CQUniversity Unit Profile
MDWF13003 Midwifery Practice 3
Midwifery Practice 3
All details in this unit profile for MDWF13003 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This clinical placement unit is the third of four that provides you with midwifery clinical experience. You will apply your knowledge of highly complex physiological and psychosocial factors that impact upon the childbearing continuum. In addition to this, you will employ midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, and inclusivity in the care of marginalised groups such as women experiencing substance misuse, and/or incarceration, refugee and immigrant women, or members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, or Queer (LGBTQ+) community. The clinical practicum component of this unit will require you to complete a minimum of 224 hours in addition to Continuity of Care Experiences (COCE).

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 12
Student Contribution Band: 7
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.25

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Co-requisites: MDWF13008 Foundations of Midwifery 3      

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 3 - 2024

Mixed Mode

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 12-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Critical Review
Weighting: 40%
2. Portfolio
Weighting: 60%
3. Professional Practice Placement
Weighting: Pass/Fail

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from SUTE data

Feedback

The feedback was harsh yet the marking was great, it didn't seem to equal each other. I appreciate the feedback and marks they just didn't seem to match each other.

Recommendation

Upon release of assessment item grades the unit coordinator will remind students via email that they are welcome to engage in informal discussion with the marker or unit coordinator to clarify any misunderstandings or perceived inconsistencies.

Feedback from Verbal communication from student

Feedback

The unit coordinator provides the students with more than enough content and support to enable the students to succeed in assessment tasks.

Recommendation

The unit will continue to offer weekly Zoom drop-in sessions and scheduled assessment discussion Zoom sessions. The unit coordinator will continue to provide updated resources on Moodle to support the completion of assessments.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Critically evaluate the consequences of physiological and socio-cultural complexities upon the physical, social and emotional wellbeing of women across the childbearing continuum
  2. Apply midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, inclusivity, and digital health and emerging technologies to the care of women from marginalised groups.
  3. Demonstrate midwifery knowledge of regional, national, and global maternal health priorities and translate these into practice
  4. Employ midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, and inclusivity in the care of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their families
  5. Critically reflect on clinical learning related to your continuity of care experiences (COCE) to enhance practice
  6. Demonstrate developing midwifery competence based upon the Nursing and Midwifery Board Australia (NMBA) Midwife Standards for Practice (2018) requirements.

The proposed changes to learning outcomes and the unit will meet the following:

The draft ANMAC Midwifery Education Standards (2020).

Standard 1: Safety of the public.

Standard 3: Program of study.

Standard 4: Student experience.

Standard 5: Student assessment.

NMBA Midwife Standards for Practice (2018).

Standard 1: Promotes evidence-based maternal health and wellbeing.

Standard 2: Engages in respectful partnerships and professional relationships.

Standard 3: Demonstrates the capability and accountability for midwifery practice.

Standard 4: Undertakes comprehensive assessments.

Standard 5: Develops plans for midwifery practice.

Standard 6: Provides safe and quality midwifery practice.

Standard 7: Evaluates outcomes to improve midwifery practice.

The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) Code of Conduct for Midwives (2018).

Principle 1. Legal compliance.

Principle 2. Woman-centred practice.

Principle 3. Cultural practice and respectful relationships.

Principle 4. Professional Behaviour.

Principle 5: Teaching, supervising, and assessing.

Principle 7: Health and wellbeing.

 

 

The International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) International Code of Ethics for Midwives (2014).

1. Midwifery Relationships.

2. Practice of Midwifery.

3. The Professional Responsibilities of Midwives.

4. Advancement of Midwifery Knowledge and Practice.

National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (2017).

Clinical Governance Standard.

Partnering with Consumers Standard.

Preventing and Controlling Healthcare-Associated Infection Standard.

Medication Safety Standard.

Comprehensive Care Standard.

Communicating for Safety Standard.

Blood Management Standard.

Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard.

The Nursing and Midwifery Digital Health Framework.

 

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Critical Review - 40%
2 - Portfolio - 60%
3 - Professional Practice Placement - 0%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

midwifery preparation for practice

Edition: 5th (2023)
Authors: Sally Pairman, Sally Tracy, Hannah Dahlen, Lesley Dixon
Elsevier
Chatswood Chatswood , NSW , Australia
ISBN: 9780729543811
Prescribed

Myles Textbook for Midwives

Edition: 17th (2020)
Authors: Jayne Marshall, Maureen Raynor
Elsevier
Chatswood Chatswood , NSW , Australia
ISBN: 9780702076428

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • Computer - ability to access study materials, including instructional videos and scan and upload assessment.
  • Zoom (both microphone and webcam capability)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Aras Moran Unit Coordinator
a.moran@cqu.edu.au
Rachelle Chee Unit Coordinator
r.chee@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 04 Nov 2024

Module/Topic

This clinical placement unit is the third of four that provides you with midwifery clinical experience. The focus of this unit is on the role of the midwife in complex childbearing. You will be involved in the provision of care of the woman and her family throughout pregnancy, birth, and the postnatal period. The practical application of different models of care will be explored with an emphasis on best practice. The clinical practicum component of this unit will require a minimum of 224 hours to be completed in addition to Continuity of Care Experiences (COCE). This unit is to be studied in conjunction with the units Foundations of Midwifery 3 and Midwifery Practice for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Families.

