CQUniversity Unit Profile
SOWK13012 Professional Practice and Mental Health
Professional Practice and Mental Health
All details in this unit profile for SOWK13012 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

You should be able to critically examine the various models of mental health, specific intervention strategies and the role of social workers and allied health professionals within mental health services. You should be able to integrate knowledge of the role of community, culture and models of mental health in the provision of evidence based strategies that promote mental health practice consistent with professional values and ethics. You should be able to evaluate the socio structural context of mental health and the implications for various client groups and determine how these elements translate into various models for intervention.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 10
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Successful completion of 48 credit points in any course.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 2 - 2019

Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: 25%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 50%
3. Written Assessment
Weighting: 25%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Have your say survey

Feedback

Some students reported that they would like to see the content included in the residential school- in a face to face environment.

Recommendation

Social work team to consider mental health content being including in the curriculum review at planning day.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Analyse the social construction of mental health.
  2. Critically evaluate models of mental health, their corollary intervention strategies and the professionals' role in delivering those various models and strategies.
  3. Critically evaluate the use of current mental health status and assessment tools.
  4. Integrate social work/allied health strategies within an interdisciplinary context using professional values and ethics.
  5. Critically evaluate different models for mental health practice with individuals, families and communities.
  6. Propose relevant effective and culturally appropriate evidence based strategies for intervention.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Written Assessment - 25%
2 - Written Assessment - 50%
3 - Written Assessment - 25%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 - Written Assessment - 25%
2 - Written Assessment - 50%
3 - Written Assessment - 25%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Social Work Practice in Mental Health: An Introduction 2nd Edition (2015)

Authors: Bland, R., Renouf, N., Tullgren, A.
Allen & Unwin
Crows Nest Crows Nest , NSW , Australia
ISBN: 9781743314753
Binding: Paperback
Supplementary

Mental Health in Australia: Collaborative Community Practice 3rd Edition (2012 )

Authors: Meadows, G., Grigg,, M., Farhall, J., McDermott., F., Fossey., E., Singh, B. (ed.)
Oxford University Press
Melbourne Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
ISBN: 9780195574883
Binding: Paperback

Additional Textbook Information


IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Paloma Cesare Unit Coordinator
p.cesare@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 15 Jul 2019

Module/Topic

The history of mental illness

The lived experience

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 22 Jul 2019

Module/Topic

Concepts in mental health

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 29 Jul 2019

Module/Topic

Psychiatric illnesses

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 05 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Psychiatric assessment

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Written Assessment 1 (1500 words) Due: Week 4 Friday (9 Aug 2019) 11:55 pm AEST
Week 5 Begin Date: 12 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Assessment and management of suicide risk

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 19 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 26 Aug 2019

Module/Topic

Case management & continuity of care

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 02 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Multi-disciplinary teams

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 09 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Carers & COPMI

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Written Assessment 2 (2000 words) Due: Week 8 Friday (13 Sept 2019) 11:55 pm AEST
Week 9 Begin Date: 16 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Culture & mental health

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 23 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Mental health social work practice and a human rights perspective

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 11 Begin Date: 30 Sep 2019

Module/Topic

Models of care in mental health

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 07 Oct 2019

Module/Topic

The policy and legal context

Chapter

Please refer to Moodle for unit readings and activities.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Written Assessment 3 (1500 words) Due: Week 12 Friday (11 Oct 2019) 11:55 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 14 Oct 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 21 Oct 2019

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Written Assessment 1 (1500 words)

Task Description

The assessment is designed to develop student knowledge about mental health issues.

You are required to watch the audiovisual material and answer the questions in relation to the audio visual.  The audiovisual   can be located on Moodle and titled Assessment Item 1. The audiovisual material is 1 hour in duration.

Your readings should inform your questions and where relevant, cite the literature. Responses to each question should be no more than 150 words each.

