CQUniversity Unit Profile
RELG13001 Contemporary Meanings and Religious Texts
Contemporary Meanings and Religious Texts
All details in this unit profile for RELG13001 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In this unit, pre-service teachers in the Catholic Education strand of the Bachelor of Education courses prepare for pedagogical roles in the teaching of Religion in Catholic schools. You will build professional knowledge of approaches to reading and interpreting religious texts that recognise the relationship between these texts and the cultural, historical and social contexts in which they were constructed. You will reflect on the guidance provided by official documents to explain how frameworks can be utilised to assist contemporary learners to construct meaning from Scripture. In addition, you will make connections between contemporary meanings of religious texts and the rationale, aims and content of curriculum learning areas that focus on personal and social development and wellbeing (HPE) and human expression of culture and spirituality (The Arts) for the purpose of implementing curriculum that is inclusive, engaging and purposeful for students from diverse social, cultural and religious backgrounds. You will apply your knowledge of reading and interpreting religious texts to select and justify resources and strategies for teaching a parable or miracle that model inclusive practices. A focus of this process will be to explore religious perspectives, values and beliefs with learners from diverse social and cultural backgrounds in a chosen level of primary schooling (early, middle or upper primary year levels).

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 7
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 2 - 2024

Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Student emails

Feedback

Excellent support from the lecturer

Recommendation

Maintain high levels of support and communication with students

Feedback from Student feedback

Feedback

Interesting content and engaging, interactive tutorials

Recommendation

Maintain content and high quality teaching practices

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Explain ways in which interpretation methods for religious texts make their meaning accessible for contemporary audiences
  2. Identify relationships between contemporary meanings of Scripture and the rationale, aims and content of curriculum learning areas that focus on human expression, personal and social development and wellbeing
  3. Select and justify resources that actively engage learners in understanding the contexts, symbolism and messages of religious texts
  4. Select strategies for interpreting religious texts with contemporary learners from a diverse range of linguistic, cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds
  5. Reflect on the support provided by official documents and sources of professional learning for teachers in Catholic schools.

Successful completion of this unit provides opportunities for students to engage with the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Graduate Career Stage) focus areas of:

1.1 Physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students

1.2 Understand how students learn

1.3 Students with diverse linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds

1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities

2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area

2.2 Content selection and organisation

2.3 Curriculum, assessment and reporting

2.5 Literacy and numeracy strategies

3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning programs

3.3 Use teaching strategies

3.4 Select and use resources

3.5 Use effective classroom communication

3.6 Evaluate and improve teaching programs

6.2 Engage in professional learning and improve practice

7.4 Engage with professional teaching networks and broader communities

Outcomes combine these standards with the knowledge and understanding required to be eligible for accreditation to teach in a Catholic school.

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Written Assessment - 50%
2 - Written Assessment - 50%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Kerry Aprile Unit Coordinator
k.aprile@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 08 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Guidance for the teaching and learning of Religion in Australian Catholic Schools (Dei Verbum, ECSI data and theology)

Chapter

National Catholic Education Commission. (2018). Framing paper: Religious education in Australian Catholic schools. https://ncec.catholic.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/NCEC_Framing_Paper_Religious_Education-1.pdf 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 15 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Introduction to the Catholic Bible - Old Testament

Chapter

Rymarz, R. Engebretson, K., & Hyde, B. (2021). Teaching religious education in Catholic schools: Embracing a new era. Garratt Publishing. Chapter 14, 199-214.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 22 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

Introduction to the Catholic Bible - New Testament

Chapter

Rymarz, R. Engebretson, K., & Hyde, B. (2021). Teaching religious education in Catholic schools: Embracing a new era. Garratt Publishing. Chapter 15, 215-226.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 29 Jul 2024

Module/Topic

11 Characteristics of Scripture

Chapter

Saltana, C. (2022). Religious Education in transition: From content-centred to student-centred. Religions, 13(10), 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100986

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 05 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Approaches to interpretation of religious texts - exploring identity and sociocultural influences on meaning

Worlds of the text

 

Chapter

Pollefeyt, D. (2021). Teaching the unteachable or why too much good is bad. Religious education in Catholic schools today. Religions, 12(810), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100810 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 12 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

No tutorial

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 19 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Modes of human expression including the Arts and language to interpret Religious texts

Catholic Education Diocese of Rockhampton (CEDR) Religious Education Curriculum 

 
 

Chapter

 

Bopardikar, A., Bernstein, D. Drayton, B. & McKenney, S. (2021). Designing educative curriculum materials in interdisciplinary teams: designer processes and contributions. Instructional Science, 49:249-286, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09538-5

Events and Submissions/Topic

Engaging with scripture in a contemporary Catholic school classroom Due: Week 6 Friday (23 Aug 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 7 Begin Date: 26 Aug 2024

Module/Topic

Catholic schools and the development of the whole person 

Personal, social and community health strands -Australian Curriculum 

Responding to diversity and individual difference

 

 

Chapter

Gilbert, R. (2019). General capabilities in the Australian curriculum: promise, problems and prospects. Curriculum Perspectives, 39, 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-019-00079-z



Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 02 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Planning for the teaching of religious texts from the CEDR Religious Education Curriculum (Parables) 

Chapter

Ryan, M. (2012). Jesus and the Gospels. Lumino Press. Chapter 8, 179-200.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 09 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Planning for the teaching of religious texts from the CEDR Religious Education curriculum (Miracles).

