, using Page’s 5 Steps as a framework (template included).
Post it on the Discussion Board.
Read and respond to your student colleagues’ posts with feedback and reply to their feedback on yours (A minimum of 2 meaningful posts are required). Before you respond, consider the following questions:
o Have they used a woman centred approach?
o Have they used an evidence-based approach? If so, how? If not, why?
Choose one (1) of the following scenarios:
1. Donna is a 42-year-old woman, pregnant with her first baby. She is currently 9 weeks pregnant. Donna fears needles and has declined all antenatal screening as a result.
2. Bonnie is 35, healthy, and having her 2nd baby. Her first pregnancy was normal, and she has had a vaginal birth. She is 30 weeks and has just been diagnosed with gestational diabetes. She is worried about what this might mean for her and her baby.
3. 21-year-old Lisbeth is Rh Negative, and it has been recommended that she receive prophylactic anti-D during her pregnancy as per local guidelines. Lisbeth is worried that this may pose a risk to the baby.
Use the following template for your discussion board post:
Roles: 1 woman, 1 midwife
Step 1: asking what is important to the woman:
Midwife: Hello, [woman’s name], how are you today, may I ask if there is anything important to you that you would like to discuss?
Woman: Hello, yes there is, I would like to…[draw upon your chosen scenario)
Etc….
Step 2: clinical history
Ask for her basic clinical/obstetric history (draw upon your chosen scenario)
Step 3: seeking the evidence
After the appointment, you look for some evidence to answer her question. Describe here what you found after doing a basic search of local protocols and guidelines, as well as any relevant literature.
Step 4: talking it through
Write a brief script of what information you would share with the woman to help her informed decision-making process
Step 5: reflection
Reflect upon the process
Discussion 2 (Assessment 1 - Week 6)
The format and requirements for this week's discussion board are:
1. Think of a clinical question that relates to midwifery. You may choose anything that interests you.
2. Construct a PICO framework and PICO structured question for your clinical question.
3. Use the following template to present your work in the discussion board.
4. Read and respond to your student colleagues’ posts with feedback and reply to their feedback on yours.
(A minimum of 2 meaningful posts are required).
The clinical question that interests me is……………………………………………
The PICO framework for this question is:
P =
I =
C =
O =
The PICO structured question is:
…………………………………………………………………………………………?
Discussion 3 (Assessment 1 - Week 9)
Write a research question that would be suited to a randomised controlled trial.
Then: Write a brief summary of how the trial would be structured.
Consider:
· The groups
· Inclusion criteria
· Exclusion criteria
· The intervention/variables
· What would be measured
Read and respond to your student colleagues’ posts with feedback and reply to their feedback on yours.
Discussion 4 (Assessment 1 - Week 12)
- Critically reflect upon one routine practice in your clinical setting.
- Consider whether it's evidence-based?
- Why do you think health professionals are slow to adopt evidence-based practices?
- How can organisations encourage and support evidence-based practice?
- Respond to the posts from your peers. How does the practice in other settings compare with the practice in your setting?
Week 12 Friday (9 Oct 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Final submission to be compiled and submitted by unit coordinator for marking
Exam Week Friday (23 Oct 2020)
|
|
HD |
D |
C |
P |
F |
% |
|
COMPREHENSION OF TOPIC |
Comprehensively addresses all aspects of the task raised by the lecturer in relation to the online lecture material/course resources. Thorough comprehension of relevance of content clearly evident. |
Extensively addresses the majority of the aspects of the task raised by the lecturer in the online lecture material/course resources and effectively comprehends relevance of content. |
Broadly addresses most aspects of the task raised by the lecturer in the online lecture material/course resources. Generally demonstrates comprehension of how content is relevant. |
Content basically addresses aspects of the task raised by the lecturer in the online lecture material/course resources. Demonstrates limited comprehension of how content is relevant. |
Content does not address all aspects of the task raised by the lecturer in the online lecture material/course resources Inadequate comprehension of required content. |
30 |
|
CRITICAL THINKING |
Clear, coherent and convincing critical thought. Comprehensively inclusive of concepts and evidence. |
Clear, coherent critical thought that is well developed and logically builds each point on the last. Effectively inclusive of both concepts and evidence. |
Clear, critical and logically developed thought presented. Generally inclusive of concepts and evidence.
