This assessment item includes GROUP submission followed by an individual evaluation, with an overall weighting of 40% comprising:

• Part A: Written report (30%) - Group Work
• Part B: Individual report (10%) - Individual evaluation (AI Reflection)

Purpose

• The primary purpose of this assessment item is to create an active learning environment so you can develop skills for undertaking research and translating, underpinning concepts about the important aspects of complex project management.
• The secondary purpose of this assignment is to give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis, communication, and critical thinking skills when reflecting on different project domains and complex project management.
• You are expected to apply the tools you learned to estimate the project's complexity and form a proper scope of work to handle it.
• Your participation, as a result, makes your learning more explicit as you translate your educational and personal experiences and share them with colleagues.
• You can then learn to critically examine the nature of your learning in this unit, in relation to specific experiences in your project management practice. It will also demonstrate that you have learned from those experiences, together with how you have achieved or maintained your professional competence.

Task

Students are expected to work in groups and finalise the group's formation and settings by Week 3 latest

Your task is to attend the lectures and tutorials, actively engage with the lectures, understand the case study (ies), and work progressively

The assessment has two Parts (Part A and Part B) and you need to respond to each as detailed in the assessment tasks. Failing to submit either part entitles zero marks

Part A requires students to submit group reports, investigating a complex case (to be advertised)

Part B Aims at introducing the students to the AI embedment in Learning and Teaching

Following the group submission, each student will be asked to work individually and actively engaged in analyzing, and reflecting upon a complex case. This could be towards reflecting and analyzing the complexity aspects of a complex case/scenario generated by AI tool. Further details will be released on Moodle. 

Students will be judged and marked for this Part based on their submission and you are expected to provide thorough, constructive, relevant, and accurate feedback. 

• You will provide evidence of your understanding of complex project management. Therefore your work should be using the PPMP20014 terms, language, and concepts
• You will need to understand the case(s). This will require undertaking some research to understand the case and provide a meaningful analysis
• There is no specific word count, but you are expected to submit a group report with no less than 2500 words excluding the references

Assessments will be marked based on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria:

Part A

• The written report needs to provide a detailed understanding of the case study. Use the unit terms and language in explaining the complexity aspects
• All arguments should be supported using insights and relevant examples, drawn from the case study.
• In terms of the complexity factors and ICCPM outcomes, the report needs to address the minimum requirements.
• The report should be relevant and accurately reflect the external varieties, supported by examples drawn from the case study.
• Finally, in terms of complexity types, the report needs to graph their relative weight and be supported by a coherent argument and discussion.

Part B: AI Reflection

• Part B involves evaluation report , which will test student’s ability to constructively assess a complex case study.
• Your submission will be judged based on the quality of your analysis and reflection where you are expected to reflect on a generated AI report about a complex issue/projects
• Assessment of others' work is expected to be in the form of constructive, relevant, and appropriate feedback. If you are analyzing a case study you need to form a good understanding of the case, review  generated AI report and undertake an in-depth review
• Tutorials will offer a platform to discuss and assess the peer assessment report feedback.
• Your evaluation will be checked and moderated to ensure the quality of the feedback and the peer assessment.
• Failing to submit the peer assessment report will lead to zero (0) marks.

Part A: Group Written Report (30%)

• Introduce the case and demonstrate your understanding of the complexity context within the case study(15%)
• Analyse and evaluate the complexity factors (10%)
• Discuss ICCPM outcomes and complexity factors (10%)
• Identify main external varieties- Ashby Law (15%)
• Identify the complexity factors and group them under the main four complexity types (30%)
• Link the complexity types with the desired project manager competencies (15%)
• Conclusion & reference list (5%)

Part B: Individual Assessment Report (10%)

• Review the report/case assigned to you and provide a comprehensive analysis, evaluation, and comments 
• Provide a detailed response to the task sheet and prove a high level of understanding and analysis

Purpose

• The primary purpose of this assessment item is to help you to identify factors associated with complex project management.
• The secondary purpose of this assessment is to give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis and critical thinking skills.

Task

This assessment item involves an online quiz which is worth 10% of the unit marks.

• The quiz is an open-book test with random questions
• The quiz will be available for 24 hours on the Moodle site 
• Only one attempt is allowed within the timeframe whilst the quiz is available.
• The questions will be randomly selected from a pool of questions from the related topics.
• The questions will test your knowledge and understanding of the lectures' material.
• There will be a cut-off time of 20 minutes to complete the quiz (open attempts will be submitted automatically).
• You can attempt the quiz at any location provided you have access to Moodle website.
• It is your responsibility to use a reliable internet connection to attempt the quiz.

• No penalty for the wrong answers will be applied.

