CQUniversity Unit Profile
PSYC13021 Forensic Psychology
Forensic Psychology
All details in this unit profile for PSYC13021 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

Forensic Psychology is the area of behavioural science concerned with psychology and the law. In this unit, you will discuss how psychological principles and practices can be applied to topics such as personality and crime, suspect interviewing, pathways to offending, courtroom practices and witness reliability, understanding criminal behaviour, mental competency, and justice. You will also discuss general psychological principles as they relate to the legal systems within Australia and other countries as well as specific case studies.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 10
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

96 credit points

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 2 - 2024

Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Group Work
Weighting: 40%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 45%
3. Online Test
Weighting: 15%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Personal reflection.

Feedback

The current marking criteria and associated rubric for the end-of-term take-home test need to be clearer.

Recommendation

The Unit Coordinator will review the marking criteria for the end-of-term take-home test to ensure it is clear.

Feedback from Student unit teaching evaluations.

Feedback

Students requested a more detailed rubric for the group assessment.

Recommendation

The Unit Coordinator will review the marking rubric for the group assessment task to ensure it is clear and at an appropriate level of detail.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Describe the similarities and differences underlying the disciplines of psychology and the legal system.
  2. Describe and critically evaluate how psychological theory and research have been applied to the legal system.
  3. Identify challenges that psychologists face when interacting with the legal system.

This unit addresses Foundational Competencies as specified by the Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC) and specifically aligns to:

1.1 Comprehend and apply a broad and coherent body of knowledge of psychology, with depth of understanding of underlying principles, theories and concepts in the discipline, using a scientific approach, including the following topics: (i) the history and philosophy underpinning the science of psychology and the social, cultural, historical and professional influences on the practice of psychology; (ii) individual differences in capacity, behaviour and personality; (iv) psychological disorders and evidence-based interventions; (xi) culturally appropriate psychological assessment and measurement.

1.2 Apply knowledge and skills of psychology in a manner that is reflexive, culturally appropriate and sensitive to the diversity of individuals

1.3 Analyse and critique theory and research in the discipline of psychology and communicate these in written and oral formats.

1.4 Demonstrate an understanding of appropriate values and ethics in psychology.

1.5 Demonstrate interpersonal skills and teamwork.

1.6 Demonstrate self-directed pursuit of scholarly inquiry in psychology.

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Group Work - 40%
2 - Written Assessment - 45%
3 - Online Test - 15%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Forensic Psychology: Crime, Justice, Law, Interventions

4th edition (2024)
Authors: Davies, Graham M., Beech, Anthony, R., and Colloff, Melissa, F. (Eds).
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Brisbane Brisbane , Queensland , Australia
ISBN: E-Book ISBN: 978-1-119-89202-1 Print ISBN: 978-1-119-89200-7
Binding: eBook

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Rebecca Wilcoxson Unit Coordinator
r.wilcoxson@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 08 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

The Intersection of Psychology and Law

 

 

 

Chapter

Nolan, M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). Introduction. In M. Nolan & J. Goodman-Delahunty, Legal psychology in Australia (pp. 1-28). Thomas Reuters.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 15 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Risk Assessment 

Chapter

Beech, A. R. & Hatcher, R. M. (2024). Risk assessment. In Davies, G. M., Beech, A. R., & Colloff, M. F. (Eds). Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions (4th Ed.) (pp. 539 - 568).  John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

 

 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 22 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Offender Profiling

Chapter

Woodhams, J., Tonkin, M., & Burrell, A. (2024). Offender profiling and crime linkage.  In G. M. Davies, A. R. Beech, & M. F. Colloff (Eds). Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions (4th Ed.) (pp. 313 - 336).  John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 29 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Psychopathy

Chapter

Gillespie, S. M., & Garofalo, C. (2024). Psychopathy. In G. M. Davies, A. R. Beech, & M. F. Colloff (Eds). Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions (4th Ed.) (pp. 78 - 102).  John Wiley & Sons.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 05 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Mental Disorder and Law

Chapter

Nolan, M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). Mental disorder and law. In M. Nolan & J. Goodman-Delahunty, Legal psychology in Australia (pp. 155 - 219). Thomas Reuters.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 12 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

 

Vacation week

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 19 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Personality Disorders & Offending

 

 

Chapter

McMurran, M., & Howard, R. (2019). Personality disorders and offending. In The Wiley international handbook of correctional psychology (pp. 265 - 281). John Wiley & Sons.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 26 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Interviewing and Interrogation

 

Chapter

Nolan, M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). Investigative interviewing. In M. Nolan & J. Goodman-Delahunty, Legal psychology in Australia (pp. 89 - 126). Thompson Reuters.