|
Critical thought discernible. Generally demonstrates logical flow although some reliance on descriptive discussion. |
Discussion is poorly developed or absent. No or minimal evidence of critical thought. |
40 |
|
Online posting |
Postings are made in a timely manner providing other students with the opportunity to respond as appropriate. Postings consistently respond directly to course content material and demonstrate a critical and thoughtful approach to the content. Critical and mindful connections are made to other student’s discussion as appropriate. Posts for every discussion topic. |
Other students are given the opportunity to respond as postings are made in a timely manner as appropriate. Postings largely respond directly to course content material and demonstrate a critical and thoughtful approach. Mindful connections are made to other student’s discussion in the majority of postings as appropriate. Posts for every discussion topic. |
Other students are given the opportunity to respond as postings are made in a timely manner as appropriate. Postings in the majority of the time respond directly to course content material and demonstrate a thoughtful approach. Connections are made to other student’s discussion in some of postings as appropriate. Posts for every discussion topic. |
Other students are given the opportunity to respond as postings are made in a timely manner as appropriate. Postings in the majority of the time respond directly to course content material. However could demonstrate a more thoughtful approach. Connections are made to other student’s discussion in the majority of postings as appropriate. Posts for every discussion topic. |
Other students are not given the opportunity to respond as postings are not made in a timely manner as appropriate. Postings in the majority of the time do not respond directly to course content material. Connections are not made to other student’s discussion in the majority of postings as appropriate. Fails to post for every discussion topic. |
30 |
- Identify the concepts that underpin the types of evidence informing current midwifery practice.
- Communication
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
2 Written Assessment
ASSESSMENT 2 – WRITTEN ESSAY
Weighting 30%
Word Count 2000 words (+/- 10%)
Due Date Friday 14th August 2020 (week 5 at 23.55pm)
Objectives This assessment relates to learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, and 4.
1. Identify the concepts that underpin the types of evidence informing current midwifery practice.
2. Demonstrate the ability to analyse current evidence for best practice in midwifery
3. Critique current policy relevant to midwifery practice
4. Recommend appropriate midwifery care informed by current research and ethical decision making.
Assessment task:
Choose one of the below clinical scenarios (choose one)
1. Angela is a 35-year-old woman, pregnant with her second baby. Angela’s first baby was born via LSCS due to failure to progress during labour. Angela’s obstetrician discussed vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) with her at her last appointment. She is currently 26 weeks pregnant and she and her baby are well. Angela asks you what the safest option is for her and her baby.
2. 30-year-old Lisa has been admitted to the antenatal ward at 33-week gestation following an episode of bright red bleeding. Lisa had an ultrasound scan done which showed that her placenta is located 23mm away from her cervical os (she has a low-lying placenta which is believed to be responsible for the bleeding). Lisa asks you if it is still safe for her to have a vaginal birth.
You must now undertake a traditional review of the literature to identify evidence that you would use to inform your discussion with the woman outlined in the chosen case study above.
1. Write a brief background to the identified ‘problem’
2. Describe the search process you would undertake to locate the relevant literature to address the ‘problem’ and inform your discussion.
3. Identify and present the papers to be included in the review (this can be in the form of a table).
4. Synthesise and discuss the review findings with application to the case study, whilst identifying how you would explain the recommendations to the woman.
Additional Information
Review the marking criteria rubric. Consider that your paper's grade will be derived from criteria outlined in that sheet and thus clear explanations of the expectations for varying grades are provided for both your direction and the assessment of your paper.
Your essay is to follow academic conventions of structure with a background, body and conclusion.
· Double Line spacing throughout 2.0 (including reference list)
· Font size 12, easily readable style (e.g. Arial, Times Roman, Calibri)
· Word count must be within 10% plus or minus of the given word count. For this essay words in excess of 2200 cannot contribute to your mark. All words form part of the word count apart from the reference list.