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 2 Begin Date: 11 Nov 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 3 Begin Date: 18 Nov 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 4 Begin Date: 25 Nov 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.


Critical Review Due: Week 4 Wednesday (27 Nov 2024) 4:00 pm AEST
Week 5 Begin Date: 02 Dec 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

 

Week 6 Begin Date: 09 Dec 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Assessment 3: Professional Practice Placement Formative AMSAT due 2355 hours (AEST) Friday 22nd December 2023

Week 7 Begin Date: 16 Dec 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Vacation Week Begin Date: 23 Dec 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Vacation Week Begin Date: 30 Dec 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 8 Begin Date: 06 Jan 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 9 Begin Date: 13 Jan 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 10 Begin Date: 20 Jan 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Week 11 Begin Date: 27 Jan 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.


Portfolio Due: Week 11 Wednesday (29 Jan 2025) 4:00 pm AEST
Week 12 Begin Date: 03 Feb 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.


Professional Practice Placement Due: Week 12 Wednesday (5 Feb 2025) 4:00 pm AEST
Exam Week Begin Date: 10 Feb 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Australian College of Midwives' National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia: Code of Conduct, Ethics and Professional Standards for Midwives

Queensland Health State-Wide Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines

CQUniversity Bachelor of Midwifery (Graduate Entry) Student Clinical Experience Record Book

Events and Submissions/Topic

Ongoing clinical placement.

Assessment Tasks

1 Critical Review

Assessment Title
Critical Review

Task Description

Type:                         Written assessment

Due date:                  16:00 hour (AEST) Wednesday 27th November 2024 (Week 4) 

Return to Students: 17:00 hour (AEST) Wednesday 11th December 2024 (Week 6)

Weighting:                40%

Length:                      2,000 words +/-10% (excluding reference list)

Unit Coordinator:     Rachelle Chee and Aras Moran

 

Learning Outcomes Assessed
1.    Critically evaluate the consequences of physiological and socio-cultural complexities upon the physical, social and emotional wellbeing of women across the childbearing continuum.

2.    Apply midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, inclusivity, and digital health and emerging technologies to the care of women from marginalised groups.

3.    Demonstrate midwifery knowledge of regional, national, and global maternal health priorities and translate these into practice.

4.    Employ midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, and inclusivity in the care of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their families.

 

Aim
The aim of this assessment is to deepen students’ understanding of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) by exploring its various administration methods and evaluating its respective strengths and weaknesses. Students are required to critically assess the effectiveness of the EPDS in screening for perinatal anxiety and depression among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) women and First Nations women in Australia. This involves identifying potential challenges and proposing strategies to enhance the screening process for these specific populations. Students will develop perspective on the application of the EPDS in diverse contexts.

 

Instructions
Please follow the steps below to complete your assessment task:

1.    Provide a brief introduction outlining the aim of your assessment (approximately 100 words).

2.    Use contemporary literature to identify the ways that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (Cox et al., 1987) can be administered (i.e., pen-on-paper, telehealth, digital, etc.), and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each (approximately 400 words).

3.    Critically evaluate the use of the EPDS in culturally and linguistically (CALD) women in Australia, and suggest strategies for optimal screening for perinatal anxiety and depression in this population (approximately 700 words), and

4.    Critically evaluate the use of the EPDS in First Nations women in Australia and suggest strategies for optimal screening for perinatal anxiety and depression in this population (approximately 700 words).

5.    Provide a concise conclusion summarising the main concepts from your assessment (approximately 100 words).

 

Literature and references
In this assessment use at least 10 contemporary references (7 years or less) to support your discussion. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible websites. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature sourced from the internet must be from reputable websites such as from government, university, or peak national bodies; for example, the Australian College of Nursing or the Australian Association of Social Workers. Note, that websites such as StatPearls, Life in the Fastlane, and Wikipedia are not suitable for this assessment task. Lecture notes are not primary sources of evidence and should not be used in this assessment.

 

  • Requirements
    Use a cover page for your assessment that includes the student’s name, student number, unit number and name, assessment number and title, due date, in-text word count, and use of Gen AI declaration,
    • Use of Gen AI: Gen AI agent.……..has been used for editing and proofreading this assessment (insert or delete as applicable)
  • Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman, with 2.0 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).
  • Include page numbers on the top right side of each page in a header.
  • Indent the first line of each paragraph 1.27cm (standard pre-set indent in Microsoft Word.
  • Follow academic writing conventions: spell out contractions in full; introduce abbreviations and acronyms; spell out numbers for zero through nine and use numerals for 10 and above.
  • Write in the third-person perspective.
  • Use formal academic, discipline-specific and inclusive language and essay structure.
  • Use Microsoft Word English (Australia) spelling and grammar checker.
  • All work submitted must be your own work.
  • Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style. The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.
  • The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations. Please note, direct quotes should be used minimally in academic writing.