 

 

 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Risk Assessment via the HCR-20-V3 Due: Week 7 Monday (26 Aug 2024) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 8 Begin Date: 02 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Eyewitness Evidence

Chapter

Colloff, M. F., Lowe, H. D., & Bennett, T. C. (2024). Eyewitness evidence. In G. M. Davies, A. R. Beech, & M. F. Colloff (Eds). Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions (4th Ed.) (pp. 199 - 232). John Wiley & Sons.

 

 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 09 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Interpersonal Violence and Stalking 

Chapter

Dixon, L., & Bowen, E. (2024). Interpersonal violence and stalking. In Davies, G. M., Beech, A. R., and Colloff, M. F. (Eds). Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions (4th Ed.) (pp. 337 - 366). John Wiley & Sons.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 16 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Children in the Criminal Justice System

Chapter

Nolan, M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). Children in the criminal justice system. In M. Nolan & J. Goodman-Delahunty, Legal psychology in Australia, (pp. 221 - 261). Thomas Reuters.

Events and Submissions/Topic

The Accuracy of an AI Generated Report Due: Week 10 Friday (20 Sept 2024) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 11 Begin Date: 23 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Detecting Deception

Chapter

Granhag, P. A. & Hartwig, M. (2024). Detecting deception. In G. M. Davies, A. R. Beech, & M. F. Colloff (Eds). Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions (4th Ed.) (pp. 289 - 312). John Wiley & Sons.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 30 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Miscarriages of Justice

Chapter

Dioso-Villa, R., Julian, R., Kebbell, M., Weathered, L. & Westera, N. (2016). Investigation to exoneration: A systemic review of wrongful conviction in Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28(2), 157-172.

Stratton, G., & Sigamoney, A. (2020). Why we don’t see race: How Australia has overlooked race as an influence on miscarriages of justice. Race and Justice, 1- 16.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 07 Oct 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 14 Oct 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Online test Due: Exam Week Monday (14 Oct 2024) 9:00 am AEST
Term Specific Information

 

 

Assessment Tasks

1 Group Work

Assessment Title
Risk Assessment via the HCR-20-V3

Task Description

This task involves self-selection to a six-person study group, completing a memorandum of understanding with your group members to determine how the group will operate and the responsibility of members, performing a risk assessment of a real individual (to be advised) and providing a rationale for your chosen risk level and a personal reflection on your contribution to the group. 

Group members will collaboratively assess the individual's likelihood of future violence/risk to the community using an HCR-20-V3 form. The HCR-20-V3 is a popular tool used by forensic practitioners to assess the level of risk posed by individuals in the forensic system (Douglas et al., 2013), for example, before a parole hearing. An explanation of the HCR-20-V3 will be provided in week 2. Group members will also provide a brief individual rationale as to the level of risk that was decided on, including their personal opinions on the risk level (i.e., did you agree/disagree with the group on all the chosen items and why?). The group members will also provide a self-reflection on their adherence to the MOU and how their contribution to the group likely affected the group process.

The group will present the HCR form, MOU, rationale, personal opinions on risk level and personal reflection as a pre-recorded Zoom presentation of approximately 60 minutes which is broken down by: approximately 10 minutes to present the HCR form and approximately 5 - 7 minutes of talk time for each member to provide their rationale and personal opinions on the risk level and their reflection on their adherence to the MOU and how their contribution to the group likely affected the group process. 


