CQUniversity Unit Profile
ORAL12001 Oral Disease Prevention and Management
Oral Disease Prevention and Management
All details in this unit profile for ORAL12001 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In this unit, you will study current approaches for the prevention, treatment and management of dental diseases such as dental caries (including root caries), periodontal diseases and non carious tooth structure loss. By recording and considering the patient’s medical, dental and social history you will be able to diagnose dental diseases and develop an appropriate treatment plan. You will use your clinical judgment skills with a wide range of patients, including children and adults, medically compromised patients, people with special needs and the elderly.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 2
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 9
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Prerequisites:ORAL11004 Oral Anatomy; ANDORAL11005 Dental Morphology and Microscopic Anatomy; ANDORAL11003 Oral Pathology and Diagnosis; ANDBIOH11006 Advanced Anatomy and Physiology OR BMSC11011 Human Anatomy and Physiology 2; ANDHLTH12031 Community Engaged Learning.Co-requisites:ORAL12002 Oral Health Pre Clinical Practice 1; ANDORAL12003 Oral Health Clinical Practice 1.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2023

Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Group Work
Weighting: 20%
2. Online Quiz(zes)
Weighting: 40%
3. Case Study
Weighting: 40%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Student Unit and Teaching Evaluations

Feedback

The weekly tiles can be overwhelming with supporting material. "The content was heavy but was delivered well. The unit coordinator emphasised what I should learn from that week's content and how the other material would be helpful for more clarity on the topics covered. Furthermore, supporting material was beneficial and handy information for further learning".

Recommendation

It is recommended to reorganise Moodle to clearly define compulsory content and additional resources.

Feedback from Student Unit and Teaching Evaluations

Feedback

"Kahoot quizzes were a good way of challenging students knowledge. The addition of weekly formative quizzes would be helpful for preparing for the online summative quizzes".

Recommendation

It is recommended to introduce formative online quizzes throughout the term.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Explain the processes of assessment, prevention and management of dental diseases, including non-carious tooth structure loss, dental caries (including root caries), and periodontal diseases on patients of all ages
  2. Develop a diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan for patients of all ages, including medical compromised and special needs patients
  3. Advocate for, and promote, oral health to individuals and groups across diverse community settings in a variety of formats
  4. Recognise and act upon the legal, ethical, and safeguarding issues involving dental practitioners and patients as defined by the relevant professional regulatory bodies in Australia and overseas.

All unit profiles in the Bachelor of Oral Health are made available to the Australian Dental Council for on-going accreditation purposes.

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Group Work - 20%
2 - Online Quiz(zes) - 40%
3 - Case Study - 40%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Group Work - 20%
2 - Online Quiz(zes) - 40%
3 - Case Study - 40%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd

Edition: 3rd (2017)
Authors: Stephen J. Stefanac and Samuel P. Nesbit
Elsevier
St Louis St Louis , Missouri , USA
ISBN: ISBN -978-0-323-28730-2
Binding: eBook
Prescribed

Therapeutic Guidelines Oral and Dental

Edition: Version 3 (2019)
Authors: Oral and Dental Expert Group
Therapeutic Guidelines Limited
Melbourne Melbourne , Victoria , AUSTRALIA
ISBN: 9780980825312
Binding: Paperback
Supplementary

Foundations of Periodontics for the Dental Hygienist

Edition: 5th (2018)
Authors: Gehrig, J.S, Shin, D.E. and Willmann D.E.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Philadelphia Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA
ISBN: 9781496384027
Binding: Hardcover
Supplementary

Modern Dental Assisting

Edition: 12th (2018)
Authors: Doni L. Bird and Debbie S. Robinson
Elsevier
St Louis St Louis , Missouri , USA
ISBN: 9780323430302
Binding: Hardcover

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • Webcam and headset for on-line sessions
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing styles below:

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Karen Smart Unit Coordinator
k.smart@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 06 Mar 2023

