Overview
This unit is designed to equip you with the analytic skills necessary to carry out advanced applied research. You will develop a toolbox of practical skills that will allow you to undertake qualitative and quantitative research as part of your undergraduate and/or professional career/s in psychology, research, business, government, community development, education, and beyond. The unit builds on earlier research methods units in psychology (PSYC11012 and PSYC12048). You will be introduced to advanced statistical techniques, as well as how to analyse and interpret quantitative data using industry-standard statistical software packages. You will also continue to develop your skills in qualitative research methods and build your abilities in research interviewing, thematic analysis and reporting of qualitative data, how to build rapport and trust with participants, and how to be self-aware and reflexive when conducting qualitative research.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
PSYC11012 and PSYC12048.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2024
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Self-reflection, staff feedback, informal student discussion.
Too many quantitative portfolio assessments close together and in the second half of term.
Aggregate the three statistical portfolio tasks into two, retaining a similar depth and breadth of content.
Feedback from Formal student feedback (SUTE), self-reflection, staff feedback.
Provide shorter "step-by-step" videos to help students perform basic tasks in SPSS that are needed to engage in data analysis.
Increased number of short and basic "step-by-step" video guides will be produced to support the live and interactive SPSS workshops.
Feedback from Formal student feedback (SUTE), staff feedback.
Comprehensive feedback was provided on all assessment tasks, allowing students to improve on the next assignment.
Continue to provide detailed written feedback for quantitative and qualitative assessment tasks.
Feedback from Formal student feedback (SUTE), staff feedback, self-reflection.
One quantitative and one qualitative assessment task fell on the same due date.
Ensure there is no overlap with assessment due dates in 2024.
- Prepare quantitative data ready for analysis in a statistical software package.
- Analyse and report quantitative data in a professional format.
- Interpret and defend qualitative data analysis in a professional format.
- Prepare for and conduct a qualitative interview.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
1 - Portfolio - 50% | ||||
2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||
3 - Practical Assessment - 20% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
1 - Communication | ||||
2 - Problem Solving | ||||
3 - Critical Thinking | ||||
4 - Information Literacy | ||||
5 - Team Work | ||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | ||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | ||||
8 - Ethical practice | ||||
9 - Social Innovation | ||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Textbooks
SPSS Statistics: A Practical Guide
5th Edition (2022)
Authors: Peter Allen, Kellie Bennett, Brody Heritage
CENGAGE
Australia
ISBN: 9780170460163
Binding: Paperback
Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners
1st Edition
Authors: Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke
Sage
ISBN: 9781847875822
Binding: Paperback
Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics
5th Edition (2017)
Authors: Andy Field
Sage
London London , UK
ISBN: 9781526419521
Binding: Paperback
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA)
7th Edition (2019)
Authors: American Psychological Association
American Psychological Association
Washington Washington , DC , USA
ISBN: 9781433832161
Binding: Paperback
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Internal/external webcam with microphone of sufficient quality for conducting an interview
- SPSS version 28 or higher (preferably 29) STANDARD Grad pack. The cheapest BASE edition is not sufficient.
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
d.j.walker@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to Research Methods 3 and Interviewing A
Chapter
Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapter 1 (essential)
Allen et al (2022) Chapters 1 & 2 (recommended)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom online tutorial (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Interviewing B (doing)
Chapter
Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapter 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom online tutorial (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Interviewing C (reflecting)
Chapter
Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapter 4
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom online tutorial (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Revision ANOVA (one-way designs)
Chapter
Allen et al (2022) Chapters 3 & 7
Events and Submissions/Topic
Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Factorial ANOVA part 1 [Between subjects designs]
Chapter
Allen et al (2022) Chapter 8
Events and Submissions/Topic
Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshop (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Factorial ANOVA part 2 [Mixed designs]
Chapter
Allen et al (2022) Chapter 9
Events and Submissions/Topic
Live lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Advanced thematic analysis A
Chapter
Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapters 8 & 9
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom online tutorial (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Advanced thematic analysis B
Chapter
Braun and Clarke Chapters 10 & 11
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom online tutorial (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Multiple Regression Part 1 (correlation and simple linear regression)
Chapter
Allen et al (2022) Chapters 12 & 13
Events and Submissions/Topic
Live lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Multiple Regression Part 2 (multiple regression)
Chapter
Allen et al (2022) Chapter 13
Events and Submissions/Topic
Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshop (1hr duration).
