Overview
This unit will provide you with knowledge of the different patterns of symptom presentation in people experiencing mental health challenges. You will be able to critically reflect on the use of self in the development and maintenance of therapeutic relationships with consumers and their families. The integral nature of consumer perspectives and input into mental health care will be examined. In this unit you will be encouraged to critically examine interventions for people experiencing different mental health challenges.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Pre-requisites NURS11163 Recovery Approach to Mental Health or NURS12150 Recovery Approach in Mental Health NURS12156 Clinical Nursing Practice 2 or NURS11156 Acute Nursing Management NURS11158 Evidence Informed Nursing Practice or NHLT12001 Evidence Informed Practice
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2018
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student feedback
I feel that the assessment could have been made clearer by only including the relevant parts in the template and removing the other parts that are out of the scope of practice. This may help to lessen the number of questions asked.
A template has been developed for both assessment items for term 3 2017 that includes all elements and guidelines included
Feedback from Student feedback
Assessment feedback needs to be more clear and concise so that the student can see why they received the mark they received
An audit has been completed and the markers that provided limited feedback will not be employed to mark again
- Explore the different presentations in people experiencing mental health challenges.
- Appraise the use of self in the development and maintenance of therapeutic relationships with consumers and their families.
- Analyse the integral nature of consumer perspectives and input into mental health care.
- Use professional, legal and ethical frameworks to investigate a range of culturally appropriate interventions and management strategies for people experiencing different forms of mental health challenges.
- Examine mental health and mental health promotion as a component of overall health and well-being as it applies to consumers, carers, families and communities inclusive of health care professionals at a local, national and international level.
The learning outcomes are linked to the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council (ANMAC) Standards for registered nurses and the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) registered nurse standards for practice.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||
2 - Written Assessment - 60% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1 - Communication | |||||
2 - Problem Solving | |||||
3 - Critical Thinking | |||||
4 - Information Literacy | |||||
5 - Team Work | |||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||
8 - Ethical practice | |||||
9 - Social Innovation | |||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 60% |
Textbooks
Mental health care: An introduction for health professionals (Black and White Print on Demand ).
3rd edition (2017)
Authors: Hungerford, C., Clancy, R., Hodgson, D., & Jones, T.
Wiley
Milton Milton , QLD , Australia
ISBN: 97807303505769781118644805
Binding: Paperback
Additional Textbook Information
Available as either
Wiley E-Text
Mental Health Care: An Introduction for Health Professionals in Australia, 2nd Edition
ISBN :9780730344612 October 2017, ©2017
approx. $75.00
from Wiley direct. website: http://au.wiley.com/WileyCDA/
Paperback
Mental Health Care: An Introduction for Health Professionals in Australia, 2nd Edition
ISBN : 9780730350576
October 2017, ©2017
approx. $120.00
from CQUni Bookshop http://bookshop.cqu.edu.au/texts.asp
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 6th Edition (APA 6th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
s.a.harris@cqu.edu.au
e.aquin@cqu.edu.au
c.t.barnard@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Module 1: From the beginning
Chapter
Chapter 1: Mental health care in Australia
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 2: Say hello to Jonathon
Chapter
Chapter 2: Assessment in the mental health context
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 3: Mental health assessment
Chapter
Chapter 2: Assessment in the mental health context
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 3 (cont.): Mental health assessment
Chapter
Chapter 2: Assessment in the mental health context
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 4: Exploration of diagnostic categories
Chapter
Chapter 7: Caring for a person with depression, anxiety or perinatal mental health
Chapter 9. Caring for a person with a serious mental illness
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 4 (cont): Exploration of diagnostic categories
Chapter
Chapter 10. Caring for a person with a substance use disorder
Chapter 11. Caring for an older person with a mental illness
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 5: Crisis intervention
Chapter
Chapter 5. Common reactions to stressful situations
Chapter 8. Caring for a person who has self-harmed
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 6: Therapeutic interventions
Chapter
Chapter 7. Caring for a person with depression, anxiety or perinatal mental health
Chapter 10. Caring for a person with a substance use disorder
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 6 (cont.): Therapeutic interventions
Chapter
Chapter 9. Caring for a person with a serious mental illness
Chapter 12. Approaches to mental health service delivery
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 7: Community options
Chapter
Chapter 12. Approaches to mental health service delivery
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 8: Cultural issues
Chapter
Chapter 4. Delivering culturally appropriate mental health care
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Assessment Objectives:
This assessment tasks requires the student to:
1. Explore the
assessment process within mental health nursing.