Questions:

  1. What were some of the symptoms that Millie demonstrated and what impact did these have on Tina and Susan as children; and on Millie's relationship with Alan?
  2. What were Millie's negative symptoms and what medication was she prescribed for these symptoms?
  3. Discuss the degree of insight or understanding each family members had in the past and have now in relation to Millie's illness and treatment?  Examine these family members - Millie's ex-husband, Alan; Susan; Tina; and Millie herself?
  4. To what degree was Alan's response to Millie's  attempted suicide, he product of the era (mid 1960s)?  Refer to the Australian context. 
  5. What role did mental health providers play in ensuring Millie's safety and the safety of her children.
  6. How do you believe Millie's children, Susan and Tina, understood their mother's illness when they were young?  Your answer should be informed by theories of child development. 
  7. In what ways did Alan hinder/and or help her progress towards recovery?
  8. In what ways did Millie hinder/and or help her progress toward recovery?
  9. What coping strategies and resources are displayed by each of Millie's daughters presently?
  10. How does the historical framework of schizophrenia inform attitudes towards recovery for someone such as Millie?


 


Assessment Due Date

Week 4 Friday (9 Aug 2019) 11:55 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 6 Friday (30 Aug 2019)

Electronic Feedback


Weighting
25%

Assessment Criteria

 

 

Marking Criteria

High Distinction

85-100%

Distinction

75-84%

Credit

65-74%

Pass

50-64%

Fail

Below 50%

Demonstrates an

understanding of contemporary mental health issues

 

10 marks

 

 

 

Advanced

understanding demonstrated which integrates academic literature and observations from the audio visual

Very good understanding demonstrated which integrates academic literature and observations from the audio visual

Good understanding demonstrated which integrates academic literature and observations from the audio visual

Adequate or basic understanding demonstrated which integrates academic literature and observations from the audio visual

Inadequate or

inappropriate understanding which integrates academic literature and observations from the audio visual

Demonstrates a capacity for critical analysis of the presenting issues in the audio visual

 

 

10 marks

 

 

Advanced critical analysis of the presenting issues in the audio visual.  Identifies and evaluates all of  evidence and provides new or critical  insights, analyses assumptions and how this influences understanding of the context,  and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Very good analysis of the presenting issues in the audio visual.  Identifies and evaluates most of the evidence and provides expected insights, considers assumptions; and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates some of the evidence.  Gives consideration to obvious assumptions and provides some insights; and considers some of the implications of the critical analysis

Adequate analysis of the presenting issues. Presents some evidence.  Does not question evidence thoroughly, questions some assumptions  but is not clear on the relevance or implications of the critical analysis

Demonstrates a lack of awareness of critical analysis and thinking.

The presenting issues are not clearly stated; information is not interpreted; evidence is considered fact without question; and implications considered are simplistic

Demonstrates consultation of the literature relevant to the assignment topic 

Advanced literature review, with includes strong academic research; and comprehensive research

Very good literature review with includes academic research that varies in quality; and

Good literature review which includes some academic research and a few references

Adequate literature review which includes limited academic research and a few references

Inadequate or inappropriate literature review with reliance on internet sources or irrelevant and inappropriate references.

 

Adheres to the word limit.

 

Demonstrates consultation of literature relevant to the assignment topic.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and integration of literature, correct spelling (Macquarie) and punctuation, with appropriate citation and referencing (Harvard CQU) and adheres to the word limit.

 

5 marks

 

Excellent in all aspects

Very good overall

Good overall

Adequate overall

Inadequate or inappropriate overall

 

 

 

 

 

Total  /25


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse the social construction of mental health.
  • Critically evaluate models of mental health, their corollary intervention strategies and the professionals' role in delivering those various models and strategies.
  • Critically evaluate the use of current mental health status and assessment tools.
  • Integrate social work/allied health strategies within an interdisciplinary context using professional values and ethics.
  • Critically evaluate different models for mental health practice with individuals, families and communities.
  • Propose relevant effective and culturally appropriate evidence based strategies for intervention.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Written Assessment 2 (2000 words)

Task Description

You are required to examine the Coroner’s report located on the Moodle site to identify the problems associated with the treatment and care of  Ms X. You need to make reference to some of the key concepts that underpin contemporary mental health services. The concepts are as follow:

  • Continuity of care
  • Psychiatric assessment 
  • Suicide risk assessment and management
  • Multi-disciplinary teamwork
  • Family and carers' roles' in the treatment and care of loved ones

The course material and readings introduce you to some of the key concepts that underpin contemporary mental health services. The Coroner’s report covers some of these concepts and the problems associated with the treatment provided to Ms X. The report is located on Moodle and titled Assessment Item 2.