Resources

  • You can use unit provided materials and other credible sources (e.g. journal articles, books) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important. Please note, that lecture notes are not peer-reviewed primary sources of evidence.
  • We recommend that you access your discipline specific library guide: the Nursing and Midwifery Guide.
  • We recommend you use EndNote to manage your citations and reference list. More information on how to use EndNote is available at the CQUniversity Library website.
  • For information on academic communication please go to the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources including information for students with English as a second language. You may wish to submit a draft to Studiosity.
  • Submit at least one draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.

 

Academic Integrity

  • You must abide by the principles of academic integrity (see Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure). Completion of this assessment with another party or sharing of responses is not permitted at any time.
  • The use of any generative artificial intelligence is permitted for the following purposes:
  1. Gen AI content is used to generate ideas and general structures.
  2. Gen AI content editing. 
  • If you use Gen AI to generate ideas, you are required to reference the Gen AI agent as per APA 7th guidelines. If you are using a Gen AI agent for content editing, please complete the declaration on the title page of your assessment. If Gen AI is not used, please delete this declaration.

 

Submission
Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.

 

Marking Criteria
Refer to the marking rubric on the Moodle site for more detail on how marks will be assigned. Assessment re-attempt is not available for Assessment One.

 

Minimum Pass Criteria
Students must achieve a cumulative grade of at least 49.5 across all assessments to complete this unit.

References
Cox, J., Holden, J., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782

 

 


Assessment Due Date

Week 4 Wednesday (27 Nov 2024) 4:00 pm AEST

Submit your assessment task to the Midwifery Practice 3 Moodle site in Microsoft Word document format.


Return Date to Students

Week 6 Wednesday (11 Dec 2024)

Please allow two weeks for the return of this assessment task.


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

Key Criteria

High Distinction

84.5–100%

Distinction

74.50–84.49%

Credit

64.50–74.49%

Pass

49.50–64.49%

Fail

49.5–40%

Low Fail

39.5–0%

Introduction and conclusion.

 

(10%)

 

(10–8.5)

The written assessment has a clear and succinct introduction and conclusion and is the student’s own work. The introduction provides excellent background information and outlines the direction of the assessment, and the conclusion succinctly summarises the key points.

(8.4–7.5)

The written assessment has a clear introduction and conclusion and is the student’s own work. The introduction provides good background information and outlines the direction of the assessment, and the conclusion summarises most key points.

(7.4–6.5)

The written assessment has an adequate introduction and conclusion and is the student’s own work. The introduction provides some background information and outlines the direction of the assessment, and the conclusion summarises some key points.

(6.4–5)

An introduction and conclusion have been attempted and are the student’s own work. The introduction provides limited background information and an outline of the assessment’s direction, and the conclusion has a few key points.

(4.9–4)

The introduction has significant errors or omissions of aims and direction of content or the introduction is not provided and/or is not the student’s own work. The logical direction of the assessment is unclear. The conclusion does not summarise the assessment or is omitted.

(3.95–0)

The introduction has significant errors or omissions of aims and direction of content or the introduction is not provided and/or is not the student’s own work. The logical direction of the assessment is unclear. The conclusion does not summarise the assessment or is omitted.

Advanced knowledge and critical discussion of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in culturally and linguistically diverse women and First Nations women in Australia

 

(70%)

(10–8.5)

Content is clearly relevant to the topic; the approach comprehensively answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice and the discourse proceeds logically.

(8.4–7.5)

Content is relevant to the topic; the approach clearly answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice and the discourse proceeds logically.

(7.4–6.5)

Content is appropriate and answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice and the discourse for the most part proceeds logically.

(6.4–5)

Content answers the question in relation to current midwifery practice, but the discourse is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion

(4.9–4)

Content is frequently off topic and only partially answers the questions in relation to current midwifery practice. The discourse frequently lacks cohesion

(3.95–0)

Content is irrelevant and or does not answer the question in relation to current midwifery practice. The discourse lacks cohesion.

(10–8.5)

An articulate and comprehensive discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the EPDS administration methods.

(8.4–7.5)

A well-developed discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the EPDS administration methods.

(7.4–6.5)

A logical discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the EPDS administration methods.

(6.4–5)

A disjointed discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the EPDS administration methods.

(4.9–4)

An inadequate discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the EPDS administration methods.

(3.95–0)

No discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the EPDS administration methods.