EXPERIENTIAL THEMATIC ANALYSIS Due: Week 10 Thursday (16 May 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Bridge to honours statistics [ANCOVA]
Chapter
Allen et al (2022) Chapter 10
Events and Submissions/Topic
Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration).
Module/Topic
Bringing it all together
Chapter
Journal papers suggested.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Component 2 of Portfolio.
SPSS ANALYSES Due: Monday (3rd June 2024) 11:45 pm AEST.
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Portfolio
You will be given data sets for statistical tests covered in the unit. You will be required to enter the data into SPSS, analyse these data and write up the statistical program output in brief APA style. There will be three data sets which form your portfolio. However, you are required to submit each component of the portfolio at designated submission dates to scaffold learning and enable you to benefit from feedback. The first component (one-way ANOVA) is due in the vacation week and is worth 15% of the unit marks. The second component (factorial ANOVA, multiple regression and ANCOVA) is due at the start of Review/Exam week and is worth 35% of the unit marks.
Vacation Week Thursday (11 Apr 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Component 1 due vacation week and component 2 due at the start of Review/Exam week.
Component 1 will be returned to enable students to make use of feedback for component 2. The aim is within two teaching weeks of submission, i.e., not including Easter nor the half-term break.
Component 1.
One-Way ANOVA. The % of marks awarded will be split among the following criteria: appropriate analysis, assumption testing, correct interpretation of statistical output, effect size, and statistics written concisely in APA format. 15 marks awarded in total. WORD RANGE 250-400.
Component 2.
Factorial ANOVA. The % of marks awarded will be split among the following criteria: appropriate analysis, assumption testing, correct interpretation of statistical output, effect size, and statistics written concisely in APA format. 18 marks awarded. WORD RANGE 300-500.
Multiple regression. The % of marks awarded will be split among the following criteria: appropriate analysis, assumption testing, correct interpretation of statistical output, effect size, fit of the model, and statistics written concisely in APA format. 13 marks awarded. WORD RANGE 250-450.
ANCOVA. There will be two short answer questions. You will need to a) provide a logical rationale for implementing an ANCOVA; b) suggestions for an alternative analysis / design if the statistical assumptions for an ANCOVA are not met. 4 marks awarded. WORD RANGE 75-150.
- Prepare quantitative data ready for analysis in a statistical software package.
- Analyse and report quantitative data in a professional format.
2 Written Assessment
You will be given a transcript from a fictitious interview on the topic of student mental health. You will undertake Experiential Thematic Analysis upon the transcript. This will involve the following steps: 1) familiarise yourself fully with the transcript, 2) code the transcript and find a pattern in your coding that can be presented in the form of one overarching theme, two themes and three sub-themes, 3) You will present these types of themes in a graphical figure along with a written description of the relationship between the different types of themes you have identified, 4) you will provide a written explanation of the overarching theme, one theme and one sub-theme using a balance of analytic commentary and appropriately cited data extracts. Your written submission will show steps 3-4 (steps 1 and 2 are not submitted).
Week 10 Thursday (16 May 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 12 Tuesday (28 May 2024)
The aim is to return experimental thematic analysis marks and feedback prior to interview skills being submitted
You will be assessed on your evidence of having undertaken a systematic and thorough process of qualitative data analysis that results in a convincing and compelling interpretation of the data. This will be assessed using the following four criteria: 1) balancing analytic commentary against data extracts (citing direct quotes from the transcript) in a professional format, 2) constructing an analytic commentary that provides original and novel insights into the meaning of the data, 3) capturing both overt and latent levels of meaning, 4) defending against alternative plausible interpretations of the data.
