Overview
In an increasingly mobile world, many people are experiencing periods of time immersed in different cultural contexts, either as part of our work, study, volunteering or leisure. This unit provides you with theoretical and scholarly support for cultural immersion at the point of experiencing it in order to help deepen your understanding of yourself and of your new cultural context. Cultural immersion can be a potentially powerful transformative learning experience if undertaken with such support and can develop effective cultural competence skills and knowledge. As this unit explores cultural disruption, it is recommended you take this unit at the beginning of a cultural immersion experience. The unit content will help you to make sense of the disruption and support you in developing strategies and resources to facilitate cultural integration and the development of respectful cross-cultural relationships.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2020
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Self-relfection
Students have difficulty understanding reflective process and how it applies to real practice demands.
Case studies be used more extensively to illustrate connection between theory and practice to assist students in understanding the reflective process.
- Explain the experiences of cultural disruption and integration
- Identify community and institutional strategies and resources that enable cultural integration
- Critically reflect on own experiences of cultural disruption and integration
- Critically reflect on developing and maintaining respectful cross-cultural relationships.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
1 - Group Work - 50% | ||||
2 - Reflective Practice Assignment - 50% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
1 - Knowledge | ||||
2 - Communication | ||||
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | ||||
4 - Research | ||||
5 - Self-management | ||||
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | ||||
7 - Leadership | ||||
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
1 - Group Work - 50% | ||||||||
2 - Reflective Practice Assignment - 50% |
Textbooks
Reflective practice: writing and professional development
Fifth Edition (2018)
Authors: Bolton, G & Delderfield, R
Sage Publications
London London , UK
ISBN: 9781526450531
Binding: eBook
Additional Textbook Information
Student can have hard copy or e-copy of the book. There are limited copies available in the library. If you would prefer your own paper copy, you purchase at the CQUni Bookshop here: http://bookshop.cqu.edu.au
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Access to Laptop or Desktop Computer
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
s.kaphle@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to culture
Chapter
Bolton, G & Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective practice: writing and
professional development, Sage Publications, London, Chapter 1, pp. 1-24.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Cultural disruption (part 1)
Chapter
Bolton, G & Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective practice: writing and
professional development, Sage Publications, London, Chapter 2, pp. 25-50.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Cultural disruption (part 2)
Chapter
Bolton, G & Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective practice: writing and professional development, Sage Publications, London, Chapter 3, pp. 51-77.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Cultural consonance
Chapter
Dressler, W. W., Balieiro, M. C., & Dos Santos, J. E. (2018). What You Know, What You Do, and How You Feel: Cultural Competence, Cultural Consonance, and Psychological Distress. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2355. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02355
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Cultural integration
Chapter
Berry, J.W.
(1997) Immigration, Acculturation and Adaptation. Applied Psychology
International Review, 46, 5–34.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Vacation
Chapter
Vacation
Events and Submissions/Topic
Vacation
Module/Topic
Group presentations
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Groups presentations (assessment 1) will be held in tutorials this week. Information about this assessment is contained in this unit profile, in the study guide for the unit, and on Moodle.
Group Presentation Due: Week 6 Friday (24 Apr 2020) 11:30 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Critical reflective practice
Chapter
Bolton, G & Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective practice: writing and professional development, Sage Publications, London, Chapter 4, pp. 78-96.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Metaphor and photo-voice
Chapter
Bolton, G
& Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective practice:
writing and professional development, Sage Publications, London, Chapter 6,
pp. 121-134.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Contents, evocation and images
Chapter
Drew, S and Guillemin, M, 2014, From photographs to findings: visual meaning-making and interpretive engagement in the analysis of participant-generated images, Visual Studies, 29:1, 54-67.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Use of literature in reflective writing
Chapter
Bolton, G
& Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective
practice: writing and professional development, Sage Publications, London,
Chapter 7, pp. 135-156.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Representation and truth in reflective writing
Chapter
Bolton, G
& Delderfield, R 2018, Reflective
practice: writing and professional development, Sage Publications, London,
Chapter 8, pp. 157-182.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Weekly classroom tutorial
Weekly online tutorial
Module/Topic
Finalizing portfolio and reflective essay
Chapter
Recap all lectures
Events and Submissions/Topic
Reflective portfolio due Friday (11 October) by 5:00 pm.
Reflective Portfolio Due: Week 12 Friday (5 June 2020) 11:30 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1. Explain the experiences of cultural disruption and integration
2. Identify community and institutional strategies and resources that enable cultural integration
3. Critically reflect on own experiences of cultural disruption and integration
4. Critically reflect on developing and maintaining respectful cross-cultural relationships.
Most of the materials needed for this unit is available on Moodle. In addition, there is a study guide for this unit which student can download to use. The study guide describes the preparation you will need to do before class each week and provides notes on each topic to be covered during the term.