· Provide a cover sheet that includes your name, student number, the unit code, the assessment item number, and word count.
Referencing
Use a separate page for the reference list and ensure it is APA 7th style also.
Use references that are from contemporary and valid sources such as peer-reviewed journals; or evidence-based websites (e.g. government bodies, professional organizations).
Week 5 Friday (14 Aug 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020)
|
HD |
D |
C |
P |
F | |
|
Structure (15%) |
|
|
|
| |
|
Clear and succinct background that introduces the topic and outlines the direction of the paper. (5%) |
Clear and appropriate background that introduces the topic and outlines the direction of the paper |
Appropriate background that introduces the topic and outlines the direction of the paper |
Background is apparent and the topic is introduced but there is not clear direction to the paper |
No recognisable background-the topic is not introduced and/or there is no direction of the paper | |
|
Clear and succinct conclusion that outlines the main points and brings the discussion to a logical close. (5%) |
Clear and appropriate conclusion that outlines the main points and brings the discussion to a close |
Conclusion outlines most of the main points and brings some sense of closure |
Conclusion apparent and outlines most of the main points and endeavours to bring the discussion to a close-there may be some incongruity |
No recognisable conclusion-little reference to the main points and no clear conclusion to the paper | |
|
Excellent presentation of assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. Consistently accurate with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. (5%) |
Well-presented assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. 1 or 2 errors spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. |
Well-presented assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. 3 or 4 consistent errors with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. |
Well-presented assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. 3 or 4 inconsistent errors with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure |
Poorly presented assignment. Double spacing not used. 12 point font not used. Many inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure. (> 5 errors). | |
|
Approach & Argument (75%) | |||||
|
Content is clearly relevant to the topic, the approach comprehensively answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice, and the discourse proceeds logically and is within the set word limit. (10%) |
Content is relevant to the topic, the approach clearly answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice, and the discourse proceeds logically. Word count is within the set word limit. |
Content is appropriate and answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice and the discourse for the most part proceeds logically. Word count is within the set word limit. |
Content answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice but the discourse is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion. Word count is within the set word limit. |
Content is irrelevant and or does not answer the question in relation to current midwifery practice. The discourse lacks cohesion. The word limit has not been adhered to, the word limit is well over or under the 10% allowance. | |
|
An articulate and comprehensive description of the search process you would undertake to locate the relevant literature to address the ‘problem’ and inform your discussion. (10%) | A well-developed description of the search process you would undertake to locate the relevant literature to address the 'problem' and inform your discussion. |
A logical description of the search process you would undertake to locate the relevant literature to address the 'problem' and inform your discussion. | A disjointed description of the search process you would undertake to locate the relevant literature to address the ‘problem’ and inform your discussion. |
An inadequate description of the search process you would undertake to locate the relevant literature to address the ‘problem’ and inform your discussion. | |
|
Clear and comprehensive identification and presentation of the papers to be included in the review. (15%) |
Clear identification and presentation of the papers to be included in the review. |
Logical and appropriate identification and presentation of the papers to be included in the review.
|
Disjointed and limited identification and presentation of the papers to be included in the review. |
Inadequate identification and presentation of the papers to be included in the review. | |
|
Clear and comprehensive synthesis and discussion around the review findings with application to the case study, whilst identifying how you would explain the recommendations to the woman. (40%) |
A clear and articulate synthesis and discussion around the review findings with application to the case study, whilst identifying how you would explain the recommendations to the woman. |
A broad synthesis and discussion around the review findings with application to the case study, whilst identifying how you would explain the recommendations to the woman. |
A disjointed synthesis and discussion around the review findings with application to the case study, whilst identifying how you would explain the recommendations to the woman. |
Inadequate synthesis and discussion around the review findings with application to the case study, whilst identifying how you would explain the recommendations to the woman.