Module/Topic

Ethical and legal considerations

Patient evaluation and assessment

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 6 - Ethical and legal considerations when treatment planning.
  • Chapter 1 - Patient evaluation and assessment.
  • Chapter 3 - Evidence based treatment planning

Gehrig, J.S., Shin, D.E & Willmann, D.E. (2018) Foundations of Periodontics for the Dental Hygienist, 5th Ed., Chap 19. p 321 and Chapter 23. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Compulsory two week residential intensive (2 weeks prior to the commencement of Term 1)

Week 2 Begin Date: 13 Mar 2023

Module/Topic

Detecting Dental Disease

  • Caries management system
  • Risk assessment tools



Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.



Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 20 Mar 2023

Module/Topic

Developing a problems list and diagnosis

Common diagnoses in dentistry

Introduction to diagnostic radiography

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 2 - Common Diagnoses in Dentistry

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 27 Mar 2023

Module/Topic

Developing the Treatment Plan

Interprofessional Practice


Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 4 - Developing the treatment plan
  • Chapter 5 - Interprofessional treatment planning
  • Chapter 7 to 11 - Phases of the treatment plan

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 03 Apr 2023

Module/Topic

Communication for behaviour change

  • Health education
  • Health promotion

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 18 - Patients who are motivational compromised or financially limited.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Online Quiz - Part 1

Vacation Week Begin Date: 10 Apr 2023

Module/Topic

Chapter


Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 17 Apr 2023

Module/Topic

Systemic Phase Considerations

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 12 - Patients with special needs

Oral and Dental Expert Group (2019) Therapeutic Guidelines: Oral and Dental Version 3. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 24 Apr 2023

Module/Topic

Treatment planning for the client experiencing substance abuse

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 13 - Patients who are substance dependent

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 01 May 2023

Module/Topic

Treatment planning for the elderly client 

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 17 - Geriatric patients

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 08 May 2023

Module/Topic

Treatment planning for the child and adolescent client

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

  • Chapter 16 - Adolescents patients.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 15 May 2023

Module/Topic

Treatment planning for clients of all ages

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Stefanac, Stephen J. & Nesbit, Samuel P. (2017) Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Dentistry 3rd Ed., Mosby Elsevier.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Group Work assessment due for submission


Group Work Due: Week 10 Monday (15 May 2023) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 11 Begin Date: 22 May 2023

Module/Topic

Treatment planning for clients of all ages

Chapter

See Moodle for links to additional resources.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Case study assessment due for submission



Individual Case Study Due: Week 11 Monday (22 May 2023) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 12 Begin Date: 29 May 2023

Module/Topic

Revision 

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Online quiz - Part 2

Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 05 Jun 2023

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 12 Jun 2023

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Group Work

Assessment Title
Group Work

Task Description

Component A - Group Work (20 marks)

Work as a group (4-5 students in each group) to:

  • Research a specific topic and its impact on oral health and the systemic phase management considerations in the provision of dental care. A list of references should be in a consistent style.
  • Present the research findings in a recorded 18-20 minute rapid-fire oral/visual presentation to your peers and 2 examiners. All students must speak. There will be time allocated after the submission of the oral presentation allowing for questions from the audience.


Component B - Individual Work (20 marks)

  • Individually develop a one-page fact sheet for patients. This could be a particular component of your researched topic. The focus of the fact sheet must be approved by the unit coordinator.
  • Peer evaluation - The individual will be assessed on their ability to give constructive (strategies for improvement) feedback to other student groups. This is completed individually after viewing the oral presentation and attending the tutorial session in Week 11, the peer evaluation template is available on the unit Moodle page.
  • Self and Peer Assessment (SPA) - A link will be sent to you via Moodle to complete the SPA. The SPA is feedback to the unit coordinator regarding the group work. This must be completed prior to the due date in Week 10.


