CQUniversity Unit Profile
WRIT11023 Creative Writing 1: Fundamentals of Writing
Creative Writing 1: Fundamentals of Writing
All details in this unit profile for WRIT11023 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This unit has as its focus the development of basic writing techniques necessary for the creative reproduction of personal and imaginative experience. The student will investigate and practice techniques such as narrative viewpoint, characterization, dialogue and description of setting via drafting and editing creative writing pieces.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 1
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 10
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2017

Distance

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Written Assessment
Weighting: Pass/Fail
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 45%
3. Written Assessment
Weighting: 55%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Have your say feedback

Feedback

Students request more compulsory writing activities

Recommendation

Due to the ratio of students to lecturers (54:1), this is difficult, and the assessment has been set. It would be possible to provide more writing space on the forums and allow students to provide peer feedback, with consultation and guidance from the lecturer.

Feedback from Have your say feedback

Feedback

Student requests that more prescriptive writing topics are given; and that writing exercises provided in course materials should have been made into assessment items

Recommendation

Creative writing requires imagination - prescriptive writing exercises are anathema to tertiary-level writing. There was no impediment to students choosing to use writing exercises to create their assessment writing pieces. That this is an option will be made clearer in the next iteration of the course.

Feedback from Have your say feedback

Feedback

Students requests novella or novel-length word limits.

Recommendation

The word limits are commensurate with the level of the students - undergraduate first and second year students. A student would need to enrol in a Masters or PhD level degree program to submit work of around 30,000 - 100,000 words.

Feedback from Moodle feedback

Feedback

Students request video materials

Recommendation

Investigating Camtasia and creating podcasts of lectures

Feedback from Have your say feedback

Feedback

More in-class writing activities

Recommendation

Will provide time in class for writing exercises and feedback - will encourage flex students to post their work online to facilitate an online writing space

Feedback from Have your say feedback

Feedback

More / greater contact with flex students requested

Recommendation

Measures will be taken to ensure communication with flex students is more effective in the next offering - using video and Camtasia should assist this, as well as increased presence on forums

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. development of your skills in literary craftsmanship
  2. development of your analytical skills through first-hand experience with problems of crafting 'imaginative' literature
  3. broadening of your understanding of the 'imaginative' writer's relationship with both society and individuals within that society through a heightened awareness of your reactions to society and the individual and the parts such reactions play in the generation of your own 'imaginative' themes.
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Written Assessment - 0%
2 - Written Assessment - 45%
3 - Written Assessment - 55%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Written Assessment - 0%
2 - Written Assessment - 45%
3 - Written Assessment - 55%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

The Road to Somewhere : A Creative Writing Companion

Edition: 2nd edn revised (2013)
Authors: Graham , R
Palgrave Macmillan
London London , UK
ISBN: 9781137263568
Binding: Paperback

Additional Textbook Information


IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: Harvard (author-date)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Nicole Anae Unit Coordinator
n.anae@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 06 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Introduction

Chapter

Armstrong, J A Writers Territory, in The road to somewhere, pp. 14 – 17

Leach, H Creativity, in The road to somewhere, pp. 18 – 27

Please note: page numbers for listed readings will varying depending on which edition of the textbook you have.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 13 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Getting Started

Chapter

Leach, H Becoming a Writer, in The road to somewhere, pp. 5 – 13

Please note: page numbers for listed readings will varying depending on which edition of the textbook you have.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Proposal due.


Proposal/Pitch Due: Week 2 Friday (17 Mar 2017) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 3 Begin Date: 20 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

The Fundamentals of Writing: Show, Don't Tell and other rules

Chapter

Graham, R Immediacy: It’s Showtime, in The road to somewhere, pp. 168 - 178

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 27 Mar 2017

Module/Topic

Perspectives

Chapter

Graham, R Narrators: Whose Story Is It Anyway?, in The road to somewhere, pp. 106 – 111

Alternatively:

Graham, R Point of view, in The road to somewhere, pp. 105 – 112

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 5 Begin Date: 03 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Creating Authentic Characters

Chapter

Graham, R Your Travelling Companions, in The road to somewhere, pp. 113 – 122

Alternatively:

Graham, R Characterisation, in The road to somewhere, pp. 95 – 104

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 10 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 17 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Dialogue

Chapter

Singleton, John Dialogue in Prose Fiction, in The road to somewhere, pp. 156 – 166

Alternatively:

Singleton, John Dialogue, in The road to somewhere, pp. 113 – 122

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 24 Apr 2017

Module/Topic

Setting

Chapter

Newall, H, Setting, in The road to somewhere, pp. 124 – 133

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 01 May 2017

Module/Topic

Image / Symbol / Rhythm

Chapter

Leach, H 2014 Poetry for People Who Don’t Like Poetry, in The road to somewhere, pp. 204 – 208