All lectures for this unit are recorded and are available to view at your convenience. It is students' responsibility to watch the lecture before attending the tutorial each week. Any questions, please contact Unit Coordinator, Dr Sabi Kaphle, Email - s.kaphle@cqu.edu.au or Phone +61 3 9616 0586.
1 Group Work
The first assessment task is a group assignment that will involve a presentation with a visual map. The aim of the assignment will be to work with the members of your group to discuss an example of cultural disruption (culture shock) that might occur when an individual enters a situation of cultural immersion, explain the dimensions of the experience, and map out the social and institutional resources that would be beneficial for cultural integration process. Assessment will be based on a 7-10 minute presentation involving all members of the group and the development of a visual map that presents the resources relevant to your example.
Each group will contain five students. Each student in the group will be responsible for preparing presentation and visual map. The required slides are: 1) title and names and ID numbers of all students in your group; 2) description of cultural disruption experience; 3) specific factors that might contribute to the experience of cultural disruption; 4) social, psychological and physical impacts of cultural disruption experience; 5) social and institutional resources that would be beneficial for cultural integration; and 6) a visual map that shows the relationships of factors, impacts and integration resources related to your example of cultural disruption. Each student in the group will be responsible for one slide from numbers 2-6 above. For slides 2-6, each student will prepare the notes for their presentation slide.
The examples of cultural disruption for this assignment are as follows. Your topic will be assigned by your instructor.
1. An individual coming to Australia as a refugee from a region of conflict;
2. A 17-year-old moving from a rural area to study at a university in a large Australian city;
3. An immigrant coming to Australia for the purpose of employment;
4. An individual graduating from a university and beginning his or her first job as a healthcare professional at a large hospital;
5. An Australian professional moving to a developing country to work as a volunteer in a healthcare field.
Week 6 Friday (24 Apr 2020) 11:30 pm AEST
Students must submit their slides with notes in the Moodle.
Week 8 Friday (8 May 2020)
Feedback files will be uploaded to Moodle.
The presentation will be assessed on the following criteria:
The nature of the experience of cultural disruption is clearly described and explained: 10%
Well researched and evidence-based presentation of social and institutional resources to assist cultural integration process.: 20%
A visual map has been developed that accords with the literature, shows the connections between the people and institutions involved, and reflects resources available at various level and institutions: 20%
The student's individual slide with note shows an understanding of the issues involved, appropriate reference to literature and analysis of the context of cultural disruption as relevant to his or her part of the presentation: 20%
The language of the presentation (oral and written) is clear and concise and easily understood: 10%
Self reflection and peer assessment report written and submitted: 10%
All work represents the students' own thinking, references are clearly and accurately cited, and any direct quotations are properly identified according to academic conventions: 10%
- Explain the experiences of cultural disruption and integration
- Identify community and institutional strategies and resources that enable cultural integration
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
2 Reflective Practice Assignment
The second assessment task for this unit is a portfolio that demonstrates your understanding of reflective practice. Your portfolio must contain 5-10 visual images (photographs) taken by you or creative works (poetry, songs etc) written by you. These images and materials should be chosen to represent your experiences of cultural disruption and integration throughout the term.
Your portfolio must also contain a reflective essay (2000 words) that analyses your experiential journey throughout the term and discusses the meaning behind your visual and creative representations and how respectful cross-cultural relationships have supported your integration. You will also need to use three to five relevant articles from the literature to support your reflection and analysis of it.
Week 12 Friday (5 June 2020) 11:30 pm AEST
Submission is due 11.30 PM on Friday of Week 12.
Exam Week Friday (19 June 2020)
Feedback files will be uploaded to Moodle.
The reflective portfolio will be assessed on the following criteria:
The portfolio includes the 5-10 visual images; a 2000-word reflective essay; and appropriate reference as described in the assessment brief: 10%
The essay shows evidence of understanding of relevant issues and the reflection shows an attempt at self-understanding and personal insight: 20%
Appropriate literature has been used to support reflections: 20%
The essay is written in clear, concise language and developed in a logical linear manner: 20%
Images are integrated into the essay and their relationship to the reflective content is clearly demonstrated: 20%
All work submitted is the student's original words and ideas, any direct quotations are appropriately identified and acknowledged, and all references to literature are cited in the text: 10%
- Critically reflect on own experiences of cultural disruption and integration
- Critically reflect on developing and maintaining respectful cross-cultural relationships.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.