(25–21.25)

Comprehensive and insightful evaluation of the use of the EPDS in CALD women, which includes strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(21.2–18.75)

Clear and detailed evaluation of the use of the EPDS in CALD women, which includes strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(18.7–16.25)

Logical and appropriate evaluation of the use of the EPDS in CALD women, which includes strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(16.2–12.5)

Disjointed and limited evaluation of the use of the EPDS in CALD women, which includes limited strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(12.4–10)

Inadequate evaluation of the use of the EPDS in CALD women, which includes minimal strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(9.9–0)

No evaluation of the use of the EPDS in CALD women, which does not include strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(25–21.25)

Clear and comprehensive evaluation of the use of the EPDS in First Nations women, which includes strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(21.2–18.75)

A clear and detailed evaluation of the use of the EPDS in First Nations women, which includes strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(18.7–16.25)

A logical and appropriate evaluation of the use of the EPDS in First Nations women, which includes strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(16.2–12.5)

A disjointed and limited evaluation of the use of the EPDS in First Nations women, which includes limited strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(12.4–10)

Inadequate evaluation of the use of the EPDS in First Nations women, which includes minimal strategies for optimal screening in this population.

(9.9–0)

No evaluation of the use of the EPDS in First Nations women, which does not include strategies for optimal screening in this population.

Professional writing and presentation

 

(10%)

(10–8.5)

Content is students own work, consistently clear, accurate, and presented in a logical, succinct order demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic. There are no errors in English grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The language of the discipline is comprehensively used. Formatting requirements applied without error. Adheres to the word count.

 

(8.4–7.5)

Content is students own work, frequently clear, correct, and presented in a logical order demonstrating a good understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 1 error. The language of the discipline is frequently used. Formatting requirements applied with 1 error. Adheres to the word count.

(7.4–6.5)

Content is students own work, mostly clear, correct, and presented in a logical order demonstrating a sound understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 2 errors. The language of the discipline is mostly used. Formatting requirements applied with 2 errors. Adheres to the word count.

(6.4–5)

Content is students own work, sometimes clear, correct, and presented in a logical order demonstrating a reasonable understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 3 errors. The language of the discipline is used. Formatting requirements applied with 3 errors. Adheres to the word count.

(4.9–4)

Content is not students own work, consistently unclear or incorrect and is disorganised demonstrating insufficient understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have ≥4 errors. The language of the discipline is infrequently or incorrectly used. Formatting requirements applied with ≥4 errors. Deviates +/- 10% of the word count.

(3.95–0)

Content is not students own work. Little to no meaningful writing. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have ≥4 errors. The language of the discipline is infrequently or incorrectly used. Formatting requirements applied with ≥4 errors. Deviates +/- 10% of the word count.

Intext citations

 

(5%) 

(5–4.25)

Consistently accurate intext citations with no errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style to support and reflect all ideas, information, and quotations.  

(4.2–3.8)

One consistent in-text citation error in APA 7th Edition referencing style identified. Intext citations support and reflect most ideas, information, and quotations. 

(3.75–3.55)

Two consistent in-text citation errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style identified. Intext citations support and reflect many ideas, information, and quotations.

(3.50–2.5)

Three consistent in-text citation errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style identified. Intext citations support and reflect some ideas, information, and quotations.

(2.4–1.99)

Four or more consistent in-text citations errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style. Limited intext citations used to support ideas, information, and quotations.

(1.98–0)

Five or more consistent in-text citations errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style. Limited or no or inadequate intext citations used to support ideas, information, and quotation.

Reference List

 

(5%)

 

(5–4.25)

Acknowledges all sources and meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with no errors. Ten peer reviewed references provided. Evidence used is factual and supports arguments. Literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(4.2–3.8)

Acknowledges majority of sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 1 error. Nine peer reviewed references provided. Evidence used is factual and supports arguments. The majority of literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(3.75–3.55)

Acknowledges most sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 2 errors. Eight peer reviewed references provided. Evidence used is factual and supports arguments. Most literature cited has been published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(3.50–2.5)

Acknowledges some sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 3 errors. Seven peer reviewed references provided. Evidence used is factual and supports arguments. Some literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(2.4–1.99)

Acknowledges a couple of sources not acknowledged and/or 4 APA (7th Edition) referencing errors and/or references not provided.

Six or less peer reviewed references provided. Evidence used is occasionally supports arguments. Some literature cited is published ≥7 years and/or not sourced from the CQUniversity library.

 

(1.98–0)

Multiple sources not acknowledged and/or 4 APA (7th Edition) referencing errors and/or references not provided.

Six or less peer reviewed references provided. Evidence used rarely supports arguments. Some literature cited is published ≥7 years and/or not sourced from the CQUniversity library.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit your assessment task to the Midwifery Practice 3 Moodle site in Microsoft Word document format.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Critically evaluate the consequences of physiological and socio-cultural complexities upon the physical, social and emotional wellbeing of women across the childbearing continuum
  • Apply midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, inclusivity, and digital health and emerging technologies to the care of women from marginalised groups.
  • Demonstrate midwifery knowledge of regional, national, and global maternal health priorities and translate these into practice
  • Employ midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, and inclusivity in the care of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their families


Graduate Attributes

2 Portfolio

Assessment Title
Portfolio

Task Description

Type:                         Reflective journals

Due date:                  16:00 hour (AEST) Wednesday 29th January 2025 (Week 11) 

Return to Students: 16:00 hour (AEST) Wednesday 12th January 2025 (Exam week)

Weighting:                60%

Length:                      Each journal entry should be approximately 400 words however labour and birth reflections                                           can be longer.

