Overview
This unit will provide you with comprehensive training in Research Ethics and the Ethics of Professional Practice. This unit will develop and assess your ability to apply ethics concepts in real life situations and scenarios, with emphasis placed on the provision of evidence based reasoning and justifications. As an advanced level unit there is a high level of expectation regarding independent study and self-directed learning. You are expected to be an active participant in the learning process, to independently research and read widely and to reflect upon multiple perspectives and opinions about best ethics practice in psychology - both in research and in professional practice. The unit is split into two six-week modules. Module 1 - Research Ethics will provide you with an understanding of the necessity for, and the processes which underpin research ethics within the Psychology discipline. This module has a focus on and will acquaint you with, the human research ethics procedures set by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Module 2 - Professional Practice aims to equip you with the knowledge necessary for practicing as a psychologist in a professional manner. The focus of this module is on the identification of ethical issues in practice, and the development of professional decision making skills. This module will acquaint you with the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Guidelines set by the Australian Psychological Society.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Academic Course = CC42
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2019
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Residential Schools
This unit has a Compulsory Residential School for distance mode students and the details are:
Click here to see your Residential School Timetable.
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student Evaluation
Residential School was very beneficial - both for meeting fellow students and lecturers, but also the group presentation assessment was a great way to start understanding research ethics.
Residential School will continue to be offered and will be in the same format (including group presentation assessments).
Feedback from Student Evaluation
Clarity needed as to which marking rubric should be used and what was required from the assessments.
Marking rubrics and other assessment information will not be altered once the Moodle site is made available to students.
Feedback from Student Evaluation
Assignments needed to be returned on time.
All staff will be reminded that return of student work by the dates specified in the Unit Profile is essential. The Head of Course will continually check on marking progress and will take steps to address any issues before they have an impact on assessment return.
Feedback from Student Evaluation, emails.
Teaching staff were supportive and approachable.
Continue to foster an open dialogue between students and staff.
- Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.
- Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.
- Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1 - Group Work - 15% | |||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 20% | |||
| 3 - Practical Assessment - 15% | |||
| 4 - Written Assessment - 20% | |||
| 5 - Examination - 30% | |||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1 - Communication | |||
| 2 - Problem Solving | |||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | |||
| 4 - Information Literacy | |||
| 5 - Team Work | |||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | |||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||
| 8 - Ethical practice | |||
| 9 - Social Innovation | |||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1 - Group Work - 15% | ||||||||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
| 3 - Practical Assessment - 15% | ||||||||||
| 4 - Written Assessment - 20% | ||||||||||
| 5 - Examination - 30% | ||||||||||
Textbooks
APS Code of Ethics
Edition: N/A (N/A)
Authors: Australian Psychologcial Society
Australian Psychological Society
Melbourne Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
Binding: Hardcover
APS Ethical Guidelines
Edition: N/A (Latest - most currently available)
Authors: Australian Psychological Society
Australian Psychological Society
Melbourne Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
Binding: Paperback
Ethical Practice in Applied Psychology
(2014)
Authors: Christopher Boyle and Nicholas Gamble
Oxford University Press Australia & New Zealand
South Melbourne South Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
ISBN: 9780195523102
Binding: Paperback
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research
Edition: N/A (2007)
Authors: National Health and Medical Research Council
Australian Government
Australia
Binding: Paperback
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
Edition: 6th (2009)
Authors: American Psychologcial Association
Footprint Books
Sydney Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
Binding: Paperback
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 6th Edition (APA 6th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
charli.sargent@cqu.edu.au
greg.roach@cqu.edu.au
j.baranoff@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to the Unit
Research Ethics at CQU
Chapter
Readings on Moodle:
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 1
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 9
- NHMRC - Summary of the National Statement on ethical conduct in human research
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The chequered (and sometimes terrifying) history (and the lack) of ethics in Research
Chapter
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 9
- NHMRC - Summary of national
statement on ethical conduct in human research
- Helsinki Declaration
- The Nuremberg Code
- Stanford Prison Experiment
documents
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Introduction to models of ethical decision making (EDM)
Evaluation of a Research Project
Chapter
Readings on Moodle:
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 3
- Australian Psychology Society (APS) Ethical Decision Making model
- Week 3 Case Study
- NHMRC - Summary of national statement on ethical conduct in human research
Events and Submissions/Topic
Group work assessment. Due 1pm Wednesday 31st of July.
Residential School
Group work presentation (Research Ethics) Due: Week 3 Wednesday (31 July 2019) 1:00 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Exploring key concepts in research ethics
Chapter
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 9
- NHMRC - Summary of national
statement on ethical conduct in human research
- Informed consent examples1
& 2
- WHO informed consent
- Office for Human Research
Protections (2010) Working with vulnerable populations.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Submission of Practical Assessment Task: Use of the EDM in a Professional Ethical Dilemma
Due Week 4: Monday August 5th, 2019 at 11.55pm AEST.