This assessment item includes a group submission followed by an individual presentation, with an overall weighting of 50% comprising:

• Part A: Critical review report (35%) - Group work
• Part B: Presentation (15%) - Individual

Purpose

• The primary purpose of this assessment item is to help you to define your thinking and to classify the tools and techniques related to the complex project management field.
• The secondary purpose of this assignment is to give you the opportunity to enhance your teamwork skills, analysis, critical thinking, and written communication skills; particularly in the areas of argument development and academic writing.

Tasks

• The complexity aspects of the case study, the uncertainties involved, the interconnectivity, and the wickedness of the problem;
• The stakeholders involved and their roles in magnifying the complexity level;
• The evaluation of the complexity level together with the size and the scale of the complexity;
• The four complexity types (structural, temporal, directional, and technical complexity);
• The assessment/ evaluation of the complexity types and estimate of the relative weight of each complexity type using the various assessment tools; and
• The various tools and techniques that might be useful to manage this complex project.

You should compile your discussion into a report while responding to the above points. You need to thoroughly study and understand the case study in order to create a clear and succinct summary of the case.

You need to illustrate the theories, tools, and techniques that might be relevant to manage such a complex case. You also need to use real evidence/examples from the case to support your discussion. Finally, you then must propose a management framework on how to address and reduce the complexity using the knowledge gained throughout the unit.

Groups

• Groups comprise 3 students. Groups will be randomly allocated by the Unit Coordinator who may vary the group size and composition.
• Students are expected to actively participate, respond and engage in this group assessment to maximise active learning.
• Students will be called for an oral presentation (as part of a group presentation) and present their work individually. Failing to satisfy the presentation requirements may lead to failing the assessment regardless.
• Only one member needs to submit the critical analysis report and presentation slides on behalf of the group.

Structure

• Your submission should follow the standard academic writing of a review report.
• The report should be a maximum of 3,000 words +- 5% (excluding references).
• The report exceeding the maximum word limit (i.e. 3,000 words) by more than 5% will be penalised.
• The report should be structured as a review report with clear and coherent abstract, introduction, thorough literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
• The abstract should summarise your findings in no more than 250 words.
• The introduction should introduce the report and include brief relevant information about the case study as well as the objectives.
• The literature should present the evidence you have collected to support your argument, detailing information about the case and relevant previous literature. It should highlight the complexity aspects, the uncertainties, and any other relevant information. The literature review should be integrated into the article.
• The methodology should show what has been done to analyse this case and how you undertook the research/analysis.
• The results should present the findings and may include critical discussion. A conclusion section should also be included.
• Each member's contribution must be attached as a separate sheet in the Appendix section of the report.
• Flex (online) students may be allowed to work individually with the approval of the unit coordinator.

This assessment comprises two parts:

• Part A: Critical review report - worth 35%, and
• Part B: Individual presentation - worth 15%.

You will be assessed based on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria:

• A clear and coherent introduction that covers the rationale (the why) and a brief overview of the content;
• A clear understanding of the case study based on a thorough review of the case including its complexity aspects;
• An explanation of the causes, environment, and properties leading to complexity in this case study. A detailed description/ analysis of the complexity types needs to be provided;
• Assessment of the level of complexity, providing relevant complexity radar diagram(s). This includes assigning relative weights, and justifications for the various complexity types;
• Analyzing the full list of potential stakeholders involved, their roles, interest, and importance together with including a stakeholder matrix (for relevant stakeholders);
• A discussion of the tools and techniques to support the project manager in managing the complexities involved within the case study. Justifications should be provided as to why and how these tools could be useful;
• The submission should be structured in a correctly formatted academic report including Abstract, Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results/Discussion, and Key Findings/Recommendations;
• A clear and concise conclusion including a summary of the main points and a reference list, with a minimum of 15 scholarly references;
• Individual presentation and oral examination - Students' performance will be evaluated individually and students may receive varying marks depending on their level of involvement, understanding, and contribution during this session. Marks will be allocated according to the below marking rubric.
• Students will be accessed their oral presentation together with the accompanying presentation slides and notes.
• Presentations will be held via Zoom or face-to-face during the tutorial class in Week 12.

Part A: Critical Analysis Report (35%) - Group Submission

• Introduction (5%)
• Literature review (5%)
• Complexity factors (7%)
• Stakeholder matrix (8%)
• External varieties (10%)
• Complexity level (10%)
• Complexity characteristics histogram (10%)
• Structural/dynamic complexity matrix (10%)
• Dreyfuss model (10%)
• Butterfly effect (10%)
• Conceptual hurdles (10%)
• Report structure, grammar, referencing, etc. (5%)

Part B: Individual Presentation (15%) - Individual Submission

• Preparation and consistency of presentation (30%)
• Evidence of understanding and relevance of the presentation content (30%)
• Response to questions during the presentation (30%)
• Timing including questions and answers (5%)
• Presentation manners (5%)