Assessment Due Date

Week 10 Monday (15 May 2023) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
20%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

The final grade for this assessment comprises your group grade and the individual grade. There will be two examiners for the rapid-fire research oral presentation, the grade for the research and oral presentation will be an average of the 2 examiners marks. The individual component will be marked by one examiner.

The assessment criteria for your group and individual components are defined on the rubrics below.

GROUP:
GROUP research rapid fire PRESENTATION Unacceptable (0) Acceptable (2) Good (4) Exemplary (6)
Content: Identifies and concisely explains the topic/issue to the target audience Fails to identify, summarize, or explain the main topic or question.Represents the topic/issues inaccurately or inappropriately. Identifies main issues but does not summarize or explain them clearly or sufficiently Successfully identifies and sumarizes the main issues, but does not explain why/how they are problems or create questions Clearly identifies and summarizes main issues and successfully explains the topic;and identifies embedded or implicit issues, addressing their relationships to each other
CRITICAL ANALYSIS-Evaluation the literature/ research-Identify relevant literature/research There are virtually no sources that are professionally reliable. The audience seriously doubts the value of the material presented.Fails to identify data and information that counts as evidence for truth-claims and fails to evaluate its credibility. Majority of the references are not peer reviewed professional journals or other approved sources.References from questionable sources (e.g., trade books, internet sources, popular magazines).Successfully identifies data and information that counts as evidence but fails to thoroughly evaluate its credibility References are primarily from peer reviewed professional journals or other approved sources.Identifies all important evidence and rigorously evaluates it. References are from peer reviewed professional journals or other approved sources.The audience is confident that the information and ideas can be trusted.Not only identifies and rigorously evaluates all important evidence offered, but also provides new data or information for consideration
GROUP research rapid fire PRESENTATION Unacceptable (1) Acceptable (2) Good (3)

Visual Presentation

COMPONENTS

1. Layout & flow

2. Font size

3. Colour scheme and background

4. Correct acknowledgement of images

Difficult to read the text on the presentation, inappropriate background, and colour selection
Limited (0 to 1) aspects were considered
Acceptable visual presentation.

Some aspects were considered
Good visual presentation.

All aspects were considered
Limiting factor: TONE/LANGUAGE The tone/language is unprofessional. It is not appropriate for an academic presentation The tone/language is not consistently professional The tone/language is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic presentation.
Limiting factor: LENGTH OF PRESENTATION Within +/- 3 minutes of allocated time Within +/- 1 minute of allocated time

Research rapid fire presentation GRADE

(Out of 20)

EXAMINER:

Any of the following will result in a grade of fail or serious fail:

  • Unprofessional practice/conduct.
  • Failure to attend the presentation unless the unit coordinator has granted prior permission.
  • The poster and presentation did not relate to the group topic
Student:
INDIVIDUAL COMPONENT ONE PAGE FACT SHEET FOR PATIENTS (1) (2) (3)
CONTENT: Identifies and concisely explains the topic/issue to the target audience Fails to identify, summarize, or explain the main topic or question.Represents the topic/issues inaccurately or inappropriately. Identifies main issues but does not summarize or explain them clearly or sufficiently Clearly identifies and summarizes main issues and successfully explains the topic.ANDIdentifies embedded or implicit issues, addressing their relationships to each other.