Assessment Due Date

Week 8 Friday (13 Sept 2019) 11:55 pm AEST

Upload electronically to moodle


Return Date to Students

Week 10 Friday (27 Sept 2019)

Electronic Feedback


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

 

Marking Criteria

High Distinction

85-100%

Distinction

75-84%

Credit

65-74%

Pass

50-64%

Fail

Below 50%

Demonstrates an understanding of the core concepts and relevance to the delivery of best practice in mental health care

20 marks

Advanced understanding demonstrated.  Comprehensive definitions are provided and a comprehensive analysis of the literature is explored in relation to the relevance of these concepts in mental health care delivery.  

Very good understanding, discussion and relevance explained. Very good analysis of the literature is explored.

Good understanding, discussion and relevance explained.  Good analysis of the literature is explored.

Adequate application, discussion and relevance explained. Adequate analysis of the literature is explored.

Inadequate application, discussion and relevance explained.  Inadequate or absent analysis of the literature is explored.

Demonstrates an ability to critically analyse the relevance of the concepts in relation to the problems associated with the treatment and care of Ms X

 

25 marks

Advanced critical analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates all of  evidence and provides new or critical  insights, analyses assumptions and how this influences understanding of the context,  and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Very good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates most of the evidence and provides expected insights, considers assumptions; and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates some of the evidence.  Gives consideration to obvious assumptions and provides some insights; and considers some of the implications of the critical analysis

Adequate analysis of the presenting issues. Presents some evidence.  Does not question evidence thoroughly, questions some assumptions  but is not clear on the relevance or implications of the critical analysis

Demonstrates a lack of awareness of critical analysis and thinking.

The presenting issues are not clearly stated; information is not interpreted; evidence is considered fact without question; and implications considered are simplistic

Demonstrates consultation of literature relevant to the assignments topic.

 

 

Demonstrates synthesis and integration of literature, strength and logic of argument, correct spelling (Macquarie) and punctuation, with appropriate citation and referencing (Harvard) and adheres to the word limit

5 marks

Advanced literature review, which includes strong academic research; and research undertaken exceeds expectations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Very good literature review with includes academic research that varies in quality;  comprehensive research undertaken

Good literature review which includes some academic research and a few references and reasonable research undertaken

Adequate literature review which includes limited academic research and adequate research undertaken

Inadequate or inappropriate literature review with reliance on internet sources or irrelevant and inappropriate research undertaken

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

/50

 

 


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Moodle Upload

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse the social construction of mental health.
  • Critically evaluate models of mental health, their corollary intervention strategies and the professionals' role in delivering those various models and strategies.
  • Critically evaluate the use of current mental health status and assessment tools.
  • Integrate social work/allied health strategies within an interdisciplinary context using professional values and ethics.
  • Critically evaluate different models for mental health practice with individuals, families and communities.
  • Propose relevant effective and culturally appropriate evidence based strategies for intervention.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

3 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Written Assessment 3 (1500 words)

Task Description

You are required to identify two models of mental health care within Australia or internationally.  Examine the following for each of the models:

  • Examine the social-political and historical development of the model 
  • Examine the core features and principles of service delivery
  • Examine the professionals’ role in mental health service delivery
  • Examine the strengths and challenges of the model 
  • Examine the implications for social work practice

 Please select two of the models from the list below:

  • Case Management (Western countries)
  • Open Dialogue (Finland and Internationally)
  • Peer support (Western countries)
  • Hearing Voices (Western countries)
  • Assertive Outreach Teams (Western countries)
  • Home Treatment Team (UK)
  • Headspace (Australia)
  • Early Intervention in Psychosis Teams (UK)


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Friday (11 Oct 2019) 11:55 pm AEST

Electronic submission via moodle


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Friday (25 Oct 2019)

Electronic Feedback


Weighting
25%

Minimum mark or grade
This assessment must be submitted to pass the unit.

