CQUniversity Unit Profile
PBHL20001 Understanding Public Health
Understanding Public Health
All details in this unit profile for PBHL20001 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

Understanding Public Health introduces you to ways of thinking and perspectives that form the foundations of public health. These include examining the received wisdom of public health from the last 200 years such as different models of health and theoretical frameworks, and critiquing the approaches used in the past. You will be introduced to the social-ecological model of health that forms the basis of community-based and community-led public health. As such, you will consider the different types of leadership required for various approaches to public health practice and consider your own positionality. You will explore the differences between evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence and how these types of evidence can apply to the various approaches in public health. Finally, you will be introduced to strengths-based and disease prevention approaches as they are applied in public health.

Details

Career Level: Postgraduate
Unit Level: Level 8
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2021

Cairns
Melbourne
Online
Sydney

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 40%
2. Group Work
Weighting: 40%
3. Reflective Practice Assignment
Weighting: 20%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Student and staff feedback

Feedback

Students need additional support to develop reflective practice.

Recommendation

Additional time in tutorials will be dedicated to helping students understand reflective practice and the different levels of reflection.

Feedback from Student and staff feedback, personal reflection

Feedback

Workbook is helping students develop critical thinking but could be explained further.

Recommendation

Critical thinking will be explained more explicitly in tutorials and related to structure of the Workbook.

Feedback from Personal reflection

Feedback

Academic integrity not fully appreciated by all students.

Recommendation

Academic integrity will be reinforced in explanations of assessments and in tutorial classes.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Analyse the history of public health and its changing philosophical, theoretical and practice models over the last 200 years
  2. Critique the ethics associated with different scales and approaches to public health, particularly in relation to First Nations Peoples
  3. Discuss the impact of a social ecological model of health on public health practice
  4. Differentiate between transactional and collaborative leadership and the related implications for public health practice
  5. Reflect on own positionality regarding approach to health practice and relationships with others, especially those from different backgrounds
  6. Distinguish between practice-based and evidence-based approaches used in public health and relate each to different models of health and approaches to practice
  7. Justify taking a strengths-based or disease prevention approach to public health practice.


Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 - Written Assessment - 40%
2 - Group Work - 40%
3 - Reflective Practice Assignment - 20%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Written Assessment - 40%
2 - Group Work - 40%
3 - Reflective Practice Assignment - 20%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Rebecca Fanany Unit Coordinator
r.fanany@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 08 Mar 2021

Module/Topic

What is Public Health?

Chapter

CDC (2020) Public health responses to COVID19 outbreaks on cruise ships -- Worldwide February to March 2020. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69 (12): 347-352.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 15 Mar 2021

Module/Topic

Models of Health

Chapter

Baron-Epel, O & Ivancovsky, M (2015) A socio-ecological model for unintentional injuries in minorities: a case study of Arab Israeli children, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 22 (1): 48-56, DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2013.855794

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 22 Mar 2021

Module/Topic

The Historical Context

Chapter

Riedel, S (2005) Edward Jenner and the History of Smallpox and Vaccination, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 18 (1): 21-25, DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 29 Mar 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health Practice: Surveillance

Chapter

Johnson, I, Hansen, A. & Bi, P (2018) The challenges of implementing an integrated One Health surveillance system in Australia.Zoonoses and Public Health, 65(1): e229–e236. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12433

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 05 Apr 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health Practice: Disease Control

Chapter

Grogan, P & Banks, E (2020) Far from ‘mission accomplished’: Time to re-energise tobacco control in Australia, Public Health Research and Practice, 30 (3): e3032016

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 12 Apr 2021

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 19 Apr 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health Practice: The Changing Nature of Human Health

Chapter

Moon, L et al (2019) Measuring health loss in Australia: The Australian Burden of Disease Study, Journal of Korean Medical Science, 26 (34 Suppl 1): e61.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Research Report Due: Week 6 Friday (23 Apr 2021) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 7 Begin Date: 26 Apr 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health Practice: People and the Living Environment

