Overview
Understanding the patterns and distribution of health outcomes across populations requires public health professionals to be able to examine the influence of the social determinants of health. Social epidemiology is a branch of epidemiology that focuses on the influence of social factors on individual and population level health, and grew out of the public health tradition of examining health inequalities relating to social class. This unit examines the complexities of social patterns of health and health data needed within and between populations to explore health inequities and health inequalities. This unit will strengthen your skills to identify, critique, interpret, and translate public health findings from social epidemiology. You will learn how to explain and utilise social epidemiological data and statistics related to the social determinants of health, explore specific ethical principles related to Indigenous Data Sovereignty, and to respect the rights associated with First Nations Peoples' data. You will be introduced to Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science frameworks, and consider their utility in guiding the effective dissemination of social epidemiological findings to improve health outcomes globally.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2020
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
- Distinguish social epidemiology from traditional epidemiology to understand and explain its contribution to public health practice by focusing on social determinants of health
- Critique and interpret routinely used data in social epidemiology and explain the strengths and limitations according to complex adaptive systems thinking in public health
- Explain the range of statistics essential to social epidemiological data to understand individual, community and population influences on health
- Justify ethical principles related to Indigenous Data Sovereignty and respecting the rights and different ways of knowing of First Nations Peoples when using, collecting, analysing and interpreting social epidemiological data
- Utilise a range of statistics in social epidemiological data to advocate for health promotion, protective and disease prevention approaches to public health practice
- Reflect on and evaluate uses of social epidemiological data and statistical understanding from Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science frameworks.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Literature Review or Systematic Review - 50% | ||||||
2 - Presentation - 20% | ||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 30% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Knowledge | ||||||
2 - Communication | ||||||
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | ||||||
4 - Research | ||||||
5 - Self-management | ||||||
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | ||||||
7 - Leadership | ||||||
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
1 - Literature Review or Systematic Review - 50% | ||||||||
2 - Presentation - 20% | ||||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 30% |
Textbooks
The New Public Health 4th
Edition: 4th (2016)
Authors: Fran Baun
Oxford University
Melbourne Melbourne , Vic , Australia
ISBN: 9780195588088
Binding: eBook
Social Determinants of Health
Edition: 1st (2019)
Authors: Liamputtong Pranee
Oxford University press
ISBN: 9780190313524
Binding: eBook
Social Epidemiology
Edition: 2nd (2014)
Authors: Lisa F. Berkman, Ichiro Kawachi, and Maria Glymour
Oxford University press
ISBN: 9780199395330
Binding: eBook
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Zoom videoconferencing software (access provided by CQU): desktop and app
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
g.a.vaughan@cqu.edu.au
r.fanany@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to traditional and social epidemiology.
Why social epidemiology?
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, other workshop activities, and opportunities to work on your assessment.
Introduction to Assessments #1 and #2.
Module/Topic
The social determinants of health
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, other workshop activities, and opportunities to work on your assessment.
Module/Topic
Tools of social epidemiology 1:
Measurement in epidemiology
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study discussion, workshop activities, and opportunities to work on your assessment.
Module/Topic
Tools of social epidemiology 2: introduction to critical appraisal and study types
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, other workshop activities, and opportunities to work on your assessment.
Module/Topic
Socio-economic status, gender and health inequities.
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, other workshop activities, and opportunities to work on your assessment.
Assessment #1 (Individual assignment, literature review) due week 5, Friday 14 August @ 11:59pm.
Literature review Due: Week 5 Friday (14 Aug 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Social structure and health inequities.
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment #2:
1) Group presentations in your tutorials this week via Zoom.
2) Revised presentations (based on tute feedback) including background research for submission by one group member by Friday 28 August @ 11:59pm.
Group presentation Due: Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Tools of social epidemiology 3: statistical concepts.
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, and other workshop activities.
Assessment #3 briefing.
Module/Topic
Living environments and health inequities.
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, and other workshop activities.
Module/Topic
Interpreting data in social epidemiology
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, and other workshop activities.
Module/Topic
Ethics and governance: doing no harm.
