Overview
This unit is part of the sequence of units that culminates in the degree of Master in Clinical Psychology. This unit is intended to provide advanced knowledge and skills in therapy research, theory and practice necessary for working as a Clinical Psychologist.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
PSYC21003 Therapy I: Theory, Research, Practice
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2017
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Moodle
I would like to see the addition of some instruction of additional therapeutic styles/interventions (i.e. Interpersonal Therapy, Emotion Focused Therapy
Students expressed an interest in Emotion Focused Therapy. This could be included in the unit for 2017.
Feedback from Moodle
I enjoyed focusing each week on a different disorder and found the oral assessment a really useful exercise to complete and to observe and learn from others completing theirs.
Continue with oral assessment. Perhaps incorporate practice assessments throughout the term.
Feedback from Moodle
Might be useful to provide more specificity regarding assessment criteria.
Increase level of detail in the assessment guidelines.
- Conceptualise complex client presentations, such as PTSD, OCD and eating disorders and establish appropriate formulations to guide treatment planning.
- Apply aetiological understandings of psychological presentations to the selection and implementation of therapeutic practices.
- Integrate knowledge of evidence based normative interventions with ipsative practices.
- Recognise and respond appropriately to more complex ethical dilemmas in clinical practice
- Describe a range of prevention and intervention techniques and the relative efficacy and effectiveness of these techniques across a range of problems, people and groups. This includes different cultural groups and across the lifespan.
The Learning Outcomes link directly to external accreditation criteria around core capability development.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||
| 2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 60% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | |||||
| 2 - Communication | |||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | |||||
| 4 - Research | |||||
| 5 - Self-management | |||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | |||||
| 7 - Leadership | |||||
| 8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||
| 2 - Practical and Written Assessment - 60% | ||||||||
Textbooks
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The process and practice of mindful change
Edition: 2nd (2012)
Authors: Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson
The Guilford Press
New York New York , NY , USA
ISBN: 9781609189648
Binding: Hardcover
Additional Textbook Information
Students can choose to purchase this book either in hard-copy or as an e-book.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 6th Edition (APA 6th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
m.lorien@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Philosophical framework for therapists
- Common Factors Model
- Therapeutic alliance
- What makes therapy effective?
Chapter
- Wampold, B.E. (2015). How important are common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry.
- Ch.1 Introduction, Heart and Soul of Change, Hubble, Miller, Duncan, and Wampold, 2010.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The Therapeutic Relationship
The relationship is the vehicle through which therapy tasks & strategies are delivered. The stronger the relationship, the more likely a client will be interested in, and benefit from, that therapeutic task.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
- Ontology
- Relational Frame Theory
- Contextual Science
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
ACT and Psychological Flexibility; and
Case Formulation in ACT
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Submit first essay Sunday 6th Aug 2355 AEST
Module/Topic
The Therapeutic Relationship in ACT and creating a context for change.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
ACT Core Clinical Processes:
Present Moment Awareness
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
ACT Core Clinical Processes:
Dimensions of Self
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
ACT Core Clinical Processes:
Defusion
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Submit second essay Sunday 10th Sept 2355 AEST
Written essays (2 essays) Due: Week 8 Friday (8 Sept 2017) 12:00 am AEST
Module/Topic
ACT Core Clinical Processes:
Acceptance
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
ACT Core Clinical Processes:
Connecting with Values
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
ACT Core Clinical Processes:
Committed Action
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Summary, review and reflection.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Submit video and written component of final assessment - Friday 6th Oct 2355 AEST
Video demonstration roleplay of four ACT Techniques and written critique Due: Week 12 Friday (6 Oct 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
There will be two essays
Each essay will be 1500 words in length (not including title page, abstract and references)
Essay 1
- Review the literature to develop an essay entitled: Factors that influence the therapeutic relationship.
- Length: 1500 words (not including title page, abstract or references).
- The essay will contain appropriate citations to the current literature.
- It will include an abstract section.
- Use APA formatting and referencing.