Assessment Criteria

Marking Criteria

High Distinction

85-100%

Distinction

75-84%

Credit

65-74%

Pass

50-64%

Fail

Below 50%

Demonstrates an understanding of the features and principles of each mental health model

  

 

 

5 marks  

Advanced understanding demonstrated.  Comprehensive overview is provided and the analysis of the literature is comprehensive

Very good understanding demonstrated. Very good overview is provided the analysis of the literature is very good

Good understanding demonstrated.   Good overview is provided and the analysis of the literature is good

Adequate understanding demonstrated.  Adequate analysis of the literature is explored

Inadequate understanding demonstrated.   Inadequate or absent analysis of the literature

Demonstrates an understanding of the professionals’ role in mental health service delivery

 

 

4 marks  

Advanced understanding demonstrated.  Comprehensive overview is provided and the analysis of the literature is comprehensive

Very good understanding demonstrated. Very good overview is provided the analysis of the literature is very good

Good understanding demonstrated.   Good overview is provided and the analysis of the literature is good

Adequate understanding demonstrated.  Adequate analysis of the literature is explored

Inadequate understanding demonstrated.   Inadequate or absent analysis of the literature

Demonstrated ability to critically evaluate the socio-political and historical development of the model 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 marks  

Advanced critical analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates all of  evidence and provides new or critical  insights, analyses assumptions and how this influences understanding of the context,  and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Very good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates most of the evidence and provides expected insights, considers assumptions; and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates some of the evidence.  Gives consideration to obvious assumptions and provides some insights; and considers some of the implications of the critical analysis

Adequate analysis of the presenting issues. Presents some evidence.  Does not question evidence thoroughly, questions some assumptions  but is not clear on the relevance or implications of the critical analysis

Demonstrates a lack of awareness of critical analysis and thinking.

The presenting issues are not clearly stated; information is not interpreted; evidence is considered fact without question; and implications considered are simplistic

Demonstrated ability to critically evaluate the success and challenges of the model of care

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 marks  

Advanced critical analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates all of  evidence and provides new or critical  insights, analyses assumptions and how this influences understanding of the context,  and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Very good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates most of the evidence and provides expected insights, considers assumptions; and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates some of the evidence.  Gives consideration to obvious assumptions and provides some insights; and considers some of the implications of the critical analysis

Adequate analysis of the presenting issues. Presents some evidence.  Does not question evidence thoroughly, questions some assumptions  but is not clear on the relevance or implications of the critical analysis

Demonstrates a lack of awareness of critical analysis and thinking.

The presenting issues are not clearly stated; information is not interpreted; evidence is considered fact without question; and implications considered are simplistic

Demonstrated ability to critically evaluate the implications for social workers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 marks

Advanced critical analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates all of  evidence and provides new or critical  insights, analyses assumptions and how this influences understanding of the context,  and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Very good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates most of the evidence and provides expected insights, considers assumptions; and considers the implications of the critical analysis

Good analysis of the presenting issues.  Identifies and evaluates some of the evidence.  Gives consideration to obvious assumptions and provides some insights; and considers some of the implications of the critical analysis

Adequate analysis of the presenting issues. Presents some evidence.  Does not question evidence thoroughly, questions some assumptions  but is not clear on the relevance or implications of the critical analysis

Demonstrates a lack of awareness of critical analysis and thinking.

The presenting issues are not clearly stated; information is not interpreted; evidence is considered fact without question; and implications considered are simplistic

Demonstrates consultation of literature relevant to the assignments topic.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and integration of literature, strength and logic of argument, correct spelling (Macquarie) and punctuation, with appropriate citation and referencing (Harvard) and adheres to the word limit

 

4 marks  

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

/25


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Upload to moodle

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Analyse the social construction of mental health.
  • Critically evaluate models of mental health, their corollary intervention strategies and the professionals' role in delivering those various models and strategies.
  • Critically evaluate the use of current mental health status and assessment tools.
  • Integrate social work/allied health strategies within an interdisciplinary context using professional values and ethics.
  • Critically evaluate different models for mental health practice with individuals, families and communities.
  • Propose relevant effective and culturally appropriate evidence based strategies for intervention.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?