2. Appraise the
interviewer’s use of self in establishing a therapeutic relationship with
Jonathon
3. Record
observed symptom presentation in relation to a Mental Status Examination.
4. Utilise a
Mental health assessment tool to assist in recording the mental health assessment.
The Task:
After watching the Jonathon episode 1 video and utilising the
assessment one template for submission. You are required to record a Mental
Status Examination on Jonathon Doeman.
This is to be recorded on the provided template.
Week 5 Wednesday (8 Aug 2018) 9:00 am AEST
Week 7 Wednesday (29 Aug 2018)
Not Attempted/Not Demonstrated (0,1 or 2): No recognisable attempt made at the task as described. If task attempted no demonstration of understanding or response is off topic or not related to the task at hand.
Superficially Demonstrated (3 or 4): Task attempted but no demonstration of significant understanding to warrant a pass. There is no direction offered in respect of the task. Does not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking, argument lacks cohesion.
Satisfactory (5-6): Limited demonstration of how content is relevant but Content addresses the assigned assessment task. May be repetitive at times or lacks cohesion. Content provides passable evidence based rationale for all interventions.
Good Understanding (7-8): Clearly demonstrates how content is relevant, show broad consideration of most aspects of the assigned assessment task. The approach clearly answers the question and the argument proceeds logically with well-defined evidence based rationale for all interventions.
Excellent (9-10): The work accurately and consistently reflects the task required. Thorough demonstration of relevance of content is clearly evident and comprehensive consideration of all aspects of the assigned assessment task. Content that provides comprehensive evidence of critical thinking and decision making ability.
- Explore the different presentations in people experiencing mental health challenges.
- Appraise the use of self in the development and maintenance of therapeutic relationships with consumers and their families.
- Analyse the integral nature of consumer perspectives and input into mental health care.
- Use professional, legal and ethical frameworks to investigate a range of culturally appropriate interventions and management strategies for people experiencing different forms of mental health challenges.
- Examine mental health and mental health promotion as a component of overall health and well-being as it applies to consumers, carers, families and communities inclusive of health care professionals at a local, national and international level.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Team Work
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
2 Written Assessment
Assessment Objectives To assess the students’ understanding of the coursework in relation to the course learning objectives.
The Task To develop an ePortfolio that demonstrates an understanding of the module content. A series of 7 questions are included in your weekly learnings that together make up this assessment. Each question will specify a word limit and will be required to be correctly referenced using APA referencing.
The Tasks:
1: Introduction to Mental Health Myths, misunderstandings, and negative stereotypes and attitudes surround mental illness. These result in stigma, discrimination, and isolation of people with mental illness, as well as their families and carers. Below are three of these misconceptions. For task one you are to choose one of the three myth statements listed below. Using current literature to support your position present a 500 word response refuting the myth.
-
You're either mentally ill or mentally healthy
-
People with mental illness are violent.
-
Mental health problems are forever.
A minimum of 4 current references are required in your response.
Word Limit: 500 words
2: Mental Health Assessment After watching the first two video interactions between Jonathon and Ed, your task is to: Define the concept, therapeutic use of self, Identify 2 examples of therapeutic use of self used by Ed during the assessment process. A minimum of 3 current references are required.
Word Limit: 500 words
3: Exploring Diagnostic Criteria Choose one of the diagnostic categories below and provide a brief 200 word summary of the DSM-5 classification of that diagnosis.
• Bi-polar 1 disorder
• Anorexia Nervosa
• Dissociative Identity disorder
In 500 words, identify and discuss any significant ethical and legal implications that may arise from this diagnosis as well as outline culturally appropriate interventions and management strategies to address these issues. A minimum of 3 current references plus the DSM-5 are required
Word limit: 700 total (200 diagnostic summary, 500 for discussion)
4: Risk Assessment Whilst affected by alcohol Jonathon was involved in a single vehicle accident and admitted to hospital. Episode 4,5 and 6 show Ed assessing Jonathon in the hospital after this accident. After watching the three episodes, your task is to:
-
identify 2 potential suicide risk factors that Jonathon is displaying
-
identify the ethical and legal implications of these risk factors
-
outline how to commence management planning within a consumer focused ethico-legal framework.
