Overview
This unit is designed to equip the learner with a comprehensive knowledge of contemporary trends in the regulation and management of health and safety in organisations. Students will explore legal liability for health and safety and examine contemporary statutory developments regarding prevention. In addition, students will become acquainted with modern corporate governance and due diligence requirements which provide the impetus for the implementation of effective risk based health and safety management and its integration with organisational business processes.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2017
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 12-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Have Your Say
A number of students were dissatisfied with the degree of interaction.
Weekly zoom seminar sessions will be introduced to facilitate regular engagement and interaction.
- Interpret and apply legal concepts, processes and procedures relevant to liability for exposure to risk of fatality, injury and ill-health.
- Apply the work health and safety regulatory framework to determine legal exposure.
- Outline the elements of an effective risk based safety management system.
- Design, develop and implement a risk based safety management system.
- Evaluate the design, development and implementation of a risk based safety management system.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||
| 2 - Portfolio - 10% | |||||
| 3 - Portfolio - 20% | |||||
| 4 - Portfolio - 30% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | |||||
| 2 - Communication | |||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | |||||
| 4 - Research | |||||
| 5 - Self-management | |||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | |||||
| 7 - Leadership | |||||
| 8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
| Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 40% | ||||||||
| 2 - Portfolio - 10% | ||||||||
| 3 - Portfolio - 20% | ||||||||
| 4 - Portfolio - 30% | ||||||||
Textbooks
Safety Management: A Comprehensive Approach to Developing a Sustainable System
1st edition (2012)
Authors: C Lutchman, R Maharaj & W Ghanem
CRC Press
Philadelphia Philadelphia , PA , USA
Binding: Paperback
Work Health and Safety Law and Policy
3rd edition (2012)
Authors: R Johnstone, E Bluff & A Clayton
Thomson Reuters
Sydney Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
ISBN: 9780455229836
Binding: Paperback
No Textbook Title
Binding: Other
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
a.raineri@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction
Chapter
Johnstone, Bluff & Clayton, Chapter 1 paras 1.05 - 1.170
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Development of the law regulating the prevention of work-related death, injury & disease
Work Health and Safety Act introductory concepts
The primary duty of care under the Work Health and Safety Act
Chapter
Johnstone, Bluff & Clayton, Chapter 1 para 1.175
Chapter 2 para 2.05 - 2.70 & para 2.175 - 2.240.
Chapter 3 para 3.05 - 3.185, para 3.190 - 3.370 & para 3.375 - 3.485
Chapter 4
Chapter 5 para 5.05 - 5.155
Chapter 6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Systematic safety management
Chapter
Lutchman, Maharaj & Ghanem, Chapter 4, pp.41-63
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Risk management
Chapter
Selected readings
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Developing the System
Chapter
Lutchman, Maharaj & Ghanem, Chapter 6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Lutchman, Maharaj & Ghanem,
Chapter 11, pp.194-198)
Chapter 13
Chapter 16
Chapter 20
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Lutchman, Maharaj & Ghanem, Chapter 4, p.64
Chapter 11
Chapter 14
Chapter 19
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Lutchman, Maharaj & Ghanem, Chapter 8, pp.130-131
Chapter 13
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Using the scenario provided on the unit moodle site, determine whether any provisions of the Work Health and Safety Act (or comparable legislation in Victoria or Western Australia) have been breached.
If so, outline which provisions have been breached, how and by whom (2 000 - 2 500 words)
Week 6 Monday (17 Apr 2017) 10:00 am AEST
Week 8 Friday (5 May 2017)
Relevance (30%)
- Depth of understanding in formulating responses to the assigned task
- Alignment of responses to the assigned task
- Connections between discussion and evidence
Validity (40%)
- Depth and extent of discussion; ie: understanding of concepts and evidence
- Accuracy and originality of the discussion
- Judgement and reasoning; ie: assertions made based on level of critical thought, analysis and synthesis
- Depth and extent of evidence used
Organisation (20%)
- Consideration of required components of the assigned task
- Structure and flow of information
- Coherence and clarity of expression (spelling, grammar, syntax)
Presentation (10%)
- Style and formatting in accordance with required academic standards
- Typographical matters
- Referencing protocols
- Length
- Interpret and apply legal concepts, processes and procedures relevant to liability for exposure to risk of fatality, injury and ill-health.
- Apply the work health and safety regulatory framework to determine legal exposure.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
- Leadership
2 Portfolio
Using the scenario provided on the moodle site and your analysis in Portfolio 1, conduct a Needs Analysis to identify the organisation's necessary requirements and outline the framework for a new recommended safety management system (SMS) for the organisation.
Week 8 Monday (1 May 2017) 10:00 am AEST
All componets of Portfolio 2 must be submitted by Monday 10th October 2016.
Week 10 Friday (19 May 2017)
Relevance (30%)
- Depth of understanding in formulating responses to the assigned task
- Alignment of responses to the assigned task
- Connections between discussion and evidence
Validity (40%)
- Depth and understanding of discussion; ie: understanding of concepts and evidence
- Accuracy and originality of the discussion
- Judgement and reasoning; ie: assertions made based on level of critical thought, analysis and synthesis
- Depth and extent of evidence used
Organisation (20%)
- Consideration of required components of the assigned task
- Structure and flow of information
- Coherence and clarity of expression (spelling, grammar, syntax)
Presentation (10%)
- Style and formatting in accordance with required academic standards
- Typographical matters
- Referencing protocols
- Length
- Outline the elements of an effective risk based safety management system.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
- Leadership
3 Portfolio
Develop a comprehensive Consultation and Participation procedure for the organisation.
Week 10 Monday (15 May 2017) 10:00 am AEST
Week 12 Friday (2 June 2017)
Relevance (30%)
- Depth of understanding in formulating responses to the assigned task
- Alignment of responses to the assigned task
- Connections between discussion and evidence
Validity (40%)
- Depth and extent of discussion; ie: understanding of concepts and evidence
- Accuracy and originality of the discussion
- Judgement and reasoning; ie: assertions made based on level of critical thought, analysis and synthesis
- Depth and extent of evidence used
Organisation (20%)
- Consideration of required components of the assigned task
- Structure and flow of information
- Coherence and clarity of expression (spelling, grammar, syntax)
Presentation (10%)
- Style and formatting in accordance with required academic standards
- Typographical matters
- Referencing protocols
- Length
- Design, develop and implement a risk based safety management system.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
- Leadership
4 Portfolio
Develop a Safety Improvement Plan for the organisation. The aim is to effectively implement the new SMS and ensure regulatory compliance after the incident outlined in the scenario.
The Implementation Plan should include time frames, resources,accountabilities and performance indicators.
Week 12 Monday (29 May 2017) 10:00 am AEST
Exam Week Friday (16 June 2017)
Relevance (30%)
- Depth of understanding in formulating responses to the assigned task
- Alignment of responses to the assigned task
- Connections between discussion and evidence
Validity (40%)
- Depth and extent of discussion; ie: understanding of concepts and evidence
- Accuracy and originality of the discussion
- Judgement and reasoning; ie: assertions made based on level of critical thought, analysis and synthesis
- Depth and extent of evidence used
Organisation (20%)
- Consideration of required components of the assigned task
- Structure and flow of information
- Coherence and clarity of expression (spelling, grammar, syntax)
Presentation (10%)
- Style and formatting in accordance with required academic standards
- Typographical matters
- Referencing protocols
- Length
- Evaluate the design, development and implementation of a risk based safety management system.
- Knowledge
- Communication
- Cognitive, technical and creative skills
- Research
- Self-management
- Ethical and Professional Responsibility
- Leadership
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
