Write a 1200-word (+/- 10%) case study analysis about AGL (www.agl.com.au).

I) Choose any TWO of the topics from Week 1 to Week 5.

II) Analyse the impact of your chosen topic/s on the company’s performance and other related activities by answering the suggested questions below.

• Week 1: What is the governance structure of this organisation and how does the structure of this company impact its business operations and strategic choices?
• Week 2: What key external factors in the current market environment affect this company's financial results and management decisions?
• Week 3: What major risks or vulnerabilities could negatively impact this company's performance and planning, and how might the leadership team mitigate them?
• Week 4: What core business practices or programs does this organisation adopt and how does this company create value and compete in its industry?
• Week 5: What are the main functional groups or departments within this organisation, and how does each one enable and support overall performance and decision-making?

III) Students must cite recent and relevant peer-reviewed academic references in this assessment (preferably post-2018 articles).

Suggested case study structure and key points:

Introduction

• Briefly summarise the key facts of the case study
• Outline the purpose of your case analysis
   

Analysis (note that this is the body section of the case study, supported by relevant and recent academic journal articles)

• Apply relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks in this unit to analyse the case study (as per suggested questions above)
• Examine the causes of the issues or problems faced (if available)
• Evaluate the strategies, decisions, or actions taken by the company
• Identify the key factors influencing the situation or performance
• Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the company/person in responding to the situation (if available)

Conclusion

• Summarise the key findings and insights from your analysis
   

References

Make sure you have a list of references that you cited in the text, using the APA7 style

Referencing and written communication requirements: 

Use the APA 7 referencing style consistently in in-text citations and in the reference list (See https://delivery-cqucontenthub.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/apa-referencing-style.pdf?v=51e1aea7)

Criteria 1. Introduction (10%) - Clearly outlines the purpose and scope of the case study.

Criteria 2. Theoretical knowledge (25%) - Demonstrates the ability to define key terms and apply the theories and concepts associated with the topic selected.

Criteria 3. Research and analysis (35%) - Level of research efforts demonstrated on the organisation and ability to critically analyse the impact of a range of contextual factors on the performance of the organisation, supported by recent and relevant peer-reviewed academic and other references.

Criteria 4. Conclusion (10%) - All aspects are drawn together in a brief and concise summary. Consistent with findings, no new materials; highlight implications for the future of the company.

Criteria 5. Communication (10%) - High quality of expression, grammar, spelling, punctuation, and proofreading.

Criteria 6. Referencing (10%) - Correctly use the APA referencing system to cite academic sources both in the in-text and in the reference list, including using recent and relevant peer-reviewed academic references and numerous non academic references. (industry/news/media/websites/databases on the company).

Note: Further support on writing, referencing, recommended journals is given on the Moodle site - Assessment folder for this assignment. A session on academic writing will be provided in one of the workshops on campus or online. 

This is a group assignment that involves a 15-minute student-led live presentation and a 5-minute Q&A session after the presentation.

Assessment 2 must be completed by students in a group of about 4 students. The group presentation can be conducted over Zoom for distance/offshore students and in-person for on-campus students.

I) Joining a group

Join an Assessment 2 group through the unit's Moodle site. All members of a group must be from the same workshop since you will be presenting together during your scheduled class time. If you do not join a group yourself, you will be assigned one.

There will be no changes to Assessment 2 groups after Week 6: Please make sure that you have enrolled in the workshop class you want to attend by the Census Date (Week 4). More information and guidance on group formation will be provided on Moodle.

II) Choosing a topic

Your group is required to choose ONE of the topics from Week 6 to Week 9. Some suggested questions are below for each topic. You may choose to address a different question about one of these topics in consultation with your lecturer. 

