Viewing Unit History

The information below is relevant from 11/03/2019 to 08/03/2020
Click Here to view current information

PSYC20061 - Research Project: Systematic Review

General Information

Unit Synopsis

The scientist-practitioner model is integrated throughout the entire Master of Professional Psychology. It is essential that as a psychologist you will establish and evaluate your therapeutic practice based on scientific research. This unit will equip you with knowledge and skills related to conducting a systematic review. First you will utilise an acceptable framework such as PICO (problem, intervention, comparison and outcome) to develop a research question. In the next step you will implement the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol to conduct a systematic review.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 9
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 4
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites There are no pre-requisites for the unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 1 - 2019

Term 2 - 2019 Profile
Online
Term 2 - 2020 Profile
Online
Term 2 - 2021 Profile
Cairns
Melbourne
Online
Sydney
Term 2 - 2022 Profile
Online
Term 2 - 2023 Profile
Online
Term 2 - 2024 Profile
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Written Assessment 30%
2. Literature Review or Systematic Review 70%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2023 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 57.14% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 66.67% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Student feedback to Unit coordinator.
Feedback
Weekly discussion sessions were useful in earlier parts of the term, but not so useful later on.
Recommendation
Maintain weekly class discussion sessions with whole unit cohort until week 10.
Action Taken
Weekly in class discussions were maintained and and breakout rooms were trialed due to the larger cohort. Many students found these useful, but still reported some of the later group sessions were not a good use of time.
Source: Student feedback to Unit coordinator. SUTE data
Feedback
The ability to book individual sessions with the Unit coordinator was very useful.
Recommendation
Maintain the ability for students to book individual sessions on a regular basis with staff teaching into the unit.
Action Taken
This was maintained in 2023, with students able to book in with the UC and with the second lecturer working in the unit. Students indicated these sessions were useful and positively supported them in achieving the evaluation report assessment task.
Source: SUTE Data Unit Coordinator reflection Consultations with MPP and MCP teaching teams
Feedback
Add completion of the proposal back into this unit, rather than in the Term 1 unit.
Recommendation
Add the report proposal as an early hurdle assessment for this unit.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: SUTE Data Individual student emails
Feedback
The timing of the final assessment piece coincides with final placement reviews and other assessment due dates.
Recommendation
Review due date timing for the final report.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: SUTE Data Feedback from students in class Unit coordinator reflections
Feedback
Students appeared overwhelmed by the amount of information presented early in the term, and because lectures and discussions were delivered live, there was not an opportunity to review the information.
Recommendation
Review weekly content and provide short video recordings for later review.
Action Taken
Nil.
Unit learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Apply an acceptable framework such as PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) to develop a research question
  2. Implement the PRISMA (Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) protocol to produce a systematic review
  3. Communicate high level evaluation, and synthesis of a specific body of psychological research through the use of systematic review processes.

Learning outcomes are related to core competencies stated by the Psychology Board of Australia (PsyBA), program of study criteria as stated by the Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC), and specifications for study at level 9 as indicated by the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF).

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Written Assessment • •
2 - Literature Review or Systematic Review • •
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
• Advanced Level
• Professional Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Knowledge • • •
2 - Communication • • •
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills • •
4 - Research • • •
5 - Self-management •
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility • •
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
• Advanced Level
• Professional Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Written Assessment • • •
2 - Literature Review or Systematic Review • • • • • •