Singleton, J Words and Images, in The road to somewhere, pp. 199 – 206

Sheppard, R & Thurston, S 2014 Poetry, in The road to somewhere, pp. 194 – 203

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 08 May 2017

Module/Topic

Plot / Suspense / Pace

Chapter

Graham, R Your Vehicle: Plot, in The road to somewhere, pp. 138 – 142

Newell, H Sense of Pace (in Setting), in The road to somewhere, pp. 128

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 Begin Date: 15 May 2017

Module/Topic

Editing and The Drafting Process

Chapter

Graham R & Leach H Reflection: Looking Your Words in the Face, in The road to somewhere, pp. 80-86

Graham R Revision: Cut it Out, Put it In, in The road to somewhere, pp. 183-192

Events and Submissions/Topic

Critical Reflection Journal Due


Critical Reflection Journal Due: Week 10 Friday (19 May 2017) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 11 Begin Date: 22 May 2017

Module/Topic

Genre

Chapter

See Study Guide for Readings

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 29 May 2017

Module/Topic

Conclusion

Chapter

See Study Guide for Readings

Events and Submissions/Topic

Final Assessable Draft due.


Final Creative Artefact Due: Week 12 Friday (2 June 2017) 5:00 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 05 Jun 2017

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Exam Week Begin Date: 12 Jun 2017

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Proposal/Pitch

Task Description

Please refer to the unit moodle site for a detailed description.

Task Description: Chose one writing technique (e.g., dialogue, characterisation, setting, point of view, etc.) and one genre (either short story, a play, a suite of poems, or short creative non-fiction). Write a 500-700 word pitch for a written piece in this genre to myself as 'editor'.

Explanation: You are required to write a creative writing piece for your major assessment item. You must first identify a collaborative story writing site. This is simply 'a place to start.' Looking at the creative writing of others gives you a way of thinking about what you might like to write, and in the process, will help you to focus your creative writing. Start by investigating free collaborative story writing sites such as Inkle, Ficly, StoryMash, Twine, Novlet, FanStory, Episode, StoryWars, Protagonize, FoldingStory, StoryTimed, or FanFic (among many others) for inspiration. For instance, you might be a serious Supernatural fan and dream of writing your own storyline. If so, FanFic would definitely be an option for structuring your major piece (your creative artefact).

Depending on the site you choose, your major work could be part of a narrative thread started by someone else, a prequel or sequel woven into a story already written, a story chapter created after jumping into someone else's tale, or, an original story you have started entirely yourself. The possibilities are limited only by your imagination. It is up to you whether you actually submit your work to your chosen site. I would encourage you to do so, but submission to the collaborative writing site you have chosen is not a requirement of the unit.

The pitch/proposal is pass/fail only. This means that you are required to complete the proposal/pitch (on which you will receive feedback), but this does not contribute to the overall grade percentage. Why? Because, as you are required to develop a 500 - 700 word 'proposal/pitch' for a work (perhaps inspired by collaborative writing site of your choice such as Inkle, Ficly, StoryMash, Twine, FanFic, etc.), you must first show that you have actually identified a possible interactive/collaborative story writing site, and considered how the theme/topic/focus of your piece 'matches' that of the collaborative writing stream. Again, this will depend on whether you intend your major work to be part of a narrative thread started by someone else, a prequel or sequel woven into a story already written, or an original story you have started entirely yourself. The proposal/pitch gives you the opportunity to focus your piece toward your chosen interactive/collaborative writing platform and gives you a way to plan completing Assessment Item 2 and 3 over the course of the Term.

NOTE: Creative writing pieces submitted WITHOUT a prior pitch being received and marked may be penalised.


Assessment Due Date

Week 2 Friday (17 Mar 2017) 5:00 pm AEST

he Proposal represents the student's account of what they hope to achieve with regards the creative work over the course of the Term, and so it's submission on or before the specified due date is a requirement of this course


Return Date to Students

Week 4 Friday (31 Mar 2017)

Distributed to students electronically.


Weighting
Pass/Fail

Assessment Criteria

Please access the unit moodle site for detailed information.

The Proposal will be evaluated according to the extent to which:

  1. the proposal evidences that it will carry-out a clearly articulated set of outcomes as regards the genre and form of the writing project (e.g., writing the first chapter of a novel, writing a short story, writing a children's book, a suite of poems, etc.);
  2. the proposal identifies the specific colloaborative writing site and the style in which the content of the creative artefact will be written (e.g.,third-person limited, intimate, or omnipotent, etc.)
  3. the proposal of the creative artefact represents an original piece of writing according to the chosen genre (e.g., horror, sci-fi, fantasy, historical romance, popular romance, crime, etc.), and is of an achievable standard shown via a week-by-week timeline indicating what is to be undertaken and when in the writing process (including milestones, e.g., benchmarks achieved leading up to Assessment 2 - First Draft, benchmarks achieved leading up to Assessment 3 - Final Draft)
  4. the proposal is presented in a flawless literary presentation, formatting and referencing (Harvard (author-date) referencing style)
  5. the proposal includes at least 5 references identified as important in ensuring that your creative artefact is informed by the literary and stylistic conventions of your chosen genre and the specified style in which the content will be written.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • development of your skills in literary craftsmanship
  • development of your analytical skills through first-hand experience with problems of crafting 'imaginative' literature
  • broadening of your understanding of the 'imaginative' writer's relationship with both society and individuals within that society through a heightened awareness of your reactions to society and the individual and the parts such reactions play in the generation of your own 'imaginative' themes.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Ethical practice

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Critical Reflection Journal

Task Description

Please refer to the unit moodle site for detailed information.