| |
|
Referencing (10%) | |||||
|
Consistently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect all ideas, factual information, and quotations. (5%) |
Generally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information, and quotations, with 1 or 2 exceptions. |
Frequently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information, and quotations, with 3 or 4 exceptions. |
Occasionally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations, with 5 or 6 exceptions. |
Fails to or infrequent attempts (>7 errors) to integrate up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations. | |
|
Consistently accurate with referencing. A minimum of 10 references used including 7 journal articles and relevant websites. (5%) |
1 or 2 consistent referencing errors identified. A minimum of 10 references used including 6 journal articles and relevant websites. |
3 or 4 consistent referencing errors identified. A minimum of 10 references used including 5 journal articles and relevant websites. |
3 or 4 inconsistent referencing errors identified. A minimum of 10 references used including 4 journal articles and relevant websites. |
Many inaccuracies with referencing (>5). Less than 10 references used. Less than 4 journal articles not sourced. Relevant web-sites not included. | |
- Identify the concepts that underpin the types of evidence informing current midwifery practice.
- Demonstrate the ability to analyse current evidence for best practice in midwifery.
- Critique current policy relevant to midwifery practice.
- Recommend appropriate midwifery care informed by current research and ethical decision making.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Ethical practice
3 Written Assessment
Assessment 3 - Written Essay
Weighting 40%
Word Count 2500 words (+/- 10%)
Due Date Friday 2nd October (week 11) at 23:45 pm.
Objectives This assessment relates to learning outcomes 2, 3, and 4.
2. Demonstrate the ability to analyse current evidence for best practice in midwifery
3. Critique current policy relevant to midwifery practice.
4. Recommend appropriate midwifery care informed by current research and ethical decision making.
Assessment Task:
This assignment task requires the student to outline and evaluate the research evidence that relates to one aspect of clinical practice relating to normal pregnancy, labour, birth, or the postnatal period. Please choose one from the options below: - Continuity of midwifery care, - Routine screening for bacterial infections during pregnancy, - mobilisation during labour, - auscultation of the fetal heart during labour and birth, - skin to skin contact after birth.
2. You should make a recommendation on whether a change to current practice should occur based upon this evidence. 3. Provide a rationale for the recommendation in the context of an evidence-based approach (integrating the available evidence, woman-centred midwifery philosophy, and available resources). |
Additional Information
Review the marking criteria rubric. Consider that your paper's grade will be derived from criteria outlined in that sheet and thus clear explanations of the expectations for varying grades are provided for both your direction and the assessment of your paper.
Presentation Requirements
Your essay is to follow academic conventions of structure with an introduction, body and conclusion.
Double Line spacing throughout 2.0 (including reference list)
Font size 12, easily readable style (e.g. Arial, Times Roman, Calibri)
Word count must be within 10% plus or minus of the given word count. For this essay words in excess of 2750 cannot contribute to your mark.
Use quotations sparingly and only to illustrate a point that cannot be made with equal impact in your own words – if used, give page numbers.
Provide a cover sheet that includes your name, student number, the unit code, the assessment item number, and word count.
Referencing
APA 7th Style
Use a separate page for the reference list and ensure it is APA 7th style also.
Use references that are from contemporary and valid sources such as peer-reviewed journals; or evidence-based websites (e.g. government bodies, professional organisations).