- Due: end of week 4 - Sunday 6th August 2355 AEST
Essay 2
- Use a case study scenario to write an essay entitled: Using ACT to provide a case conceptualisation/formulation to enhance collaboration with a client.
- Length: 1500 words (not including title page, abstract or references).
- The essay will contain appropriate citations to the current literature.
- It will include an abstract section.
- Use APA formatting and referencing.
- Due: end of week 8 - 2345 AEST Sunday 10th September 2355 AEST
Week 8 Friday (8 Sept 2017) 12:00 am AEST
End of week 4 and end of week 8
Week 10 Friday (22 Sept 2017)
Submissions to be emailed as MS Word documents via the Moodle site.
Essay 1: Factors that influence the therapeutic relationship. (Weighting: 20% of total grade)
- Demonstrated understanding of the principles underlying therapeutic relationships (25%).
- Demonstrated understanding of those common factors that effect therapy (25%)
- Inclusion and quality of abstract (15%)
- Integration of current and relevant literature (15%)
- Language and writing style are appropriate for a professional / academic audience (10%)
- Effective use of American Psychological Association formatting, citations and referencing in the submission (10%)
Essay 2:Using ACT to provide a case conceptualisation/formulation to enhance collaboration with a client. (Weighting: 20%of total grade)
- Demonstrated understanding of the theories supporting ACT (25%)
- Demonstrated understanding of writing an ACT based formulation (25%)
- Demonstrated understanding of how to describe the ACT model to a client (15%)
- Integration of current and relevant literature (15%)
- Language and writing style are appropriate for a professional / academic audience (10%)
- Effective use of American Psychological Association formatting, citations and referencing in the submission (10%)
- Conceptualise complex client presentations, such as PTSD, OCD and eating disorders and establish appropriate formulations to guide treatment planning.
- Apply aetiological understandings of psychological presentations to the selection and implementation of therapeutic practices.
- Integrate knowledge of evidence based normative interventions with ipsative practices.
- Recognise and respond appropriately to more complex ethical dilemmas in clinical practice
- Describe a range of prevention and intervention techniques and the relative efficacy and effectiveness of these techniques across a range of problems, people and groups. This includes different cultural groups and across the lifespan.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
2 Practical and Written Assessment
The task consists of a video component and a written critique of the video due end of week 12
Video Presentation
- Demonstrate doing four of the ACT techniques from the Hexaflex. Each technique will be allocated 15 minutes in the video.
- The completed video will last approximately 60 minutes. This can be in four separate sections for each technique demonstrated.
- The student can choose which techniques to demonstrate.
- The student can use a person they know to be in the role of a client, such as another student or a family member.
- To be submitted via the Wellness Centre video drive in your student folder.
Written Assessment of video
- Write a reflective review of each technique demonstrated in the video assignment.
- Include a critique of those areas that you feel went well, and
- Identify the areas that you could improve, including what you would do differently in future, and why.
Week 12 Friday (6 Oct 2017) 11:45 pm AEST
By saving onto the Wellness Centre video drive/folder during week 12.
Exam Week Friday (20 Oct 2017)
written feedback to be provided to students during exam week.
- Clear demonstration of ACT techniques that show allegiance to the model (50%)
- Effective demonstration relating to therapeutic alliance (20%)
- Skill in implementation of task within time allocated (20%)
-
Appropriate use of material to support task understanding, where relevant (10%).
Assessment criteria for written component (Weighting: 20% of total grade)
- Clear identification of successful components of video (40%)
- Clear identification of areas for improvement (40%)
- Reflections on how to strengthen implementation for subsequent clients (20%)
- Conceptualise complex client presentations, such as PTSD, OCD and eating disorders and establish appropriate formulations to guide treatment planning.
- Apply aetiological understandings of psychological presentations to the selection and implementation of therapeutic practices.
- Integrate knowledge of evidence based normative interventions with ipsative practices.
- Recognise and respond appropriately to more complex ethical dilemmas in clinical practice
- Describe a range of prevention and intervention techniques and the relative efficacy and effectiveness of these techniques across a range of problems, people and groups. This includes different cultural groups and across the lifespan.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