VISUAL PRESENTATION

COMPONENTS

1. Layout & flow

2. Font size

3. Colour scheme and background

4. Correct acknowledgement of images

Difficult to read the text on the presentation, inappropriate background, and colour selectionLimited (0 to 1) aspects were considered Acceptable visual presentation.Majority of (2 to 3) aspects were considered Good visual presentationAll (4) aspects were considered.
GRAMMER, SPELLING, WRITING MECHANICS There are so many errors that meaning is obscured. There are occasional errors, but they don't represent a major distraction or obscure the meaning. The writing is free or almost free of errors.
Individual evaluation grade (out of 9)
Individual ORAL PRESENTATION communication grade: (1) (2) (3)
COMMUNICATION: Verbal and Non-verbal skills, audience response, eye contact Inaudible or too loud, rate is too slow or too fast.Audience lost interest, could not determine point of the presentation, no eye contact. Lost topic or attention mostly presented fact, without engagement, minimal eye contact, reads from notesClear on all points but not as polished Involves and holds audience's attention most of the time; hold audience attentionPoised, clear, articulate, volume, steady, pacing, confidence
Individual oral presentation GRADE (out of 3)
INDIVIDUAL PEER EVALUATION (1) (2) (3)
The individual's ability to give constructive (positive and ideas for improvement) feedback to other student group(s) Unable to provide any constructive written feedback to peer.ANDFeedback lacked constructive ideas for improvement. Student was able to provide constructive feedback, including positive and negative feedback and ideas for improvement, to other student group(s). Exemplary ability to provide constructive feedback, including positive and negative feedback and ideas for improvement, to other student group(s).
PEER Grade (out of 3)
SPA (out of 5) - graded in Moodle
TOTAL GRADE for Part B  (Out of 20)
Examiner:

Any of the following will result in a grade of fail or serious fail:

  • Unprofessional practice/conduct.
  • Failure to attend the presentation unless the unit coordinator has granted prior permission.
  • The poster and presentation did not relate to the group topic.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online Group

Submission Instructions
Marks will be deducted at a penalty of 5% or equivalent of the total available marks for the assessment for each calendar day (full or part) it is overdue.

Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Team Work
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Social Innovation


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Explain the processes of assessment, prevention and management of dental diseases, including non-carious tooth structure loss, dental caries (including root caries), and periodontal diseases on patients of all ages
  • Advocate for, and promote, oral health to individuals and groups across diverse community settings in a variety of formats

2 Online Quiz(zes)

Assessment Title
Online quizzes

Task Description

All students must complete this assessment. The online quiz(zes) will be a two-part assessment. The time and date will be confirmed on the News Forum on the unit Moodle site.
  1. Part A - Week 5
  2. Part B - Week 12

Your assessment is to be your own individual work and not a result of collaboration with other students. Any identified cases of potential collusion will result in a breach of academic integrity case being raised.

  • You are allowed one attempt only at each summative online quiz(zes) and must be completed within the allocated time frame.
  • Open attempts are submitted automatically. This means that if you have technical difficulties, it will save any questions you have already answered.

There are a number of support and technology mechanisms of which you need to be aware.

  • If you experience any technical difficulties accessing or during the in-class test, please contact TASAC (Moodle assistance option) on 1300 666 620.
  • Notify the unit coordinator as soon as physically possible (same day) with details of the technical issues. If you are able, take a screenshot of any error message received and include that in your email to the unit coordinator.
  • If you are unable to undertake the in-class test at the set time and date you will need to apply for an extension in Moodle (in the support area on the top of the page and supply supporting documentation as per normal extension requests.



Number of Quizzes

2


Frequency of Quizzes

Other


Assessment Due Date

Week 5 and Week 12. Time and date to be advised by unit coordinator.


Return Date to Students

The Week 5 quiz results will be available at the end of Week 8 and the final quiz results made available on certification of grades day.


Weighting
40%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

This online quiz(zes) will cover all learning material from ORAL12001. The questions relate to applying knowledge to the treatment planning and the management of dental conditions. The question format will be a combination of a multiple choice and short response question which require a paragraph or short answers relating to oral disease, prevention and management.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Explain the processes of assessment, prevention and management of dental diseases, including non-carious tooth structure loss, dental caries (including root caries), and periodontal diseases on patients of all ages
  • Develop a diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan for patients of all ages, including medical compromised and special needs patients
  • Advocate for, and promote, oral health to individuals and groups across diverse community settings in a variety of formats
  • Recognise and act upon the legal, ethical, and safeguarding issues involving dental practitioners and patients as defined by the relevant professional regulatory bodies in Australia and overseas.