Unit Coordinator:     Rachelle Chee and Aras Moran

 

Learning Outcomes Assessed

  1. Critically evaluate the consequences of physiological and socio-cultural complexities upon the physical, social and emotional wellbeing of women across the childbearing continuum.
  2. Apply midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, inclusivity, and digital health and emerging technologies to the care of women from marginalised groups.
  3. Demonstrate midwifery knowledge of regional, national, and global maternal health priorities and translate these into practice.
  4. Critically reflect on clinical learning related to your continuity of care experiences (COCE) to enhance practice.

 

Aim
The aim of this assessment is for you to demonstrate reflective practice on the continuity of care experience (COCE) between yourself, the student, and the woman from initial contact in early pregnancy through to the weeks after the woman has given birth, across the community and hospital settings. Reflective practice is a key element that contributes to the Nurses and Midwives’ Board of Australia’s Midwife Standards for Practice (2018). It is through reflective processes that both students and registered midwives can identify and explore diverse values, beliefs, learning needs and sociocultural structures.

 

Instructions
To facilitate your reflective skill development, you are required to complete a reflective piece of writing for each of the three (3) recruited 'continuity of care experience' (COCE) women you recruited in term 2, AND for each of your four (4) newly recruited COCE women in term 3. If you have already completed more than the recommended COCEs thus far, you will need to recruit a minimum of two (2) COCEs in term 3. The total of your reflective journals should be at least 10 by the end of term 4.

A reflective journal is a way of thinking in a critical and analytical way about your clinical experience. It involves looking at a situation, assessing what you have learnt from it, what you could have done differently, realising new approaches to your care and ultimately, how you felt about the whole experience. As a student midwife it shows how different aspects of your work interconnect and can be very useful for identifying gaps in knowledge and ethical dilemmas or situations that need further thought. Reflective writing is more personal than other kinds of academic writing and is an exploration of events not just a description of them.

Please use the framework below to structure each reflective journal entry.

1.    Description – What is it? What happened? Why am I talking about it?

2.    Interpretation – What is important and relevant? Look through your description and try to find words or phrases that require further exploration. Include the rationale for what was done or why it was done. Where there is controversy about what was done or found, provide the rationale and sources of evidence for both sides of the argument. How can it be explored and explained using contemporary theories?

3.    Outcome – What have I learned from this? How will it influence my future work?

Please note that you must use the template provided on the MDWF13003 Moodle page.

 

Literature and references
In this assessment, use at least 1 contemporary reference (7 years or less) for each journal entry. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible websites. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature sourced from the internet must be from reputable websites such as from government, university, or peak national bodies; for example, the Australian College of Nursing or the Australian Association of Social Workers. Note, that websites such as StatPearls, Life in the Fastlane, and Wikipedia are not suitable for this assessment task. Lecture notes are not primary sources of evidence and should not be used in this assessment.

 

Requirements

  • Each COCE woman must be de-identified within the journal.
  • Each journal entry in the portfolio must adhere to the template provided on the MDWF13003 Moodle page.
  • Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman, with 2.0 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).
  • Include page numbers on the top right side of each page in a header.
  • Indent the first line of each paragraph 1.27cm (standard pre-set indent in Microsoft Word).
  • Follow academic writing conventions: spell out contractions in full; introduce abbreviations and acronyms; spell out numbers for zero through nine and use numerals for 10 and above.
  • You may write in the first-person perspective (I, my) for reflective writing tasks.
  • Use formal academic, discipline-specific and inclusive language.
  • Use Microsoft Word English (Australia) spelling and grammar checker.
  • All work submitted must be your own work.
  • Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style. The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.
  • The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations. Please note, direct quotes should be used minimally in academic writing.

 

Resources

  • You can use unit provided materials and other credible sources (e.g. journal articles, books) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important. Please note, that lecture notes are not peer-reviewed primary sources of evidence.
  • We recommend that you access your discipline specific library guide: the Nursing and Midwifery Guide.
  • We recommend you use EndNote to manage your citations and reference list. More information on how to use EndNote is available at the CQUniversity Library website.
  • For information on academic communication please go to the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources including information for students with English as a second language.
  • You may wish to submit a draft to Studiosity.
  • Submit at least one draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence Statement

  • You must abide by the principles of academic integrity (see Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure). Completion of this assessment with another party or sharing of responses is not permitted at any time.
  • The use of any generative artificial intelligence is permitted for the following purposes:
  1. Gen AI content is used to generate ideas and general structures.
  2. Gen AI content editing.
  • If you use Gen AI to generate ideas, you are required to reference the Gen AI agent as per APA 7th guidelines. If you are using a Gen AI agent for content editing, please complete the declaration on the title page of your assessment. If Gen AI is not used, please delete this declaration.