WORD LIMIT: Your submission should be no more than 800 words (inclusive of data extracts, data citations, text used in figures and headings). Any words over that limit will not be read or assessed by your marker. See the Psychology Word Count Information document for a rationale for this type of word limit restriction.
- Interpret and defend qualitative data analysis in a professional format.
3 Practical Assessment
You will conduct and record an individual interview with a classmate using Zoom software. Your tutor will allocate you to a group and you will then be responsible for arranging an interview with a classmate from that group. You will be provided with a research topic and a research question and you will be responsible for formulating your interview questions. The interview should be no shorter than 20 minutes and no longer than 40 minutes. You will need to schedule the interview to take place during teaching week 6. You will be responsible for scheduling the interviewing, arranging the Zoom meeting and for recording the meeting. You are advised to record the interview locally rather than to the cloud. You will submit a short, edited version of your interview for assessment. Your edited video should be no longer than 3 minutes. This will require you to select the parts of the interview that you believe show your best interviewing skills. You will be provided with basic instruction on how to edit a video using the Windows 10 app called ‘Video Editor’.
Following the interview, you will produce a written reflection on your performance in the interview.
Your reflection could include one or more of the following points:
- Your introduction (did it set the person at ease by giving them a clear easy to understand overview of what you would be doing together?)
- The wording of your questions (Were they open, non-leading, short and clear, empathetic?)
- Your listening skills (How was your posture, gaze and attention? What distracted you from listening well, what helped? How well did you include active listening responses?)
- Your responsive skills (How well were you able to adapt your language/questions/structure to the participant’s account? What helped/hindered this?)
- What skills did you use to help elicit a rich, detailed account in the participant’s own words?
Week 12 Thursday (30 May 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Exam Week Friday (14 June 2024)
You will be assessed against four criteria. The first three will relate to your performance in the interview as presented in your edited video recording. The fourth criteria will relate to your written reflection on the interview.
The three key criteria against which your interview recording will be assessed are: clarity of your recording, encouragement, and flexibility and listening. These criteria are designed to assess your ability to record an interview with sufficient fidelity to ensure it can be efficiently transcribed (you will not be required to transcribe your interview). The encouragement criteria will assess your ability to communicate respect and interest in your interviewee. Flexibility and listening will assess your ability to be responsive to your interviewee in relation to what questions you ask and how you ask those questions.
The fourth criteria against which your written reflection will be assessed is insightful and balanced reflection. This criteria is designed to asses your ability to both envision how you might further improve you interviewing skills and your reflections on the challenges posed by working in a qualitative research paradigm.
WORD LIMIT: Your written reflection should be no more than 300 words. Any words over that limit will not be read or assessed by your marker. See the Psychology Word Count Information document for a rationale for this type of word limit restriction. Similarly, your edited interview recording should be no longer than 3 minutes and if you submit a longer video, only the first 3 minutes will be viewed.
INTERVIEW RECORDING FORMAT: You should record in mp4 video format (the default recording format for Zoom) and render your video, after you have edited it. Then save it as an mp4 video file. That video file should have a resolution of either 720p (standard definition) or 1080p (high definition), have a bitrate no higher than 5mbps and a frame rate no higher than 30fps. Do not record in a higher resolution, higher bitrate or higher frame rate and do not render your video in a file format other than mp4. If you do so, your video file may be too large to upload to the submission page in Moodle or may not be viewable by your marker and you would be required to resubmit your assignment. It is also important that the dialogue is clear and of sufficient volume for the marker. You should check the quality of your webcam and/or external microphone. Teaching resources on Moodle will provide you with guidance on all of these technical aspects of recording and rendering your video
- Prepare for and conduct a qualitative interview.
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.