Week 11 Friday (2 Oct 2020) 11:45 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Friday (16 Oct 2020)
|
HD |
D |
C |
P |
F | |
|
Structure (15%) |
|
|
|
| |
|
Clear and succinct introduction that introduces the topic and outlines the direction of the paper. (5%) |
Clear and appropriate introduction that introduces the topic and outlines the direction of the paper |
Appropriate introduction that introduces the topic and outlines the direction of the paper |
Introduction is apparent and the topic is introduced but there is not clear direction to the paper |
No recognisable introduction-the topic is not introduced and/or there is no direction of the paper | |
|
Clear and succinct conclusion that outlines the main points and brings the argument to a logical close. (5%) |
Clear and appropriate conclusion that outlines the main points and brings the argument to a close |
Conclusion outlines most of the main points and brings some sense of closure |
Conclusion apparent and outlines most of the main points and endeavours to bring the argument to a close-there may be some incongruity |
No recognisable conclusion-little reference to the main points and no clear conclusion to the paper | |
|
Excellent presentation of assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. Consistently accurate with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. (5%) |
Well-presented assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. 1 or 2 errors spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. |
Well-presented assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. 3 or 4 consistent errors with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. |
Well-presented assignment, double spaced with 12 point font. 3 or 4 inconsistent errors with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure |
Poorly presented assignment. Double spacing not used. 12 point font not used. Many inaccuracies with spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. (> 5 errors). | |
|
Approach & Argument (75%) | |||||
|
Content is clearly relevant to the topic, the approach comprehensively answers the question and the argument proceeds logically and is within the set word limit. (10%) |
Content is relevant to the topic, the approach clearly answers the question and the argument proceeds logically and is within the set word limit. |
Content is appropriate and answers the question and the argument for the most part proceeds logically and is within the set word limit |
Content answers the question the argument is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion and is within the set word limit with a 10% allowance (under or over the set limit) |
Content is irrelevant and or does not answer the question and the argument lacks cohesion. The word limit has not been adhered to, the word limit is well over or under the 10% allowance | |
| An articulate and comprehensive discussion which outlines and evaluates the research evidence that relates to the chosen aspect of clinical practice. (35%) | An insightful and well-developed discussion that outlines and evaluates the research evidence that relates to the chosen aspect of clinical practice. | A logical discussion that demonstrates a competent outline and evaluation of the research evidence that relates to the chosen aspect of clinical practice. |
A disjointed discussion that demonstrates a generalised or limited outline and evaluation of the research evidence that relates to the chosen aspect of clinical practice. |
An inadequate discussion of the chosen aspect of clinical practice. Evaluation of the research evidence is limited or missing. | |
|
Comprehensive discussion that supports the recommendation of whether a change to current practice should occur, based upon this evidence. (15%) |
Well-developed analysis and discussion that supports the recommendation of whether a change to current practice should occur, based upon this evidence. |
Broad discussion that supports the recommendation of whether a change to current practice should occur, based upon this evidence.
|
Minimal analysis and disjointed discussion that supports the recommendation of whether a change to current practice should occur, based upon this evidence. |
Inadequate analysis and discussion (which at times is repetitive) that does not support the recommendation of whether a change to current practice should occur, based upon this evidence. | |
| Clear, coherent discussion that critically outlines an evidenced based recommendation on whether a change to current practice should occur. (15%) |
A clear and relevant discussion that outlines an evidenced based recommendation on whether a change to current practice should occur. |
A logical discussion which broadly outlines an evidenced based recommendation on whether a change to current practice should occur. |
Satisfactory exploration that shows a limited discussion that can be repetitive at times regarding an evidenced based recommendation on whether a change to current practice should occur. |
Poor understanding of the topic. Content does not outline the evidenced based recommendation on whether a change to current practice should occur. | |
|
Referencing (10%) | |||||
|
Consistently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. (5%) |
Generally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations, with 1 or 2 exceptions. |
Frequently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations, with 3 or 4 exceptions. |
Occasionally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations, with 5 or 6 exceptions. |
Fails to or infrequent attempts (>7 errors) to integrate up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations. | |
|
Consistently accurate with referencing. A minimum of 10 references used including 7 journal articles and relevant web-sites. (5%) |
1 or 2 consistent referencing errors identified. A minimum of 10 references used including 6 journal articles and relevant web-sites. |
3 or 4 consistent referencing errors identified. A minimum of 10 references used including 5 journal articles and relevant web-sites. |
3 or 4 inconsistent referencing errors identified. A minimum of 10 references used including 4 journal articles and relevant web-sites. |
Many inaccuracies with referencing (>5). Less than 10 references used. Less than 4 journal articles not sourced. Relevant web-sites not included. | |
- Demonstrate the ability to analyse current evidence for best practice in midwifery.
- Critique current policy relevant to midwifery practice.
- Recommend appropriate midwifery care informed by current research and ethical decision making.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Ethical practice
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