Data sovereignty issues in Indigenous health.
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, and other workshop activities.
Module/Topic
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion, other workshop activities, and opportunities to work on your assessment.
Module/Topic
Social epidemiology making a difference 2: translating findings into policy.
Subject review.
Chapter
Various readings and learning materials.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Tutorial class including group work: case study review and discussion.
Review the term and celebrate!
Assessment #3 Report: due Friday, 9 October @ 11:59pm
Written Report Due: Week 12 Friday (9 Oct 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Review week
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Term 2, 2020 will be conducted online using Zoom videoconferencing. Each tutorial comprises a tutor-led component, followed by group tasks where you will work with your fellow students to discuss weekly topics, work on your assessments and review a case study through a social epidemiological lens.
1 Literature Review or Systematic Review
The literature review provides an overview of the social epidemiological aspects of your topic. It summarises broad trends in the literature on your topic and highlights important points in selected articles. The review task includes:
- Outlining the relevant social, environmental and economic contexts that relate to your condition and discuss the factors that influence those contexts;
- Critiquing previous national and international epidemiological data and research with a particular emphasis on the gaps that may exist in our understanding of the impact of social factors on your condition.
- Considering the relevance of the reported statistics and findings to advocating for health promotion and disease prevention in public health practice.
While the assignment is individual, the topic will be assigned to your group and this will be the topic of your assessment 2 (group) and 3 (individual). In other words, all members of a group will work on the same topic throughout the term. However, the Literature Review is an INDIVIDUAL task: you may not work together with your classmates to write the review.
Assessment topics include:
- Antibiotic resistance
- Climate change
- Diarrhoeal diseases
- Hepatitis B
- Pandemics
- Rheumatic heart disease
Choosing the literature to include in your assignment is important. Only peer-reviewed scholarly material should be used. You need to note various views and approaches contained in the literature and to choose works to include without bias or preconceived ideas. Journal articles are often more relevant than books due to the long lead time between the writing and publication of books and because journals are often the forum where the latest thinking on a topic appears. The University library has a number of online guides that will be helpful in preparing your assignment. You can also consult a University librarian or your lecturer for additional advice. However, it is well worth taking some time to learn how to use the Library and its academic databases, how to conduct literature searches, and how to recognize the best resources for your needs.
Week 5 Friday (14 Aug 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Week 7 Friday (4 Sept 2020)
Assignment 1 will be assessed by the following criteria:
- Selection of relevant, current and appropriate items from the scholarly literature: 20%
- Thorough and accurate summary and critique of the selected literature: 20%
- Discussion of social, economic, and environmental context and the factors that influence them: 20%
- Presentation of various views represented in the literature and discussion of their strengths and weaknesses: 20%
- Use of clear, concise language and linear presentation of argument: 10%
- All work submitted is the student's original words and ideas and all information from sources is properly cited, including direct quotations: 10%
- Distinguish social epidemiology from traditional epidemiology to understand and explain its contribution to public health practice by focusing on social determinants of health
- Critique and interpret routinely used data in social epidemiology and explain the strengths and limitations according to complex adaptive systems thinking in public health
- Utilise social epidemiological data to advocate for health promotion, protective and disease prevention approaches to public health practice
- Reflect on and evaluate uses of social epidemiological data from Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science frameworks.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
2 Presentation
The group presentation presents the social epidemiological background of your condition and a critique of the data that were part of your literature review (assessment #1). The 10 minute presentation will:
- Explain how social factors influence your condition and identify and critique the social epidemiological data.
- Identify high-risk groups and show the way in which social factors may affect this risk. Vulnerable groups might include Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, individuals with low income, older adults, or other specific groups that would be impacted by strategies to address the chosen topic in the community of interest.
Your presentation slides must include the following:
- Title slide – include the condition and the full name and ID number of each student in the group;
- Nature and proximal cause of the condition;
- Social epidemiological factors that affect the development and progression of the condition;
- Mechanisms by which social factors contribute to the condition;
- Life course factors that affect the condition;
- Critique of existing social epidemiological data, including strengths and weaknesses of these data;
- A slide containing the references cited on all slides.