Assessment Due Date

Week 7 Monday (26 Aug 2024) 5:00 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 10 Monday (16 Sept 2024)


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

The assignment will be marked according to the following:

Total 40 Marks comprised of:

Group mark (30 marks)

The group submission will be assessed based on:

The appropriate completion of the HCR-20-V3 form, and the memorandum of understanding completion (5 marks)

The coherence and quality of the group rationale provided (10 marks)

The clarity and quality of oral communication skills (5 marks) 

The incorporation of relevant weekly readings into the rationales for specific risk assessment scores (10 marks)   

Individual mark (10 marks)

The individual mark will be awarded based on the following:

 Articulation of areas of agreement and disagreement with the group risk assessment level (5 marks)

 Personal reflection on the individual's adherence to the memorandum of understanding and how their contribution to the group likely affected the group process (5 marks)


 
 
 


Referencing Style

Submission

No submission method provided.


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe the similarities and differences underlying the disciplines of psychology and the legal system.
  • Identify challenges that psychologists face when interacting with the legal system.


Graduate Attributes

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
The Accuracy of an AI Generated Report

Task Description

This assessment involves assessing the quality of information provided by generative artificial intelligence (AI) on a forensic psychology topic (this will be provided in week 1) and preparing an essay that provides evidence that supports or disputes the accuracy of the AI report. Only peer-reviewed academic articles, minimum of ten, can be used to prepare the essay. Full details, a grading rubric, and the topic will be provided through Moodle.

The maximum word count is 1500 words.


Assessment Due Date

Week 10 Friday (20 Sept 2024) 5:00 pm AEST

Submit via Moodle


Return Date to Students

Return via Moodle


Weighting
45%

Assessment Criteria

Assessment criteria (100 marks)

The required word count is a maximum of 1500 words (excluding the reference list).

Essay (80 marks)

- Introduction (10 marks)

- Presentation of peer-reviewed information regarding the forensic psychology topic (20 marks)

- Comparison of AI information to peer-reviewed information (20 marks)

- Implications of using AI to prepare reports on forensic psychology topics (10 marks)

- Conclusion (10 marks)

- Quality of references (i.e., peer reviewed) (10 marks)

Reference list (10 marks)

- Correct APA format

- Minimum of ten references used

Style/Presentation (10 marks)

- Grammar, spelling, and sentence structure

- Overall readability, the flow of writing

- Adheres to word limit length: maximum of 1500 words (including in-text references but excluding the reference list)


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submitted via Moodle

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe the similarities and differences underlying the disciplines of psychology and the legal system.
  • Describe and critically evaluate how psychological theory and research have been applied to the legal system.
  • Identify challenges that psychologists face when interacting with the legal system.


Graduate Attributes

3 Online Test

Assessment Title
Online test

Task Description

The end of term online test will consist of ‘long answer' responses (approximately 300 - 400 words; however, you can use less or more if you like) to three questions related to the textbook readings (Forensic Psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions, 4th Ed.) for the unit. Students will be required to answer all three questions, and the responses to items can be written on Moodle, or if you prefer to write this in Word, then an attachment can be uploaded. Once you open the test you will have two hours to complete it. 


Assessment Due Date

Exam Week Monday (14 Oct 2024) 9:00 am AEST


Return Date to Students

Weighting
15%

Assessment Criteria

Students will be marked for each of the three short answer questions that are completed. Each question will be worth 10 marks for a total contribution of 40 marks (40% of the overall mark).

Marks for each question (5 possible marks each) will be awarded as follows: 

- An excellent response that is factual, extremely well-written and includes a reference to the relevant chapter (5 marks)

- A very good response that is factual, well-written and includes a reference to the relevant chapter (4 marks)

- An adequate response that is mostly factual and or mostly well-written and includes a reference to the relevant chapter (3 marks)

- A limited response that is somewhat lacking in the accuracy of response and or quality of written work and or lacks a reference to the relevant chapter (2 marks) 

- A very poor response that is lacking in accuracy and or quality of written work and or lacks a reference to the relevant chapter (1 marks)

- No response or irrelevant response (0 marks)


Referencing Style

Submission

No submission method provided.


Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe and critically evaluate how psychological theory and research have been applied to the legal system.


Graduate Attributes

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?