Viewing Future Unit Information

The information below will be relevant from 10/03/2025.
Click Here to view current information

LAWS12063 - Legal Drafting

General Information

Unit Synopsis

Lawyers engage in legal drafting on a daily basis and effective written communication skills are essential for legal practice. The unit focuses on the foundational principles for drafting legal documents to prepare you for the significant and diverse range of tasks you may face as a legal practitioner. This unit aims to enhance your legal drafting skills by providing you with an authentic practical learning experience. You will complete a variety of practical drafting tasks that newly qualified lawyers are likely to undertake in practice, such as drafting pleadings, affidavits, contracts and letters of advice.

Details

Level Undergraduate
Unit Level 2
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 4
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Pre-requisite of 24 credit points of law units including LAWS11057. 

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 2 - 2025

Term 2 - 2025 Profile
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see assessment details from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2024 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 100.00% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 34.48% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Reflection by the unit coordinator.
Feedback
The unit includes a week focused on digital drafting, including the practical and ethical implications of using generative AI in legal drafting. As generative AI is advancing all the time, further content should be directed towards this topic.
Recommendation
Expand discussion of the ethical implications of lawyers using generative AI when drafting legal documents and encourage students to investigate the quality of legal documents generative AI produces.
Action Taken
Further content was provided on this topic, including readings focused on recent advancements in the technology and ethical issues arising from the use of AI.
Source: Student feedback and reflection by the unit coordinator
Feedback
Students benefited from extensive feedback on the two different drafting tasks in the mid-term written assessment, but there was only a short amount of time between completing the content relevant to the second task and the due date.
Recommendation
Review the timing of the mid-term written assessment.
Action Taken
The timing of the mid-term assessment was adjusted.
Source: Tutor reflection, comments from students in their reflective portfolios
Feedback
Students benefitted from the peer review/collaboration process in the second half of the unit and this helped strengthen the 'drafting community'
Recommendation
Include a peer review/collaboration exercise in the first half of the term to further strengthen the 'drafting community'.
Action Taken
In Progress
Source: Tutor reflection, comments from students in their reflective portfolios
Feedback
Even though the drafting portfolio should be completed weekly, some students were not completing it until shortly before the deadline in week 12, which impacted on the quality and the progression of their drafting skills
Recommendation
Explore whether the drafting portfolio could be submitted on a weekly/fortnightly basis or in two parts to ensure students complete their portfolios over the course of the term.
Action Taken
In Progress
Unit learning Outcomes
This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see Learning Outcomes from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.