• Week 6: What innovative strategies could you propose to enhance creativity and innovation within your chosen organisation? Consider the differences between creativity and innovation. How could your organisation sustain everyday innovation while also cultivating disruptive thinking?
• Week 7: What are the key challenges for modern internet-based companies in leveraging big data, the Internet of things, and emerging technologies? Recommend creative solutions your chosen organisation could implement to harness these technologies while mitigating risks like data security, privacy concerns, and information overload.
• Week 8: What are the major advantages and disadvantages of globalisation for contemporary organisations? Recommend innovative strategies your chosen organisation could use to capitalise on global opportunities while also navigating challenges like cultural differences, economic instability, and geographic distance.
• Week 9: Should today's organisations factor in national cultural dimensions when making HR decisions, whether for international or diverse domestic workforces? Why or why not? Recommend creative solutions your chosen organisation could implement to address cultural considerations in areas like communication norms, leadership styles, and team dynamics.

II) Choosing ONE organisation and developing a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation

• The PPT should have a clear structure (Introduction, Body, Conclusion), and a reference list.
• You must choose one real-life corporate example in your analysis.
• Your PPT slides must include about eight (8) peer-reviewed academic references (preferably post-2018 articles), together with numerous non-academic references (industry/news/media/websites/databases).
• This presentation should demonstrate a critical understanding of the problems associated with the relevant contextual factor, the ability to evaluate complex problems, and recommend creative solutions.

Additional Group Presentation Requirements:

• All group members need to present and participate. Each member needs to speak for 4 to 5 minutes. Therefore, divide time equally within your group.
• You will have a Q&A session post-presentation to interact with the audience and receive Peer + Lecturer feedback or questions. (5 minutes)
• Only ONE member of your group uploads PPT slides (no video) on Moodle.

Note: Please check Moodle for further support on forming groups, developing a PPT presentation, writing, and referencing.

Referencing and written communication requirements:

Use the APA 7 referencing style consistently in in-text citations and in the reference list (See https://delivery-cqucontenthub.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/apa-referencing-style.pdf?v=51e1aea7)
Use an appropriate structure with Introduction, Body, and Conclusion, and appropriate conventions of academic writing for ppt slides.

Criteria 1 - Quality of the ppt presentation (visual) (15%) Demonstrates high quality of the ppt presentation, design, and visual aids. Develop a concise and structured presentation to the required professional standard.
Criteria 2 - Presentation style (verbal) and teamwork (30%) Demonstrates good presentation skills and competencies within the time limit.
Criteria 3 - Content (25%) Demonstrates critical understanding of the problems associated with the selected contextual factors and relevant solutions regarding how the organisation can deal with contemporary challenges posed by the relevant contextual factor.
Criteria 4 - Research (10%) Provides strong key points in response to the chosen topic supported by research evidence.
Criteria 5 - Corporate example(s) (10%) Provides the strength and relevance of the argument by incorporating one appropriate real-life organisation example in the presentation.
Criteria 6 - Referencing (5%) Correctly use the APA referencing system to cite academic sources both in the in-text and in the reference list, including using recent and relevant peer-reviewed academic references and numerous nonacademic references. (industry/news/media/websites/databases on the company).
Criteria 7 - Q&A (5%) The ability to handle the Q&A session.

You will be required to write two (2) reflections (approximately 800 words each) in response to tasks or scenarios given on Moodle. Please check more details on Moodle – Assessment 3 tile for this task.

This assessment will be available on Moodle by Week 11.

Assessment Marking Criteria

• Criteria 1. Description (20%) - Describe the key contents of the topic you are going to reflect on. Do this in the formof a brief narrative. Write in the first person.
• Criteria 2. Analysis (30%) - Analyse the task. Is there something about it that challenged your ideas about what you have learned in this Unit? Does it reinforce those ideas? How did your experience fit with the literature and unit learning material that you have read in this Unit
• Criteria 3. Evaluation (30%) - What will you draw from it? Will it lead you to change the way you do something? Will it lead you to change the way you think about something or future work?
• Criteria 4. Communication (20%) - Quality of writing, expression, grammar, spelling, punctuation, structure, and flow within the word count.