Professional Ethics Practical assessment: Applying the Ethical Decision Making (EDM) model Due: Week 4 Monday (5 Aug 2019) 11:55 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Doing research work "with" or
"on" vulnerable populations
Chapter
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 9
- NHMRC - National statement
on ethical conduct in human research
- Office for Human Research
Protections (2010) Working with vulnerable populations.
- NHMRC - Values and ethics:
Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island
Health Research.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Introduction to Professional Ethics
What is an ethical and moral psychologist?
Chapter
Readings on Moodle:
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter
1
- Morrissey and Reddy: Eight
Core competencies for ethical practice
- Ethical guidelines on record
keeping
- Psychology Board of
Australia policy for the management of notifications about single court
appointed expert psychologists in family law courts proceedings
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Privacy, confidentiality and consent.
Mandatory reporting requirements
Child abuse and neglect
Chapter
Readings on Moodle:
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 2
(from page 24) and Chapter 5
- Ethical guidelines on social
media
- Ethics in the digital age
- Confidential health care for
adolescent
- Article by Goesling et al.
(2000)
- Ethical guidelines on
reporting abuse and neglect, and criminal activity
- Ethical guidelines on
confidentiality
- Ethical guidelines on the
prohibition of sexual activity with clients
Events and Submissions/Topic
Submission of Individual written critique of a research ethics application.
Due Week 7: Monday September 2nd, 2019 at 9.00am AEST.
Written critique of the Research Ethics application Due: Week 7 Monday (2 Sept 2019) 9:00 am AEST
Module/Topic
Advertising and ethics
Boundaries and dual relationships
Working in small and regional
communities
Chapter
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapter 4
- What's in a name: Psychologist's titles
- Managing multiple relationships in rural communities (Faulkner & Faulkner, 1997)
- Legal issues in Psychology (Youngstrom, 2000).
- Psychology Board of Australia policy for the management of notifications about single court appointed expert psychologists in family law courts proceedings
- Ethical guidelines for managing professional boundaries and multiple relationships
- Ethical guidelines for psychological practice in rural and remote settings
- Ethical guidelines for working with and in the media
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Clients at risk to self or others
Suicide and suicide prevention
Children and families and risk
Chapter
- Boyle and Gamble - Chapters
7 & 8
- Hawgood and De Leo (2015).
Working with suicidal clients.
- Day (2013). Responding to
serious antisocial behaviour.
- Ethical guidelines for
working with clients when there is a risk of serious harm to others
- Ethical guidelines relating
to clients at risk of suicide
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Gender and cultural diversity
Cultural ethics
Working with Indigenous
clients
Chapter
- Ethical guidelines on working with sex and/or gender diverse clients
- Ethical guidelines for
psychological practice with lesbian, gay and bisexual clients
- Ethical guidelines for
psychological practice with clients with an intellectual disability
- Ethical guidelines for
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
Events and Submissions/Topic
Submission of Written Assessment (Professional Ethics).
Due Week 10: Monday September 23rd, 2019 at 9.00am AEST.
Professional practice dilemma Due: Week 10 Monday (23 Sept 2019) 9:00 am AEST
Module/Topic
Issues with using animals for research - who benefits?
The 3 Rs
Chapter
- Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes 8th edition (2013)
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Review of the material covered this term, preparation for the examination.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Group Work
Groups will be assigned prior to the start of term.
Your goal is to conduct an ethical critique of a research ethics application, and develop a presentation based on the aspects you consider need addressing by the researcher. Your critique should focus on requirements according to the NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, with a particular focus on Sections 1 and 2, and Section 4 where required.
Focus on issues such as the clarity of the research question, identification of risk and participant confidentiality.
Provide some solutions to the problems identified – what would need to be changed to ensure the project meets the required ethical standards?
Use the following approach: Identify and explain the problem (with reference to the NHMRC guidelines and other appropriate empirical sources)
What alternatives are there to the proposed approach and how might these lead to better ethical conduct of this specific research project (again with reference to both the NHRMC guidelines and the provision of other empirical evidence to justify your assertions and propositions)
Your group should develop a PowerPoint presentation that explains and addresses at least three (3) of the issues your group identifies.
Each group will present their critique and solutions at the Residential School, and each group member should participate fully in the development of the presentation as well as being present at the presentation itself.
It is expected that your PowerPoint slides will provide an outline and summary of the content of your presentation. However, you are not restricted to the use of PowerPoint alone (although remember that this is what you are submitting). Props, singing, dancing, audience involvement, photo stories etc can all be used – feel free to be creative – but ensure you get your point across.
Your presentation and PowerPoint slides should include the following: A very brief overview/introduction to the proposed research task
Clear identification of at least three (3) ethical issues present in the project proposed
Clear justifications for the alternative approaches and solution proposed to address each of the identified issue.
Week 3 Wednesday (31 July 2019) 1:00 pm AEST
Give the presentation at Residential School. Email Powerpoints to the Unit Coordinator prior to 1pm AEST on Wednesday the 27th of March.
Week 5 Friday (16 Aug 2019)
Feedback and a mark will be emailed to each student individually. Overall group feedback wil be posted on the Moodle Forum for each group.
