PBHL12002 - Public Health Initiatives

General Information

Unit Synopsis

Public health programs require a coordinated effort and are typically based on a systematic planning model. This unit builds on your understanding of public health by providing a planning framework and the necessary tools to tackle complex public health issues at population, community and individual levels. Effective public health programs incorporate a combination of initiatives to promote and protect health, hence you will explore and critique a range of individually focused initiatives (aimed at changing individual behaviour) and structural initiatives (aimed at changing social, economic, political, and environmental factors). Public health advocacy will be explored as a key strategy for facilitating 'upstream' changes such as regulation, policy or procedural changes. You will have the opportunity to develop a planning model to address a specific public health issue; this model can be used to prioritise health issues, select appropriate public health initiatives and develop indicators to assess health impacts and outcomes over time.

Details

Level Undergraduate
Unit Level 2
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites 48 credit points

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 1 - 2025

Term 2 - 2025 Profile
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Written Assessment 20%
2. Written Assessment 40%
3. Written Assessment 40%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2024 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 100.00% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 12.5% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Feedback from staff member. Review of Moodle site.
Feedback
There was limited interaction on the discussion board.
Recommendation
Ensure more interactions on the discussion board with students by linking more topics with assessment tasks. Highlight to students how the discussion board is good practice for Assessment 1: Short Answer Quiz.
Action Taken
To improve engagement, discussion board topics were directly linked to assessment tasks, particularly Assessment 1: Short Answer Quiz, to reinforce their relevance. Students were explicitly informed about the benefits of participation, and reminders were integrated into weekly announcements. Additionally, staff engagement on the discussion board was increased to encourage interaction and model expected contributions.
Source: Student evaluation
Feedback
One student evaluated that they did not see the relevance of the unit.
Recommendation
Reiterate to students the relevancy of the unit materials for both Health Promotion and Environmental Health careers through contemporary practice examples.
Action Taken
The relevance of unit materials was reinforced through contemporary practice examples linked to both Health Promotion and Environmental Health careers. Lectures and tutorials included real-world case studies, and explicit connections were made between unit content and professional practice. Additionally, assessment tasks were framed to highlight practical applications, ensuring students could see the value of their learning in future career pathways.
Source: Unit Coordinator
Feedback
An increase is being seen in the use of generative AI.
Recommendation
Develop clear guidelines on the appropriate use of generative AI in assessments, ensuring students understand ethical and academic integrity expectations. Revise assessment design to emphasise critical thinking, application, and reflection, reducing opportunities for AI-generated responses. Provide targeted support on academic writing and independent analysis, and consider integrating AI literacy workshops to help students use these tools responsibly while maintaining academic rigour.
Action Taken
In Progress
Unit learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Articulate the importance of a planning model to guide program planning within public health
  2. Distinguish between 'individually focused' and 'structural' public health initiatives
  3. Determine the most appropriate combination of initiatives for addressing a key public health issue
  4. Articulate the importance of public health advocacy as a key strategy for improving the health of the community
  5. Develop a planning model to address a specific public health issue
  6. Solve ethical concerns relating to initiative development.


Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Written Assessment • •
2 - Written Assessment • • • •
3 - Written Assessment • • • •
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
• Introductory Level
• Intermediate Level
• Graduate Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 - Communication • • • • • •
2 - Problem Solving • • • • • •
3 - Critical Thinking • • • • • •
4 - Information Literacy • • •
7 - Cross Cultural Competence • •
8 - Ethical practice • • •
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
• Introductory Level
• Intermediate Level
• Graduate Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10