The stages of development, characteristics and backgrounds of children and young people have a significant impact on their participation and learning in early years settings and P-12 schools. In this unit, you will deepen your understanding of the teacher’s role in responding to the diverse range of student learning needs through engagement with two distinct modules designed to encourage critical reflection on teaching practices that have a positive impact on student learning. In the first module, you will research and analyse socio-cultural definitions of literacy that recognise the multiple modes in which literacy practices are performed in the contemporary world and the multiple perspectives that affect learners’ comprehension of, and communication through language as a result of their social and cultural backgrounds. You will apply this knowledge to an analysis of curriculum documents and construct a series of vignettes that illustrate and justify teaching approaches and learning activities that make the language and literacy demands of the curriculum accessible for all students. In the second module, you will be introduced to the Australian Professional Standards as a framework for describing quality teaching practice in the 21st century. You will also participate in a wider field experience to record observations and critically reflect on the ways in which learners’ linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds and physical, social and intellectual stages of development affect their learning and engagement and influence teachers’ curriculum decision-making.
Level | Postgraduate |
---|---|
Unit Level | 8 |
Credit Points | 6 |
Student Contribution Band | SCA Band 1 |
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load | 0.125 |
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites |
There are no pre-requisites for the unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework). |
Class Timetable | View Unit Timetable |
Residential School | No Residential School |
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).
All University policies are available on the Policy web site, however you may wish to directly view the following policies below.
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of policies are available on the Policy web site .
Term 1 - 2024 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 72.00% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 22.94% response rate.
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.