Critical Reflection Journal: Students are required to reflect weekly on their progress through the writing process with specific reference to their experiences using/consulting their chosen online collaborative writing site. The reflective journal must discuss in a critical way how the final written piece (the creative artefact) is being/has been shaped by the online story writing process. Again, this will depend on whether your creative artefact is/was part of a narrative thread started by someone else, a prequel or sequel woven into a story already written, or an original story you started yourself.

Students can complete their reflective journal as a blog if desired (using the weekly topic forums on the unit moodle site) or submit as a word document.

Students weekly reflections must account for the period Week 3 until Week 10 (7 weeks in total).

Each weekly reflection response is worth 6.5 marks.

Word limit: Each response should be between 200-275 words in total (references are not included in the word count).


Assessment Due Date

Week 10 Friday (19 May 2017) 5:00 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 12 Friday (2 June 2017)

Distributed to students electronically.


Weighting
45%

Assessment Criteria

This assessment will be evaluated on the extent to which it demonstrates Critical Reflection:

  1. regarding the ways in which the creative work evidences a carrying-out of the clearly articulated set of outcomes as per The Pitch/Proposal including the nominated collaborative writing site and the genre and form of the creative artefact (e.g., writing the first chapter of a novel, writing a short story, writing a novella, writing a series of short stories, writing a children's book, etc.);
  2. taking into account the thematic/literary standards of the nominated collaborative writing site;
  3. engagement with the 5 references (listed in The Proposal) in ensuring that the creative artefact is informed by the literary and stylistic conventions of the chosen genre and the specified writing technique and genre nominated in the proposal;
  4. regarding the progress of the artefact according to the standards shown via the Proposal's week-by-week timeline indicating what was to be undertaken and when in the writing process (that is, the achieved milestones leading up to Assessment 3 - Final Draft)
  5. each critical reflection reflects flawless presentation, clarity of expression - including spelling and grammatical correctness using the Harvard (author-date) referencing style.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • development of your skills in literary craftsmanship
  • development of your analytical skills through first-hand experience with problems of crafting 'imaginative' literature
  • broadening of your understanding of the 'imaginative' writer's relationship with both society and individuals within that society through a heightened awareness of your reactions to society and the individual and the parts such reactions play in the generation of your own 'imaginative' themes.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Ethical practice

3 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Final Creative Artefact

Task Description

Please access the unit moodle site for detailed information and guidelines.

Students are required to complete at least one piece of writing of a publishable standard. The Final Creative Artefact is a proofread and polished piece of the creative writing artefact students have been working on over the Term. The publishable piece must be completed according to the topic proposed in Assessment One ('The Pitch'/Proposal), as negotiated with their supervisor.

The total word count is 2500 words.

The assessment item is worth 55% of the overall grade.

A copy of the Proposal/Pitch (Assessment Item 1) must be included with this assessment item (placed either at the very beginning, or on the final page/s of the Creative Artefact).


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Friday (2 June 2017) 5:00 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

As soon as practicable after the end of the examination period.


Weighting
55%

Assessment Criteria

The Final Creative Artefact will be evaluated according to the extent to which:

  1. the final piece realises the articulated set of outcomes (The Pitch/Proposal) with respect to the genre and form of the creative artefact;
  2. the final piece incorporates all of the stipulations outlined for the creative artefact;
  3. the draft realises the elements of the chosen genre (e.g., horror, sci-fi, fantasy, historical romance, popular romance, etc.), and form (a chapter, a short story, a novella, etc), and accords with the standards shown via the Proposal's week-by-week timeline indicating what was to be undertaken and when in the writing process (that is, the achieved milestones leading up to Assessment 3 - Final Creative Artefact)
  4. the draft is presented in a flawless literary presentation, formatting and (where/if required) referencing (Harvard (author-date) referencing style)
  5. the draft shows the realisation of an original piece of writing indicating the literary and stylistic conventions of the chosen genre and the specified style in which content of this type should be written.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • development of your skills in literary craftsmanship
  • development of your analytical skills through first-hand experience with problems of crafting 'imaginative' literature
  • broadening of your understanding of the 'imaginative' writer's relationship with both society and individuals within that society through a heightened awareness of your reactions to society and the individual and the parts such reactions play in the generation of your own 'imaginative' themes.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Ethical practice

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?