PMSC20003 - Pharmacological Application in the Critical Care Setting

General Information

Unit Synopsis

This unit will provide you with advanced knowledge of all aspects of clinical pharmacology to allow you to function safely within the current and emerging critical care context. You will acquire advanced theoretical knowledge and develop advanced clinical judgement for competent critical care pharmacology practice.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 8
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Co-requisites

PMSC20001 Advanced Clinical Assessment and Decision Making

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 1 - 2025

Term 1 - 2025 Profile
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see assessment details from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 1 - 2024 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 25.00% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 16.67% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Self-reflection
Feedback
The existing second assessment is a portfolio of two clinical cases, requiring the students to explore the pharmacology in each case. The listed word count does not presently allow students to fully explore all aspects of pharmacology to the standard expected.
Recommendation
Submit an Updated Unit Proposal to change the second assessment to a case study, enabling a focus on one case to allow students to more comprehensively explore the pharmacology involved.
Action Taken
An Updated Unit Proposal was submitted, reducing the second assessment to one case study only. This change seemed to work well this term.
Source: Self-reflection & student feedback.
Feedback
Articulate accommodation of different learning styles in presentation of unit materials.
Recommendation
Reinforce articulation of intent behind delivery of both powerpoint and recorded powerpoint to accommodate different learning styles in the introductory video.
Action Taken
In Progress
Source: Self-reflection & student feedback.
Feedback
Clarify assessment criteria in written assessments.
Recommendation
Continue peer review of assessments and associated rubrics to ensure clarity and suitability of assessment criteria.
Action Taken
In Progress
Source: Self-reflection & student feedback.
Feedback
Engage experienced subject matter experts (SMEs).
Recommendation
Add in video discussions with SMEs to support student learning.
Action Taken
In Progress
Source: Self-reflection.
Feedback
Improve student experience of learning materials.
Recommendation
Engage the learning design team to discuss options to improve student experience of learning materials.
Action Taken
In Progress
Unit learning Outcomes
This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see Learning Outcomes from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.