Chapter

Kondo, MC et al (2018) Urban green space and its impact on human health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15:455. (This is a systemic review; please focus on the Discussion section (page 21 of 28))

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 03 May 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health Practice: Protecting the Public Sphere

Chapter

Gostin, LO et al (2020) Responding to COVID19: How to Navigate a Public Health Emergency. Hastings Center Report, March-April 2020.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 10 May 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health in a Changing World: New Challenges to Population Health

Chapter

Bloom, DE and Caderette, D (2019) Infectious disease threats in the twenty first century: Strengthening the global response, Frontiers in Immunology, 28 March. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00549

Events and Submissions/Topic

Presentation Due: Week 9 Friday (14 May 2021) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 10 Begin Date: 17 May 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health in a Changing World: Impacts of Technology

Chapter

Krause, NM, Freiling, I, Beets, B & Broussard, D (2020) Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19, Journal of Risk Research, DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11 Begin Date: 24 May 2021

Module/Topic

Public Health in a Changing World: The Future of Public Health

Chapter

Mercer AJ (2018) Updating the epidemiological transition model. Epidemiology and Infection 146: 680–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268818000572

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 31 May 2021

Module/Topic

Discussion and reflection

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Reflective Essay Due: Week 12 Friday (4 June 2021) 5:00 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 07 Jun 2021

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 14 Jun 2021

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Research Report

Task Description

The first assessment task is a written assignment of about 1000 words that you will complete on an individual basis. For this assignment, you will choose one of the topics from the list below and write about its significance in Public Health. The assignment will require some very focused research, so it is important to begin early and seek help from the Academic Learning Centre or advice from your lecturer or tutor if you need it.

The topics for this assignment are:

1. The recognition of AIDS as a new disease;

2. The spread of dengue into northern Australia;

3. The identification of metabolic syndrome;

4. The development of mRNA vaccine technology;

5. The use of telehealth in providing health care;

6. The ‘Health in All Policy’ approach to governance;

7. The rise of ‘Dr Google’ (use of the internet to research and self-diagnose health issues by members of the public);

8. Social distancing as an approach to disease control.

Each of these topics is a fairly new phenomenon. For your chosen topic, you will need to research the scholarly literature as well as information available from organizations like the AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) to understand the background of your topic. However, you are not to write about the clinical aspects of the topic. Your assignment must address the following issues in separate sections: 1) Introduction -- outlines the issue and gives an indication of its Public Health significance; this section must include the population affected or at risk, if relevant; 2) Public Health Implications – describes how has your topic affected thinking and practice in the field of Public Health and what are some important issues that came to attention because of your topic;; 3) Historical Context – discusses how your topic fits into the Public Health context that came before and the broader history of Public Health; 4) Future Context– discusses your personal view on the future of your topic and how you believe it will change or affect Public Health thinking and practice into the future.

This assignment must be written in a formal, academic style (not first person) and must be fully referenced. Harvard referencing is preferred for this unit. You will need to have BOTH in text references and a complete, properly formatted reference list. If you need help with referencing, please consult the ALC as soon as possible.

This assignment is worth 40% of the marks for the unit, and you must achieve a mark of 50% on this assignment to pass the unit.

This assignment is due by 5:00pm on Friday of Week 6.


Assessment Due Date

Week 6 Friday (23 Apr 2021) 5:00 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
40%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

The following assessment criteria appply:

1. The assessment contains the required sections and discussion;

2. The public health aspects of the topic are explicitly discussed;

3. Accurate referencing is provided with all material from sources fully cited;

4. A formal writing style conforming to academic convention is used;

5. There is evidence of the student's own thnking, analysis and opinion.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Assessment task must be submitted int he form of an MS Word file.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse the history of public health and its changing philosophical, theoretical and practice models over the last 200 years
  • Discuss the impact of a social ecological model of health on public health practice
  • Distinguish between practice-based and evidence-based approaches used in public health and relate each to different models of health and approaches to practice


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills
  • Research

2 Group Work

Assessment Title
Presentation

Task Description

The second assessment task for this unit is a presentation. This is a group assignment. You will be assigned to a group by your lecturer.

