This unit requires you to complete a minimum of 400 hours of supervised work integrated learning (WIL). This intermediate level placement will provide key opportunities for you to integrate previously acquired knowledge (theories and principles of occupational therapy) within your professional practice experience. The practice educator who supervises the WIL will assess you using the Student Practice Evaluation Form Revised Second Edition (SPEF-R2). This will then be returned to the unit co-ordinator for the results to be recorded.

You will be assessed as either passing or failing using the Student Practice Evaluation Form - Second Revised (SPEF-R2) by the supervising practice educator/s. In addition to rating items, practice educators provide written feedback in the feedback / recommendation spaces provided on the form.The evaluation is completed at halfway and again at completion of the WIL. To achieve an overall pass on the final evaluation you will need to:
- pass all core items (a rating of 3 or more). If you fail a core item, you will consequently fail the evaluation overall.
- pass the additional minimum requirements indicated for each learning objective
- pass the relevant learning objectives for all domains
More detailed information on the SPEF-R2 can be found in the user manual located on the unit Moodle page. Minimum requirements for passing each learning objective are specifically located on page 27 of the SPEF-R2 user manual.
A final summary statement regarding your overall performance will be recorded together with your final grade of pass or fail.

You are required to submit a Portfolio using Portfolium. The Portfolio should consist of:

• An introductory statement which includes a description of the WIL and a clear rationale for your choice of individual learning goals from your learning plan for this WIL.
• Completed and signed learning plan with at least four learning goals addressing different domains in the SPEF-R2.
• Completed Student Review of Professional Practice Placement form from the SPEF-R2.
• Completed log of fieldwork hours (this is not marked however these hours need to be recorded for evidence that the WFOT fieldwork requirements have been met at your graduation).
• Evidence of a wide range of skills, knowledge and a good use of WIL opportunities that displays obvious improvements in competencies over the duration of the WIL. This evidence will be clearly linked with competencies relating to your learning plan.
• Evidence of your Moodle forum posts which (a) demonstrate your application and understanding of professional and clinical reasoning and (b) identify a resource which assisted you during your WIL.
• A summary statement at the end of the page which summarises your strengths and future learning and career goals as an occupational therapist.

You can find full details of the Portfolio assessment on the unit Moodle page.

To achieve a pass, the minimum content of the Portfolio must include:

1. An introductory statement which provides a description of the WIL;

2. A completed Learning Plan that:
a) Is signed by the practice educator;
b) Has at least four smart (4) goals representing a range of domains in the SPEF-R2;
c) Clearly identifies which domain of the SPEF-R2 each SMART goal represents;

3. Evidence of the different types of learning activities completed during WIL including:
a) Four (4) examples of different types of activities that you have completed during WIL to support your learning. Whilst not limited to, the learning activities may include one of any of these examples; in-service education programs, workshops, journal club, development of an evidence-based practice resources, reading a journal article, de-identified case study, reflective journaling and online learning opportunities;
b) A summary reflection on each activity presented regarding how it is linked to your Learning Plan goals and its impact on your practice as an occupational therapy student;

4. Evidence of at least four (4) Moodle discussion forum posts, including:
a) One (1) post on your use of the hierarchy of thinking to reflect on your professional and clinical reasoning as it was used to support one aspect of your occupational therapy practice as a student during WIL;
b) Feedback on at least two (2) other students’ reflections as above;
c) Sharing of one resource you found beneficial during your WIL;

5. Completed log of WIL hours signed by your practice educator;

6. Completed Student Review of Professional Practice Placement form included in the SPEF-R2;

7. Completed Student Practice Education Form – Revised Second Edition (SPEF-R2) is to be included in your Portfolio if your practice educator uses the hard copy of the form. If your practice educator uses the online form, they will submit your completed SPEF-R2 through that online platform and it is not required in your portfolio;

8. Summary statement at the end of the page which summarises your strengths and future learning and career goals as an occupational therapy student.

In addition: Each piece of evidence of learning, cited in the Portfolio, is clearly linked to the Learning Plan goals.

The Portfolio is presented logically and is easy to follow with a fluent and mature writing style that includes accurate grammar, spelling, and APA referencing.

Client and / or organisation confidentiality is rigorously maintained throughout the Portfolio.

Incomplete portfolio's will be returned to the student for resubmission within two weeks.

For this written assignment, you will write a 2,000 word literature review to put your research project into context. That is, you will develop a literature review that reveals the gaps in present research, and which will inform the research questions you will address in your research protocol in OCCT14002. Please refer to Moodle for details about the process of conducting a literature review.

A literature review provides context to your proposed study and clearly demonstrates its rationale and importance. The literature review itself should be a critical analysis rather than a regurgitation of pertinent literature.

You should indicate that you have considered all relevant literature in your review, and comment critically on the strengths and challenges inherent in this body of literature which will be demonstrated in the aims/hypotheses of your research project. Headings should be used in the literature review to assist the reader to assimilate the content. 

The assessment criteria for the literature review are identified below. Please refer to the Marking Rubric for full details of this criteria.

1. Demonstrates the ability to critically analyse, synthesise and integrate the literature (20 marks)
2. Demonstrates the ability to select quality literature for the review (15 marks)
3. Demonstrates the ability to develop appropriate aims, objectives, and research questions/hypotheses (as appropriate) relating to the project (15 marks)
4. Demonstrates clarity of expression in the literature review (20 marks)
5. Demonstrates the ability to appropriately present a literature review (15 marks)
6. Individual Reflection (15 marks) (NB. This component is scored separately for each individual student)