Viewing Unit History

The information below is relevant from 05/03/2018 to 08/03/2020
Click Here to view current information

ENRP20003 - Engineering Research Project Implementation

General Information

Unit Synopsis

This unit is designed so that students can complete an investigative study through the analysis of, reflection on and critique of, an area of their professional practice that was commenced in Engineering Research Project Planning. By completing this project, students will contribute to the body of knowledge for their discipline. Students will present their project in a thesis, a professional presentation and a technical paper.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 9
Credit Points 12
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.25
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites Prerequisite:   ENRP20001 Engineering Research Project Planning

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 3 - 2018

Term 1 - 2019 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2019 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2020 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2020 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2021 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2021 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2022 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2022 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2023 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2023 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2024 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2024 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 12-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Report 20%
2. Presentation 20%
3. Thesis/Dissertation 50%
4. Essay 10%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2022 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 90.91% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 50.00% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
Good support and guidance from the UC which helps students progress with their project submissions.
Recommendation
This practice will be continued in future offerings.
Action Taken
Continuous support was provided to students.
Source: Unit evaluation and reflection
Feedback
Students face difficulties in getting their experiments scheduled due to clashes with other laboratory activities.
Recommendation
Encourage project supervisors to collaborate with lab techs in a timely fashion and ensure all project experiments are confirmed well in advance.
Action Taken
Students are advised to prepare their design of the experiment and prepare the schedule in collaboration with lab techs and supervisors during the planning phase.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
Some confusion prevails between the submission templates provided and the grading criteria
Recommendation
Investigate and ensure that all information is consistent.
Action Taken
The information provided was crossed checked to maintain consistency.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
It would be good to undertake more industry-based projects
Recommendation
Explore opportunities to develop more real world and industry based projects using the various industry networks.
Action Taken
More than fifty percent of industry-based projects were provided.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
Very happy with the course overall. Improvement has been made for clear feedback marking criteria.
Recommendation
Will continue this practice in the next offering.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
Some feedback did not help to improve.
Recommendation
Reviewers will be more preciously allocated based on the project scope and expertise.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
The gap between the presentation and the final thesis submission is one week.
Recommendation
The final thesis submission can be moved a few days into exam week to increase the gap.
Action Taken
Nil.
Unit learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Implement the project plan prepared in the Planning unit with consultation and guidance from your project advisers and stakeholders
  2. Think critically, demonstrate sound analysis, and make rational, justifiable decisions in order to find the optimal, sustainable solution
  3. Demonstrate leadership by contributing to the body of knowledge related to the discipline area and participating in professional networks
  4. Communicate preliminary results to stakeholders through interim and regular progress reports to solicit timely and constructive feedback
  5. Communicate findings using written and oral methods to inform both internal and external workplace practicing professionals
  6. Critically reflect on self-performance and develop a plan for lifelong and professional learning.

n/a

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Report
2 - Presentation
3 - Thesis/Dissertation
4 - Essay
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Advanced Level
Professional Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Advanced Level
Professional Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Report
2 - Presentation
3 - Thesis/Dissertation
4 - Essay