A minimum of 4 current references are required
Word count: 600 words
5: Therapeutic Interventions Jayne overhears some nurses discussing Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and is worried, as neither she nor Jonathon have any knowledge of this form of therapeutic intervention. How do you engage with Jayne and Jonathon in a therapeutic manner to provide them with important information on CBT to alley her concerns? In your response, consider side effects, short and long-term response to treatment and any further information you feel necessary that will assist both Jonathon and Jayne to have input into Jonathon’s further mental health care. Your response can be presented as a reference script. A minimum of 3 current references are required.
Word count: 500 Words
6: Exploring your local mental health services. This week’s ePortfolio task requires you to explore what services provide on-going mental health care management and health promotion strategies in your local area that would be appropriate for Jonathon and his family to access at this time. Don’t forget to include any services that may be accessed via the internet or telephone.
In your ePortfolio list 10 services. Be sure to include a mix of public, private and Non-Government Organisations (NGOs). From your list choose 3 services and for each of these services provide a 200 word overview of how the service may benefit Jonathon and his family at this time.
A minimum of 1 reference per service overview is required
Word count: 600 words
7: Reflection This final task of the ePortfolio is a capstone for the unit that requires you to critically reflect on your learning journey, paying particular attention to the following elements: (Please note that the following elements are provided to help guide your reflective process and should not be used as headings in your reflection)
• Therapeutic use of self in the development of relationships with consumers and their families
• The importance of inclusion of consumer perspectives in the provision of mental health care
• The importance of using an ethico-legal framework for assessment, intervention and evaluation of mental health care and culturally appropriate mental health care management.
In your response, consider the following;
• Have you noticed any change in your attitudes, beliefs and values across the term?
• If yes, what do you think contributed to this? If there is no change, why do you think this is so?
• What is your “take home message” from this unit?
Word limit: 500 words
Week 11 Wednesday (26 Sept 2018) 9:00 am AEST
Exam Week Monday (15 Oct 2018)
Not Attempted/Not Demonstrated (0,1 or 2):
Presentation: No evidence of title page, table of contents or reference list included in submission as per directions in Moodle.
Referencing: Fails to up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations. Many inaccuracies with referencing. . Reference list does not adhere to APA presentation guidelines. No evidence of reading widely on the topic through brevity of references on the reference list, not all of which are used in the body of the activities
Language: Ten or More inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation
General Tasks: No recognisable attempt made at the task as described. If task attempted no demonstration of understanding or response is off topic or not related to the task at hand.
Superficially Demonstrated (3 or 4):
Presentation: three or more elements missing as per Moodle guidelines.
Referencing: Occasionally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations. Occasional inaccuracies with referencing. Reference list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through a passable reference list, all of which are used in the body of the activities
Language: 7-10 inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation
General Task attempted but no demonstration of significant understanding to warrant a pass. There is no direction offered in respect of the task. Does not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking, argument lacks cohesion.
Satisfactory (5-6):
Presentation: two elements missing as per Moodle directions.
Referencing: Satisfactory integration up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations. Occasional inaccuracies with referencing. Reference list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through an adequate reference list, all of which are used in the body of the activities
Language: 5-7 inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation .
General Task: Limited demonstration of how content is relevant but Content addresses the assigned assessment task. May be repetitive at times or lacks cohesion. Content provides passable evidence based rationale for all interventions.
Good Understanding (7-8):
Presentation: A single element missing as per Moodle directions
Referencing: Generally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations. Generally accurate with referencing. Reference list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through an ample reference list, all of which are used in the body of the activities.
Language: No more than 5 inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation.
General Task: Clearly demonstrates how content is relevant, show broad consideration of most aspects of the assigned assessment task. The approach clearly answers the question and the argument proceeds logically with well-defined evidence based rationale for all interventions.
Excellent (9-10):
Presentation: As per Moodle directions
Referencing: Consistently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. Consistently accurate with referencing. Reference list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through an extensive reference list, all of which are used in the body of the activities.
Language: No inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation.
General Task:The work accurately and consistently reflects the task required. Thorough demonstration of relevance of content is clearly evident and comprehensive consideration of all aspects of the assigned assessment task. Content that provides comprehensive evidence of critical thinking and decision making ability.
- Explore the different presentations in people experiencing mental health challenges.
- Appraise the use of self in the development and maintenance of therapeutic relationships with consumers and their families.
- Analyse the integral nature of consumer perspectives and input into mental health care.
- Use professional, legal and ethical frameworks to investigate a range of culturally appropriate interventions and management strategies for people experiencing different forms of mental health challenges.
- Examine mental health and mental health promotion as a component of overall health and well-being as it applies to consumers, carers, families and communities inclusive of health care professionals at a local, national and international level.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Team Work
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.