The aim of your presentation is to answer the question, “what is Public Health?” To address this, you and your group members will identify some object, scene, practice, etc that you feel reflects some principle of practice of Public Health. This example must exist in your own environment and must be documented in a photograph which will appear as part of your presentation. For example, waste management is an important aspect of public health management, so you might choose to discuss this and represent it with a picture of a garbage can located on street corner outside the University. It is important to think broadly about all the aspects of daily life with a Public Health element and use your ingenuity to choose a topic that may not be recognized generally as part of Public Health.

Your group will give a presentation, either in class or online, as directed by your lecturer. You will need a set of Powerpoint slides with speaker notes. If you are doing an online presentation, you will need to record yourself giving the presentation on the Powerpoint. It is not necessary for every member of the group to speak in the presentation -- you may choose one or two people to do this. However, each student in the group must be responsible for at least one slide, and the slides must indicate who made each one. You will also need a cover slide that contains the name of the assignment and the names and ID numbers of all the members of the group. Your references, as required, must be on the final slide(s) of the presentation.

Your presentation must: 1) explain what aspect of Public Health you are discussing; 2) present the picture(s) you took to represent it; 3) explain how the picture symbolizes the issue; 4) discuss the public health implications of the issue; and 5) explain how the issue is managed or addressed in the context of public health practice.

This assignment is worth 40% of the mark for the unit, and you must achieve a mark of 50% on this assignment to pass the unit.

This assessment task is due by 5:00pm on Friday of week 9. The Powerpoint presentation must by submitted through Moodle by ONE member of each group.


Assessment Due Date

Week 9 Friday (14 May 2021) 5:00 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
40%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

1. Presentation contains the required slides and content;

2. Any material taken from other sources is fully cited;

3. Language is original, formal and academic in nature, and reflects contribution by all group members;

4. Content shows evidence of original thinking, analysis, and creativity on the part of the groups.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online Group

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Critique the ethics associated with different scales and approaches to public health, particularly in relation to First Nations Peoples
  • Differentiate between transactional and collaborative leadership and the related implications for public health practice
  • Justify taking a strengths-based or disease prevention approach to public health practice.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills
  • Ethical and Professional Responsibility
  • Leadership

3 Reflective Practice Assignment

Assessment Title
Reflective Essay

Task Description

The third assessment task for this unit is a reflective practice assignment of about 2000 words that describes your growing understanding of Public Health as a discipline. This is an individual assignment. You are strongly encouraged to work on your reflection throughout the term and to make notes of ideas that occur to you or issues that interest you that you can include when you write your assignment.

Your reflection should focus on how your understanding of Public Health changed over the course of the term, and you should compare your knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes at the beginning of this unit with how you feel at the end. You should also reflect specifically on the following questions:

1. How does an understanding of the history of Public Health contribute to professional practice?

2. How important are the non-health factors that are part of public health practice?

3. What are some of the ethical issues associated with public health practice?

4. How will the things you have learned as part of this unit affect your own practice in the future?

This reflective assignment is an essay. A less formal writing style may be used, and references are not required. If you do use any source material, however, each item must be identified in an in text reference and also appear fully cited on a reference list.

This assignment is worth 20% of the mark for the unit, and you must achieve a mark of 50% on this assignment to pass the unit.

This assessment task is due by 5:00pm on Friday of week 12.


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Friday (4 June 2021) 5:00 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
20%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

1. Assessment shows real reflection and consideration on professional practice in Public Health;

2. The assigned questions are considered and discussed;

3. Any sources used are fully cited;

4. All language is original and reflects the stduent's own work;

5. Personal learning has been documented.



Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Reflect on own positionality regarding approach to health practice and relationships with others, especially those from different backgrounds


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Self-management
  • Ethical and Professional Responsibility

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?