 

Submission
Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.

 

Marking Criteria
Refer to the marking rubric on the Moodle site for more detail on how marks will be assigned. Assessment re-attempt is not available for Assessment Two.

 

Minimum Pass Criteria
Students must achieve a cumulative grade of at least 49.5 across all assessments to complete this unit. 

 

References
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2018). Midwife standards for practice. https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD18%2f25281&dbid=AP&chksum=kYbO0%2bO7kx9I%2fBlvmKH%2bwg%3d%3d

 


Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Wednesday (29 Jan 2025) 4:00 pm AEST

Each COCE woman must have their own individual journal in Word Document format, which should be uploaded as individual files to the Midwifery Practice 3 Moodle site.


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Wednesday (12 Feb 2025)

Please allow up two weeks for the return of this assessment task.


Weighting
60%

Assessment Criteria

 

Key Criteria

High Distinction

84.5–100%

Distinction

74.50–84.49%

Credit

64.50–74.49%

Pass

49.50–64.49%

Fail

<49.5%

Low Fail

39.5–0%

Critically reflective knowledge of COCE.

 

(80%)

(40–34)

Comprehensive critical and analytical reflective journals that explore and identify gaps in knowledge. Each reflective journal provides:

A description

An Interpretation

An outcome –what was learnt.

(33.5–30)

Insightful and well- developed reflective journals that explore and identifies gaps in knowledge.

Each reflective journal provides:

A description

An Interpretation

An outcome – what was learnt.

(29.5–26)

Provides logical and broadly reflective journals that explore and identifies gaps in knowledge.

Each reflective journal provides:

A description

An Interpretation

An outcome – what was learnt.

(25.5–20)

Disjointed reflective journals that explores and identify some gaps in knowledge. Each reflective journal provides some of the following:

A description

An Interpretation

An outcome - what was learnt.

(19.5–16)

Inadequate reflective journals that do not explore or identify gaps in knowledge.

The following have not been included:

A description

An Interpretation

An outcome –what was learnt.

(15.5–0)

Inadequate reflective journals that do not explore or identify gaps in knowledge.

The following have not been included:

A description

An Interpretation

An outcome –what was learnt.

(40–34)

Six (6) Comprehensive reflective journals that include:

·    Four (4) antenatal visits

·    +/- the labour (intrapartum care)

·    Two (2) postnatal visits

·    Face to face/ telehealth visits.

(33.5–30)

Six (6) Well-developed reflective journals that include:

·    Four (4) antenatal visits

·    +/- the labour (intrapartum care)

·    Two (2) postnatal visits

·    Face to face/ telehealth visits.

(29.5–26)

Six (6) reflective journals that include:

·     Four (4) antenatal visits

·     +/- the labour (Intrapartum care)

·     Two (2) postnatal visits

·     Face to face/ telehealth visits.

 

(25.5–20)

Six (6) disjointed reflective journals that include:

·   Four (4) antenatal visits

·   +/- the labour (Intrapartum care)

·   Two (2) postnatal visits

·   Face to face/ telehealth visits.

(19.5–16)

Six (6) or less inadequate reflective

journals that do not meet the expected requirements of:

·    Four (4) antenatal visits

·    +/- the labour (Intrapartum Visits)

·    Two (2) postnatal visits

·    Face to face/ telehealth visits.

(19.5–16)

Six (6) or less poorly constructed reflective

journals that do not meet the expected requirements of:

·    Four (4) antenatal visits

·    +/- the labour (Intrapartum Visits)

·    Two (2) postnatal visits

·    Face to face/ telehealth visits.

Professional writing and presentation

 

(10%)

(10–8.5)

Excellent and comprehensive presentation of portfolio. Reflective journals set out as per template.

Content is students own work, consistently clear, accurate, and presented in a logical, succinct order demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic. There are no errors in English grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The language of the discipline is comprehensively used. Formatting requirements applied without error. Adheres to the word count.

 

(8.4–7.5)

Concise and well-presented portfolio. Reflective journals set out as per template. Content is students own work, frequently clear, correct, and presented in a logical order demonstrating a good understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 1 error. The language of the discipline is frequently used. Formatting requirements applied with 1 error. Adheres to the word count.

(7.4–6.5)

Well-presented portfolio. Reflective journals set out as per template. Content is students own work, mostly clear, correct, and presented in a logical order demonstrating a sound understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 2 errors. The language of the discipline is mostly used. Formatting requirements applied with 2 errors. Adheres to the word count.

(6.4–5)

Adequately presented portfolio. Reflective journals set out as per template. Content is students own work, sometimes clear, correct, and presented in a logical order demonstrating a reasonable understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 3 errors. The language of the discipline is used. Formatting requirements applied with 3 errors. Adheres to the word count.