Chapter

Ryan, M. (2012). Jesus and the Gospels. Lumino Press. Chapter 9, 201-226.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 16 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Resources for teaching Religious texts in a contemporary Catholic school (Bible, commentaries, online resources)

Chapter

Stack-Nelson, J. (2014). Beyond Biblical literacy: Developing readerly readers in teaching biblical studies, Dialog : a journal of theology, 53(4), p.293-303.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11 Begin Date: 23 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Effective strategies for teaching Religious texts in contemporary Catholic schools (explicit teaching and assessing of cognition, strategies to maximise impact, dialogue and inquiry, negative theology)

Chapter

Pollefeyt, D. & Richards, M. (2020). The living art of religious education: a paradigm of hermeneutics and dialogue for RE at faith schools today. British Journal of Religious Education, 42(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2019.1593106

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 30 Sep 2024

Module/Topic

Review

Check in Q & A

Chapter

Jones, D. (2007). Speaking, listening, planning and assessing: the teacher's role in developing metacognitive awareness, Early Child Development and Care, 177(6-7), 569-579. DOI: 10.1080/03004430701378977

Events and Submissions/Topic

Teaching scripture in a contemporary Catholic school classroom Due: Week 12 Friday (4 Oct 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 07 Oct 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 14 Oct 2024

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Engaging with scripture in a contemporary Catholic school classroom

Task Description

The Catholic Church acknowledges scripture and tradition together as the source of its beliefs, liturgy, prayer and moral teaching. In coming to understand and appreciate the story of God’s engagement with humanity in scripture and in the ongoing tradition of the Church, students increasingly recognise God’s loving activity in human history and in the lives of individuals.  

Describe the National Catholic Education Commission (2018) features of high quality religious education and how these inform teachers’ planning for the teaching and learning of Scripture within Religious Education.

Explain how the 11 Essential Characteristics for Scripture Learning (Nolen) and the Worlds of the Texts frameworks provide structures to interpret scripture passages from the Catholic Christian bible to assist the students to construct meaning.

Consider how teacher preparation and professional learning builds capacity to facilitate the process of interpretation of Scripture with students in contemporary Catholic schools.

Length: 1500 words


Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence agents (Gen AI)
Within this assessment, the use of Gen AI agents is as follows: 
•  No Gen AI use at any point during this assessment.

This task provides opportunities for demonstrating achievement of the following Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Graduate Level): 2.1, 6.2, 6.4.



 


Assessment Due Date

Week 6 Friday (23 Aug 2024) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Feedback on this assessment task will be returned following moderation and in sufficient time to allow for academic support and advice as necessary and to inform responses for Assessment Task 2.


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

Knowledge and application of the 11 Essential Characteristics for Scripture Learning and Worlds of the Text interpretive framework

Understanding of the impact of personal, social and cultural backgrounds on interpretation and meaning making processes

Critical reflection on teachers’ professional knowledge base for planning and teaching Religious Education in contemporary Catholic schools


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Upload the task through the link on the Moodle site for Assessment Task 1.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Explain ways in which interpretation methods for religious texts make their meaning accessible for contemporary audiences
  • Reflect on the support provided by official documents and sources of professional learning for teachers in Catholic schools.

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Teaching scripture in a contemporary Catholic school classroom

Task Description

  1. Select a Scripture passage found within the P-6 CEDR Religious Education Curriculum and a resource from the associated short learning cycle.

  2. Justify how the resource can be used to support the interpretation of the chosen religious text by students with diverse backgrounds and experiences to construct meaning.  

  3. Select teaching strategies to enable learners with diverse backgrounds and experiences to engage in the process of interpreting the selected religious text. 

  4. Justify how the selected teaching strategies provide opportunities for students with diverse backgrounds and experiences to interpret the selected religious text to construct meaning.  

  5. Infer how contemporary meanings of scripture can relate to the development of human expression, personal and social development and wellbeing. Make explicit links to one or more of the learning areas of HPE or The Arts and the CEDR Personal and Social Development Guidelines for the chosen year level. 

Length: 1000 words.

Please note: For this task, students enrolled in the Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood) course must use the F-2 levels of the Australian Curriculum.

Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence agents (Gen AI)
Within this assessment, the use of Gen AI agents is as follows: 
•  No Gen AI use at any point during this assessment.

This task provides opportunities for engaging with and demonstrating the following Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Graduate Level) at a consolidating stage: 1.1, 1.3, 2.1, 2.5, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 7.2.


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Friday (4 Oct 2024) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Feedback on this task will be returned following marking and moderation.


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

Knowledge of documents and resources that guide interpretation of religious texts for contemporary audiences

Knowledge of developmentally appropriate teaching strategies and interpretive processes from the Arts curriculum to support meaning making at early middle or upper primary year levels 

Ability to plan for the teaching of religious education curriculum content and align HPE, or The Arts curriculum and Personal and Social Development Guidelines to implement relevant and inclusive curriculum for all learners 

Selection of resources that facilitate promotion of personal, social and community health and wellbeing 

 


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Explain ways in which interpretation methods for religious texts make their meaning accessible for contemporary audiences
  • Identify relationships between contemporary meanings of Scripture and the rationale, aims and content of curriculum learning areas that focus on human expression, personal and social development and wellbeing
  • Select and justify resources that actively engage learners in understanding the contexts, symbolism and messages of religious texts
  • Select strategies for interpreting religious texts with contemporary learners from a diverse range of linguistic, cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?