3 Case Study

Assessment Title
Individual Case Study

Task Description

Individually complete a patient case study you have been given by the unit coordinator:

  • Identify disease risk factors.
  • Formulate a risk assessment, problems list and diagnosis/diagnoses.
  • Develop a treatment plan considering further investigations, prognosis, patient and clinician modifiers, treatment goals and objectives.
  • Explain the rationale for risk assessment, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment plan according to the treatment phases.
  • Provide information regarding consultation with other professionals and /or referrals.

The patient case study is formulated as a written report. The student is required to appraise published literature and apply evidence-based knowledge in terms of justifying the treatment decisions as well as relevant pathways, protocols and guidelines.


Assessment Due Date

Week 11 Monday (22 May 2023) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Individual written feedback will be provided by the certification of grades date.


Weighting
40%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

The assessment criteria for your case study is defined in the rubric.

STUDENT NAME:
IDIVIDUAL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN 0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7
PATIENT HISTORY ANALYSIS Clinical notes were not analysed to integrate sallient points into the case management plan. Clinical notes were summarised and integrated into the case management plan. Clinical notes were analysed, and the best information incorporated into the case management. Provides a critical analysis of clinical notes with the best information synthesisesd into the case management
PROBLEM LIST/ DIAGNOSIS/PROGNOSIS Cannot formulate a problem list/diagnosis or prognosis for the patient. Identifies some (not all) problems/diagnosis/prognosis. Identifies problems/diagnosis/prognosis Identifies a complete problem list and diagnosis without unnecessary information included.
RISK ASSESSMENT No or very limited attempt to complete the risk assessments Risk assessments are partially complete Risk Assessment completedWith creditable resources
CLINICAL REASONING Cannot formulate treatment plan or provides incorrect treatment plan. Recommendations are vague, confusing and /or irrelevant.
Clinical reasoning is vague or not evident in terms of evidence-based reasons for clinical decision-making.
Provides basic recommendations that are applicable to every case, however, are not individualised to this specific case.
Clinical reasoning is basic or general in terms of evidence-based reasons for clinical decision-making.
Displays good evidence of clinical reasoning of a specific case.
Recommendations are comprehensive and case-specific in terms of evidence-based reasons for clinical decision-making.
Complete tratment planning presented in a thoughtful and in-depth manner.
Provides highly individualised recommendations in terms of evidence-based reasons for clinical decision-making.
CRITICAL THINKING No evidence of critically appraised published scientific literature and no application of the relevant evidence-based knowledge in terms of justification of treatment decisions and choices Provided minimal evidence of critically appraised published scientific literature and /or minimal application of the relevant evidence-based knowledge in terms of justification of treatment decisions of choices Provided evidence of critically appraised published scientific literature and minimal application of the relevant evidence-based knowledge in terms of justification of treatment decisions and choices Independently critically appraised published scientific literature.Applied the relevant evidence-based knowledge in terms of justification of treatment decisions and choices, as well as relevant pathways, protocols and guidelines.
ORGANISATION The treatment plan is not logically organised.
Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest.
In general, the treatment plan is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what writer intends. The treatment plan is arranged logically to support appropriate management. Components are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. The treatment plan is arranged logically to support the purpose or goal of treatment. Components flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning.
1 2 3
GRAMMAR, SPELLING, WRITING MECHANICS There are so many errors that meaning is obscured. There are occasional errors, but they don't represent a major distraction or obscure the meaning. The writing is free or almost free of errors.
Case study grade (out of 43)


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Marks will be deducted at a penalty of 5% or equivalent of the total available marks for the assessment for each calendar day (full or part) it is overdue.

Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Team Work
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice
  • Social Innovation


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Develop a diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan for patients of all ages, including medical compromised and special needs patients
  • Recognise and act upon the legal, ethical, and safeguarding issues involving dental practitioners and patients as defined by the relevant professional regulatory bodies in Australia and overseas.

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?