(4.9–0)

Poorly presented portfolio. Provided template not utilised. Content is not students own work, consistently unclear or incorrect and is disorganised demonstrating insufficient understanding of the topic. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have ≥4 errors. The language of the discipline is infrequently or incorrectly used. Formatting requirements applied with ≥4 errors. Deviates +/- 10% of the word count.

(0)

Poorly presented portfolio. Provided template not utilised. Content is not students own work. Little to no meaningful writing. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have ≥4 errors. The language of the discipline is infrequently or incorrectly used. Formatting requirements applied with ≥4 errors. Deviates +/- 10% of the word count.

Intext citations

 

(5%) 

(5–4.25)

Consistently accurate intext citations with no errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style to support and reflect all ideas, information, and quotations.

(4.2–3.8)

One consistent in-text citation error in APA 7th Edition referencing style identified. Intext citations support and reflect most ideas, information, and quotations. 

(3.75–3.55)

Two consistent in-text citation errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style identified. Intext citations support and reflect many ideas, information, and quotations.

(3.50–2.5)

Three consistent in-text citation errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style identified. Intext citations support and reflect some ideas, information, and quotations.

(2.4–0)

Four or more consistent in-text citations errors in APA 7th Edition referencing style. Limited intext citations used to support ideas, information, and quotations.

 

(0)

No reference list provided.

Reference List

 

(5%)

 

(5–4.25)

Acknowledges all sources and meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with no errors. A minimum of one reference used for each journal entry, including journal articles and relevant websites. Literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(4.2–3.8)

Acknowledges majority of sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 1 error. A minimum of one reference used for each journal entry, including journal articles and relevant websites. The majority of literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(3.75–3.55)

Acknowledges most sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 2 errors. A minimum of one reference used for each journal entry, including journal articles and relevant websites. Most literature cited has been published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(3.50–2.5)

Acknowledges some sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 3 errors. A minimum of one reference used for each journal entry, including journal articles and relevant websites. Some literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(2.4–0)

Multiple sources not acknowledged and/or ≥4 APA (7th Edition) referencing errors and/or references not provided.

Some or all journal entries lacking the minimum of one reference. Journal articles not sourced. Relevant websites not included. Some literature cited is published ≥7 years and/or not sourced from the CQUniversity library.

(0)

Multiple sources not acknowledged and/or ≥5 APA (7th Edition) referencing errors and/or references not provided.

Some or all journal entries lacking the minimum of one reference. Journal articles not sourced. Relevant websites not included. Some literature cited is published ≥7 years and/or not sourced from the CQUniversity library.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Each COCE woman must have their own individual journal in Word Document format, which are to be uploaded as individual files to the Midwifery Practice 3 Moodle site.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Critically evaluate the consequences of physiological and socio-cultural complexities upon the physical, social and emotional wellbeing of women across the childbearing continuum
  • Apply midwifery knowledge, cultural safety, inclusivity, and digital health and emerging technologies to the care of women from marginalised groups.
  • Demonstrate midwifery knowledge of regional, national, and global maternal health priorities and translate these into practice
  • Critically reflect on clinical learning related to your continuity of care experiences (COCE) to enhance practice


Graduate Attributes

3 Professional Practice Placement

Assessment Title
Professional Practice Placement

Task Description

Type:                         Professional Practice Placement`

Due date:                  Formative AMSAT: 4pm (AEST) Wednesday 11th December  2024 (Week 6)

                                   Summative AMSAT and Record of Clinical hours:  4pm (AEST) Wednesday 5 February 2025                                             (Week 12)

Weighting:                Pass/Fail

Unit Coordinator/s:  Rachelle Chee and Aras Moran

 

Learning Outcomes Assessed
6.    Demonstrate developing midwifery competence based upon the Nursing and Midwifery Board Australia (NMBA) Midwife Standards for Practice (2018) requirements.

 

Aim
The aim of this assessment is to consolidate your midwifery knowledge and the application of theory to practice for ensuring safe and effective care is received by the women and infants in your care. This assessment aims to for you to demonstrate competent midwifery clinical practice that meets the requirements of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia’s Midwife Standards for Practice (2018).

 

Instructions
A minimum of 224 hours of clinical practice experience is required for the completion of this unit. This clinical experience will allow you to consolidate knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit. You are required to meet the clinical requirements listed below and these requirements need to be documented within your Student Clinical Experience Record Book. Please note that successful completion of this unit is not merely completing requisite clinical hours and skills but also demonstrating midwifery novice competency based upon the NMBA requirements and professional behaviour as per relevant CQUniversity policies.

 

Please follow the steps below to complete your assessment task:

1.    Complete the Facilitator/preceptor notification form and submit to SONIA online platform on day 1 of placement.

2.    Maintain an accurate Record of Clinical hours with each shift co-signed by an RM, preceptor or clinical facilitator.