Assessment will be based on:
A very brief overview/introduction to the proposed research task.
Clear identification of at least three (3) ethical issues present in the project proposed.
Clear justifications for the alternative approaches and solution proposed to address each of the identified issue.
Presenting style and group cohesion will also be assessed.
Download Written Assessment Task 1 PDF from Moodle site for more details and the grading matrix.
- Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.
- Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Team Work
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
2 Practical Assessment
Evaluate material provided which illustrates a professional ethical dilemma that may be faced by a practicing psychologist.
Prepare a critique which includes:
A brief description of the ethical dilemma.
Identification of the factors involved in the dilemma.
Identifying potential courses of action.
Selecting and justifying the chosen course of action from those presented.
Use of the Australian Psychology Society (APS) ethical decision making (EDM) model as a guide to resolve the dilemma.
Week 4 Monday (5 Aug 2019) 11:55 pm AEST
carry this task out on-line
Week 6 Friday (30 Aug 2019)
Marks and feedback will be posted on Moodle
This will be a time-limited and on-line assessment where you will work through the Australian Psychology Society (APS) ethical decision making model (EDM) (discussed and practiced during the Residential School) in response to a professional ethical dilemma.
Assessment criteria will be based on a critique which includes:
A brief description of the ethical dilemma.
Identification of the factors involved in the dilemma.
Identifying potential courses of action.
Selecting and justifying the chosen course of action from those presented.
Use of the Australian Psychology Society (APS) Ethical Decision Making (EDM) model as a guide to resolve the dilemma.
Please download the Assessment Task 3 PDF file from the Moodle site for more details and the marking matrix.
- Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Team Work
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
3 Written Assessment
In a logical, well-integrated essay (using APA style referencing and headings) identify (with well-reasoned justification) the major issues of ethical concern in relation to the application assigned to your group, and how these might be rectified. The issue/s you identify should be consistent with the approach taken in your group presentation. Your individual submission can focus on only one point, and can also address points in addition to your group presentation. It is expected however that will be a degree of overlap between the group submission and your individual submission. It is important to note here that you are expected to apply ethical concepts within the context of the ethics application assigned to your group and not write an essay about a particular ethical concept/s more generally.
Using the same approach as Task 1 and the group work presentation, your essay must:
Clearly identify each ethical issue and explain why it is of ethical concern (with appropriate empirical justification provided).
Clearly outline, and provide justifications for any alternatives to the proposed approach and how these might lead to better ethical conduct of this specific research project (again with reference to both the NHRMC guidelines and the provision of other empirical evidence to justify your assertions and propositions)
Be formatted according to APA Style Requirements
Have a separate initial paragraph which summarises the proposed research study (which is not marked and not counted in word count)
Have a correctly formatted reference list
Be between 1250 and 1500 words (count does NOT include title page, initial summary paragraph or reference lists. Word count DOES include in-text citations). Submissions in excess of the 1500 word maximum will be penalised 10% of the total possible grade and assessment will only occur on the text of the assignment up to the 1500 words.
Follow a similar approach to your group presentation and ensure that each of the following aspects are addressed for each issue you identify:
Problem identification (i.e. what is the issue?)
Articulation of WHY that particular aspect is a problem (with reference to empirical sources)
Proposal of an appropriate solution
Clear justification (with reference to empirical sources) of WHY the proposed solution is appropriate
Clear justification (with reference to empirical sources) of WHY and HOW the proposed solution will solve the problem identified.
Week 7 Monday (2 Sept 2019) 9:00 am AEST
Week 10 Monday (23 Sept 2019)
Download Written Assessment Task 2 PDF from Moodle site for details and grading matrix
- Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.
- Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
4 Written Assessment
Four (4) professional ethical dilemmas will be made available on Moodle.
You are to choose one of these dilemmas and apply the Australian Psychology Society (APS) ethical decision making model (EDM) discussed and practiced during the residential school.
Essay length is 1250-1500 words.
Week 10 Monday (23 Sept 2019) 9:00 am AEST
Review/Exam Week Monday (14 Oct 2019)
Assessment will be based on the following:
Content of the essay (10%) including: Identification of relevant ethical issues.
Explanation of relevant ethical issues.
Detailed explanation of possible implications from these issues.
Review and integration of valid and current research.
Referral to relevant sections of the Australian Psychology Society (APS) Code of Ethics and the Australian Psychology Society (APS) Ethical Decision Making model (EDM).
Structure and style of the essay (8%)
Demonstration of high level critical thinking.
Demonstration of high level analytical skills.
Logical argument.
Definite conclusions (clear stance).
Appropriate language and style for a professional / academic audience.
Good sentence structure, spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Format and layout (2%)
Accuracy of in-text citations.
Appropriate use of in-text citations.
Correct APA formatting for in-text citations and reference list.
Overall adherence to APA requirements
Please download Assessment Task 4 from the Moodle site for more details and the marking matrix
- Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.
- Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Information Technology Competence
- Cross Cultural Competence
- Ethical practice
Examination
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
