ENRP20003 - Engineering Research Project Implementation

General Information

Unit Synopsis

This unit is designed so that students can complete an investigative study through the analysis of, reflection on and critique of, an area of their professional practice that was commenced in Engineering Research Project Planning. By completing this project, students will contribute to the body of knowledge for their discipline. Students will present their project in a thesis and a professional presentation.


Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 9
Credit Points 12
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.25
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Prerequisite: ENRP20001 Engineering Research Project Planning

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 2 - 2022

Term 2 - 2022 Profile

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 12-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Report 20%
2. Presentation 20%
3. Portfolio 60%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams, please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2021 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 4.6 (on a 5 point Likert scale), based on a 57.63% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Self-reflection and informal discussion with student
Academic Integrity
All assessments with similarity scores above a minimum threshold must be investigated for academic misconduct.
Action Taken
All assessments with similarity scores over the threshold are investigated for academic misconduct or integrity.
Source: Self-reflections
Student supervisor interactions
Interaction with supervisor and students is important and regular weekly meetings are one way of ensuring this. Weekly meetings should be made compulsory.
Action Taken
Interaction with supervisors and students are improved as they meet regularly /weekly meetings. Weekly meetings are compulsory.
Source: Unit evaluation and self-reflection
Feedback quality and return time
Supervisors and reviewers shall be asked and reminded of the quality and timely feedback. The Unit Coordinator should check and ensure the quality of feedback.
Action Taken
Supervisors and reviewers requested quality and timely feedback. As the Unit Coordinator, checked and confirmed the quality of feedback.
Source: Unit evaluation
Good support and guidance from the UC which helps students progress with their project submissions.
This practice will be continued in future offerings.
Action Taken
Source: Unit evaluation and reflection
Students face difficulties in getting their experiments scheduled due to clashes with other laboratory activities.
Encourage project supervisors to collaborate with lab techs in a timely fashion and ensure all project experiments are confirmed well in advance.
Action Taken
Source: Unit evaluation
Some confusion prevails between the submission templates provided and the grading criteria
Investigate and ensure that all information is consistent.
Action Taken
Source: Unit evaluation
It would be good to undertake more industry-based projects
Explore opportunities to develop more real world and industry based projects using the various industry networks.
Action Taken
Unit learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Implement the project plan prepared in the planning unit with consultation and guidance from your project advisers and stakeholders
  2. Think critically, demonstrate sound analysis, and make rational, justifiable decisions in order to find the optimal, sustainable solution
  3. Demonstrate leadership by contributing to the body of knowledge related to the discipline area and participating in professional networks
  4. Communicate preliminary results to stakeholders through interim and regular progress reports to solicit timely and constructive feedback
  5. Communicate findings using written and oral methods to inform both internal and external workplace practising professionals
  6. Critically reflect on self-performance and develop a plan for lifelong and professional learning.

The Learning Outcomes for this unit are linked with the Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competency Standards for Professional Engineers in the areas of 1. Knowledge and Skill Base, 2. Engineering Application Ability and 3. Professional and Personal Attributes at the following levels:
1.1 Comprehensive, theory-based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the engineering discipline. (LO: 2A )
1.2 Conceptual understanding of the mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, and computer and information sciences which underpin the engineering discipline. (LO: 2A )
1.3 In-depth understanding of specialist bodies of knowledge within the engineering discipline. (LO: 2A )
1.4 Discernment of knowledge development and research directions within the engineering discipline. (LO: 2A )
1.5 Knowledge of engineering design practice and contextual factors impacting the engineering discipline. (LO: 2A )
1.6 Understanding of the scope, principles, norms, accountabilities and bounds of sustainable engineering practice in the specific discipline. (LO: 1A 3A )
2.1 Application of established engineering methods to complex engineering problem solving. (LO: 1A 2A )
2.2 Fluent application of engineering techniques, tools and resources. (LO: 1A 2A )
2.3 Application of systematic engineering synthesis and design processes. (LO: 1A 2A )
2.4 Application of systematic approaches to the conduct and management of engineering projects. (LO: 1A )
3.1 Ethical conduct and professional accountability. (LO: 2A 6A )
3.2 Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains. (LO: 3A 4A 5A )
3.3 Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour. (LO: 2A )
3.4 Professional use and management of information. (LO: 2A 4A 5A )
3.5 Orderly management of self, and professional conduct. (LO: 6A )

Note: LO refers to the Learning Outcome number(s) which link to the competency and the levels: N – Introductory, I – Intermediate and A - Advanced.
Refer to the Engineering Postgraduate Units Moodle site for further information on the Engineers Australia's Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineers and course level mapping information

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Report
2 - Presentation
3 - Portfolio
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Advanced Level
Professional Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Advanced Level
Professional Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Report
2 - Presentation
3 - Portfolio