3.    Recruit four Continuity of Care Experience (COCE) women (in addition to those recruited in term 2) and attend episodes of antenatal care with the women. You may or may not have participated in the experience of your COCEs’ births and postnatal care. 

4.    Complete 224 hours of professional experience placement plus COCE hours. 

5.    Complete a formative AMSAT midway through your placement. This requires you to undertake the following steps:

  1. Complete the Student formative self-assessment form in SONIA and submit to your assessor when nearing the midway point of placement.
  2. Engage in discussion with your assessor after they have completed their feedback in the Formative Assessment in SONIA.
  3. The Unit Coordinator will review your AMSAT assessment, add comments and sign it. If you have a score below 3, a learning support plan may be implemented to provide you with clear performance expectations and goals.
  4. Review the Unit Coordinator’s comments and complete the Student Declaration and signature section at the end of your formative AMSAT. You will receive an email notification when this is available (Completing these steps will trigger the release of the summative AMSAT).

6.    Complete a summative AMSAT near the end of your placement:

  1. Complete the Student summative self-assessment form in SONIA and submit to your assessor near the completion of your placement.
  2. Your assessor will complete your Summative Assessment in SONIA discuss your assessment and feedback with you.
  3. You will be notified by email to complete the Student declaration and signature section on your summative AMSAT.
  4. A score of 3 or higher for each AMSAT criterion on the summative AMSAT assessment is required to pass the summative assessment. If you do not meet each AMSAT criteria at a 3 or above on your summative assessment, you may receive a fail grade for the Unit.

7.    The Unit Coordinator will review your summative assessment, check the COCE hours, Record of Clinical hours, and assign a grade.

8.    Complete the term 3 formative AMSAT, summative AMSAT and the Record of Clinical Hours with your preceptor/facilitator/educator via the SONIA online platform by the specified due date.

 

Requirements

  • Attendance of clinical placement is mandatory for this unit.
  • To be eligible for a Pass grade for this unit, you must complete 224 hours of Professional Experience Placement and COCE hours and achieve a score of 3 or higher on the summative AMSAT assessment. 
  • If you are not meeting satisfactory practice standards at any point of the placement, a meeting will be scheduled with you, the facilitator and the Unit Coordinator to discuss your progress. A support plan may be implemented to assist you to satisfactorily meet the AMSAT criteria. If you do not meet each AMSAT criteria at a satisfactory level at the Summative assessment, you may receive a Fail grade for this assessment.
  • Any unsatisfactory performance that jeopardises the safety of people in your care or which does not adhere to the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) MidwifeStandards for Practice, Code of Professional Conduct, Code of Ethics, and/or Social Media Policy criteria may result in you being removed from placement. Please refer to The Work-integrated Learning-Student Placement Policy and Procedure that can be found on the WIL Moodle site.
  • As a midwifery student representing CQUniversity, you are required to comply with CQU midwifery student uniform requirements and the CQU student Charter during your professional experience placement. Please refer to Work-integrated Learning-Student Placement Policy and Procedure that can be found on the WIL (Work Integrated Learning) Moodle site

 
Submission
Submit your Record of Continuity of Care Experiences to SONIA as a pdf. All other formats will be returned for resubmission.

Complete and submit your AMSATs and Record of Clinical Hours via the SONIA platform.

 

Marking Criteria

  • Students are assessed against the Australian Midwifery Standards Assessment Tool (AMSAT). A copy of this is available to you through SONIA.
  • Any unsatisfactory performance that jeopardises people's safety in your care or that does not adhere to the NMBA Midwife standards for practice, Code of professional conduct, Code of ethics, A nurse's guide to professional boundaries, and Social media policy criteria, may result in your placement being cancelled.
  • The required clinical experience will be reviewed by the midwifery educator/manager in conjunction with the unit coordinator.

 

Minimum Pass Criteria

A minimum score of 3 for each AMSAT assessment criterion and at least 224 hours of clinical professional experience placement must be achieved to pass this assessment.

 

References
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2018). Midwife standards for practice. https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD18%2f25281&dbid=AP&chksum=kYbO0%2bO7kx9I%2fBlvmKH%2bwg%3d%3d

 


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Wednesday (5 Feb 2025) 4:00 pm AEST

Complete and submit your AMSATs and Record of Clinical Hours via the SONIA platform. Submit your Record of Continuity of Care Experiences as pdf attachment with your Record of Clinical Hours.


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Wednesday (12 Feb 2025)

Please allow two weeks for the return of this assessment task.


Weighting
Pass/Fail

Assessment Criteria

The required clinical experience will be reviewed by the midwifery educator/manager in conjunction with the unit coordinator.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Complete and submit your AMSATs and Record of Clinical Hours via the SONIA platform. Submit your Record of Continuity of Care Experiences as pdf attachment with your Record of Clinical Hours.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Demonstrate developing midwifery competence based upon the Nursing and Midwifery Board Australia (NMBA) Midwife Standards for Practice (2018) requirements.


Graduate Attributes

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?