COIT20273 - Software Design and Development Project

General Information

Unit Synopsis

In this capstone project, you are required to synthesise and demonstrate your technical and generic skills developed across the units studied previously. To achieve this, you will work in small teams with a designated customer to identify a small software application, its requirements (both functional and non-functional) and a software development methodology for its realisation. Your team will then develop a well designed and documented application that meets the identified requirements. In addition to the documented application, your team will also identify and produce the project management and quality assurance components required to ensure that the project is delivered within specified project outcome parameters. Emerging technologies and current research issues will support your design choices.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 9
Credit Points 12
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.25
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Pre-requisites:

PPMP20007 Project Management Concepts

COIT20258 Software Engineering

Co-requisites:

COIT20259 Enterprise Computing Architecture

COIT20257 Distributed Systems: Principles and Development

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 1 - 2023

There are no availabilities for this unit on or after Term 1 - 2023

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 12-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see assessment details from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams, please login
Previous Feedback

Term 1 - 2021 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 4.5 (on a 5 point Likert scale), based on a 62.79% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Student evaluation
Feedback
Teamwork and project management skills are well received.
Recommendation
Continue to maintain the project-based teamwork learning model.
Action Taken
The project-based teamwork learning model has been continued.
Source: Student evaluation
Feedback
The staged approach of assessment tasks and documentation requirements helps students in building their final product.
Recommendation
Continue the current assessment plan.
Action Taken
The staged assessment requirements plan has been continued.
Source: Unit Coordinator's reflection
Feedback
The marking criteria should be made clearer and simpler.
Recommendation
A review of the marking criteria for the final submission is recommended.
Action Taken
The marking criteria for the last assignment has been reviewed and updated.
Source: Feedback from ACS accreditation
Feedback
The skills development plan should be reinforced.
Recommendation
Integrate the SFIA framework into the unit.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: Student unit evaluation and unit coordinators' reflection
Feedback
Authentic industry projects provide students real-world experience which is well received.
Recommendation
Continue to establish more links with industry and introduce more industry projects into the unit.
Action Taken
Nil.
Unit learning Outcomes
This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see Learning Outcomes from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.