- Each slide (excepting the Title and Reference slides) should include background research information in the Notes area for that slide.
Each group will prepare a single presentation. Each student prepares the material for at least one slide in the presentation which must be identified with the student’s name, and prepare the text (background information) for presentation for his or her slide.
Your slides should be easy to read, uncluttered, and facilitate understanding among members of the audience. You will be told to stop after 10 minutes, regardless of whether your group has finished its presentation, so it is important to plan carefully and time your presentation before class. The group may choose one or two students to present or each member may present his or her own slide.
There are many guides to Powerpoint presentations available on the internet and through the Library. If you have not given this type of presentation in the past, it would be helpful to consult some of the reference material on effective design and presentation.
Week 6 Friday (28 Aug 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Week 8 Friday (11 Sept 2020)
Assignment 2 will be assessed by the following criteria:
- Epidemiological data relevant to the topic are presented and summarized: 20%
- Critique of data is presented: 20%
- Needs of vulnerable groups relevant to implementing a strategy to address the assigned condition are outlined and discussed: 20%
- Student's individual contribution is significant and shows understanding of the topic as well as of the element presented: 20%
- Language of the presentation (oral and written) is clear and easily understood: 10%
- All work reflects the students' own thinking and words, referencing is correctly and accurately done, and any direct quotations are properly identified according to academic convention: 10%
- Distinguish social epidemiology from traditional epidemiology to understand and explain its contribution to public health practice by focusing on social determinants of health
- Critique and interpret routinely used data in social epidemiology and explain the strengths and limitations according to complex adaptive systems thinking in public health
- Identify and justify different types of social epidemiological data necessary to understand individual, community and population influences on health
- Justify ethical principles related to Indigenous Data Sovereignty and respecting the rights and different ways of knowing of First Nations Peoples when using, collecting, analysing and interpreting social epidemiological data
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
3 Written Assessment
The third assessment task is a report that could be presented to a local health department responsible for planning initiatives to address your condition topic. This report involves:
- Reviewing and critiquing the social epidemiological data currently available to inform public health practice on your topic;
- Outlining what additional social epidemiological data would need to be collected. Justifying how and why these data would be needed, and at what stage of a strategy implementation (prior, during, and after); and
- Assessing how the social epidemiological data would be used to inform other practitioners, researchers and policy makers.
In preparing this assessment task, it is important to remember that your intended audience is a local health department. You will need to balance the technical demands of the topic with the needs of this audience, with the understanding that that the aim of such a report in real life would be to inform practitioners working in the field and underpin policy development. In other words, you will need to focus on the aspects of your topic that are most relevant in the development of new strategies and policy and the evidence from the literature that would support this activity. Your focus is a social epidemiological approach: biomedical information should only be used to give context in describing the burden of disease.
This is a formal report and must use appropriate language and referencing. Resources for report writing are available through the Library.
The assessment is an INDIVIDUAL task: you may not work together with your classmates to write the Report.
Week 12 Friday (9 Oct 2020) 11:59 pm AEST
Exam Week Friday (23 Oct 2020)
Assessment 3 will be marked according the following criteria:
- The epidemiological data relevant to the topic are summarised and critiqued: 20%
- Requirements for additional data are outlined and justified: 20%
- The ways social epidemiological data would inform policymakers and practitioners is discussed: 20%
- Insight into any specific issues related to the topic and linkage of these issues to available data is presented and discussed: 20%
- Clear, concise language is used and presentation of argument is linear: 10%
- All work reflects the student's own thinking and words; all information is properly cited, and any direct quotations are identified according to academic conventions: 10%
- Identify and justify different types of social epidemiological data necessary to understand individual, community and population influences on health
- Justify ethical principles related to Indigenous Data Sovereignty and respecting the rights and different ways of knowing of First Nations Peoples when using, collecting, analysing and interpreting social epidemiological data
- Utilise social epidemiological data to advocate for health promotion, protective and disease prevention approaches to public health practice
- Reflect on and evaluate uses of social epidemiological data from Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science frameworks.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
- Leadership
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.